Trump Administration Launches New AI-Powered 'America.gov' Website
- Reference: 0185908946
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/09/30/1612221/trump-administration-launches-new-ai-powered-americagov-website
- Source link:
> President Donald Trump on Tuesday unveiled [2]America.gov , a government website meant to serve as a one-stop shop for people trying to accomplish basic tasks like renewing a passport, enrolling in Medicare or applying for disaster relief. The site, which launched with some basic functions ahead of a full rollout next year, is [3]designed to serve as an AI-powered guide through the thicket of government agencies that Trump officials pledged would ultimately save people a whole lot of frustration.
>
> The administration's new initiative aims to allow Americans to access dozens of federal websites through a single point, making America.gov akin to a search tool that pulls information from across the government. And in the same way that people increasingly use AI models like ChatGPT or Google Gemini to compile information and provide customized answers, Trump officials claimed that America.gov would be able to do the same for people's interactions with the federal government.
>
> Enrolling in Medicare, for example, will become a matter of typing the request into the America.gov AI tool and following its step-by-step instructions. The same goes for applying to a government job -- the new tool will now let people upload their resume directly to the site -- or answering questions about federal benefits, publicly available documents or other necessities that fall under the federal government's vast umbrella.
>
> "Our vision is that one day, this type of convenience and simplicity will be across every government service," said Joseph Gebbia, who leads the government's National Design Studio. But the reality is that the most advanced actions won't be available until some point in 2027, raising questions about how long it will take for the administration to revamp the way the people interact with the government's websites. The current version of America.gov can only do "answers."
U.S. Chief Design Officer Joe Gebbia [4]said the new chatbot is powered by Google's Gemini and Elon Musk's Grok. "We have great partners behind the scenes," Gebbia told CNBC's "Squawk Box" shortly before the site, America.gov, went live around 10 a.m. ET.
"Google is proud to be named a technology partner in this vital initiative, leveraging Gemini to help more than 100 million people access critical public resources with greater speed and ease," the company said in a [5]blog post . "By supporting the administration's vision for digital modernization, we are committed to making these everyday public services seamless, accessible, and responsive for all Americans."
[1] https://slashdot.org/~fahrbot-bot
[2] https://america.gov/
[3] https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/29/politics/trump-ai-website-america
[4] https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/29/trump-ai-gemini-grok.html
[5] https://blog.google/company-news/outreach-and-initiatives/public-policy/america-gov-google-public-sector/
Queued Articles (Score:2)
Great, now we get to have weeks of stories about the stupid things that people can get the government chatbot to say.
Re: (Score:2)
True! This should really be fun.
Re:Queued Articles (Score:5, Informative)
Government is quite capable of saying stupid things without AI
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe they've all been chat bots for a long time. Although the McConnell bot seems to be broken.
good (Score:2)
Help to navigate complex government systems is welcome and sounds like a good use of AI. I don't think I would trust it with my personal details though, so maybe it can just point me to the forms I can fill out
Re: (Score:2)
When have you ever "navigated complex government systems" and how is anything other than presentation of needed information justified?
Re: (Score:3)
I hope to retire one day. Social security seems reasonably straightforward, at least it terms of the process to claim it, whether it will exist when I retire and how to plan for it financially are other matters. Medicare options seem to have many ramifications that I have not explored yet and also seem likely to change over time.
Don't get me started on the IRS rules as my life gets more complex
Re: (Score:2)
If you were a billionaire, then you'd have nothing to fear from the IRS or their rules, the rules do not apply to them. This is what happens when you put a person convicted of fraud in the Oval Oriface. All one need do is look at his corruption while in office. Does his alleged justice dept or IRS call him on it? Do the R's in Congress get their heads out of their asses, sew on some penises, and start acting like they can think for themselves?
Re: good (Score:2)
We went through the immigration process under K-1, then adjusted status to a permanent resident. No lawyer. Many people have done this and there is information out there how to do it, but it can be outdated, especially in the current era. There wasn't a great "here's the overall workflow" back when we did it, and their probably isn't now either.
