'Qatar's $400 Million Jet For Trump Is a Gold-Plated Security Nightmare' (theregister.com)
- Reference: 0177491211
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/05/13/2234225/qatars-400-million-jet-for-trump-is-a-gold-plated-security-nightmare
- Source link: https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/13/presidents_trump_747_qatar/
> The current VC-25s aren't just repainted 747s. They're a pair of flying fortresses that must be capable of allowing the president to run the country, survive wartime conditions (even nuclear), and be totally secure from outside influence or intrusion. While the precise details of the current airframe are a tightly guarded secret, some details are included on [2]government fact sheets or have been revealed in various media reports. For a start, it must have an [3]in-flight refueling capability so the president can go anywhere in the world and stay up as long as needed. Retrofitting this to an existing 747 would be very expensive, as the feds would need to strengthen portions of the hull to handle the refueling system and reconfigure the fuel tanks to handle trim issues.
>
> Then there's the hull, which is known to be armored, and the windows are also thicker than you'd find on a normal flight. The government would also need to build in weapons systems like the chaff rockets used against radar-guided missiles, flares against heat seekers, and AN/ALQ-204 Matador Infrared Countermeasure systems, or similar to [4]try and confuse incoming missiles . Next up, the engines and electrical systems would have to be replaced. The electronics in the current VC-25s are hardened as much as possible against an electromagnetic pulse that would be generated by a nuclear detonation. There are also claims that the aircraft have extra shielding in the engines to help against missile fragments should a physical attack happen.
>
> Next up are communications. Air Force One has air-to-ground, air-to-air, and satellite comms systems that are thought to be the equal of what's in the White House. There are at least two separate internal phone systems - one open and the other highly secure - that would need to be installed and checked as well. Then there are incidentals. Contrary to what films will tell you, there is [5]no escape capsule on the current Air Force One, nor a rear parachute ramp, but there is a medical suite with emergency equipment and space for a physician which would already need to be installed, as well as a secured cargo area designed to prevent tampering or unauthorized access.
As for the threat of embedded surveillance devices, Richard Aboulafia, managing director of aircraft consultancy AeroDynamic Advisory, said: "You'd have to take it apart piece by piece to stop a professional operator putting in lots of equipment to confuse things, like spare sensors and wiring."
"It wouldn't be in the air before 2030 at the earliest, long after he's left office and probably later than the existing planned replacements," said Aboulafia. "It makes no sense on any level, except that he wants a free 747 for himself. Nothing else makes any sense."
"What's sort of annoying about the whole thing is I'm not sure what's wrong with the current Air Force One," Aboulafia said. "Maybe if they gave it a gold makeover, he'd like it more."
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/13/presidents_trump_747_qatar/
[2] https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104588/vc-25-air-force-one/
[3] https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/air-force-one/
[4] https://theaviationist.com/2018/10/23/these-are-the-systems-that-protect-air-force-one-from-heat-seeking-missiles/
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvyCqgrzOYc&t=60s
Bribe (Score:1)
"It makes no sense on any level, except that he wants a free 747 for himself. Nothing else makes any sense."
"Maybe if they gave it a gold makeover, he'd like it more."
How dumb do you have to be? (Score:2)
What if a man had an IQ of 156 but was too lazy to give a shit?
Re: (Score:2)
What if a man had an IQ of 156 but was too lazy to give a shit?
You left out the decimal point.
Re: How dumb do you have to be? (Score:2)
And leading 0
Re: (Score:2)
> What if a man had an IQ of 156 but was too lazy to give a shit?
So he's smart to know better but does not care. Would that not make him a terrible human being?
emoluments clause (Score:4)
Well, he's Trump, leader of the GOP cult. So, phuck the constitution and that little paragraph about being bought off by foreigners. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
But as far as actual corruption goes, the Trump family stands supreme as they have increased their net worth by almost a $1 Billion per month. [2]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/t... [cbsnews.com] ... and silent is the GOP. Trump is a grifter. nothing else. And the GOP is going to take away health care for the poor, State aid, all so the rich can get a (c) trillion dollar tax gift. The US is the very definition of plutocracy.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Emoluments_Clause
[2] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-family-net-worth-crypto-investments/
Re: (Score:1)
did it ever occur to you, that maybe trump assumes he is going to get assassinated, just like JFK, if he crosses Mossad the wrong way, and there aren't mossad agents embedded in the US government.
Re: (Score:2)
Jesus fucking christ. You're as bad as the fucking Trumpers in 2020. Cut from the same exact fucking cloth.
It's like dealing with a toddler (Score:5, Funny)
Just tell him "no", let him throw his tantrum, and eventually he'll be distracted by something else.
Has Trump considered that maybe his administration could use his "gift" plane for another purpose - luxury deportations, perhaps?
Re: (Score:2)
Wouldnt that be hilarious? First class accommodation followed by a forced parachute landing over Bikini Atoll. Welcome to your new home.
LARP gaslighting! (Score:2)
I've been suggesting since last time around that they build him a model Oval Office with phones and big red buttons and everything and let him get on with his presidenting. Have a team of of folks for him to talk to, "make deals" with, etc.
It would be a bigger effort than past war games, but I'm sure a team could keep him roleplaying for 3.65 more years. He's sundowning, so it'll get easier over time.
Re: (Score:2)
> Just tell him "no", let him throw his tantrum, ...
According to the Constitution, Congress has to approve any gifts to the President. From [1]ArtI.S9.C8.3 Foreign Emoluments Clause Generally [congress.gov]:
> Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
> No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress , accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
That article has commentary about the litigation during the first Trump administration, about related issues like whether the Presidency is an "Office of Profit or Trust" and applies to him, whether gifts are actually gifts..., noting,
> In late 2020, the Supreme Court denied review in one of these cases,4 and—after the end of President Trump’s term in January 2021—instructed two federal appellate courts to vacate their judgments and dismiss the other two cases as moot.
