News: 0180999478

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Android, Epic, and What's Really Behind Google's 'Existential' Threat to F-Droid (thenewstack.io)

(Monday March 16, 2026 @03:34AM (EditorDavid) from the see-who-develops dept.)


Starting [1]in September , even Android developers not in Google's Play Store will still be required to register with Google to distribute their apps in Brazil, Singapore, Indonesia, and Thailand, with Google continuing "to roll out these requirements globally" four months later. Even developers distributing Android apps on the web for sideloading will be [2]required to register , pay Google a $25 fee, and provide a government ID.

But there's [3]a new theory on what's secretly been motivating Google from an unnamed source in the "Keep Android Open" movement, writes long-time Slashdot reader [4]destinyland :

> "You can't separate this really from their ongoing interactions with Epic and the settlement that they came to," they argue. Twelve days ago Epic Games and Google [5]announced a new proposal for settling their long-running dispute over the legality of alternative app stores on Android phones. (Rather than agreeing to let third-party app stores into their Play Store, Google wants them to continue being sideloaded, promising in [6]a blog post last week that they'll even offer a "more streamlined" and "simplified" sideloading alternative for rival app stores. "This Registered App Store program will begin outside of the US first, and we intend to bring it to the US as well, subject to court approval.")

>

> So "developer verification" could be Google's fallback plan if U.S. courts fail to approve this. "If the Google Play Store has to allow any third-party repository app store, Google essentially has given up all control of the apps. But if they're able to claw back that control by requiring that all developers, no matter how they distribute their apps, have to register with Google — have to agree to their Terms & Conditions, pay them money, provide identification — then they have a large degree of indirect control over any app that can be developed for the entire platform."

But that plan threatens millions of people using the alternative F/OSS app distributor [7]F-Droid , since Google also wants to have only one signature attached to Android apps. Marc Prud'hommeaux, a member of F-Droid's board of directors, says that "all of a sudden breaks all those versions of the application distributed through F-Droid or any other app store!"

Prud'hommeaux says they've told Google's Android team "You know perfectly well that you're killing F-Droid!" creating an "existential" threat to an app distributor "that has existed happily for over 10 years." But good things started happening when he created the website [8]Keep Android Open :

> There's now a "huge backlog" of signers for [9]an Open Letter that already includes EFF, the Software Freedom Conservancy, and the Free Software Foundation. He believes Android's existing Play Protect security "is completely sufficient to handle the particular scenarios they claim that developer verification is meant to address"...

>

> The Keep Android Open site urges developers not to sign up for Android's early access program when it launches next week. (Instead, they're asking developers to respond to invites with an email about their concerns — and to spread the word to other developers and organizations in forums and social media posts.) There's also a [10]petition at Change.org currently signed by 64,000 developers — adding 20,000 new signatures in the last 10 days. And "If you have an Android device, try installing F-Droid!" he adds. Google tracks how many people install these alternative app repositories, and a larger user base means greater consequences from any Android policy changes.

>

> Plus, installing F-Droid "might be refreshing!" Prud'hommeaux says. "You don't see all the advertisements and promotions and scam and crapware stuff that you see in the commercial app stores!"



[1] https://support.google.com/android-developer-console/answer/16650243?hl=en

[2] https://developer.android.com/developer-verification/guides/faq

[3] https://thenewstack.io/f-droid-says-googles-android-developer-verification-plan-is-an-existential-threat-to-alternative-app-stores/

[4] https://www.slashdot.org/~destinyland

[5] https://www.epicgames.com/site/en-US/news/googles-changes-will-open-android-devices-to-competition-benefiting-developers-and-consumers

[6] https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/a-new-era-for-choice-and-openness.html

[7] https://f-droid.org/en/

[8] https://keepandroidopen.org/

[9] https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

[10] https://www.change.org/p/stop-google-from-limiting-apk-file-usage



Ads (Score:2)

by ChunderDownunder ( 709234 )

I always go to f-droid first because Google Play apps generally have ads.

Re: (Score:3)

by Errol backfiring ( 1280012 )

I specifically buy easy-to-flash android phones so I can install LineageOS on it and F-droid. I would not touch the play store with a 3.3 meter pole.

Google treats small developers like crap (Score:3, Informative)

by Anonymous Coward

I pulled my apps when Google doxxed Android individual developers on Play Store listings. Yes to comply with EU law, but even for free apps? Or Google Play stores not in the EU?!

For years Google has let big corps break the Developer Distribution Agreement by providing bogus Support contact details such as unmanned email addresses such as noreply@microsoft.com and support@apple.com in breached of the DDA.

Some recommended F-Droid apps (Score:3)

by echo123 ( 1266692 )

NewPipe (a super awesome YouTube player w/o ads)

DuckDuckGo mobile browser (I like how easy it is to blow away cookies)

TiefPrompt (a teleprompter)

The Megacorps don't learn, do they? (Score:2)

by Qbertino ( 265505 )

One of the big reasons I went with Android and not Apple when the mobile software craze started was that Apple was "We own you and the entire pipeline you use to bring software to end-users" and Google was "We don't care as long as you use our toolkits and services - which are totally FOSS btw."

This new totally-not-the-old-Google registration requirement is a hard turn-off for peer-group opinion leaders like myself. There are still FOSS Android alternatives, yes, so anybody doing Android development isn't s

None of Google's damn business (Score:2)

by Mononymous ( 6156676 )

> Google tracks how many people install these alternative app repositories

If true, this is totally creepy. It means they're already watching everything you sidelload.

I don't have any Google apps installed (I use [1]LineageOS for microG [microg.org]), but it's amazing how much spying their apps do.

[1] https://lineage.microg.org/

Genius is pain.
-- John Lennon