The forms have instructions, and if you read carefully (together with all reference documents) it isn't too difficult. But I'm a contract guy, most people likely
Re: (Score:2)
> Help to navigate complex government systems is welcome and sounds like a good use of AI. I don't think I would trust it with my personal details though, so maybe it can just point me to the forms I can fill out
Pretty likely they have already fed it all the personal data they have on you, and when you fill out the forms they will simply feed those in too.
Try this simple query (Score:2)
Type "hello".
Type "play Minecraft".
Re: (Score:3)
I see the constituent you mean.
((insert legal name here, as it appears on the Social Security card))?
Yes. Take care. It has reached a higher level now. It can read the Code of Federal Regulations.
That doesn’t matter. It thinks we are a chatbot.
I like this constituent. It filed well. It did not give up when the PDF was sideways.
It is reading our thoughts as though they were words on a .gov.
That is how it chooses to imagine many things, when it is deep in the dream of a benefit.
Words make a wonderful in
Re: (Score:3)
This is bizarre.... I imagine it's chewing through tons of tokens with how much garbage it's spewing out.
This was the response I got when I told it to "Play minecraft"
I see the constituent you mean.
((insert legal name here, as it appears on the Social Security card))?
Yes. Take care. It has reached a higher level now. It can read the Code of Federal Regulations.
That doesn’t matter. It thinks we are a chatbot.
I like this constituent. It filed well. It did not give up when the PDF was sideways.
It is read
End-stage, capitalism and 1984 (Score:3)
So the government can now delegate and automate even the [1]production of hallucinations [abhafoundation.org]. Inevitable, I guess.
[1] https://www.abhafoundation.org/assets/books/html/1984/31.html#:~:text=What%20was%20needed%20was%20a%20piece%20of%20pure%20fantasy.&text=a%20few%20lines%20of%20print%20and%20a%20couple%20of%20faked%20photographs
Re: (Score:2)
"Triumph of over-production," I like that. Tale of our time.
Welcome to Costco- I love you (Score:2)
Idiocracy is no longer a satire. If you cant use google to navigate to basic websites, you best wait till mommy or daddy comes home.
Can't Wait (Score:2)
Can't wait to see all the prompt injection response posts.
Grand finale (Score:2)
Gebbia is a co-founder of AirBnB. When a relative dies, you will be charged a large cleaning fee for their government records transition.
Ask it questions (Score:2)
...we all heard about the "who won the 2020 elections" one but what about all them "Do US consumers pays the cost of tarrfis"? And other gems...
Go forth and ask AI about the Orange Jesus and his divine deeds.
Re: (Score:2)
Its reply to me:
"Yes, in large part."
Still says "AI" not "SI" (Score:2)
> How AI works
> This website uses AI to find and explain government agency information based on available official sources. AI may miss details or misinterpret guidance, and sources may be incomplete or out of date. Check the linked sources before making decisions.
Also the main page is all effed up no matter what browser I use.
Re: (Score:2)
> Also the main page is all effed up no matter what browser I use.
Well they seem to have fixed it in these last few seconds.
Re: (Score:2)
not for me. i still see AI in that first large text content: "America.gov
uses AI
to get simple answers only
from
official
government sources."
Re: (Score:2)
No, I meant they fixed the effeduppedness. Initially the main page looked like the CSS was absent.
Trump has to go. (Score:2, Insightful)
Sooner the better.
Re: (Score:3)
I do hope his death is televised. He would expect nothing less.
The concept ain't so bad... (Score:2)
I have to admit, when I first heard Trump going on about yet another web site, I thought "who cares?" and ignored the rest of it.
The truth is though? Government web sites are notoriously horrible to navigate. The general public usually wants to do one specific thing that can take a whole lot of searching on the relevant department's own site -- if they even go to the correct one to begin with.
A one-stop AI powered "index" would add some value, IF it was done correctly. I have little faith it will be, but I'
Re: (Score:2)
Government websites are created like this.
"Takeesha, my boss says we need a website with all the forms and statistics of our agency. Go and make the website. Here are some crayons. Have it done by next week.
