'Dragonfly' Mission to Saturn's Moon Titan: Behind Schedule, Overbudget, Says NASA Inspector General (nasa.gov)
- Reference: 0179216552
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/25/09/14/0026256/dragonfly-mission-to-saturns-moon-titan-behind-schedule-overbudget-says-nasa-inspector-general
- Source link: https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/dragonfly/2025/09/08/nasas-dragonfly-soaring-through-key-development-test-activities/
From [2]the Inspector General's report :
> The cost increase and schedule delay were largely the result of NASA directing [Johns Hopkins University] Applied Physics Laboratory to conduct four replans between June 2019 and July 2023 early in Dragonfly's development. Justifications for these replans included the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain issues, changes to accommodate a heavy-lift launch vehicle, projected funding challenges, and inflation."
But its higher-than-expected life-cycle cost over $3 billion "will continue to absorb an increasing proportion of the Planetary Science Division's total budget," meaning Dragonfly's increased cost (and "additional budget constraints") have "contributed to a gap of at least 12 years in New Frontiers [planetary science] mission launches, and will jeopardize future priorities outlined in the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's (National Academies) decadal surveys."
Yet a NASA press release notes the mission " [3]has cleared several key design , development and testing milestones and remains on track toward launch in July 2028." Its software-defined radio has been completed, and the part of the spectrometer which analyzes Titan's chemical components for "potentially biologically relevant" compounds (as well as structural and thermal testing of the lander's insulation).
"The mission is scheduled to launch in July 2028 on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch vehicle from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida."
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader [4]schwit1 for spotting this news [5]on the space/science blog "Behind the Black" .
[1] https://oig.nasa.gov/office-of-inspector-general-oig/audit-reports/nasas-management-of-the-dragonfly-project/
[2] https://oig.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/final-report-ig-25-011-nasas-managment-of-the-dragonfly-project.pdf?emrc=68c0447a5efed
[3] https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/dragonfly/2025/09/08/nasas-dragonfly-soaring-through-key-development-test-activities/
[4] https://www.slashdot.org/~schwit1
[5] https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/nasa-inspector-general-dragonfly-mission-is-vastly-overbudget-and-behind-schedule/
Software defined radio? (Score:2)
On the face of it, a software-defined radio seems like adding unnecessary complexity to a system that, if it fails, would end the mission. Is there a reason a software-defined radio is a good thing - or perhaps a necessary thing - for this mission?
We know how to make simple, dependable radios - we've been doing it for 150 years.
Re: (Score:2)
The mission is very bandwidth limited, there is no orbiter, they have to direct-to-earth transmission with a small antenna .(at least that was the case when I last saw it). So they want to maximize data transmission efficiency per transmit power.
Such a cool mission, I don't care what it costs. (Score:2)
A quad copter on Titan would be amazing. I don't mind if the cost goes up a lot, its well worth it.
Re: (Score:2)
It's got 8 rotors in a dual-quad config.
Re: (Score:2)
100% agree. It will be fucking amazing. Titan is amazing. Can't wait to see close-up images of ice and liquid oceans on another planet.