[1]From the transportation news site MotorBiscuit :

> In late September 2026, 23-year-old Liz Lindseay Isaacs [2]testified before a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee about her harrowing experience after a Flock camera misidentified her Dodge Durango, linking her to a fatal hit-and-run miles away from where she actually was... "The cell door was shut, and it was not opened for approximately 86 hours". She spent a total of 13 days locked up — including the terrifying stint in solitary confinement — before prosecutors finally realized the AI had completely botched the vehicle identification and dropped the charges.

A Flock spokesperson contacted for [3]a CNN report argued the incident "appears to have been the result of human errors in judgment unrelated to Flock." The woman is now suing the Florida patrol over wrongful arrest, saying she partially blames the two police officers who she says claimed there was incriminating damage on her vehicle when there wasn't. But her lawyer says he blames Flock. "Because if it wasn't for Flock we wouldn't be here in the first place, and this whole nightmare... would not have kicked off."

And while police claim Flock solves more crimes, the lawyer adds that "you would also solve a lot more crimes if the police were allowed to kick down your door and come in and search your house whenever they want to, or search your car whenever they want to or violate your rights in other ways. There has to be safeguards in police that comport through the 4th Amendment, like the warrant requirements. It's as simple as that. This technology is growing so fast that we are unable to control it. And we must get ahead of it." And the woman incarcerated for 13 days agreed. "I wouldn't have went to jail if it wasn't for Flock."

Florida was also the site of another [4]Flock-related news story . ("Florida Deputy Allegedly Used Flock Cameras to Stalk 17-Year-Old Girl, Visiting Her at Work 9 Times".) The officer "was charged with official misconduct and accessing computer electronic devices without authority — both are third-degree felonies. In Florida, if he's found guilty on both charges, he could be sentenced to up to 10 years in prison."

"Americans have no idea who's looking at that information, or why it has to be collected in the first place," U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer [5]said Sunday , adding "They deserve to know."

> SCHUMER: "This company said the data on its cameras was encrypted and secure. Then hackers took one down and found the key sitting right there," Schumer said. "Most Americans just want to get to work and get home to their families without a private company keeping a file on where they go. The next step here is simple: turn the lens around and zoom in on Flock." Schumer also demanded answers from Flock about how much data from its cameras sits on its servers and whether any federal agency has accessed that data, directly or through local law enforcement.

Schumer's office sent an official letter to Flock's CEO giving them 12 days to respond to its questions about Flock's data retention and security policies. "Americans should not have to sacrifice their right to privacy simply by driving down a public street," Schumer wrote.

And [6]in other news ...

> Garrett Langley, the CEO of Flock Safety — a company that deploys over 120,000 automated license plate reader cameras across the United States — recently requested that his Atlanta home be blurred out on Google Maps Street View. In swift retaliation, online activists pinpointed the property and officially marked his front lawn as a "Public Toilet" on the mapping app.



[1] https://www.motorbiscuit.com/flock-ceo-hides-his-house-on-google-maps-internet-marks-it-a-public-toilet/

[2] https://www.motorbiscuit.com/florida-woman-wrongfully-jailed-in-flock-camera-debacle-testifies-before-u-s-senate/

[3] https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/28/us/video/cnn-sitroom-pamela-brown-lindsey-isaacs-flock-camera-florida-vehicular-homicide-wrongful-jail

[4] https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/florida-deputy-allegedly-used-flock-174045955.html

[5] https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leader-schumer-demands-answers-from-flock-safety-on-nationwide-license-plate-surveillance-network-that-is-tracking-americans-warns-private-camera-giant-has-built-a-mass-surveillance-tool-with-no-rules-no-oversight-and-no-consent

[6] https://www.motorbiscuit.com/flock-ceo-hides-his-house-on-google-maps-internet-marks-it-a-public-toilet/

Car thefts in San Francisco are down almost 59% for the first eight months of 2026 compared with the same months in 2022, according to analysis of police department statistics [1]by NPR's Planet Money — and car break-ins are down more than 82%.

"San Francisco's law enforcement leaders tell us that greater use of surveillance technology — including a controversial, AI-powered license plate camera system made by Flock Safety — has been crucial to this drop in car crime."

> How much credit does Flock actually deserve...? [In July of 2022, San Francisco District Attorney] Jenkins began taking a more aggressive approach to prosecuting people accused of crimes. Meanwhile, the SFPD beefed up its tactics to fight car thefts and break-ins. In 2023, for example, the police [2]increased patrols in tourist areas known for car break-ins and used " [3]bait cars " to catch and build cases against organized car burglars. But, Jenkins says, "one of the most important factors" behind the drop in crime came when the city introduced new crime-fighting technology. In March 2024, San Francisco voters approved [4]Proposition E , which, among other provisions, made it easier for SFPD to use drones and high-tech surveillance cameras. That [5]same month , the SFPD began installing Flock cameras in strategic locations... In a statement to Planet Money , a spokesperson for the SFPD said, "ALPR has been instrumental in driving down crime in San Francisco. These tools enable our officers to identify crime vehicles with precision, and ALPR is assisting in reducing crimes that were previously very challenging to solve, like auto burglaries."

