Hollywood Stars Sign Open Letter Protesting Paramount-Warner Bros Merger (nbcnews.com)
- Reference: 0181689028
- News link: https://slashdot.org/story/26/04/13/2056254/hollywood-stars-sign-open-letter-protesting-paramount-warner-bros-merger
- Source link: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/hollywood-letter-paramount-warner-bros-merger-rcna331499
> "This transaction would further consolidate an already concentrated media landscape, reducing competition at a moment when our industries -- and the audiences we serve -- can least afford it," the signatories wrote in the letter, published early Monday on a website called Block the Merger. "The result will be fewer opportunities for creators, fewer jobs across the production ecosystem, higher costs, and less choice for audiences in the United States and around the world. Alarmingly, this merger would reduce the number of major U.S. film studios to just four," the signatories added.
>
> [T]he open letter illustrates the deep resistance to the deal among many members of Hollywood's creative community. The list of signatories includes A-list stars (Glenn Close, Ben Stiller), celebrated filmmakers (Yorgos Lanthimos, Denis Villeneuve) and acclaimed writers ("The Sopranos" creator David Chase). "Media consolidation has accelerated the disappearance of the mid-budget film, the erosion of independent distribution, the collapse of the international sales market, the elimination of meaningful profit participation, and the weakening of screen credit integrity," the signatories wrote. "Together, these factors threaten the sustainability of the entire creative community," they added.
>
> [...] Monday's open letter letter was spearheaded by a group of advocacy organizations -- including the Committee for the First Amendment, a free speech group led by Fonda, who warned that the merger "would be one of the most destructive threats to free speech and creative expression in our history." In the letter, first reported by The New York Times, the signatories expressed support for California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who has said the merger is "not a done deal." "These two Hollywood titans have not cleared regulatory scrutiny -- the California Department of Justice has an open investigation, and we intend to be vigorous in our review," Bonta said in a Feb. 26 post on X.
Paramount Skydance said that they "hear and understand the concerns" and are committed to "protecting and expanding creativity." The studio also reiterated its commitment to releasing a minimum of 30 "high-quality feature films annually with full theatrical releases" and "preserving iconic brands with independent creative leadership" to make sure "creators have more avenues for their work, not fewer."
[1] https://blockthemerger.com/openletter
[2] https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/26/02/27/1027259/netflix-ditches-deal-for-warner-bros-discovery-after-paramounts-offer-is-deemed-superior
[3] https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/hollywood-letter-paramount-warner-bros-merger-rcna331499
Re:first amendment red herring (Score:4, Insightful)
The only reason people like you are still alive today to be able to display their ignorance and cluelessness to the entire Internel is because people like me had the good sense to listen to people way smarter and more knowledgeable than you or me and follow their advice.
You're welcome.
Re: (Score:1)
+1, tell us more :-)
Re:first amendment red herring (Score:4, Funny)
You sound like a snowflake.
Put your $ where your mouth is, kids (Score:3, Insightful)
Who cares what the self-important talent thinks?
If they want to do something about it, take their vast wealth and instead of buying a 3rd home in St Tropez, set up a production co-op.
It's been done before.
"United Artists is an American film production and distribution company owned by Amazon MGM Studios. In its original operating period, it was founded on February 5, 1919 by Charlie Chaplin, D. W. Griffith, Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks as a venture premised on allowing actors to control their own financial and artistic interests rather than being dependent upon commercial studios. " (wiki)
Put up, or shut up.
Re: (Score:2)
Many celebrities do own production companies.
I don't think you understand the difference (Score:2)
Between 100 million and a billion dollars. It's a really huge gap that people have a hard time grasping because human beings are bad at grasping numbers that large.
The absolute top Stars might have net worth in the hundred million range or so but besides one or two super duper Stars none of them approach billionaire status. They simply do not have the money to start their own production studios that are capable of competing with Disney and Warner Bros.
