Switching Off One Crucial Protein Appears to Reverse Brain Aging in Mice (sciencealert.com)
- Reference: 0179052470
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/25/09/06/1922218/switching-off-one-crucial-protein-appears-to-reverse-brain-aging-in-mice
- Source link: https://www.sciencealert.com/switching-off-one-crucial-protein-appears-to-reverse-brain-aging-in-mice
> FTL1 is known to be related to storing iron in the body, but hasn't come up in relation to brain aging before... To test its involvement after their initial findings, the researchers used genetic editing to overexpress the protein in young mice, and reduce its level in old mice. The results were clear: the younger mice showed signs of impaired memory and learning abilities, as if they were getting old before their time, while in the older mice there were signs of restored cognitive function — some of the brain aging was effectively reversed...
>
> "It is truly a reversal of impairments," says biomedical scientist Saul Villeda, from the University of California, San Francisco. "It's much more than merely delaying or preventing symptoms." Further tests on cells in petri dishes showed how FTL1 stopped neurons from growing properly, with neural wires lacking the branching structures that typically provide links between nerve cells and improve brain connectivity...
>
> "We're seeing more opportunities to alleviate the worst consequences of old age," says Villeda. "It's a hopeful time to be working on the biology of aging."
The research was led by a team from the University of California, San Francisco — and [3]published in Nature Aging. .
[1] https://www.sciencealert.com/switching-off-one-crucial-protein-appears-to-reverse-brain-aging-in-mice
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocampus
[3] https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-025-00940-z
Yeah, "exciting" (Score:4, Funny)
..until RFK Jr cancels the research.
Re: (Score:2)
> Shirley if you're studying the Hippocampus, do the research on Seahorses.
I don't think this research is being conducted on the continent hosting hippos, so not on that campus. And don't call me Shirley!
Immortal Mice? (Score:2)
This could lead to immortal mice. Imagine the plague risk with immortal mice. We've got to put a stop to this research now!
No distinction between neurotypical and neurodiver (Score:1)
Neurodivergent brains have about 2-3 times the synaptic connections that neurotypical brains do. They are physically different, distinctly. It is not some deficiency in a neurotypical brain.
This basic fact makes neurological research that doesnâ(TM)t control for the known-different kinds of brains unreliable. They have failed to create a scientifically-valid experiment because they didnâ(TM)t control for an obvious physical difference. Mixed the apples in with the oranges and tried to draw a valid
Re: No distinction between neurotypical and neurod (Score:1)
Honestly itâ(TM)s the fault of the IRB involved.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you really asking scientists to create neurodivergent mice??? I presume you're neurodivergent and feeling underrepresented in the population of...mice test subjects? ;)
Different (Score:2)
Reading TFA, we have a journalist who is pretty based, and at least one scientist who seems to claim that aging is now reversible.
TFA notes that there is a question of whether the Protein and the aging relationship is picking apart which changes in the body are the result of aging, and which changes might be driving it, while the scientist is quoted "It is truly a reversal of impairments"
My money is on the results of aging. But we can expect people to start claiming that cast iron cookware causes dem
Re:Different (Score:4, Insightful)
In the shorter term, it doesn't matter if suppressing this gene is correcting an age-related overexpression or if it is forcing an underexpression to correct for some other age-related failure.
Even if the machinery keeps falling apart and it doesn't offer a single extra day of life, it's one less symptom of a failing body you'd have to deal with when you're older.
Re: Different (Score:1)
Completely agree! It's better if you can fix the ultimate cause, but if all we do is play whack a mole on the faults or outcomes it's still progress...
Re: (Score:2)
> Completely agree! It's better if you can fix the ultimate cause, but if all we do is play whack a mole on the faults or outcomes it's still progress...
My point was that the author of the FA noted that this suppression of FTL1 protein may not mean a thing. while the scientist claims it actually rolls back aging. Read TFA, then tell me who has what outlook. Who do you agree with? Here's what he is quoted: "It is truly a reversal of impairments, it's much more than merely delaying or preventing symptoms."
Not a lick of ambiguity there, the problem is solved according to him.
I get these contradictory responses that really have nothing to do with my point.
Re: Different (Score:1)
Itâ(TM)s a bad study. Lacked an obvious control.