News: 0180955994

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Only Half of Americans Went To a Movie Theater In 2025, Study Finds (variety.com)

(Thursday March 12, 2026 @12:00PM (BeauHD) from the reality-check dept.)


A Pew Research Center survey [1]found that [2]only 53% of U.S. adults went to a movie theater in the past year , while 7% said they've never seen a movie in a theater at all. "The findings reflected a domestic box office still fighting to regain its footing since the COVID-19 pandemic, when ticket sales collapsed 81% in 2020 due to theater closures," reports Variety. From the report:

> In 2025, moviegoers in the U.S. and Canada bought 769.2 million tickets, less than half of the all-time peak of roughly 1.6 billion tickets sold in 2002, according to data from Nash Information Services. However, an August 2025 study field by NRG/National Research Group showed that 77% of Americans ages 12-74 went to see at least one movie in a theater in the previous 12 months.

>

> Box office revenue peaked at an inflation-adjusted $16.4 billion in 2002, and annual ticket revenue held relatively steady through the 2000s and 2010s before falling to under $3 billion in 2020 when theaters closed for months. Last year, U.S. theaters sold just over $9 billion worth of tickets, per media analytics firm Comscore. The number represents a recovery, but nowhere near a full one, as ticket sales have been lagging around 20% below pre-pandemic levels.



[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/03/06/as-the-academy-awards-approach-a-look-at-moviegoing-habits-in-the-united-states/

[2] https://variety.com/2026/film/news/half-americans-went-to-movie-theater-2025-1236684921/



surprised it's that high (Score:4, Interesting)

by argStyopa ( 232550 )

I am a cinephile, and genuinely enjoy the experience of going to see a film in a place with an audience, but I haven't been inside a massmarket theater for a decade. The only place worth the ticket price are specialty theaters like the Trylon & candidly, for a 100mile round trip that needs to be something I really want to see as I haven't been there since mid COVID.

Re: (Score:2)

by afaiktoit ( 831835 )

I'm surprised too, that seems way high. I was thinking 5% at most.

This (Score:3)

by Viol8 ( 599362 )

I'm not american but I haven't been for over 20 years. Whats the point of paying extortionate ticket prices to sit in a smelly theatre with a floor covered in popcorn and gum with the usual obligatory noise makers in the audience to watch a film that'll be out on streaming - or for us old timers DVD - in 6 to 12 months anyway?

Re: (Score:2)

by martin-boundary ( 547041 )

Me too!

TBH I prefer Netflix & Chill (but then I don't pay much attention to Netflix...)

Re: (Score:3)

by skam240 ( 789197 )

Where I live in the US the theaters are quite clean and comfy with big, padded reclining chairs and fold out tables for ones food. Noise issues from other viewers are pretty minimal too. This is a big change from 20 years ago so I wonder if where ever you're from hasn't also improved since you've last been.

Re: (Score:2)

by Viol8 ( 599362 )

Quite possibly its changed here in the UK , but I don't fancy spending money on transport, food and the ticket price itself for all the family to find out it hasn't.

Re: (Score:2)

by Valgrus Thunderaxe ( 8769977 )

The theaters by me are also very clean. I suspect it's because nobody is there to dirty them.

Re: (Score:2)

by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 )

Based on news stories I've read, over the last decade or so a lot of theaters did pivot to (in their phraseology) "a premium viewing experlience" in an attempt to bring back customers. However more recently I've seen stories specifically about those "premium" theaters starting to close down... so it doesn't sound like the pivot worked.

Re: (Score:2)

by Un-Thesis ( 700342 )

I'm an American living in Egypt. Here in New Cairo at the richest mall, I pay 170 EGP ($3.25) for a movie ticket, 20 EGP ($0.38) for 500 mL of water, and 100 EGP ($2.00) for a large popcorn.

What about you???

Re: (Score:3)

by lucifuge31337 ( 529072 )

What about me? I pay more so I don't have to live in the middle east. It's worth it.