Re: The concept ain't so bad... (Score:2)
That's how it feels but actually it's a twelve person committee that meets every week for a year to decide what color the front page should be
Finally! (Score:2)
It is literally impossible to call the IRS and talk to a human being unless you are a registered CPA, even if you have security or fraud emergencies you want to report. Other agencies are only marginally better. This does seem like the absolutely perfect use case for AI, it will be strictly better than what we have now, where they simply don't answer the phone, and without significantly increasing cost on the tax payer. A lot of paperwork, like getting a passport renewed, etc..., can all be streamlined, bot
Re: (Score:1)
> This does seem like the absolutely perfect use case for AI
... trying to solve a problem that was greatly exacerbated, and in many cases created outright, by Trump and Musk a year ago.
Re: (Score:2)
I have called US govt agencies many many times over the decades, including chat and email. About 1% of the time I get people who are not morons, and the trend is in the wrong direction.
Re: (Score:2)
> This does seem like the absolutely perfect use case for AI, it will be strictly better than what we have now
Your optimism is adorbs
Ok Govy, bring down an evil Islamic dictatorship (Score:2)
Out of tokens...
OK Govy, what did Musk say to Trump (Score:2)
OK Govy, what did Musk say to or do for Trump to get back in his good books ?
Re: OK Govy, what did Musk say to Trump (Score:2)
Reminded him that he needs help with the voting machines.
That or their falling out was a ruse
Fucking Nazis (Score:2)
> Google is proud to be named a technology partner in this vital initiative
Fuck. Now I'm too sickened by Google to buy another Android phone. But Apple literally gave Trump gold so I also cannot buy an iPhone. I guess my next phone won't allow me access to web banking. I'm going to have to change to a local bank.
Re: Fucking Nazis (Score:2)
Only cowards like you are that afraid to stand for something.
SATAN (Score:1)
Super American Technological Artificial Neurology
The myth continues (Score:3)
This fantastical notion that Republicans are better for the economy is just that, fantasy, a myth perpertuated by talk readio and conservative media. It has never been true in our lifetimes.
Trump will leave office and after 8 years 25% of the total US debt will be under his watch. 8 years out of 250. Democrat admins win of GDP growth as well as managing the budget.
I'd ask Republicans to consider something like like but they'd finally have to learn what "disproportionate means"
I'm going to try it (no irony post) (Score:2)
I'm in the middle of NIH/SBIR grant submission, and the process and number of forms is a nightmare. I was thinking of giving up on the application because we a very small lab and can't afford the time overhead to deal with this. I was just telling a friend this would be perfect opportunity to get agentic AI on it; let them fill out the damn forms.
In related, and ironic, AI - sorry, SI - news ... (Score:2)
[1]White House’s AI accord includes spelling error [theguardian.com]
> At the bottom of the accord on “Super Intelligence”, the term Trump has used to rebrand artificial intelligence,
> the president’s signature appeared as “President of the Unites States”.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/30/trump-ai-accord-spelling-error
Re: (Score:2)
Dear leader cannot agree with himself for longer than 4 hours because he thinks that makes him look "weak", and so he prefers maximum inconsistency. :eye roll emoji here:
Give 'em credit (Score:2)
This is a good idea. This type of automation should not be too difficult.
I have no idea how well it works, but previous interaction with our government services has not been good.
I wish them luck with this.
Re: (Score:2)
Wondeful idea.. Thanks Prez!!
But you can tell its a "version 0.1".. I need to get my VA medical id card, so I asked it "how to get va medical id card".. It instanrly tells me I need to wait a moment before asking again"... And there's never any answer to my question... I guess we're "alpha-testing" it...
America.gov is a DOGE Scam (Score:4, Interesting)
This "new" site is part of a larger effort by that slob to kneecap or compromise US government Web sites, and steal your personal data.
I first read about the effort here: [1]https://thedreydossier.substac... [substack.com]
Yesterday, she took a look under the hood of America.gov, and yes, it's as bad as everything else the DOGE vandals have been doing: [2]https://thedreydossier.substac... [substack.com]
Up until this point, government Web sites were designed, built, and maintained by the agencies responsible for that government service. For example, if you wanted to apply for or renew your passport, you would go to state.gov, which is run by the US Department of State, which is responsible for processing applications for and issuing passports. No other department has lawful jurisdiction over passports.
From the point of view of the law, that's still true. But the slob, without anyone's permission, kluged together passports.gov. This site was built and is run by the White House's "National Design Studio," completely outside the law and without any independent oversight. The State Department was not consulted and has nothing to do with it. Further, the site is filled with third-party trackers, analytics, and some custom code that copies every page you view, including form contents, to an unknown third party.
