Rush Rescue Mission for NASA's $500M Space Telescope Fails (cnn.com)
(Saturday August 22, 2026 @05:00PM (EditorDavid)
from the down-to-earth dept.)
- Reference: 0185104356
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/08/22/1844225/rush-rescue-mission-for-nasas-500m-space-telescope-fails
- Source link: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/science/nasa-swift-boost-mission-effort-ends
Remember that [1]rush rescue mission for NASA's $500M space telescope? [2]It failed, reports CNN , and the LINK satellite won't be able to boost the telescope's orbit. NASA says its decades-old Swift telescope will now continue losing altitude, until it reaches Earth's atmosphere later this year and burns up.
CNN reports:
> Just weeks after LINK lifted off on July 3, it started to spin out of control. [Satellite designer] Katalyst was able to [3]regain control of the satellite , but the company acknowledged that the issue cost it time, which would delay LINK's rendezvous with Swift by about a month. However, that postponement — at least initially — did not seem to be a deterrent to the mission. Now, [4]NASA and [5]Katalyst have announced that LINK's mission will not capture and boost Swift to a higher orbit "due to ongoing attitude control issues," according to statements Wednesday.
>
> "NASA should be willing to move quickly and take smart risks when the potential return is worth it, and that is exactly what we did with this mission," NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said in a statement. "This is not the outcome we were working toward, but it does not change why this mission was worth attempting. The team moved with extraordinary speed to give Swift a chance to carry out more science while advancing capabilities America will need for satellite servicing in the future...."
>
> The mission team is forging ahead with its plan for LINK to rendezvous with Swift — but as a demonstration rather than a rescue. "We are going to learn everything we can from LINK's rendezvous attempt and put those lessons to work on the missions that follow," Isaacman said... Swift wasn't designed to be serviced in space, which means that insights from the demonstration could be used for future missions... "We have already learned a tremendous amount," [said Ghonhee Lee, CEO of Katalyst Space Technologies], "and now our job is to turn those lessons into something durable — building a repeatable playbook to inform future rendezvous and proximity operations and satellite servicing."
[1] https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/05/09/2112200/rush-rescue-mission-for-nasas-500m-space-telescope-passes-key-milestone
[2] https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/science/nasa-swift-boost-mission-effort-ends
[3] https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/07/science/nasa-swift-boost-mission-link-spin
[4] https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-updates-next-steps-for-commercial-swift-boost-mission/
[5] https://www.katalystspace.com/mission/link
CNN reports:
> Just weeks after LINK lifted off on July 3, it started to spin out of control. [Satellite designer] Katalyst was able to [3]regain control of the satellite , but the company acknowledged that the issue cost it time, which would delay LINK's rendezvous with Swift by about a month. However, that postponement — at least initially — did not seem to be a deterrent to the mission. Now, [4]NASA and [5]Katalyst have announced that LINK's mission will not capture and boost Swift to a higher orbit "due to ongoing attitude control issues," according to statements Wednesday.
>
> "NASA should be willing to move quickly and take smart risks when the potential return is worth it, and that is exactly what we did with this mission," NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said in a statement. "This is not the outcome we were working toward, but it does not change why this mission was worth attempting. The team moved with extraordinary speed to give Swift a chance to carry out more science while advancing capabilities America will need for satellite servicing in the future...."
>
> The mission team is forging ahead with its plan for LINK to rendezvous with Swift — but as a demonstration rather than a rescue. "We are going to learn everything we can from LINK's rendezvous attempt and put those lessons to work on the missions that follow," Isaacman said... Swift wasn't designed to be serviced in space, which means that insights from the demonstration could be used for future missions... "We have already learned a tremendous amount," [said Ghonhee Lee, CEO of Katalyst Space Technologies], "and now our job is to turn those lessons into something durable — building a repeatable playbook to inform future rendezvous and proximity operations and satellite servicing."
[1] https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/05/09/2112200/rush-rescue-mission-for-nasas-500m-space-telescope-passes-key-milestone
[2] https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/science/nasa-swift-boost-mission-effort-ends
[3] https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/07/science/nasa-swift-boost-mission-link-spin
[4] https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-updates-next-steps-for-commercial-swift-boost-mission/
[5] https://www.katalystspace.com/mission/link
This is really sad (Score:2)
by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 )
Pity us Americans. Apparently [1]two telescope rescue missions have failed just during the past few days [slashdot.org].
[1] https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/08/19/2213259/rescue-mission-is-called-off-for-nasas-aging-swift-space-telescope
Re: (Score:2)
by r1348 ( 2567295 )
Just after the launch of the new Tesla Roadster I presume.
Re: (Score:1)
> the US does fails.
Yes. And then they succeed. In ways no one else has.
Go launch your payload and then park your booster on its ass next to the American one if you think you want to talk more shit, troll.
Then toss another payload up in less than 40 minutes. Show us how you stopped breaking eggs.