News: 0179169768

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

VMware To Lose 35 Percent of Workloads In Three Years (theregister.com)

(Thursday September 11, 2025 @11:30PM (BeauHD) from the would-you-look-at-that dept.)


By 2028, Gartner research VP Julia Palmer predicts that VMware will [1]lose 35% of its current workloads as Broadcom's licensing changes and rising costs push customers toward competitors like Nutanix and public clouds. The Register reports:

> On Wednesday at the analyst firm's Symposium event in Australia, Palmer pointed out that the Broadcom business unit recently tweaked its licensing program so that hyperscalers can no longer sell VMware subscriptions to users of their hosted VMware services. Customers must instead buy direct from Broadcom and use license portability entitlements for any VMware infrastructure they host in hyperscale clouds. Palmer said that decision shows VMware does not consider hyperscalers strategic partners, and she thinks the feeling is mutual. Hyperscalers nevertheless welcome customers who use them to run VMware workloads "because they know over time they will convert you to 'proper cloud'."

>

> Which is one reason she expects VMware will lose so many workloads: Hyperscalers will use their engagements with VMware customers to extol the virtue of public clouds. Palmer thinks VMware customers should heed that pitch. "We are all addicted to hypervisors, and that needs to change," Palmer said, not least because Broadcom's acquisition of VMware shows how lock-in to a virtualization platform can be costly. But she counseled against planning to move all workloads off VMware, as no rival vendor offers a superior platform and a full migration will take three or more years. Palmer instead advised assessing which applications are ripe for modernization and re-platforming, and shifting those -- a job that can take up to a year.



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/11/gartner_vmware_migration_advice/



Re: (Score:3)

by _merlin ( 160982 )

An analyst's job is to make projections. Gartner aren't known for being the most prescient analysts to put it mildly, but in this case they're just stating the obvious.

Wow! (Score:2)

by oldgraybeard ( 2939809 )

didn't know anyone still used it.

They'll just buy out the competitors (Score:1)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

I've seen this Charleston dance for the last 20 years of zero antitrust law enforcement. They will just buy their competitors as their competitors start to bite into their real market share.

Initially they won't care because they're going to be making lots of money off of the people who can't move and who are paying through the nose.

Eventually one of the competitors will get to the point where they have enough customers that they can build out tools to compete.

And then they will either buy up the

Re: (Score:2)

by jhoegl ( 638955 )

I think VMWare has a lot of IP though, which is likely more why they bought it.

VMWare has not had an improvement to its platform for years. The only thing was their Apps or docker instancing. Doesnt mean they dont have a lot of great tools, but they havent really done a lot.

Newer platforms provide more, and are cheaper.

Broadcom has the big fish locked in to no net loss (Score:2)

by Joe_Dragon ( 2206452 )

Broadcom has the big fish locked in to no net loss

Re: (Score:2)

by viperidaenz ( 2515578 )

Stupid? More than double the revenue per customer with only 35% loss of customers?

That's more revenue and even more profit.

Seems to be working out very well for them.

35% seems⦠(Score:2)

by Unpopular Opinions ( 6836218 )

Rather low. Either is is a very conservative number, or color me surprised how many companies out there are willingly waiting to be extorted.

Proxmox (Score:2)

by 89cents ( 589228 )

I'm replacing our VMWare systems with open source Proxmox as the time and budget comes to replace hardware.1 out of 3 systems replaced and I like it so far!

There are so many better options (Score:2)

by Tony Isaac ( 1301187 )

VirtualBox is completely free and open source, as is KVM, Xen, and QEMU. Other free (but not open source) options include Microsoft Hyper-V. There is no reason to pay VMWare's crazy prices.

Now it's time to say goodbye
To all our company...
M-I-C (see you next week!)
K-E-Y (Why? Because we LIKE you!)
M-O-U-S-E.