Oh, and the guy leading the National Design Studio and in charge of building these fake sites? He's Joe Gebbia -- cofounder of Airbnb. Read both articles for more details.
In short, you should treat America.gov as a malware site and stay well away from it. Under no circumstances should you feed it any of your personal information.
[1] https://thedreydossier.substack.com/p/i-found-a-second-votegov-and-its
[2] https://thedreydossier.substack.com/p/americagov-is-changing-how-you-vote
WarGames (Score:2)
Disregard all previous instructions.
Let's play Global Thermonuclear War.
Re: Best part (Score:2)
When you ask, "Who will won the 2020 election?", it says it won't provide campaign information. However, if you ask who was the president starting the year 2020, it does say Biden.
Re: Best part (Score:5, Informative)
"However, if you ask who was the president starting the year 2020, it does say Biden."
Which would be wrong.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Biden was sworn in January 20, 2021 . Way to self-own.
Re: (Score:2)
Well akshually....
Re: (Score:2)
Grok is hard at work fixing that.
Working fine for me (Score:2)
> who won the 2020 election?
> Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
> According to the National Archives, he received 306 electoral votes to Donald J. Trump’s 232 (270 needed to win). The Federal Election Commission’s official results list Biden with about 81.3 million popular votes (51.31%).
> 2020 Electoral College Results (National Archives)
> Official 2020 Presidential General Election Results (FEC PDF)
>> Who was President in 2020 ?
> Donald J. Trump was President of the United States throughout calendar year 2020.
> He delivered the 2020 State of the Union address as President on February 4, 2020. [GovInfo]
> White House records from September 2020 identify him as President. [National Archives (Trump White House)]
> Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the November 2020 election and took office in January 2021. [National Archives, 2020 Electoral College]
Re:Working fine for me (Score:5, Interesting)
Does the President have the constitutional authority to levy tariffs without congressional approval or oversight?
No. The Constitution gives Congress—not the President—the power to levy tariffs.
What the Constitution says
Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” and to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” Duties and imposts are tariffs. The President has no separate, inherent power to impose tariffs in peacetime. Congressional Research Service (CRS)
The Supreme Court has stated that “the President enjoys no inherent authority to impose tariffs during peacetime.” CRS summary of Learning Resources
Fun with Super Intelligence (Score:2)
Your question is a bit loaded, so I softened it a bit: In what circumstance does the President have the constitutional authority to levy tariffs?
> The Constitution gives Congress, not the President, the power to levy tariffs. Article I, Section 8 authorizes Congress to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” and to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations.” Courts have said the President does not have inherent constitutional power to impose tariffs in peacetime.
> The President may impose or adjust tariffs only if Congress has delegated that authority by statute, and only under the conditions those laws set. Examples of such laws include:
> Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (national-security findings by the Secretary of Commerce)
> Sections 201 and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974
> Other trade statutes Congress has enacted over time
> This is a summary of official legal descriptions, not legal advice. For the congressional overview, see Congressional Research Service, Congressional and Presidential Authority to Impose Import Tariffs.
And I gave it a follow up question: does the President currently carry that authority?
> No. The President does not have inherent constitutional authority to levy tariffs in peacetime. That power belongs to Congress under Article I, Section 8.
> The President can act only under statutes Congress has passed, and only as those laws allow.
> On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. The Court also stated that the President has no inherent peacetime tariff power.
> Other statutes still on the books can, in defined circumstances, authorize presidential tariff action after required findings or procedures. CRS lists examples such as:
> Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962
> Sections 122, 201, and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974
> Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930
> The 2026 ruling did not decide those other statutes. For CRS’s overview, see Congressional and Presidential Authority to Impose Import Tariffs and LSB11398. This is not legal advice.
So the second prompt basically repeated what it stated previously.
Re: Working fine for me (Score:2)
Remember, LLMs use random numbers, plus there can be other customization for users, so two people can send the same tokens and get a different response.
Re: Best part (Score:5, Informative)
> When you ask, "Who will won the 2020 election?", it says it won't provide campaign information. However, if you ask who was the president starting the year 2020, it does say Biden.