Re: (Score:1)

by argStyopa ( 232550 )

Mass market theater prices are extortionate.

[1]https://www.cabletv.com/entert... [cabletv.com]

Avg movie ticket price here in MN is $18 (I would have said higher, as [2]https://www.amctheatres.com/mo... [amctheatres.com] "Southdale" is a common mainstream theater and that's $22/ticket.

And then concessions - a large bucket of popcorn and large soda are another $30

OTOH you have delightful gems like Trylon - classic movies, etc, reruns, whole series like "Alfred Hitchcock films" or the Ghibli collections - [3]https://www.trylon.org/ [trylon.org]

$8 for a seat. Con

[1] https://www.cabletv.com/entertainment/cost-of-a-movie-ticket

[2] https://www.amctheatres.com/movie-theatres/minneapolis-st-paul/amc-southdale-16

[3] https://www.trylon.org/

Re: (Score:1)

by Anonymous Coward

People don't want to pay $$$$ to have Current Thing preached at them.

Re: (Score:2)

by xeoron ( 639412 )

I think I went to 1 or 2 last year. Most films I weight is it worth the cost of going, dealing with parking, all the fees just to buy a ticket... often I do not care enough and rather wait for it to hit VOD or a streaming service.

Re: (Score:2)

by fluffernutter ( 1411889 )

I enjoy going to a movie theater too. Rather my wife does, and I like going with her. But there hasn't been anything worth seeing for adults. We are into action/dramas for adults but it has all been horror movies or family movies or superhero movies. We enjoyed Black Bag, and F1 (as much as I didn't want to like F1). I went to Wicked as a family thing but refused to go to the second one as I didn't feel it did a good job of reproducing the "world of Oz" and I'm not that into musicals anyway. That is l

Exceeding expectations (Score:2)

by devslash0 ( 4203435 )

That's 50% more than I thought. How much of it happens exclusively on Valentine's?

Re: (Score:2)

by The-Ixian ( 168184 )

Yeah, I saw that statistic and wondered what the problem was. That still sounds like a really good business to be in.

I wonder (Score:2)

by Unpopular Opinions ( 6836218 )

Which half they are talking about. The brain half or the assh*le half? Because, you see, this distinction makes a world of a difference and provides a great indication on the content qualities.

It's not the pandemic (Score:5, Insightful)

by gratuit ( 861174 )

It's not covid that killed the theaters, it's the incessant talking and cell phone use. If I wanted to listen to someone make a phone call, I could hang out somewhere else for cheaper. The response has been to increase volume to the point of discomfort. I will pass.

Re: (Score:2)

by sabbede ( 2678435 )

I was one of the people who did go a movie theater last year. After I threw enough ice cubes, he finally put the damn phone away. I don't know who he was, just that he was old enough for me to be disappointed that he couldn't put it away.

Re: (Score:2)

by nazrhyn ( 906126 )

Be careful. Someone got shot and killed for throwing popcorn at another moviegoer, and then the shooter was acquitted...

[1]https://abcnews.com/US/cop-acq... [abcnews.com]

[1] https://abcnews.com/US/cop-acquitted-deadly-florida-theater-shooting-speaks/story?id=83320436

Re: (Score:2)

by Goddamnferret ( 2556710 )

My last time going to a theater was Holtsville, NY and some dude changed his kids diaper in the aisle, then tucked the dirty one against the wall far from himself. I'm good watching movies at home now.

Theaters Used to be special (Score:4, Insightful)

by n2hightech ( 1170183 )

Movie length has gotten so long that they need to bring back the intermission. I miss the intermission. Who wants to buy a big drink to enjoy with popcorn and then be uncomfortable for the last hour of the movie. If I wait until it comes out on line I can stop the show and take a break get a snack. Why go to a theater where you have to get up and miss part of the show to relieve yourself? Theaters screwed themselves when they eliminated the intermission. It cut the profits of extra concession sales and drove most viewers home for comfort.