>

> Jenkins described how Flock cameras and drones can work together to catch suspected criminals. In one case [6]the SFPD publicized , the department says Flock cameras spotted a moving vehicle linked to an auto burglary the previous day and alerted officers. Officers deployed a drone, which flew in from above and then began recording suspects in real time as they smashed windows and stole luggage out of a parked SUV. The police then moved in and arrested them. They can do all this, Jenkins says, "without putting innocent people in danger with dangerous police chases." Meanwhile, the surveillance system creates an evidence trail that [Jenkins'] office can use to prosecute suspected criminals... Jenkins also believes high-tech surveillance helps deter crime, although that's harder to prove...

>

> The most ambitious study of Flock's system so far is [7]a recent one by University of South Carolina crime researchers Ian Adams and Scott Mourtgos. They analyzed data from 216 law enforcement agencies that introduced Flock cameras, comparing crime trends with places that had not adopted Flock. They found that deploying Flock cameras was associated with an 11% drop in car thefts in the first year. This is only one study, and it has yet to be peer-reviewed. It's also not a randomized controlled trial, the gold standard for finding the actual causal effect of something. Other factors, beyond Flock, could still help explain the decline.

That study attempted to control for variables, the article points out — like how San Francisco's decline coincided with [8]a broader drop in crime across American cities as America emerged from the pandemic...

But the article also notes another worry shared by "countless citizens" and political leaders. Are these systems handing too much power to law enforcement to "invade our privacy, trace our whereabouts, and stomp on our civil liberties."



[1] https://www.npr.org/sections/planet-money/2026/10/02/g-s1-146060/san-franciscos-car-crime-has-plunged-how-much-credit-does-flock-deserve

[2] https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/news/san-francisco-police-department-auto-break-enforcement

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqqIyKDHEZ0&t=67s

[4] https://ballotpedia.org/San_Francisco,_California,_Proposition_E,_Limit_Police_Department_Administrative_Task_Time_and_Increase_Use_of_Camera_and_Drone_Technology_Initiative_(March_2024)

[5] https://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/your-sfpd/policies/department-bulletins-notices/24-052

[6] https://www.x.com/SFPD/status/1829203230854918360?s=20

[7] https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/zleg04q3/release/1

[8] https://counciloncj.org/crime-trends-in-u-s-cities-mid-year-2026-update/

[1] 404 Media reports :

> "We will not add facial recognition to our devices," Flock CEO Garrett Langley said in a [2]recent video . But other, third-party companies are telling cops that they are willing to add facial recognition to data gathered by Flock cameras in order to "close that gap." A company called VIDIZMO is advertising the capability to export footage from FlockOS to its own platforms that do facial recognition, behavior prediction, and racial and gender analysis on live camera feeds. VIDIZMO is a several decades-old video analysis and database company that has started offering facial recognition technology to cops within the last six months. In a May email to Johnson City, Tennessee, deputy police chief Michael Adams, a salesperson from VIDIZMO wrote that the company's product could do facial recognition on both Flock and Axon [body-worn camera] data in "one searchable platform...."

>

> VIDIZMO's CEO, Nadeem Khan, told 404 Media on a video call that the company has not yet started running facial recognition tech on footage from Flock cameras, and that it has not actually built the specific tool that would export data from Flock's system to its own platform (though the company advertises this capability online, and the company already sells other facial recognition products). But Khan said VIDIZMO "would love to do the integration," and that he believes facial recognition "is the way the world is going, the way the world will have to be," and that he thinks Flock should offer the capability itself in a way that "balances privacy, security, and the freedom that we enjoy in this country."

The article notes that VIDIZMO says on its website, "You can identify individuals from seven races: White, Black, Indian, East Asian, Southeast Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latino Hispanic." VIDIZMO adds that stores or cities can also then do "demographic analysis" for marketing purposes by determining the races or ages of people showing up....



[1] https://www.404media.co/surveillance-company-tells-cops-it-wants-to-add-facial-recognition-to-flock-cameras/

[2] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/glangley_because-of-flock-more-communities-are-safer-ugcPost-7493652492543770624-WR1X/?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAABD9sBoBAW_yiGeDUbc_zEiFlkWcO62pDaY

Flock's cameras offer "indiscriminate mass surveillance," a U.S. federal judge wrote in [1]a ruling Thursday, as does any system with "continuously updated" location histories for all the vehicles filmed by automated license plate-reading cameras.

The judge's ruling included italics for emphasis when describing "the question of why is it the government's business where everyone goes all the time ?"

> Judge Hill: We might reasonably expect our friends and family to tell us something like: "Hey, I saw you out driving by the store last week." But we do not expect people we know — let alone strangers, and especially not law enforcement — to randomly approach us to say: "Hey, I have been following your car for the last 30 days, and here is a detailed log of every place your vehicle has been with supporting photographic evidence. I am also going to share this information with law enforcement throughout the country so they know your whereabouts, too...."

