DNA-Level Encryption Developed by Researchers to Protect the Secrets of Bioengineered Cells (phys.org)
(Sunday April 12, 2026 @11:34AM (EditorDavid)
from the hardened-cell dept.)
- Reference: 0181623804
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/04/12/0511204/dna-level-encryption-developed-by-researchers-to-protect-the-secrets-of-bioengineered-cells
- Source link: https://phys.org/news/2026-04-hackers-dna-encryption-cells.html
The biotech industry's engineered cells could become an $8 trillion market by 2035, notes [1]Phys.org . But how do you keep them from being stolen? Their article notes "an uptick in the theft and smuggling of high-value biological materials, including specially engineered cells."
> In Science Advances , a team of U.S. researchers present [2]a new approach to genetically securing precious biological material. They created a genetic combination lock in which the locking or encryption process scrambled the DNA of a cell so that its important instructions were non-functional and couldn't be easily read or used. The unlocking, or decryption, process involves adding a series of chemicals in a precise order over time — like entering a password — to activate recombinases, which then unscramble the DNA to their original, functional form...
>
> They created a biological keypad with nine distinct chemicals, each acting as a one-digit input. By using the same chemicals in pairs to form two-digit inputs, where two chemicals must be present simultaneously to activate a sensor, they expanded the keypad to 45 possible chemical inputs without introducing any new chemicals. They also added safety penalties — if someone tampers with the system, toxins are released — making it extremely unlikely for an unauthorized person to access the cells.
"The researchers conducted an ethical hacking exercise on the test lock and found that random guessing yielded a 0.2% success rate, remarkably close to the theoretical target of 0.1%."
[1] https://phys.org/news/2026-04-hackers-dna-encryption-cells.html
[2] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aeb8556
> In Science Advances , a team of U.S. researchers present [2]a new approach to genetically securing precious biological material. They created a genetic combination lock in which the locking or encryption process scrambled the DNA of a cell so that its important instructions were non-functional and couldn't be easily read or used. The unlocking, or decryption, process involves adding a series of chemicals in a precise order over time — like entering a password — to activate recombinases, which then unscramble the DNA to their original, functional form...
>
> They created a biological keypad with nine distinct chemicals, each acting as a one-digit input. By using the same chemicals in pairs to form two-digit inputs, where two chemicals must be present simultaneously to activate a sensor, they expanded the keypad to 45 possible chemical inputs without introducing any new chemicals. They also added safety penalties — if someone tampers with the system, toxins are released — making it extremely unlikely for an unauthorized person to access the cells.
"The researchers conducted an ethical hacking exercise on the test lock and found that random guessing yielded a 0.2% success rate, remarkably close to the theoretical target of 0.1%."
[1] https://phys.org/news/2026-04-hackers-dna-encryption-cells.html
[2] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aeb8556
Monsanto (Score:1)
Monsanto must be drooling at the concept, on which they could use the DMCA if someone attenpt any kind of DRM circumvention.