Re: (Score:1)

by sabbede ( 2678435 )

In my entire life, I've only been to, as best I recall, three movies where there was an intermission. One was a Star Wars/Empire double feature, one was the theatrical release of three episodes of The Chosen, and I just found out the third was in my imagination. When I saw Glory in 1989, it was the first time I had to get up and go pee during a movie. No intermission.

Oh! Wait a minute, didn't the Lord of The Rings movies have intermissions? Maybe my count was short by 3.

Re: (Score:2)

by aitikin ( 909209 )

> In my entire life, I've only been to, as best I recall, three movies where there was an intermission. One was a Star Wars/Empire double feature, one was the theatrical release of three episodes of The Chosen, and I just found out the third was in my imagination. When I saw Glory in 1989, it was the first time I had to get up and go pee during a movie. No intermission.

> Oh! Wait a minute, didn't the Lord of The Rings movies have intermissions? Maybe my count was short by 3.

As I recall, TLotR movies did not. I've never been in a movie theater with an intermission.

I did see a movie in 2025 in theaters. I was content with the decision to go, but it takes something of substance for me to want to. That said, I haven't seen very many movies released post The Hobbit approach the 222 minute runtime of Lawrence of Arabia.

Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

by Un-Thesis ( 700342 )

Here in Egypt, 90 minute movies have a 3 minute intermission, 2 hour movies have a 7 minute intermission and 3+ hour movies usually have *two* 5 minute intermissions. Such as Avatar.

Re: (Score:1)

by sabbede ( 2678435 )

Hmm, then it's not an industry thing, it's a cultural thing?

Re: (Score:2)

by bugs2squash ( 1132591 )

The last movie I went to in India had an intermission and people selling sodas and candy in the theatre, part of the business model. It wasn't a particularly long movie. They also showed the censor certificate at the start of the movie. lots of small differences.

Re: (Score:1)

by sabbede ( 2678435 )

I did a quick lookup that said LOTR theatrical releases had an intermission. But, maybe that was up to the theater? I don't remember if there was one.

Re: (Score:3)

by Gilmoure ( 18428 )

Last film with an intermission I saw at a theater was the roadshow version of The Hateful Eight: 70mm Panaflex wide screen.

At the theater, everyone received a large booklet about the film, there was an overture playing as we walked into the theater, no previews were shown, and halfway through, there was an interview. This was just the coolest film experience and if there were more films presented like this, wouldn't mind dropping $75-$100 for family to go see stuff in theater.

My kid was 16 and glad they got

Re: (Score:1)

by sabbede ( 2678435 )

I think you stumbled over one of the problems. A family of 3-4 going to a movie can expect to spend $75-100, with half an hour of ads before the movie starts instead of booklets and interviews.

One of the reasons to got to the movies is that there weren't ads like on TV. Now, they run TV ads in the theater. Jerks.

Re: (Score:2)

by J-1000 ( 869558 )

> I miss the intermission

Me too. I miss a lot of what made early theaters special: crowded rooms, decorated auditoriums. A lot of people like the recliners but I think they take away from the experience, making it feel like you are in a sparsely populated room even when most of the seats are filled. A rush to refill concessions at intermissions is another one of those experiences that may not be obviously desirable, but I think it would add to the atmosphere. And it would sell more concessions to boot. Win / win.

Re: (Score:2)

by Snotnose ( 212196 )

> Movie length has gotten so long that they need to bring back the intermission

I have to really want to see a movie to see one 2.5 hours long in a theater. Once the movie hits 3+ hours I'm watching it at home.

Doesn't help that inside the typical 3+ hour slog is a good 2 hour movie waiting for the fluff to be edited out.

I'm old and cranky (Score:5, Insightful)

by Baron_Yam ( 643147 )

Why would I ever want to pay through the nose just to have a screen bigger than I need, sound painfully louder than I want, while surrounded by people I don't know, with a significant chance that one or more of those strangers will do something inconsiderate to subtract from the experience?

