What Happens After the Death of Social Media? (noemamag.com)
- Reference: 0179251154
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/09/15/050241/what-happens-after-the-death-of-social-media
- Source link: https://www.noemamag.com/the-last-days-of-social-media/
"Whatever remains of genuine, human content is increasingly sidelined by [2]algorithmic prioritization , receiving fewer interactions than the engineered content and AI slop optimized solely for clicks... "
> In recent years, Facebook and other platforms that facilitate billions of daily interactions have slowly morphed into the internet's largest repositories of [3]AI-generated spam . Research has found what users plainly see: tens of thousands of machine-written posts [4]now flood public groups — pushing scams, chasing clicks — with [5]clickbait headlines, half-coherent listicles and hazy lifestyle images stitched together in AI tools like Midjourney... While content proliferates, engagement is evaporating. Average interaction rates across major platforms are declining fast: Facebook and X posts now scrape an average 0.15% engagement, while Instagram has dropped 24% year-on-year. Even TikTok has [6]begun to plateau . People aren't connecting or conversing on social media like they used to; they're just wading through slop, that is, low-effort, low-quality content produced at scale, often with AI, for engagement.
>
> And much of it is slop: Less than half of American adults now rate the information they see on social media as "mostly reliable" — down from roughly two-thirds in the mid-2010s... Platforms have little incentive to stem the tide. Synthetic accounts are cheap, tireless and lucrative because they never demand wages or unionize. Systems designed to surface peer-to-peer engagement are now systematically filtering out such activity, because what counts as engagement has changed. Engagement is now about raw user attention — time spent, impressions, scroll velocity — and the net effect is an online world in which you are constantly being addressed but never truly spoken to.
"These are the last days of social media, not because we lack content," the article suggests, "but because the attention economy has neared its outer limit — we have exhausted the capacity to care..." Social media giants have stopped growing exponentially, while [7]a significant proportion of 18- to 34-year-olds even took deliberate mental health breaks from social media in 2024, according to an American Psychiatric Association poll.) And " [8]Some creators are quitting, too . Competing with synthetic performers who never sleep, they find the visibility race not merely tiring but absurd."
Yet his 5,000-word essay predicts social media's death rattle "will not be a bang but a shrug," since "the model is splintering, and users are drifting toward smaller, slower, more private spaces, like group chats, Discord servers and [9]federated microblogs — a billion little gardens."
> Intentional, opt-in micro-communities are rising in their place — like Patreon collectives and Substack newsletters — where creators chase depth over scale, retention over virality. A writer with 10,000 devoted subscribers can potentially earn more and burn out less than one with a million passive followers on Instagram... Even the big platforms sense the turning tide. Instagram has begun emphasizing DMs, X is pushing subscriber-only circles and TikTok is experimenting with private communities. Behind these developments is an implicit acknowledgement that the infinite scroll, stuffed with bots and synthetic sludge, is approaching the limit of what humans will tolerate....
>
> The most radical redesign of social media might be the most familiar: What if we treated these platforms as [10]public utilities rather than private casinos...? Imagine social media platforms with transparent algorithms subject to public audit, user representation on governance boards, revenue models based on public funding or member dues rather than surveillance advertising, mandates to serve democratic discourse rather than maximize engagement, and regular impact assessments that measure not just usage but societal effects... This could take multiple forms, like municipal platforms for local civic engagement, professionally focused networks run by trade associations, and educational spaces managed by public library systems... We need to " [11]rewild the internet ," as Maria Farrell and Robin Berjon mentioned in a Noema essay.
>
> We need governance scaffolding, shared institutions that make decentralization viable at scale... [R]eal change will come when platforms are rewarded for serving the public interest. This could mean tying tax breaks or public procurement eligibility to the implementation of transparent, user-controllable algorithms. It could mean funding research into alternative recommender systems and making those tools open-source and interoperable. Most radically, it could involve certifying platforms based on civic impact, rewarding those that prioritize user autonomy and trust over sheer engagement.
"Social media as we know it is dying, but we're not condemned to its ruins. We are capable of building better — smaller, slower, more intentional, more accountable — spaces for digital interaction, spaces..."
"The last days of social media might be the first days of something more human: a web that remembers why we came online in the first place — not to be harvested but to be heard, not to go viral but to find our people, not to scroll but to connect. We built these systems, and we can certainly build better ones."
