A Chinese Rocket Breaks Apart Dangerously Close To the Starlink Constellation (arstechnica.com)
- Reference: 0183907024
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/06/16/0539205/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation
- Source link: https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation/
> The US Space Force confirmed the breakup event in a post on [2]space-track.org , a website used by the military to distribute orbit data to the public. "The tracked pieces are being incorporated into routine conjunction assessment to support spaceflight safety," the Space Force wrote in an advisory. "There are currently no threats to human spaceflight. Analysis is ongoing." So far, the Space Force has not added any of the debris fragments to the official catalog of human-made space objects.
>
> [...] The bad news is that the Zhuque-2E's breakup is the latest chapter in China's growing contribution to the space junk problem. After decades of leaving spent rocket bodies in orbit, launch operators in most countries now reserve enough fuel to steer their upper stages back to Earth for controlled reentries. Rocket bodies attributed to Russia and the former Soviet Union account for the bulk of the launch-related debris in long-lived orbits, followed by China and the United States. But the Russian and American numbers are declining or holding steady, while the mass of Chinese rocket bodies in these long-lived orbits has grown by more than 150 percent in the past five years, according to a new analysis by Space Domain Awareness expert Jim Shell. The increase comes as China ramps up launches of its own megaconstellations designed to compete with SpaceX's Starlink.
>
> Rocket bodies are the most concerning sources of space debris because they are typically fairly large in size and mass, often with residual propellant and high-pressure gases that can trigger an explosion. There is no way to maneuver or dispose of them if left abandoned in orbit after releasing their payloads. McKnight characterized the recent breakup of the Zhuque-2E rocket as a "slight space safety issue," but the trend is not good. China's Long March 6A rocket has an especially bad track record, including two explosions that littered a higher-altitude low-Earth orbit with more than 1,000 debris fragments, where they will remain for decades or centuries. "Three of the top four breakup events in LEO are of Chinese origin, with two of these events being from Chinese (rocket body) explosions in the last four years," McKnight said.
[1] https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/06/a-chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-dangerously-close-to-the-starlink-constellation/
[2] https://www.space-track.org/
redundancy (Score:3)
Starlink satellites are meant to be cheap and redundant. Shouldn't be too bad if a few go down. We should be worried about other more important LEO satellites.
Re: (Score:3)
Have you never heard of [1]Kesler syndrome [wikipedia.org]?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that's not really a thing in LEO where debris clears itself fairly quickly due to atmospheric drag.
Re: (Score:2)
In some LEO altitudes, objects can take 50,000 years on average to clear out due to orbital decay. At the Earthlink altitude it takes 10-20 years on average for an object to de-orbit.
Because the number of objects increase dramatically every time there is an explosion/collision, we have likely already hit Kesler syndrome. That is, even if we don't launch anything else, the amount of space junk will just keep increasing. (You would know that if you'd bothered to read the Wikipedia article).
Scientists used
Re: (Score:2)
> Yeah, that's not really a thing in LEO where debris clears itself fairly quickly due to atmospheric drag.
Define quickly.
Because the YOLO stock market that snorts lines of pure HFT for breakfast every morning might have already auto-shorted every company affected 37 milliseconds after the first impact was reported.
I hope we have a fairly good grasp on the fact that LEO moves at the speed of Greed now. Impacts don’t have to hit ground to be felt. Hard.
Re: (Score:2)
Not a risk here though, because at this altitude most of it will decay and burn up in months or less.
Decaying at the speed of HFT. (Score:2)
> Not a risk here though, because at this altitude most of it will decay and burn up in months or less.
I wonder just how many companies who rely on LEO and getting through it to other orbits will decay right into bankruptcy while listening to Kessler be debated for months in the hallowed halls of every crippled org on the planet, after someone working the liability mitigation department once said..
”not a risk here.”
Re: (Score:2)
In this case the rocket failed on the way up, and there isn't much anyone can do about that.
Idiots (Score:2)
Short-sighted greed is usually attributed to capitalists. In this case, the rush to dominate will destroy access for everyone.
Satellites (Score:2)
So does... Starlink own space now?
Maybe if you hadn't sent up countless thousands of satellites without asking anyone but the US, people will give a damn about where they were.
Re: (Score:2)
And of course it's not really a problem if China clobbers the ISS, right?
People's attitude to this is interesting ... (Score:2)
... when you look at peoples assumption that this is somehow an accident or poor Chinese engineering. Why don't people consider the idea that this is a slow form of space warfare intended to deny the west access to the high frontier ? Remember the old saying : Once is unfortunate, twice is coincidence, but three times is a deliberate action.
On the other hand (Score:2)
Starlink satellites are everywhere, complicating launches and astronomy observations
no room (Score:3, Funny)
It is a bit hard not to hit a star link satellite when something breaks up there. Those satellites take up a lot of space.
Re: (Score:2)
No they don't
Re: (Score:3)
Think about how big that orbit is for a minute.