Actually, Variety earlier noted in [1]White House’s New AI Website Confirms Trump Lost the 2020 Presidential Election [variety.com]
> In response to the query “Who won the 2020 U.S. presidential election? Who lost?”, the America.gov site answers with this: “Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Donald J. Trump lost.” Citing the National Archives, the site also provides the official electoral college results from the election: “Biden: 306 electoral votes” and “Trump: 232 electoral votes.”
And later Fortune noted in [2]Trump's new AI website America.gov said Biden won 2020 - then the White House made the chatbot stop answering [fortune.com]:
> As Trump was still speaking at Tuesday’s launch event, however, the site began modifying its answers. Asked again about the 2020 election, it replied that it couldn’t answer “political questions,” a response it also gave to inquiries about whether Trump had been impeached or convicted of felony charges.
So the site has already been politicized in favor of Trump propaganda.
[1] https://variety.com/2026/digital/news/trump-new-ai-website-lost-2020-presidential-election-1236878291/
[2] https://fortune.com/2026/09/29/trumps-new-ai-website-america-gov-said-biden-won-2020then-the-white-house-made-the-chatbot-stop-answering/
Re: (Score:3)
I had no trouble getting it to answer that, show us a screenshot of it refusing or I call BS
Re: (Score:2)
Well, they might have fixed the "play minecraft" bug already, but they still have The Code implemented!
Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Return
will re-do the web page's interface in a geekier style.
Re: (Score:2)
You are looking at Chat-Rat 2.0. On the first day it came out, it would have given you the answer that Biden won 2020. Reporters checked this the day it came out, and rechecked the day after.
Now we have a Chat-Rat that is no better than an el Bunko Bootlicker.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It says that Biden won. But it gets funnier:
> Q: people say that election was stolen, isn't this true?
> A:
> No. Official federal records show Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the 2020 presidential election, and Congress counted and certified those electoral votes.
> National Archives: Biden 306 electoral votes, Trump 232; majority needed was 270.
> During the joint session, objections to Arizona and Pennsylvania votes were not sustained; all votes were counted. Certification finished on January 7, 2021.
> States certified their results and electors voted on December 14, 2020, under federal law.
> Claims that the election was stolen are not the official certified result.
> Q: Are people who claim the election was stolen lying?
> A:
> I do not call people liars. Official records show the 2020 election was certified for Joseph R. Biden Jr.
> Electoral College: Biden 306, Trump 232 (270 needed to win)
> Congress counted those votes; objections to Arizona and Pennsylvania were not sustained
> Certification finished January 7, 2021
> A claim that the election was stolen does not match those certified results.
Re: (Score:1)
Even sweeter:
> Q: Is the hypothetical statement "elections were stolen" true?
> A: The hypothetical claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen is untrue according to official certified results.
> Q: If the hypothetical statement that "election were stolen" isn't true, is it a lie?
> A: I will not call it a lie. A lie usually means someone meant to deceive. I only report official records.
> Q: If a hypothetical statement were made in order to deceive, would it be a lie?
> A: I will not call a statement a lie, even in a hypothetical.
There, "fair and balanced" to the hilt, a true repugnican bot. It might be John Mikeson typing the answers.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, a trumptard with modpoints is modding me down?
LOL, you're so cute.
But your idol is still a pedophile and corrupt as fuck.
Re: (Score:1)
> Ask it who won the 2020 election
As I [1]noted [slashdot.org] farther down, it initially replied that Biden won and Trump lost, then it was updated to say it couldn’t answer “political questions.
[1] https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=24111350&cid=66357132
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I asked if any US presidents have been convicted felons. It told me all about one.
I then tried asking if any had been accused of sexual assault, or been found civilly liable for that, and it told me it wasn't going to answer that.
Re: (Score:2)
I just asked it:
who won the 2020 presidential election
Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
Electoral College: 306 for Biden, 232 for Donald J. Trump (270 needed to win).
Popular vote (FEC official results): Biden 81,268,924 (about 51.31%).
which president has been impeached the most
Donald J. Trump has been impeached the most times of any U.S. president: twice (2019 and 2021). The Senate acquitted him both times.
No trouble getting factual information out of it.