Most Polymarket Users Lose Money, While Top 1% Claim 76.5% of Gains, Study Finds (msn.com)
- Reference: 0183177664
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/05/11/0055243/most-polymarket-users-lose-money-while-top-1-claim-765-of-gains-study-finds
- Source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/investment/why-you-re-probably-going-to-lose-money-on-polymarket/ar-AA22PkvU
"Since Polymarket launched in 2022, a few thousand people have lost the bulk of the money... and an even smaller group — .05 percent of users — has gone home with most of the overall profits, according to a [2]new analysis from finance researcher Pat Akey and colleagues ."
> A lot of users aren't that good at predicting the future. They're losing money at roughly the same rate as online gamblers betting on sports and other real-life events at traditional sportsbooks, according to the U.K. gambling regulator's analysis of 2024 data. On Polymarket, the odds of making a profit are slightly higher on weather and tech markets — and a little lower on sports...
>
> On Polymarket, just 1,200 people took more than half the profits — $591 million, or more than $100,000 each. ["The top 1% of users capture 76.5% of all trading gains," the researchers write.] When you dabble in prediction markets, you're competing against these sophisticated players who consistently win. Most of those 1,200 big winners didn't place just a few smart bets. They appear to be pros making thousands of trades, mostly in the past year and a half, that were probably automated. One user made $3 million since January on more than a million trades about the Oscars, according to TRM Labs...
>
> The most profitable participants are also just good at picking what to bet on, Akey found, winning so often it was statistically unlikely to be dumb luck. They had some sort of edge — expertise, deep research or, perhaps, inside knowledge.
"Our results suggest that the informational benefits of prediction markets come at a cost to unsophisticated participants," the researchers conclude.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/investment/why-you-re-probably-going-to-lose-money-on-polymarket/ar-AA22PkvU
[2] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6443103
Also 94% of the bets (Score:3, Insightful)
Or just regular sports betting. The silly stuff gets all the press but in reality it's all just a sports betting platform. It was just a stupid way to get around state regulations using the current incredibly corrupt national government.
Re: (Score:2)
If it's regular sports betting, then people aren't winning because of insider information.
reflects the real world (Score:2)
Reflecting the real world. The 1% use insider information to generate more wealth by titling the odds in their favor. Hmmm
Re: (Score:1)
> by titling the odds in their favor
Last time I was titling the odds, the only "wealth" I generated was a prescription for acyclovir :|
Re: (Score:2)
Insider information or insider power. Both work just as well.
Insider information is when you exploit information that isn't public. Insider power is when you influence the outcome to your favor.
Many early sports bets used insider power - the player would get a cut of the profits if they tilted the game like faking an injury.
Anyways, news like this is good. If people know these markets are rigged against them, they'd likely avoid using these platforms. It's why regulations exist - the SEC doesn't go after in
Polymarket is old news, Calamitrade is taking over (Score:2)
Unstoppable, guarantees you even footing against insider trading and the worse the world does the better you do: [1]https://youtu.be/IY9KJ5nn1yE?s... [youtu.be]
[1] https://youtu.be/IY9KJ5nn1yE?si=eXxzv1QaRzM9Jlcl&t=435
76.5% (Score:2)
Actually 76.5% isn't very good. I expected it to be higher.
the 1% with "special information" (Score:2)
As we're seeing, the market is manipulated. Yay for that.
fools (Score:2)
What's the appeal on losing money to those with inside information?
the real company name should be (Score:2)
"insidertrading.com"
"Informational benefits" (Score:3)
When people start treating these casinos as a source of predictive information is when they'll become the most dangerous:
[1]https://insights.som.yale.edu/... [yale.edu]
[1] https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/dont-trust-the-political-prediction-markets
Poker (Score:2)
If you're sitting at the table and you don't know who the mark is, it's you. It really is that simple.
It's the new 1% (Score:2)
Well, it's probably just the same old 1%.
\o/ (Score:1)
Insider traders do better?
The fact that anyone is getting any gains (Score:4, Insightful)
It's just up to various forms of insider information. Not trading because this isn't trades this is gambling.
Re: (Score:2)
Insider trading, but with the fun twist of looting not the stock market, but the general populace. Now there's a direct and no fuss way for our leadership to take money out of our pockets.
Re: (Score:2)
If the rates are similar to other forms of gambling than the majority wouldn't be due to insider information. Edge cases will be, but unless you think they have inside information about the weather, the rates between Polymarket and regular gambling wins are relatively consistent as detailed in the article.
Re: (Score:2)
> It's just up to various forms of insider information. Not trading because this isn't trades this is gambling.
You make it sound like the rich getting richer using insider information is a bad thing? You must not be among the fraction of 1%.