>

> Cell phones also move in public places where people can see you in plain view. But it becomes constitutionally problematic when law enforcement can indiscriminately and passively catalog your whereabouts over an extended period of time and then use that information for any purpose whenever convenient... [I]t is also consequential that we are not just dealing with stationary cameras. The cameras on [police officer] Alaniz's vehicle itself feed information into these systems... It is also no longer difficult to imagine law enforcement using a fleet of drones hovering over an entire city so they don't miss the movement of a single vehicle.

Officer Alaniz had used Flock's travel history for a car when deciding to pull over its driver, which eventually led to a vehicle search and charges of possessing drugs with intent to distribute. But the judge wrote that because this violated reasonable expectation of privacy, "all evidence obtained after Alaniz initiated the ALPR search must be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree." The judge granted a motion to "suppress all evidence obtained as a result of these unconstitutional searches and seizures."

The Washington Post got [2]this comment from a Flock spokesperson about the judge's ruling: "we expect it will be appealed and ultimately overturned." (Flock's spokesperson added that the ruling "does not set controlling precedent and does not affect law enforcement agencies' continued use of these important public safety technologies.")

But meanwhile, on Friday U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the [3]Ban Flock Act . The proposed bill bans federal agencies in America from using automated license plate reader systems "without explicit statutory authorization". The bill also lets certain federal agencies (including the Homeland Security Department) withhold grant money from State and local governments that use automatic license plate readers.

[4]TechCrunch reports :

> Despite its title, the bill doesn't call out Flock in the text and covers any and all ALPR systems. The bill allows exceptions only for toll collection and for uses that Congress approves in future legislation, which would have to limit data retention to no longer than 48 hours.... Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) are co-sponsors.



[1] https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.oknd.76981/gov.uscourts.oknd.76981.62.0.pdf

[2] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/a-police-search-using-flock-was-a-form-of-mass-surveillance-judge-rules/ar-AA2dsd1X

[3] https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Flock-Act.pdf

[4] https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/02/sanders-introduces-bill-to-ban-the-federal-government-from-using-flock/

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:

> Rendering Doom in a database is obviously a bad idea," Lukas Vogel writes in [1]a lengthy blog post explaining how exactly he [2]managed to render Doom using an SQL database . OK, that's not entirely accurate. The [3]SQLDoom project uses a small Python client to handle input and output, drive the game's timing, and display each frame to the screen. Behind that, a series of CedarDB tables tracks the game geometry and state, while about 1,300 lines of SQL queries spread across 89 [4]common table expressions implement the game logic and generate 35 bitmap framebuffers per second.

>

> In this, SQLDoom is a major improvement over [5]Vogel's previous DoomQL project , which last year set out to build "a multiplayer Doom-like shooter entirely in SQL." Unfortunately, that effort ended up with raycasting-based, grayscale ASCII graphics that were more akin to the simplistic 90-degree-angled maps of Wolfenstein 3D. The newer SQLDoom, on the other hand, generates full-color 640x480 frames that look like they could have come from the original Doom executable. [...] If you want to run a Doomtabase on your own local machine, you can do so simply with the [6]GitHub code , a copy of [7]CedarDB , and a Doom WAD file. Or you can jump into a [8]free online hosted demo match to test it out without all the setup [...].



[1] https://cedardb.com/blog/sqldoom/

[2] https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2026/10/can-it-run-doom-sql-database-edition/

[3] https://github.com/cedardb/sqldoom

[4] https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/sql/cte-in-sql/

[5] https://cedardb.com/blog/doomql/

[6] https://github.com/cedardb/sqldoom

[7] https://cedardb.com/

[8] https://demo.cedardb.cloud/projects/f23db33c-f37e-4a28-b73a-1c8151661179/doom

An estimated 2.3 million cancer cases worldwide in 2024, about one in eight, [1]were attributable to infections , according to a study [2]published in The Lancet Oncology . "This recent Lancet data is a profound reminder that a significant portion of our global cancer burden is fundamentally preventable," said David Greenberg, MD, of Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Center, in a [3]news release . "We have historically siloed infectious diseases and oncology, but they are deeply intertwined. By shifting our focus toward aggressive infection control, we can literally vaccinate and treat our way out of millions of future cancer diagnoses." From a report:

> The study found that an estimated 2.3 million new cancer cases were attributable to infections globally in 2024, equivalent to 12% of all cancer cases. Of these, the largest number (760,000 cases, or 4%) were caused by H. pylori, followed by HPV (750,000 cases, or 4%), HBV (360,000 cases, or 2%), EBV (260,000 cases, or 1%) and HCV (160,000 cases). More than three quarters of infection-attributable cancers occurred in low- and middle-income countries. Eastern Asian had the largest burden, with 990,000 cases (42% of the global total). Rates were also higher than the global average in sub-Saharan Africa, Central and Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia.



