Startup Targets Datacenters With 3D-Printed Nuclear Reactor Module (theregister.com)
- Reference: 0184293704
- News link: https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/07/03/1657240/startup-targets-datacenters-with-3d-printed-nuclear-reactor-module
- Source link: https://www.theregister.com/systems/2026/07/03/startup-targets-datacenters-with-3d-printed-nuclear-reactor-module/5266480
> Founder and CEO Brian Matthews revealed the prototype microreactor, which features a fully 3D-printed silicon carbide reactor core and pressure vessel. "This next-generation nuclear core and pressure vessel sets the foundation for factory-built, mass-produced nuclear energy," Matthews said. "The advanced technology and additive manufacturing used demonstrate a clear commercial path for new nuclear technology coming to market in an accelerated manner." His company is developing a subcritical, solid-state, factory-built thorium-based nuclear reactor. Subcritical means the fuel cannot sustain a nuclear chain reaction on its own, which prevents a runaway power excursion.
>
> Ampera uses "solid-state" to describe a design with solid rather than liquid fuel. The proposed fuel uses tristructural isotropic, or [3]TRISO , particles, consisting of a fuel kernel containing thorium, surrounded by multiple ceramic and carbon layers. [...] "Thorium is the future for ultra-safe, clean power production," Matthews said at the time. "By producing TRISO thorium kernels in the United States, we can ensure ample access to the needed fuel supply as we scale up and also minimize price volatility risk."
>
> Ampera also describes the heart of the reactor as as a spherical monolithic gyroid core. A gyroid, as far as we can fathom, is a complex shape that provides a massive surface area relative to its volume, making it well-suited for heat transfer. Its complexity makes it difficult to produce using conventional manufacturing methods, which is where additive manufacturing comes in. The core is 3D-printed using silicon carbide and designed to operate for up to 30 years without refueling, the firm claims. Ampera says its planned systems will provide 15 or 30 MWe, depending on the configuration, enough to supply a typical datacenter. Larger configurations are planned. Matthews said that his company expects to be the first to industrialize factory-built nuclear power with near-term deployment timelines.
[1] https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ampera-marks-major-nuclear-milestone-863473352.html
[2] https://www.theregister.com/systems/2026/07/03/startup-targets-datacenters-with-3d-printed-nuclear-reactor-module/5266480
[3] https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/triso-particles-most-robust-nuclear-fuel-earth
Availability (Score:2)
> When The Register asked about availability, their spokesperson said: "We expect the power generation portion of the system to be available as early as 2027
Dang it, "availability" is an overloaded term.
I'll take that! (Score:2)
"We expect the power generation portion of the system to be available as early as 2027
with the nuclear module being available to customers about 2030 based on regulatory
approval." From the report:
I have a million I'll bet they won't. No seriously, anyone want the other side?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They included their out right in the quote, "Based on regulatory approval".
It's also useful to consider, the public are the ones theoretically regulating everything. Sometimes even in practice, when it comes to these data centers. If the bros are having trouble with NIMBY just because of the cooling units, imagine how much trouble they'll have when they add nukes into the picture.
I'd love to see more nukes built, but the right way. Not for this bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
> It's also useful to consider, the public are the ones theoretically regulating everything. Sometimes even in practice, when it comes to these data centers. If the bros are having trouble with NIMBY just because of the cooling units, imagine how much trouble they'll have when they add nukes into the picture.
If they don't want them to have nukes they will still happily take all of whatever the NIMBY people are using. That part makes me laugh.
Nuke Them From Orbit (Score:3)
Targeting AI data centers sounds like a great idea. Using nukes might be a bit excessive, but it will get the job done.
Is it April 1st already? (Score:2)
I think we've got a better chance of seeing Joe Biden win this year's NYC marathon than seeing this "startup" doing anything other than making investor capital vanish.
Re: (Score:1)
They also claim:
> his company expects to be the first to industrialize factory-built nuclear power with near-term deployment timelines.
They're not going to be the first, China already will sell any friendly country advanced modern nuclear reactors which go into production only six years after ground breaking. The US, not being a friendly country (to anyone but billionaires, anyway), still relies on 70 year old technology for ours.
But will the core work in my power armor? (Score:2)
Otherwise there will really be nothing worth looting from the data centers I pass on my way to the raider encampments...
"Spherical monolithic gyroid core" (Score:2)
What a bunch of hucksters.
Re: (Score:2)
Not saying that this company is not legit, but most of these startups looking for investors claim to have some special doohickey or exotic process. To reassure investors: we are unique, no one will easily copy us, and even if we can't make it work there might still be a valuable patent in the company.
Hope they're not using PLA. (Score:2)
PETG has a higher glass temperature.
Investor Fishing (Score:4, Insightful)
This sounds like investor fishing. I'll check back in 10 years.
Re: (Score:1)
Like most nuclear projects, I expect it to be either cancelled or still stuck in approvals 10 years from now.
I'm sure that the NIMBY's will fight back even harder than usual on this one, and throw every environmental and regulatory approval roadblock they can at it.
Re: (Score:2)
You say it like it is a bad thing. This is the only way to treat ridiculous and impractical 'concepts of plans' that are backed by money that can buy real political influence.