[1] https://www.noemamag.com/the-last-days-of-social-media/
[2] https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/04/from-shrimp-jesus-to-fake-self-portraits-ai-generated-images-have-become-the-latest-form-of-social-media-spam/
[3] https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/news/ai-spam-accounts-build-followers
[4] https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-151
[5] https://www.wired.com/story/gadget-lab-podcast-632/
[6] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.02627
[7] https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/news-releases/more-new-years-mental-health-resolutions
[8] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/jul/05/cant-pause-internet-social-media-creators-burnout
[9] https://www.theverge.com/24063290/fediverse-explained-activitypub-social-media-open-protocol
[10] https://www.brookings.edu/articles/utilities-for-democracy-why-and-how-the-algorithmic-infrastructure-of-facebook-and-google-must-be-regulated/
[11] https://www.noemamag.com/we-need-to-rewild-the-internet/
Good. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm growing to hate social media. This last week I've been using a browser plugin to just block facebook, twitter and instagram due to the fact its just a sea of people hating and accusing each other of psychotic bullshit over the CK murder and like...... get a fucking grip americans.... Its just bad for the soul to be flooded with hyper partison aggravated political bullshit all day. So I've blocked it, and despite my inner idiot wanting to get on there and yell at people, I'll take the dopamine loss and just do something else. Like play the piano, or run the storyline on that new Dune Awakening expansion. Or go and drink rum with friends. Or fucking anything other than doomscroll on facebook again.
If AI kills social media , then maybe AI might just be good for something.
Re: (Score:2)
I've blocked their dysfunction and chaos for years at the router. I personally found doing just a single browser isn't enough to cover all my devices and their tracking logos all over the place. Well, at least the obvious ones.
As for youtube; it's now swamped with British Robot Guy#2 and midjourney clickbate titles. Nigh on useless. Rare signed out use only for me now without cookies.
From my peer group, people are absolutely switching off, so I am starting to think the cre-ai-tors have to vibe-code their
Re: (Score:2)
Bear in mind its only a small percentage of people who post like that, most people have better things to do with their lives that waste time getting into online arguments (says someone posting on social media right now albeit a tech site).
One can hope! (Score:3)
But it probably won't work out that way. Time will tell.
"not to be harvested, but to be heard" (Score:2)
The world does not need to hear from most people. And by most people I mean a staggeringly large percentage of the population. Including me, in case you're leaping to point that out... I agree. What the average person has to say should mostly be heard by their family, some of it by their community, perhaps a tiny bit of it by their township, and virtually none of it beyond that. The idea of global connection as a positive force is a delusion.
I believe that people are generally good. And good people can conn
Re: (Score:2)
I wrote my comment - just below - before I read yours. You 'went specific', and I took a wider view. That said, I suspect that you and I would have some interesting conversations were we ever to meet.
I guess that's why I keep coming here - every once in a while I find smart, stimulating people who are worth engaging with. The older I get, the more precious that is to me.
> The idea of global connection as a positive force is a delusion.
I never thought of it that way, but you may be onto something. That said: given the reach of corporations and the fact of world trade, mayb
One word (Score:2)
> What Happens After the Death of Social Media?
Life.
\o/ (Score:1)
Back to normal?
Enshittification is a human trait (Score:2)
From assaulting pristine wilderness and slowly turning it into vast tracts of dormant, rusting, poisoned industrial wastelands; to taking the internet from a vibrant new frontier to the equivalent of a shot-spotted mattress in a ratty cheap hotel; we humans seem to excel at taking things too far. We're rapacious, and we're wont to foul our own nests, forever moving on until there's nothing left to spoil.
I'd rather not believe that, but just about everything I see and read leads me to that conclusion. I'd be
who cares? (Score:2)
"social media" has been dead for years even before the AI slop, when we had the idiot slop and then the spam bot slop.
No 1 is to ban user tracking (Score:2)
If nothing else is achieved, eliminating tracking of individuals would restore the level playing field for traditional advertising channels.
Just because it's bad... (Score:2)
doesn't mean it's "dying". Otherwise Hitler, Stalin and Mao would not have lived so long. The very phrase "the attention economy has neared its outer limit" suggests that social media is very powerful actually. Even if we're at peak social media and it's 2% less powerful next year, the remaining 98% is still a whole lot.
Re: (Score:3)
The UK government isn't corrupt - they're just the usual bunch of techno illiterate legal/political types who think the solution to any problem is more legislation. And not just the current Labour government, it was the same with the previous Tory ones too.
Re: (Score:2)
Social media are more alive than democracy. In fact, social media play an important role in the decline of democracy.