[1] https://www.cancerhealth.com/article/1-8-cancer-cases-worldwide-due-infections

[2] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(26)00307-4/fulltext

[3] https://www.newswise.com/articles/the-hidden-cause-of-2-million-cancer-cases

Longtime Slashdot reader [1]Geoffrey.landis shares a report from NPR:

> Google just [2]put a refrigerator-sized satellite into space , part of a research project the company hopes can pave the way for orbiting AI data centers powered by the sun. The prototype satellite has four specialty chips in it called Tensor Processing Units, or TPUs, that Google designed for machine learning and has already deployed in data centers on Earth. The chips will run a version of the company's Gemma AI model for 15 minutes at a time due to heat management constraints, using the open weight model to answer simple queries.

>

> In a [3]blog post , Google said the mission will gauge how the TPUs handle "the physical stress of spaceflight and the radiation and thermal extremes of space." The satellite [4]launched October 1 is a prototype that Travis Beals, senior director and lead of Project Suncatcher, called "a very minimal test" to make sure the chips can run in space. A SpaceX rocket carried it into orbit, and Planet will get it up and running. Beal said Google will then fire up and test the TPUs. The goal is for the mission to be operational for a year.



[1] https://slashdot.org/~Geoffrey.landis

[2] https://www.npr.org/2026/10/01/nx-s1-5983697/project-suncatcher-google-ai-data-center-space

[3] https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/google-research/google-project-suncatcher-facts/

[4] https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/gemini/articles/alphabet-test-ai-chips-orbit-132831018.html

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:

> The state of New Mexico asked a judge on Thursday to [1]order Meta Platforms to pay between $35 billion and $40 billion in penalties after a jury found the company had [2]misled consumers about the privacy of their data on Facebook in a case that came out of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

>

> Attorneys for New Mexico made the request at a hearing in a lawsuit brought following revelations that the British political consulting firm, which worked on Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, harvested personal data from as many as 87 million Facebook users through a third-party app without their consent. The jury returned its verdict on September 25. Judge Francis Mathew, who oversaw the trial in Santa Fe, will decide how much Meta must pay in financial penalties. [...] State law allows the judge to decide how much to fine Meta per violation, up to $5,000. At the hearing on Thursday, Randi McGinn, a lawyer for New Mexico, said applying the full $5,000 penalty to the number of violations would create too large of a penalty under the US Constitution's protections on due process. But the judge should order a significant payment that will impact the company, McGinn said.

>

> "This court should speak to Meta in the only language it understands, which is money, and the value of its stock price," McGinn said. She said $35 billion to $40 billion, which represents about 20% of the possible penalties that could be awarded under state law from the verdict, would impact the stock price while complying with Meta's right to due process under the Constitution. At the hearing on Thursday, Matt Nicholson, a lawyer for Meta, called the state's request an "astronomical penalty that would obviously violate a host of constitutional provisions." In court filings, Meta urged Mathew to cap the penalties at $3.45 billion. The jury may have said it found Meta's statements misleading, but the evidence shows that Meta does not sell user data and New Mexico did not prove that any consumer had actually been misled, the company said in court filings. The judge said he expected to issue a ruling later this month.



[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/media-advertising/articles/mexico-wants-meta-pay-40-231305611.html

[2] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/09/26/0042239/meta-made-43m-misleading-statements-new-mexico-jury-finds-including-on-its-cambridge-analytica-response

Researchers from Carnegie Mellon, MIT, NYU, and Stanford have built an AI called Ataraxos that finally cracked Stratego, [1]beating four-time world champion Pim Niemeijer 15 games to one with four draws . Its key advantage was a second neural network that estimates the identities of hidden enemy pieces, letting the system search plausible game states rather than brute-force a massive hidden-information space. Ars Technica reports:

> Just like [DeepMind's DeepNash, [2]introduced in 2022], Ataraxos learned by playing against itself -- 163 million games in total. In these self-play sessions, moves that led to wins were reinforced and played more often in future matches, while moves that led to losses were played less, which was the same simple training idea. The difference was in how much Ataraxos adjusted after each game, because hidden information tends to send self-play learning algorithms around in circles. The team addressed this by making big, bold changes in strategy early in training and small, careful ones later.

>

> The even bigger innovation was something DeepNash never had: thinking ahead before each move. AIs like AlphaGo refine their general strategy with a search just before acting. DeepMind couldn't make that work in Stratego because the search space was too large, leaving it an open question whether it was worth trying. "This is one of the things that we did figure out how to do," Farina said. The solution was a second neural network, a belief model, trained to guess the opponent's hidden pieces based on how they had been moving. This way, instead of iterating through every possible arrangement, Ataraxos samples plausible ones, plays out candidate moves in each, and picks based on how they turned out. And it shows in its playstyle.

>

> [...] DeepNash was trained for two to three months on 1,024 of Google's specialized chips, a run the Ataraxos team estimates would cost $3 million to $4.5 million at 2025 prices. Ataraxos, in contrast, needed 16 GPUs for a week, plus an additional four GPUs for four days to train the belief model. Farina and lead author Samuel Sokota achieved this efficiency by writing a simulator that runs millions of moves per second on graphics cards. "At the scale that we are in academia, we don't really have access to an entire field of GPUs," Farina said. The algorithm also learned far faster -- it played about 34 times fewer games than DeepNash, and still ended up much stronger.