No thanks. I have a big screen and the Internet, I can pour a drink and make popcorn, and my couch is big enough to seat the people I want to share the screen with.

Re:I'm old and cranky (Score:4, Insightful)

by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

> No thanks. I have a big screen and the Internet, I can pour a drink and make popcorn, and my couch is big enough to seat the people I want to share the screen with.

Which probably explains it.

The 53% are city dwellers - think New York and LA and likely apartment and other high-density living arrangements.

Big screen? Doesn't work in a shoebox. And big sound? Forget it - the neighbors will be banging on the walls.

If you live in a suburban neighborhood where you need a car to do basic errands, sure it makes sense to question why go to the theatres. If you live in a shoebox apartment because that's all that's affordable, then a theatre, expensive as it is, is better than the 50" TV and TV speaker experience.

(Of course, old and cranky describes why you're living in your house in suburbia. And why spending seems bass-ackwards. It's because when you were younger, housing was cheap, and luxuries (laptops, TVs, etc) were much more expensive. These days, housing is basically unobtainium, but luxuries are cheap - a nice laptop, a nice phone, etc., cost way less today than they ever did. )

Re: (Score:2)

by fuzznutz ( 789413 )

> (Of course, old and cranky describes why you're living in your house in suburbia. And why spending seems bass-ackwards. It's because when you were younger, housing was cheap, and luxuries (laptops, TVs, etc) were much more expensive. These days, housing is basically unobtainium , but luxuries are cheap - a nice laptop, a nice phone, etc., cost way less today than they ever did. )

Supply and demand. We added 50 million people (1/6 of the existing US population) in the last fifteen years; 20 million of them over just four years. You can't build homes fast enough to satisfy that demand. And in case you hadn't noticed, we ain't making any new land to put those homes on.

Want to guess why BlackRock is buying up all those single family homes all over the country? They didn't make all that money by making bad bets. They know prices are only heading up.

Re: (Score:1)

by grrg ( 631877 )

Fact check required for the numbers that you cite. According to www.macrotrends.net, the 2025 population of the US was 343,603,404, and four years ago (in 2021) it was 332,048,977. So, an increase of 11.6 million, not the 20 million that you cite. Fifteen years before 2025 (2010) the population was 309,327,143, so an increase of 34.3 million (not the 50 million that you cite).

Re: (Score:2)

by cruff ( 171569 )

I share your sentiments. Haven't been a regular movie goer for at least 30 years. When I saw Avatar in theater the sound was painfully loud. I wrote letters complaining about it to the theater chain, the distributor and James Cameron's company. Only heard back from the theater chain with a reply that couldn't even get the details of theater where I saw it right. The ticket prices have rise beyond what I care to pay and I can't tolerate large amounts of sugary soda and that fake butter flavored popcorn anym

Re: (Score:1)

by sabbede ( 2678435 )

Because that big screen is AWESOME!

I like going to the movies, I just don't like the expense, the ads, or most movies. When the Marvel movies were still good, they were great on the big screen. Dune was fantastic.

Re: (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Invest in Miracle Ear. Theaters must be catering to the headphones at max volume crowd. The last movie I saw was Nosferatu and it was loud enough to require earplugs.

Hollywood is part of the problem (Score:4, Insightful)

by Molten Heart ( 5842394 )

I love going to the movie theater. I even used to subscribe to one of those clubs that let you see several movies a week for like $20 a month. I found that I wasn't interested in going to many of the movies that were playing. When Hollywood, or whomever is making movies these days, offer something worth going to see, I'm there.

Re: (Score:2)

by Gilmoure ( 18428 )

Thinking back, 95% of the films I've seen in theaters the last 20 years have been specticle films (action/sf: marvel, star wars, dune) where it's fun to be overwhelmed by light and sound.

