Particle Collider Experiment Recreates the Big Bang's Primordial Soup - and Finds Unexpected Pattern (livescience.com)
- Reference: 0186022348
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/10/04/1812250/particle-collider-experiment-recreates-the-big-bangs-primordial-soup---and-finds-unexpected-pattern
- Source link: https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/particle-physics/particle-collider-experiment-recreates-the-big-bangs-primordial-soup-and-finds-an-unexpected-twist
> In every collision, particles are flung out sideways; how hard they are flung, on average, varies slightly from one collision to the next. Physicists expected the size of these variations to change smoothly as they adjusted the collision energy. Instead, the variations dipped, shrinking and then growing again. This dip could be a sign of a long-sought "critical point," a special set of conditions at which nuclear matter changes the way it transforms from one form to another.
>
> The signal, detected by the STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York, is strong enough that it is very unlikely to be a statistical accident. However, the researchers cautioned that the dip is a tantalizing hint, not proof of the long-sought transition. They published their findings Sept. 22 in the journal [2]Physical Review Letters ...
The team analyzed roughly 1 billion collisions, measuring how hard charged particles were flung sideways out of the fireball, according to the article.
The dip "does point to a set of conditions where the behavior of nuclear matter changes, and it gives theorists a new, precise measurement to test their calculations against," study co-author Rutik Manikandhan, told Live Science .
[1] https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/particle-physics/particle-collider-experiment-recreates-the-big-bangs-primordial-soup-and-finds-an-unexpected-twist
[2] https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/2xsn-rgx3
Why did the soup make atoms ? (Score:2)
Why did the "hot soup of quarks and gluons" make protons and neutrons that made atoms that made [ edited for length ] us ?
I mean, if the quarks and gluons were slightly different, would atoms still have formed that were slightly different to how they actually are, but still recognisable atoms, or would there be a universe full of something else entirely ?
Laws of physics (Score:2)
Astrophysicists assume that the laws of physics was the same when the universe came into existence. That assumption could be invalid. If the speed of light was different, for example, then we would need to know what it was back then. I think a better investment is further researching gravity.
Re: (Score:3)
True enough, but what else can they do? If you start assuming that the basic "constants" of the universe are actually variable, you end up with so many adjustable terms that your model could predict anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Soup of the day.