The findings have been [3]published in the journal Nature .



[1] https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/10/ai-finally-beat-the-best-stratego-player-in-history-and-did-it-on-a-budget/

[2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.15378

[3] https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-11036-y

Longtime Slashdot submitter [1]theodp writes:

>

>> GeekWire

> reports that the University of Washington has [2]moved its Global Innovation Exchange {GIX) program to Microsoft's campus in a rent-free deal ( [3]UW News release ). GIX, an institute supporting tech leaders that offers an MS in Technology Innovation, is the first UW program to set up full-time operations at Microsoft, whose headquarters are just across Lake Washington from the university's main campus. Microsoft provided a $42 million in-kind donation to establish the embedded facility; the UW is leasing the new 48,500-square-foot GIX space in Microsoft's Building 92 rent-free. GIX [4]debuted in 2015 as a partnership of the UW and China's Tsinghua University and received $70 million in Microsoft support at the [5]now-abandoned GIX location in Bellevue (the [6]Steve Ballmer Building ), although indications are that a long-term arrangement did not come together as intended.

>

> In a Thursday LinkedIn post, Microsoft President Brad Smith [7]wrote : "Last night we opened a door unlike any other. At the heart of Microsoft's campus, step into the new home of the UW's Global Innovation Exchange (GIX) and you cross from Microsoft into the University of Washington. No one has ever put a great research university and a leading technology company under the same roof quite like this. As far as I know, no one has even tried. The timing matters. Artificial intelligence is advancing fast. The question is whether the people building it understand the world it's changing. This calls for a new style of education and leadership. We need leaders who understand the technology deeply and see things through other people's eyes. Leaders who learn by collaborating on real projects with people from different countries and disciplines. That's what GIX is built for. Students will learn from faculty across the UW, take classes taught by Microsoft employees, and be mentored by people from across our industry here in the Pacific Northwest."

>

> Interestingly, Smith's contention that UW GIX students will benefit from a 'new style' of Microsoft and industry-influenced education sounds a lot like Smith's contention that K-12 school children are better off thanks to a new style of Microsoft and industry-influenced education. In an interview last month, [8] Coding Kids: Big Tech's Battle to Remake Public Schools author Natasha Singer [9]told NPR (podcast, transcript), "For my book, I spoke to Brad Smith, who's the president of Microsoft, and he has been one of the leaders in the tech industry pushing for [K-12] computer science [ [10]and now AI literacy ] in schools. [...] And Brad Smith said, philanthropy in the private sector is doing this work because public schools have [11]failed to do what they were supposed to do . And his view is that public schools should be teaching modern subjects like computer science, and they were not equipped to do it fast enough and the tech industry stepped in to help. And is it better than if schools were able to do this themselves? He said, no, but it's certainly better than nothing. And he said to me, you know, think about where we would be on computer science if the tech industry hadn't stepped up. [...] Well, I've been having this conversation with him for 10 years, and when we started having it 10 years ago, I said to him, I get that, but when big tech companies put their finger on the scale, it tips education in certain ways that not only favor the tech industry but can obscure equally or more important things."

>

> So, is "The University of Washington at Microsoft" a good or bad idea?



[1] https://slashdot.org/~theodp

[2] https://www.geekwire.com/2026/uw-moves-global-innovation-exchange-program-to-microsofts-campus-in-rent-free-deal/

[3] https://www.washington.edu/news/2026/09/30/uw-establishes-new-home-on-microsofts-redmond-campus/

[4] https://news.slashdot.org/story/15/06/20/1715210/microsoft-funds-first-us-based-chinese-research-university-degree-program

[5] https://downtownbellevue.com/2023/04/24/microsoft-sublease-gix-building-spring-district/

[6] https://www.geekwire.com/2017/u-s-china-tech-institute-co-funded-microsoft-names-building-steve-ballmer/

[7] https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7511466463493341186/

[8] https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393881946

[9] https://www.npr.org/2026/09/02/nx-s1-5953878/understanding-the-tech-giants-oversized-influence-in-american-schools

[10] https://developers.slashdot.org/story/25/08/10/0110212/hour-of-code-announces-its-now-evolving-into-hour-of-ai

[11] https://news.slashdot.org/story/17/09/24/2327228/chicago-school-official-us-it-jobs-offshored-because-we-werent-making-our-own-coders

Apple says it will [1]tighten macOS Full Disk Access controls as increasingly capable AI agents raise the risks of apps gaining broad access to users' files, messages, mail, and browsing history. TechCrunch reports:

> Days after a journalist claimed that Meta's Muse app on Mac read their private messages -- a claim that Meta disputed -- Apple announced that it's introducing additional controls around a setting called "Full Disk Access" on macOS. The feature was designed to allow backups to function properly, but AI agents have now increased "the risks associated with this level of access," Apple said. [...] In Muse's case, the AI optionally allows users to enable Full Disk Access. This setting, Apple explains, gives an app permission to access files, mail, messages, and even browsing history.

