America's Space Force is Preparing for a New Kind of War (msn.com)
- Reference: 0179439332
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/09/21/1815235/americas-space-force-is-preparing-for-a-new-kind-of-war
- Source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/inside-the-space-force-as-it-prepares-for-a-new-kind-of-war/ar-AA1MT3FB
> The goal was to disguise the strike as a garbled connection that could be easily remedied by securing a loose cable or a simple reboot, leaving U.S. service members frustrated without raising their suspicions. [And using less power "would make it harder for the Blue Team to track where the interference was coming from."] This is how the next war could start: invisible shots fired in space on the electromagnetic spectrum that could render U.S. fighter jets and aircraft carriers deaf and blind, unable to communicate. In this case, the "aggressors" targeting the U.S. satellite were not from China or Russia, but rather an elite squadron of U.S. Space Force Guardians mimicking how potential adversaries would act in a conflict that begins in orbit... Involving more than 700 service members and spanning 50 million square miles and six time zones, the training exercise, called Resolute Space, was observed firsthand exclusively by The Washington Post.
The article describes leadership at the U.S. Space Force "still honing their mission while jousting with adversaries, such as China, that are moving quickly and conducting combat-like operations in orbit... While the Space Force continues to evolve, many defense analysts and some members of Congress fear the United States has already ceded its dominance in space to China and others."
> With a budget of just $40 billion, the relatively tiny Space Force makes up just about 4 percent of the Defense Department's budget and less than 1 percent of its personnel. It has more than 15,000 Guardians, which also includes several thousand civilians. By comparison, the Army has nearly 1 million soldiers. The Space Force has been squeezed under the department of the Air Force and struggled to distinguish itself from the other branches...
>
> China, Russia and others have demonstrated that they can take out or interfere with the satellites operated by the Pentagon and intelligence agencies that provide the nation's missile warning and tracking, reconnaissance and communications. China in particular has moved rapidly to build an arsenal of space-based weapons... [R]ecently, several of China's satellites have engaged in what Space Force officials have called "dogfighting," jousting with U.S. satellites at high speeds and close ranges.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/inside-the-space-force-as-it-prepares-for-a-new-kind-of-war/ar-AA1MT3FB
America's Space Farce .. (Score:2)
‘ A July combat training exercise involved a satellite dish-style antenna that "could fire enough electromagnetic energy to fry the satellite 22,000 miles away ’
Could you make it a little less technical /s
Re: (Score:2)
I don't even believe that statement.
Re: (Score:1)
> Usually dish-style is used for receiving
Absolutely incorrect. In fact, more and more receiving antennas are "phased array" [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phased_array/ [wikipedia.org] which can also be used for transmitting, but you lose energy. Parabolic "dish" antennas contain and focus the EM energy at the target.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phased_array/
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
That's absolutely incorrect. Dish-style transmitters use the dish to focus the energy too. Damn near every point-to-point microwave link is two dishes pointed at each other.
Not anywhere near ready (Score:2)
America's challenge in any peer conflict won't be satellites. It will be drones, and both China and Russia are far ahead of the US in drone capabilities, doctrine and manufacturing. Buying Ukraine's expertise would be a bargain at any price.
So the drones really only matter (Score:2)
Because Russia can't get proper air superiority. America would have completely bombed the shit out of any country we attacked long before drones could be a factor.
The drones mostly do not take out even Russian planes. I get a notification in my YouTube feed when one of them does because it makes the news. The problem with the drones is that they make it basically impossible to do an occupation.
It should be noted that because of that if Russia ever does take Ukraine they will kill everyone there in a
Re: (Score:2)
> We will start with Canada
I can learn to build IEDs as good as any Iraqi.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, I saw Ukraine's booth at CES where they showing off even their social drones and it was impressive.
Too bad voted to feed them to the woodchipper instead of you know helping them and making a valuable future ally.
Number of eyes (Score:2)
Well, the space force should decide on how many eyes they want to have in their mechas.
Can be a mono eye, can be binocular, can be biblically accurate...
UK is certainly going with the third option.
SF budget $40 b, NASA budget $25 b. (Score:2)
The President's 2025 Budget for NASA is $25.4 billion,
China/Russia reading this very interested (Score:2)
Immediately looking for bargain satellite dishes-
Iran and other terrorists reading this too (Score:2)
If it can fry a 22000 mile away satellite, what could it do to a 6 miles high flying plane?
Re: guardians (Score:2)
What about the Stargate?
Re: (Score:2)
I vote for Astra Militarum,