The other 5% are offbeat films like Wes Anderson or Coen Brothers, where I want to support the film makers. Sadly, judging by the almost empty theaters (nice experience for us) is that most folks aren't going to theaters for such films.

Re: (Score:3)

by Zarhan ( 415465 )

The sound was crisp, the picture clear.

No it wasn't. Flickering image that after a few runs of the through the projector was full of scratches. Optical audio going with the same.

Move to digital (audio first, picture more recently) has significantly improved the audiovisual quality.

The largest problem I have with movies and pretty much any media these days is the mixing. For a long time, actors came from theater background, they articulated their lines clearly and the dialogue was also usually mixed with hig

Re: (Score:2)

by sabbede ( 2678435 )

I'm 48 and have almost no memory of what you describe. Ushers? Curtains? When I was very little, maybe?

Re: (Score:2)

by Pascoea ( 968200 )

I'm 45, I recall the single-screen theater in my small-ass hometown had curtains. I don't remember there being ushers, but the owner would be happy to drag you out by your shirt collar if you got uppity. There was even a balcony. Super cool place, but it's been closed for decades. Replaced by a 5-screen econo-box multiplex that I couldn't even tell you is still open.

Re: (Score:2)

by Pascoea ( 968200 )

edit: The last time I was at that theater was probably late 80s early 90s. I know it was a Batman movie, but don't recall if it was I or II.

Re:Movies used to be special. (Score:5, Insightful)

by Anonymous Coward

I’m amazed you wrote that much and avoided the word “woke”. Hollywood is doing just fine. It’s the theaters having attendance problems. And yes Hollywood was always woke you just weren’t consuming right wing propaganda back then. First Blood is pretty woke. A war veteran with long hair suffers PTSD and is hassled by the town cops. Dog Day Afternoon is about a bank holdup so a man can get his male partner a sex change. Midnight Cowboy is another one. Dirty Harry is about a cop who realizes he’s gone too far and throws his badge into the river. All woke stuff.

Congratul (Score:3)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

I'm waking up from your coma. Movie theaters have been like they are now since mid 1990s at least.

Also the sound is better then it's ever been if you're in a good modern theater. The reason the sound was crisp is your younger and you had better hearing. I'm not saying that to insult you that's just what aging does and this is a website for old farts.

I will give you the advertisements. They have gotten freaking insane. It's one thing to have to show up 10 minutes after start time to actually see your

Oops (Score:1)

by Alastair Cooper ( 1500967 )

I typically go three times in a week (often the same day) so actually that was just me. I have a card for unlimited viewings. Sorry for messing up the stats.

movie. (Score:2)

by gary s ( 5206985 )

I enjoy going to a movie but its become a large expense.... Ticket prices, Fee to buy tickets even if you buy them at the theater. Popcorn/drink prices way to high and date night with the wife is $50 for just the movie. Now a days, wait a month or two and its streaming either free on a service I subscribe to or less than $5 if I have to pay for it. Few movies now a days are worth $50 to see.. $5 and a short wait is well worth it to me.

Re: (Score:2)

by Sloppy ( 14984 )

Date tip: dinner first, then a movie.

0/2 (Score:1)

by bill_mcgonigle ( 4333 ) *

I saw none last year but I'd like to see Project Hail Mary and Disclosure Day this year.

Maybe at the Drive-In, we'll see.

They just need to make movies people want to see without Luciferian propaganda being the primary goal.

LLM's can't be worse than the median Hollywood writer. Nor can they hold a candle to the best.

"only"? (Score:2)

by hcs_$reboot ( 1536101 )

Half of Americans? With all the very American ways to watch something nowadays, Netflix and the likes, Youtube and the likes, torrents and the like, you tell me that half of Americans still go to the theater! Very surprising, to say the least.

Movies cost $3 in Egypt (Score:1)

by Un-Thesis ( 700342 )

Last week, I went to the cinema four times here in New Cairo, Egypt:

- Shelter

- Crime 101

- Send Help

- Housemaid

Each cost 170 EGP after tax ($3.25). A Starbucks caramel macchiato cost me 115 EGP today ($2.20).