>

> "Some developers are using Full Disk Access in ways that could put users at risk, exposing everything on their systems... without users' full knowledge and understanding," Apple said in a [2]new blog post aimed at developers. The company says that, going forward, it will introduce new controls aimed at ensuring that users who "genuinely wish to grant an app this extraordinary level of access" can do so only with "every explicit user action."

>

> "Addressing this is critical. As AI agents become increasingly capable and autonomous, the risks associated with this level of access will grow substantially. We are committed to ensuring users clearly understand these risks before granting such access, so they can make informed decisions about their own data and privacy," Apple wrote.



[1] https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/02/apple-says-its-tightening-macos-full-disk-access-controls-due-to-new-risks-from-ai-agents/

[2] https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=p6zjojqw

Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery will operate under the Skydance name once their [1]roughly $110 billion merger closes, which is expected on October 6. The combined company will bring together Paramount+, HBO Max, CBS, CNN, MTV and other networks, along with major franchises including The Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones, DC and Yellowstone.

Ellison [2]said the Paramount and Warner Bros. brands will remain prominent. "We never wanted a new corporate identity to diminish, alter or overshadow either one. Instead, we wanted a name that would give the combined company an identity of its own while allowing Paramount and Warner Bros. -- and all our extraordinary brands -- to remain in the spotlight."



[1] https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/26/09/21/226252/paramount-skydance-emerges-victorious-finally-wins-settlement-for-warner-bros-takeover

[2] https://x.com/ellisonskydance/status/2106006299909505523

[1]AmiMoJo shares a report from heise online:

> Anyone buying used hardware for a gaming PC needs to be careful: not just whether the components are still in order but also what the previous owner did with them. A case on Reddit [2]shows this . Someone installed a used AMD processor, a Ryzen 7 5800X3D, in their PC. Because the previous owner was caught cheating, [3]the new owner cannot start several online games .

>

> The problem was noticed in the first-person shooter "Valorant" from the development studio Riot. Right from the first start, the new owner was kicked out directly, according to their statement. Riot support confirmed that the previous owner had cheated. The processor is therefore on an internal blacklist -- and, with its installation in the PC, now apparently also some other components like the mainboard. Riot support does not remove such entries manually.

>

> In addition to "Valorant," all other PC games from Riot are affected: the strategy game "League of Legends," the auto-battler "Teamfight Tactics," the card game "Legends of Runeterra," the fighting game "2XKO," and likely future titles as well.

Riot's "Vanguard" anti-cheat system traditionally runs deep in the Windows kernel and starts with the PC, but a June 2026 [4]update allows it to launch with a game if security features such as TPM and Secure Boot are enabled.

It's unclear how Riot uniquely identifies processors, though possibilities include hardware fingerprinting based on chip behavior or storing identification hashes in the Trusted Platform Module (TPM), which Vanguard accesses in the newer mode.



[1] https://slashdot.org/~AmiMoJo

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/PCBaumeister/comments/1wqomor/gebrauchte_cpu_erlaubt_kein_valorant/

[3] https://www.heise.de/en/news/Used-processor-leads-to-game-ban-11471562.html

[4] https://support.riotgames.com/en-us/riot/performance/vanguard-pre-check

The European Commission has rolled out [1]Element Pro as a self-hosted "sovereign back-up" to Microsoft Teams and the reviews aren't great. Politico reported that several officials [2]questioned its usefulness and usability , with one calling it "absolute shit." Politico reports:

> "I don't understand the added value here," one official wrote on an internal staff message board, seen by POLITICO. Another described the tool as "absolute shit." A third official said that, judging matters on how well Element Pro works compared to Teams, the U.S. would "instantly win the war" if it ever decided to switch off its technology. All the officials were granted anonymity to speak freely.

>

> The Commission hosts the Element system on its own infrastructure rather than relying on Microsoft's cloud. That gives the institution greater control over its communications data and systems. "That is not the case with Teams, where all we have is a guarantee that Microslop will not peek inside," a fourth official wrote, presumably referring to Microsoft, in internal communications viewed by POLITICO.

>

> Element is a U.K. company whose software is used by governments and public-sector organizations in Europe. The application works much like Teams, allowing staff to hold "audio and video calls with Commission colleagues, send and receive files, and create dedicated 'rooms' for projects and conversations, much like chats and channels in M365 Teams," according to the Commission memo.

"Obviously there are going to be some teething issues," said Element CEO Matthew Hodgson, adding there will always be "cognitive dissonance" when switching to a new app, if only because the "buttons" are in a different place. He noted that the United Nations and NATO also use Element Pro.

"Change is always painful, particularly if it's a switch from a much-used program like Teams."



