Silicon Valley Bets $200 Million On AI Data Centers Floating In the Ocean (arstechnica.com)
- Reference: 0183137520
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/05/06/0437216/silicon-valley-bets-200-million-on-ai-data-centers-floating-in-the-ocean
- Source link: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/silicon-valley-bets-on-floating-ai-data-centers-powered-by-ocean-waves/
> Silicon Valley investors such as Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel have bet hundreds of millions of dollars on deploying AI data centers [1]powered by waves in the middle of the world's oceans -- a move that coincides with tech companies facing mounting challenges in building AI data center projects on land. The latest [2]investment round of $140 million is intended to help the company [3]Panthalassa complete a pilot manufacturing facility near Portland, Oregon, and speed up deployments of wave-riding "nodes" designed to generate electrical power, according to a May 4 press release. Instead of sending renewable energy to a land-based data center, the floating nodes would directly power onboard AI chips and transmit inference tokens representing the AI models' outputs to customers worldwide via satellite link.
>
> Each node resembles a huge steel sphere bobbing on the water with a tube-like structure extending vertically down beneath the surface. The wave motions drive water upward through the tube into a pressurized reservoir, where it can be released to spin a turbine generator that produces renewable energy for the AI chips on board. Panthalassa claims the node's AI chips would also get cooled using the surrounding water, which could offer another advantage over traditional data centers. "Ocean-based compute might offer a massive cooling advantage because the ambient temperature is so low," Lee said. "Land-based data centers use a lot of electricity and fresh water for cooling."
>
> The newest node prototype, called Ocean-3, is scheduled for testing in the northern Pacific Ocean later in 2026. The latest version reaches about 85 meters in length and would stand nearly as tall as London's Big Ben or New York City's Flatiron Building, according to the [4]Financial Times . Panthalassa has already tested several earlier prototypes of the wave energy converter technology, including the Ocean-1 in 2021 and the [5]Ocean-2 that underwent a three-week sea trial off the coast of Washington state in February 2024. The company's CEO and co-founder, Garth Sheldon-Coulson, said in a [6]CBS interview that he hopes to eventually deploy thousands of the nodes.
[1] https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/silicon-valley-bets-on-floating-ai-data-centers-powered-by-ocean-waves/
[2] https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260504552400/en/Panthalassa-Raises-%24140-Million-to-Power-AI-at-Sea
[3] https://panthalassa.com/
[4] https://www.ft.com/content/711ce313-16fb-4a12-b6be-fbed547c8a39?syn-25a6b1a6=1
[5] https://openei.org/wiki/PRIMRE/Databases/Projects_Database/Projects/Ocean-2_Puget_Sound_Trial
[6] https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/using-wave-energy-to-power-sea-based-ai-data-centers/
Easy way to kill this (Score:3)
Propose someone build one of these in the ocean opposite one of your king's golf courses. That'll end this stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
He's getting a cut, so he's all for it.
Re: (Score:2)
If these are located more than 11 miles offshore, are they not technically considered international waters? While there are jurisdiction issues, piracy is a concern. For wave and wind farms, there is very little for pirates to plunder unless they want to strip them down for raw materials like copper. A data center would have far more valuable and easier components to strip. Oil rigs have to worry about piracy but they are manned by a large crew; offshore data farms would be minimally staffed if at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Protecting one's assets probably would not look much different if invasion happens closer to shore versus further out. It's a vessel being protected, not water, per se.
The only major difference I see is that within the boundary, the US Coast Guard would do the enforcing (barring something major), while the US Navy would if further out.
Re: (Score:2)
How many of these will the Coast Guard/Navy need to protect and how are they manned? With oil rigs, there is a large crew stationed to protect them some degree.
Re: (Score:1)
Maybe further out at sea the laws are looser, allowing them to patrol with mostly bots.
Re: (Score:2)
They're within the exclusive economic zone, though.
Re: (Score:2)
> Propose someone build one of these in the ocean opposite one of your king's golf courses. That'll end this stupidity.
Seems like a great business strategy. Propose to build one offshore near one of King Trump's golf courses and then he'll pay you $1B of taxpayer money not to build it. Rinse, repeat.
not a bet (Score:2)
They are not betting, they don't really loose when they loose. They are SPENDING $200 million on the idea. There is no potential for "failure" so it's not a bet.