And nobody is going to give them the money to d
Re: (Score:2)
The primary reason movies are so expensive these days is that they'll pay tens of millions of dollars for a familiar face on the poster.
If those familiar faces were willing to work for a regular wage rather than a million dollars a day, they could easily compete with Hollywood.
10 years of woke garbage (Score:1)
Now that large franchises are collapsing (Star Trek et al) after fully lecturing us about shit no one cares about, they're worried there may be less roles/money for them.
How about making movies for the masses? With a story and a likeable character rather than The Message to force down our throats?
Re: (Score:1)
Now is the season to get everyone on board with giving everything we own to the state...
Let's have those across all genres...
Re: (Score:2)
Star Trek isn't collapsing. Right wingers are buying media companies to influence public opinion and I have news for you, Hollywood was always woke . You just weren't getting the message. Some notable woke films include:
First Blood
Midnight Cowboy
Dog Day Afternoon
Serpico
And yes even the beloved Easy Rider was woke.
It is all from a worry about free speech. (Score:1)
The people listed are the same people who have come out against paramount due to allowing free speech and in their news setting up people to ensure that the new was now biased.
They talk that with Paramount not being biased then things such as Biden administration officials "furiously pressured" platforms like Facebook and YouTube to remove posts that questioned vaccine safety or mask efficacy, Biden explicitly having reporters in "reporting it the right way" regarding the economy, and democrats pushing the
Re: (Score:2)
> The people listed are the same people who have come out against paramount due to allowing free speech and in their news setting up people to ensure that the new was now biased. They talk that with Paramount not being biased then things such as Biden administration officials "furiously pressured" platforms like Facebook and YouTube to remove posts that questioned vaccine safety or mask efficacy, Biden explicitly having reporters in "reporting it the right way" regarding the economy, and democrats pushing the false "Biden laptop is a Russian hack and leak" will not be allowed to happen.
My kingdom for a mod point!
The only group of people I have less empathy for (Score:2)
The only group of people I have less empathy for than politicians are Hollywood movie stars (followed closely by social media influencers).
I honestly might be missing the point (Score:3, Interesting)
To misquote YouTube animator Crowne Prince: If you don't like who owns your favorite shit, make your own damn shit.
The current barrier to entry for making money online by telling stories is you having the resources to read this text.
Perhaps I'm missing something.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, you got it.
If people don't want Corporatist bullshit then they should not pay for corporatist bullshit.
If people want to make a movie using their own story and vision then they can...
Start with a .txt file.
Make a storyboard.
Shoot it using the camera they have.
Draw and render whatever they can't shoot IRL in free open source software on the computer the have (look at what they made in 1995, garbage computers running Linux nowadays can outperform what they had easily).
Composite / edit / render it in fre
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
That's the great thing about technology. Everybody is an expert now. Don't like your OS? Just write your own! Not satisfied with your car? Just design your own! Your computer isn't fancy enough? You live in a free country! Just whip one up yourself! I'm sure the quality won't suffer a bit ... After all, how hard can it be to do what Glenn Close does? It's just her spouting a bunch of words!
You can't make your own shit (Score:2)
Nobody's going to give you the money to compete with Hollywood. At best you might be able to crank out a b movie or two that you can dump on Netflix but even that is dodgy because the people in charge of everything all go to the same golf clubs and they all belong on each other's board of directors so if you're actually going to try to break into that by competing they're just not going to let you do it.
If you happen to have enough money to start your own thing then sooner or later you will trip up and
Re: (Score:1)
Your taste sucks.
Re: (Score:1)
I'm sorry, I wrote that in haste. I meant to say that it appears you think the only productions worth seeing are highly polished and expensive affairs and that this seems strange to me.
Its about where stuff is made ... (Score:2)
It's not about who owns stuff. Its about where stuff is made.
Los Angeles folks are complaining about production being moved from Los Angeles to Toronto. That's it.