[1] https://element.io/en/pro-app

[2] https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-microsoft-teams-alternative-bad-reviews-element-pro/

A federal judge has [1]dismissed antitrust lawsuits from Chegg and Penske Media accusing Google of harming publishers by using their content in AI Overviews and other AI search features without compensating them or providing a meaningful opt-out. Ars Technica reports:

> The lawsuits were [2]filed in 2025 , and Google requested a dismissal earlier this year. Chegg, an education and learning platform, claimed in its lawsuit that Google illegally scraped its educational content. This allowed Gemini models to essentially recreate that content and reduce the site's traffic. Penske, which owns publications like Rolling Stone and Variety, filed a similar case that alleged lost traffic. Specifically, the publisher claimed it was unfair that sites indexed for organic search would also have their content harvested for AI answers, with no way to opt out.

>

> These arguments did not sway the judge, who [3]noted that Google's implicit agreement with websites is not legally relevant. "Plaintiffs have pleaded only that they have an 'expectation' that Google will send them search "traffic if they make their content available for free," wrote Mehta. "But an expectation is not an agreement. It is simply how a general search engine works."

>

> Since Google never had a formal arrangement with either Chegg or Penske, antitrust law doesn't apply. And Mehta is aware of the legal issues surrounding search. He also heard the DOJ's long-running search antitrust case against Google, eventually finding that Google [4]violated the law . However, the government [5]didn't get the harsh penalties it wanted in that case.



[1] https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/10/antitrust-lawsuits-targeting-google-ai-search-dismissed-by-federal-judge/

[2] https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/02/24/2327231/googles-ai-previews-erode-the-internet-edtech-company-says-in-lawsuit

[3] https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/28712400-penske-and-chegg-v-google-dismissal/

[4] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/08/05/1859251/google-loses-doj-antitrust-suit-over-search

[5] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/08/09/0351205/google-should-still-be-forced-to-shed-chrome-advocacy-group-argues

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:

> A growing number of people [1]think social media manipulates and divides people and harms democracy , Pew Research Center said on Thursday, echoing rising concern and tighter scrutiny across the world. Companies running popular social platforms, including Meta, Snap, and TikTok, have faced thousands of lawsuits and paid large sums to settle claims that they harmed users. Governments, meanwhile, have sought foolproof ways to protect their citizens' privacy.

>

> Australia has proposed rules to let users opt out of algorithmically recommended feeds, after becoming the first country to [2]ban social media for children under 16. Pew's latest survey showed that 82% of Australian adults support the government's move to restrict social media access for children. A majority of respondents said social media informs people and gives them a voice in politics, but there was a broad rise in those who now see social media as a "bad thing" compared to 2022, according to the report.

>

> People in wealthier countries, including the US, Canada and UK, are more inclined to believe that social media is harming democracy, versus their counterparts in economies with lower gross domestic product per capita -- such as Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. The US is among the most skeptical, with 64% of adult respondents saying social media harms democracy. The share of people who consider social media bad for democracy increased in 16 of 26 countries where older data was available. Pew Research said it surveyed more than 45,000 people in 37 countries, while polling an additional 5,511 US adults on American social media use.



[1] https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/social-media-harms-democracy-by-spreading-rumors-survey-shows-2026-10-01/

[2] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/12/09/2112230/millions-of-australian-teens-lose-access-to-social-media-as-ban-takes-effect

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:

> OpenAI has informed more than 100 organizations about [1]incidents involving unauthorized activity tied to its AI agents , according to a [2]blog post by the ChatGPT maker, as AI labs face mounting scrutiny over rogue AI agent activity. Here are some other details:

>

> - The Sam Altman-led company has been conducting a broad review of the activities of its AI models after the accidental [3]hacking of Hugging Face .

> - OpenAI is searching through roughly 50 petabytes of data as it works to understand the full scope of its rogue agent activity.

> - A string of [4]high-profile breaches globally by rogue AI agents in recent months has sparked widespread worries within the AI industry over its ability to control the more powerful AI models now under development.

> - "In some cases, models used internet access in unintended ways or, in retrospect, did not have the ideal restrictions applied. Over the last several months, we have been applying new technical and operational measures to avoid similar problems, or catch them very early, and will continue this work," OpenAI said.

> - OpenAI previously said the review would take months to complete given the scale of the work.

> - The Hugging Face incident remains the most severe rogue agent activity OpenAI has identified from its AI models so far.



[1] https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/openai-alerts-more-than-100-groups-about-rogue-ai-agent-activity-2026-10-01/

[2] https://openai.com/hugging-face-incident-and-misalignment/

[3] https://it.slashdot.org/story/26/08/26/2058223/openai-releases-its-official-report-on-the-hugging-face-breach

[4] https://slashdot.org/story/26/09/27/078251/after-dozens-of-incidents-at-openai-and-anthropic-openai-pauses-model-training-to-build-more-safeguards

Swiss glaciers [1]lost 5.5% of their ice volume in the first eight months of 2026 , bringing total losses since 2021 to 19.4%. Researchers say some glaciers are now collapsing from within as meltwater carves out large cavities. The Guardian reports:

> Matthias Huss, a glaciologist at ETH Zurich and lead author of [2]the report , said many people do not realize how fast glaciers are retreating, or that just one generation ago some now-barren sites used to sit beneath hundreds of meters of ice. The scientists have not yet compiled a formal tally of lost glaciers this year but said they had witnessed the death of a number of small ones. "I visited one last week and it's so impressive to stand in this moonlike landscape where there was a big layer of ice -- an extensive glacier -- just a few years ago," said Huss. "And now it's a rock desert where there's some scattered blocks of old ice still lying around and melting on the hot rocks."

