Code.org: Use AI In an Interview Without Our OK and You're Dead To Us
(Friday January 16, 2026 @05:40PM (msmash)
from the hypocritical-views dept.)
[1]theodp writes:
> Code.org, the nonprofit backed by AI giants Microsoft, Google and Amazon and whose Hour of AI and free AI curriculum aim to make world's K-12 schoolchildren AI literate, points job seekers to its [2]AI Use Policy in Hiring , which promises dire consequences for those who use AI during interviews or take home assignments without its OK.
>
> Explaining "What's Not Okay," Code.org writes: "While we support thoughtful use of AI, certain uses undermine fairness and honesty in the hiring process. We ask that candidates do not [...] use AI during interviews and take-home assignments without explicit consent from the interview team. Such use goes against our values of integrity and transparency and will result in disqualification from the hiring process."
>
> Interestingly, Code.org CEO Partovi last year faced some blowback from educators over his LinkedIn post that [3]painted schools that police AI use by students as dinosaurs . Partovi wrote, "Schools of the past define AI use as 'cheating.' Schools of the future define AI skills as the new literacy. Every desk-job employer is looking to hire workers who are adept at AI. Employers want the students who are best at this new form of 'cheating.'"
[1] https://slashdot.org/~theodp
[2] https://code.org/en-US/about/ai-use-policy
[3] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hadip_schools-scramble-to-police-ai-cheating-activity-7334635430069342208-j-Qm/
> Code.org, the nonprofit backed by AI giants Microsoft, Google and Amazon and whose Hour of AI and free AI curriculum aim to make world's K-12 schoolchildren AI literate, points job seekers to its [2]AI Use Policy in Hiring , which promises dire consequences for those who use AI during interviews or take home assignments without its OK.
>
> Explaining "What's Not Okay," Code.org writes: "While we support thoughtful use of AI, certain uses undermine fairness and honesty in the hiring process. We ask that candidates do not [...] use AI during interviews and take-home assignments without explicit consent from the interview team. Such use goes against our values of integrity and transparency and will result in disqualification from the hiring process."
>
> Interestingly, Code.org CEO Partovi last year faced some blowback from educators over his LinkedIn post that [3]painted schools that police AI use by students as dinosaurs . Partovi wrote, "Schools of the past define AI use as 'cheating.' Schools of the future define AI skills as the new literacy. Every desk-job employer is looking to hire workers who are adept at AI. Employers want the students who are best at this new form of 'cheating.'"
[1] https://slashdot.org/~theodp
[2] https://code.org/en-US/about/ai-use-policy
[3] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hadip_schools-scramble-to-police-ai-cheating-activity-7334635430069342208-j-Qm/