Four movies for 680 EGP ($13.00). I don't think I could go to the movies ONE TIME in the USA for that price...

Uber 2.5 miles to the mall cost me 60 EGP ($1.15). The 500 mL water at cinema cost 20 EGP ($0.38) and the avocado shake at the cineme cost 180 EGP ($3.44).

Re: (Score:1)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Do they schedule movies around prayer times?

Re: (Score:1)

by Alastair Cooper ( 1500967 )

In the UK I have a Cineworld Unlimited card so I don't pay per movie - just a flat rate of 12.99 GBP ($17.72). In practice it probably works out around the same as the tickets in Egypt given I go > 5 times a month. It's very cheap leisure compared to most things *if* you have the card.

DRM broke my last in theatre movie (Score:2)

by Goat of Death ( 633284 )

My wife was excited to see Dust Bunny and so we went to the theatre. 20 minutes after showtime the movie still hadn't started. When we went to ask, they told us the system wasn't allowing the movie to play and they were on the phone with tech support. We got a refund and eventually saw it a few months later at home. So DRM killed our theatre experience.

Re: (Score:2)

by Alastair Cooper ( 1500967 )

This happened at the Glasgow Film Festival in 2013. We had a screening of 'Cloud Atlas' (which iirc was a very recent movie then) and the hard drive had been delivered and plugged in, but the distributor had given the unlock key for the wrong time. It took about an hour to track down the person in Los Angeles (mid-afternoon in Scotland, early morning there) who could issue a new key.

A more important question (Score:1, Offtopic)

by infernalC ( 51228 )

How many Americans actually read a book? /me ducks

Is so commercial now (Score:2)

by wakeboarder ( 2695839 )

Best to stay out of a place that's serving up commercials that can be up to a half hour. Also many movies are designed not for their art or creativity but for how well they will sell. I'd rather see a movie that didn't get written for the amount of tickets it will sell.

Re: (Score:1)

by Alastair Cooper ( 1500967 )

I just add half an hour to the start time.

Given up (Score:2)

by fropenn ( 1116699 )

Most theaters near where I live have given up, some are closed during slower days (M-W) and some only have one showing per evening. Everything is falling apart in the theaters, they are retro but not in the good way, with torn seat cushions, out-of-date bathroom fixtures, etc. I'm not a particularly luxury-oriented person, but I do have my limits. They seem to be just milking the last few remaining $$ until retirement and are not investing at all in the experience.

There IS a market for in-person movie exp

Subject (Score:4, Insightful)

by MBGMorden ( 803437 )

Realistically, the home experience has just gotten too good these days to bother going to the theater. I'm 44 - when I was a kid a 25" TV screen was huge. When I was in college I took some extra financial aid refund money and bought a 32" CRT television for our room and everyone felt like that TV was comically large. Our dorm room was the place everyone came to watch TV because we had "the big TV".

Now 32" is tiny, and adjusted for inflation I can get an 85" TV for almost half of what I paid for that TV. For $150-200 you can add in a soundbar with a decent subwoofer and have damned good home audio. The TV's are also laid out in a better aspect ratio compared to film so letterboxing isn't as extreme, and the resolution is through the roof compared to old NTSC.

Realistically while at home viewing used to be a pale imitation of the quality you got at a theater, these days the home experience is on par, and you don't have to worry about other people talking or ruining the movie. A bag of popcorn at home is $0.45.

Its just a better experience at home.

Re: (Score:2)

by Sloppy ( 14984 )

> Its just a better experience at home.

I think this is the essential truth.

But even so, that still leaves theaters a niche: they're an out-of-the-house activity, when you explicitly want to leave the house for some reason. (e.g. house AC ain't keeping up with the summer temps, going stir-crazy from always being at home (especially if you WFH), or even just needing to get the fuck away from That Other Person for a while even though you love them.)