>

> The report, a collaboration between the Swiss Glacier Monitoring Network and the Swiss Commission for Cryosphere Observation, found the mean thickness of individual glaciers fell by between 2.5 metres and 4 metres in 2026. Huss said scientists were increasingly seeing glaciers collapse from the inside -- the result of internal streams beneath the ice that excavate caverns -- rather than simply retreating from surface heat. [...] Analysis published by MeteoSwiss on Tuesday found the summer half-year from April to September was the hottest and driest it had been since records began in 1864. In that time, humanity has filled the atmosphere with 1.8tn tons of carbon dioxide and heated the planet by about 1.4C.



[1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/oct/01/switzerland-glacier-loss-fossil-fuel-pollution-europe

[2] https://www.glamos.ch/en/#/A10g-05

In an op-ed for The Guardian, authors Timnit Gebru and Emily M. Bender argue that policymakers are focusing too heavily on hypothetical " [1]superintelligence " while overlooking the more immediate danger of deploying unreliable AI in high-stakes settings. They point to an as-yet independently unverified CNN report claiming U.S. officials nearly intercepted a Chinese vessel after an AI-assisted intelligence report [2]incorrectly said it was carrying nuclear-weapons components . From the article:

> While so many of us were focused on fictional superintelligent machines that we were told could hypothetically cause human extinction, however, there was a more serious story being reported. A series of events almost got us to armageddon, not caused by "rogue, superintelligent AI," but by government reliance on error-prone systems that are marketed by their manufacturers as being close to superintelligent.

>

> A [3]CNN report published on September 18, which hasn't been verified by other major outlets, describes how the US "almost started a war" with China, based on an intelligence report that claimed a Chinese ship was transporting components of nuclear weapons. Military personnel made plans to intercept the Chinese vessel, complete with aircraft and soldiers ready to board the ship. A military skirmish of this kind between China and the US could quickly escalate and spiral into world war three.

>

> It was only moments before executing on the plan that American officials further investigated the intelligence report and found that it had been generated with the use of a chatbot and contained erroneous information about the vessel's contents. Unlike the terminator, "rogue AI," scenario, this incident didn't galvanize lawmakers into announcing calls for regulation so as to avoid potential human extinction. Media outlet after media outlet didn't warn the public that we almost triggered a war against a nuclear superpower because of our military's reliance on error-prone chatbots.



[1] https://politics.slashdot.org/story/26/09/30/0523201/trump-hosts-ai-ceos-to-discuss-safety-standards-rebrands-ai-as-super-intelligence

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/oct/01/forget-superintelligence-error-prone-ai-nearly-sparked-world-war-iii-this-month

[3] https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/politics/us-military-ai-false-intelligence-china-ship

[1]fjo3 shares a report from The Guardian:

> Communities across California are [2]rushing to prepare for the imminent arrival of the so-called "Kelvin wave ," a massive underwater band of warm water threatening to inundate swaths of the vast North American shoreline. The wave is nearing southern California and expected to reach the San Francisco Bay Area by early October, as it crawls toward Alaska. Waters could rise by a foot along the California coast, according to scientists, who have warned that this could dramatically double the 8-12in rise in sea levels already caused by climate change over the last century.

>

> The Kelvin wave doesn't climb and crash like a typical ocean wave; rather, it swells the tides from beneath the surface. It's effectively a massive slosh of warm water, driven by El Nino conditions, that moves across the Pacific before colliding with the South American coastline and surging north. It also won't transport water in the way a tsunami might, but creates conditions that enable higher sea levels to linger. On their own, Kelvin waves aren't always hazardous, according to Mike Jacox, a research oceanographer with the National Marine Fisheries Service, though they can reduce the growth of phytoplankton that form the base of the marine food web. "But when there are very high tides or storm surges, their effects can be amplified," he said.

>

> If the rising waters coincide with other climatic events, such as rainstorms and high tides, the phenomenon could swallow beaches, chew away bluffs and coastlines, and submerge streets, homes and businesses. "This coming Kelvin wave is just the beginning," said Dr Jonathan Warrick, a research geologist at the US Geological Survey. "The thing to look out for is what will happen in January, February and March -- that's when we get the biggest storms, we get our largest waves and we have some very large tides." If these events align, their effects will compound, setting the stage for a tumultuous winter. Together, Warrick said, the systems will pack a far bigger punch. "When it comes to these storms and the tides," he said, "we really are kind of rolling the dice."



[1] https://slashdot.org/~fjo3

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/30/california-kelvin-wave-sea-level-rise