Seems really low-maintenance to me (Score:4, Informative)
Steel structures in a salt water environment? What could possibly go wrong? (Anything with iron in it rusts very quickly at my beach house, including stainless and galvanized steel. The beach house was original build on... (wait for it!)... steel posts.
Re: (Score:2)
It will require Schrödinger levels amount of maintenance. It will be very little because AI can do everything. It will require a lot of maintenance because AI is incapable of doing real world things. Low maintenance makes the investment look good to suckers—I mean investors. Lots of maintenance means jobs to suckers—I mean the local population.
Re: (Score:2)
It only has to last for 4 years before the next model comes out
Re:Seems really low-maintenance to me (Score:4, Informative)
Good point. We have absolutely no history of building steel structures in the ocean. Certainly not a fleet of them all around the world for the last century and a half.
Directly boiling the oceans (Score:2)
Nice.
Re: (Score:2)
A sea-surface heater that offers its victims compute cycles... The Venusians are diversifying in the face of solar and EV sales.
Why not use ocean-based wind turbines? (Score:3)
We have all these ocean-based wind turbine projects (that Trump is trying to kill) that sit in that cold, cold ocean already. Maybe you could site some underwater facilities at the base of them (and join them with other, nearby facilities and turbines via underwater cables) and you have a self-contained data center...
Wind power is more developed than wave-based. Might cut costs...?
Re: (Score:2)
Wave energy is more constant than wind. You can have windless days but waveless days are not really a thing, just how big the waves are. That said I like tidal generation because the moon and earths relative paths are stable and predictable hence when and how much power you can generate is easy to determine and the cycle is within the scale that batteries can cover the dead time when the tide is turning.
the clogging problem (Score:2)
Seawater is a corrosive microbial soup, and I'm seeing that they will have it constantly circulating around through the entire structure. It will even be driving their turbines. An ecosystem of wildlife will grow in there and eventually clog it all up. I assume they've got it plated with biocides but that will eventually be defeated.
Middle Earth DC (MEDic) (Score:2)
Let's just one-up the DCs in space and in the middle of the ocean to the middle of the planet. That is thinking too small. Why not? The Earth's center has unlimited DC energy, it is very secure (hard to get to), there are a few heat issues to work out and maybe some problems drilling but that's ok. Those are just some first principle issues to resolve. Let's start raising the trillions needed for the Middle Earth DC or MEDiC for short.
there lived a ma-a-an / who s[ol]d the sea (Score:2)
If America's powerful elites absolutely insist that there be no correlation between wealth and intelligence, then I would at least like them to agree in principle that the correlation shouldn't be quite so negative.
AI Nino (Score:2)
Sure, lets warm up the Pacific Ocean. What could go wrong ?
Re:AI Nino (Score:5, Insightful)
> Sure, lets warm up the Pacific Ocean. What could go wrong ?
Wave power is generating electrical power from energy that's already present in the ocean. If you don't use it to generate electrical power, it will eventually turn into heat from damping anyway.
Microsoft already tried that? (Score:2)
It wasn't cost effective.
Wrong headline again (Score:2)
Take that redundant and pointless data center and AI buzz words soup out the headline and the story is far more interesting. The linked video is well worth watching to see how this power generation system actually works. Wish them good luck with this power generation project, hopefully the tech won't be wasted on AI, and instead be used for something useful, such as replacing existing fossil fuel use.
let me get this straight (Score:4, Insightful)
So we can't afford renewable wave energy for powering peoples' homes. But somehow it becomes feasible to power AI bros' desperate money grabs?
Re:let me get this straight (Score:5, Informative)
Undeniably the cheapest fuel sources are renewables now, wind, solar, and *probably* wave (I'm not sure if the maths done on that, but it seems plausible?)
Instead we are now paying billions to NOT do wind power.
This period of history is fueled by madness.
Re: (Score:2)
No, they can't afford the NIMBY movement. Yet.
Re: (Score:3)
Does anyone remember in Thundercats The Movie the baddies try to boil the sea? Probably where they got the idea from. It's okay because it's comically evil.