Google Tests AI Search on Its Homepage (cnbc.com)
(Tuesday May 13, 2025 @11:30PM (msmash)
from the going-all-in dept.)
- Reference: 0177491945
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/05/13/2342248/google-tests-ai-search-on-its-homepage
- Source link: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/13/google-ai-mode-search-home-page.html
Google's stalwart search button has a new neighbor: AI Mode. From a report:
> The artificial intelligence feature is being [1]tested directly beneath the Google search bar beside a "Google Search" button, replacing the "I'm Feeling Lucky" widget. The new feature, though not widely available yet, is being tested in a location where Google rarely makes changes.
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/13/google-ai-mode-search-home-page.html
> The artificial intelligence feature is being [1]tested directly beneath the Google search bar beside a "Google Search" button, replacing the "I'm Feeling Lucky" widget. The new feature, though not widely available yet, is being tested in a location where Google rarely makes changes.
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/13/google-ai-mode-search-home-page.html
Meaningless PR (Score:2)
At this point in time the two letters "AI" in front of a piece about a product signify only one thing - as evidenced by the brief, meaningless summary - dumb marketing drivel.
And no, I'm not clicking your bait.
Re: (Score:2)
Google has been giving me AI answers before search results for about a year now. I am skeptical, however, I find the AI answers very informative. I only use google for things like: "are tomatoes healthy?", and simple things. Some recipes. Sometimes things like: "why is thee sky blue". Nothing that they can track me on, try not to, sometimes I slip up. The AI does pretty good, and they give links below that I find credible, and supports the AI's assertions.
Re: (Score:2)
My experience is the opposite, the results have been less and less relevant for years - ever since google started sprinkling advertising in-between them - and now it has gotten to the point that the relevant stuff is sprinkled on page 6 or 7 among chaff.
Even looking up shit on wikipedia and following the references is now way better, plus it usually has correct translation to a number of languages and at times real nuggets in the "wikipedian" discussions and histories.
And all of that - look, ma - with no "A
Re: (Score:2)
>> I am skeptical, however, I find the AI answers very informative....
> My experience is the opposite, the results have been less and less relevant for years -
My experience is both.
Search results have indeed been getting worse. I particularly am annoyed by searches in which my search term is not present on the page in the results.
However, although I make a habit of NOT relying on the "AI" summary, I have noticed that, in general, the "AI" summary accurately reflects the information in the pages.
I still don't trust it, though, and I want the original source, not the digested version.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you're way off here, the people who comment on slashdot were three year olds when ketchup was still a vegetable.