You've decided to leave the house: now what? There are lots of o

Smell (Score:1)

by zawarski ( 1381571 )

I don't want to smell your fucking chilly burger you had delivered to your seat cause you just couldn't wait to eat.

Home watching is way better (Score:3)

by juancn ( 596002 )

I mean, the picture and sound quality at home movie watching has gotten so much better that dealing with all the strangers in the cinema and all that hassle makes no sense.

In fact most HDR movies are way better in a large, modern TV than on a cinema screen.

And even mid-range sound bars with subwoofers can approximate the audio experience very well, algorithmic audio does magic with Atmos data.

It's all about the scope (Score:1)

by RogueWarrior65 ( 678876 )

Most movies today are really off-Broadway plays that you'd find in a tiny theater in Manhattan. There aren't too many movies being made with the scope (and production budget) that warrants seeing them in a big theater. We're not getting a Lawrence of Arabia or a Star Wars. Instead, you get a film about two dumbass women who climb an abandoned radio tower and get stuck up there. The entire thing could be on a stage with one set and a cyclorama backdrop. Why spend money on that when you can sit at home a

Why Would We Go? (Score:3)

by ThomasBHardy ( 827616 )

- Ticket prices are outrageous

- Concession prices are outrageous

- People use their phones during the movie

- The sound is so absurdly loud it's damaging to the ears

Tell me again what the benefit is?

Other People SUCK (Score:2)

by blake3737 ( 839993 )

I'm ok paying decent money for a nice theater, a popcorn and a drink. I'm not ok with other people talking, checking their phones and lighting up the theater from a screen, coming on way late and walking in front of everybody. The movie experience is fine with the exception of other humans that I didn't come to the theater with.

Re: "Girl boss" movies killed it (Score:4, Insightful)

by zawarski ( 1381571 )

Sounds like you're triggered. Exactly how many girls have kicked your ass?

Re: (Score:2)

by blake3737 ( 839993 )

JFC, we get it. just yell WOKE HURT ME and close your account.

Yeah the wrong half (Score:3)

by 50000BTU_barbecue ( 588132 )

The talkers, phone users, vapers...

I'm never setting foot in a movie theater ever again

Please stop making this a bipartisan issue (Score:1)

by edgelord ( 5535856 )

While I'm actually sympathetic to the cause, the past few years of "liberal/inclusive" entertainment was just done shamefully ham-handed. At some point, watching a movie or a show felt more like being in a reeducation session rather that being entertained. You can essentially throw any message at most viewers, but sublety is key.

Stripping any affable human aspects (motivation, development, weaknesses, relationships, temptations...) from the main characters didn't help either. But I think the cardinal sin

Theaters are dinosaurs (Score:2)

by MpVpRb ( 1423381 )

...that deserve to die

At one time, the tech required them, but today's home theater tech is better in every way

The theater experience sucks.

Drive across town, find a parking spot, pay to park, wait in line for a ticket, wait in line for obscenely overpriced snacks, sit in a very uncomfortable seat while being forced to watch endless commercials.

Even worse, there is no way to pause or rewatch a confusing part or take a break to go to the toilet.

Modern movies are mixed in a way that makes it difficult to hear

The seven eyes of Ningauble the Wizard floated back to his hood as he
reported to Fafhrd: "I have seen much, yet cannot explain all. The Gray
Mouser is exactly twenty-five feet below the deepest cellar in the palace
of Gilpkerio Kistomerces. Even though twenty-four parts in twenty-five of
him are dead, he is alive.
"Now about Lankhmar. She's been invaded, her walls breached
everywhere and desperate fighting is going on in the streets, by a fierce
host which out-numbers Lankhamar's inhabitants by fifty to one -- and
equipped with all modern weapons. Yet you can save the city."
"How?" demanded Fafhrd.
Ningauble shrugged. "You're a hero. You should know."
-- Fritz Leiber, "The Swords of Lankhmar"