My understanding is that Trump was going to ultimately lose those cases, but he left office before conclusion and the arguments would no
[1] https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C8-3/ALDE_00013206/
Re: (Score:1)
No, Don would torment those who took his big gold toy away.
What could possibly go right? (Score:3)
[1]The Thing [wikipedia.org]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)
Amazing what a $400 million bribe will do (Score:2)
In 2017, the ooma loompa derided Qatar as a purveyor and [1]funder of terrorism [x.com].
Today, he gloats over receiving a $400 million bribe from those terrorist enablers.
[1] https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/1922105246110662707
Re: (Score:1)
I'd be inclined to gloat over someone giving me $400M too.
Good grief why? (Score:2)
Does any other nation on earth feel the need to have a tricked-out James-bond passenger jet for the benefit of one individual? What a colossal waste of money.
In the event of nuclear war, the chances of survival or otherwise of the President is a) not very greatly influenced by 'thicker windows' b) not very important compared to the survival of civil society in general, which is more dependent on personnel redundancy, planning and bunkers than whatever trivial armor is on a VC-25.
Imagine a US without Air For
Re: Good grief why? (Score:2)
With this guy the turmoil of picking a commercial airline would be a benefit. Buy delta, fly on delta. Sell/short sell delta + buy American, fly American. Rinse repeat. Why do you think the tarrifs are on again off again.
Re: (Score:2)
I am starting to agree. The plane reminds me of the bunker built for the governor in the 50's behind/below the Hollywood sign in case of nuclear war. It might have been useful for a WW2 era nuke, but a hydrogen bomb would vaporize it. If you need to fly into a war zone, don't do it in a 747, use a military aircraft with countermeasures integrated and an office/sleeping pod loaded in.
What if we dropped statistical impossibilties? (Score:2)
I get sweeping it for bugs. Due diligence, fine. But the rest of those ridiculous features and upgrades that have never been necessary for any world leader ever? Why are we acting like that is a standard?
It's his plane... (Score:2)
...let him pay for the upgrades. If it's not his, and really being given to the government, then it's without restriction, and 47 doesn't get to keep it when he leaves. In which case, auction it off, and use the proceeds to help pay for the already-planned replacement. Way cheaper than retrofitting.
Re: It's his plane... (Score:2)
He will never own it. Ever.
It is given to DoD, when they are done with it, it joins the African spears, illuminated documents, and other assorted trinkets given to him by foreign powers, in his Presidential Library, which he has no personal control over.
He will likely never fly in it as President, and once out of office it will be owned by his presidential library.
I think this is little more than a grand distraction - what is Trump distracting everyone from noticing while they talk about this stupid, over t
Re: (Score:2)
> He will never own it. Ever.
Not clear.
> It is given to DoD, when they are done with it, it joins the African spears, illuminated documents, and other assorted trinkets given to him by foreign powers, in his Presidential Library, which he has no personal control over.
Also not clear.
> He will likely never fly in it as President, and once out of office it will be owned by his presidential library.
You've brushed against the problem, there.
Presidential Libraries are usually government owned and operated, as you've mentioned elsewhere- but the foundations that kickstart them very much are not.
It would be very unusual to transfer ownership of an AF1 to a Presidential Library Foundation (which is a privately owned non-operating non-profit)
Reagan's, for example, is still owned by the US Air Force.
If indeed, the DOD does transfer this over to the non-profit that exists basica
Ah, don't worry (Score:2)
If Trump and JD get nuked, that will improve the defense of the country.
LIVE BY STUPID, DIE BY STUPID! (Score:2)
Let us please be able to make that an expression! Then apply it to Darwin Award candidates from that point on in "honor" of dear leader.
The Trump voters seem to be abandoning slashdot (Score:2)
There's too much reality here. Trump has already taken around 2 billion in bribes using that cryptocurrency of his not to mention the hundreds of millions of additional bribes he laundered through truth social.
If you don't think he's going to sell you out at this point I don't even know what to say to you.
So did Trump faithful just kind of seem to be checking out of this website. Retreating to save spaces where their love of Donald Trump will never be questioned.
I'm almost going to miss idiots y
Re: (Score:3)
I got the vibe most of those guys were retired engineers so maybe they're educated enough that this is grossing them out? Hard to say, but I agree there's been a lot less of them. Maybe it really was all Russian astroturf
Re: (Score:2)
That is simple, Russia stopped paying for shills and bots. I remember when Biden managed to freeze Russia's money and the month or two we had where Twitter trends actually didn't reflect the rightwing nutjobs and sycophants seemed to decrease slightly. Remember Tim Poole and other influences were bankrolled by Russia until that was exposed -- now they have to try to make a comeback or have smaller new Russian sources.
I bet Russia paid at least as much as Musk. It is a far better use than having another m
Maybe the point was to embarrass Boeing (Score:2)
Boeing was already years late and saying they could not deliver until 2034. Now as per CNN [1]https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/08... [cnn.com] "Boeing now plans to deliver new Air Force One jets in 2027, before Trump leaves office"
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/08/business/boeing-trump-air-force-one
Re: (Score:2)
Others are saying 2027 IF no more hiccups. Most likely 2029 or later. And this was the point.
[1]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/1... [cnbc.com]
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/17/boeings-air-force-one-program-could-be-delayed-until-2029-or-later-senior-official-says.html
Maybe he can keep it unmodified (Score:2)
And take it for a spin over enemy airspace.
Re: Maybe he can keep it unmodified (Score:2)
I agree. He should hot dog around a bit! See if he can buzz the Houthis and give them the finger in the way by
Re: Maybe he can keep it unmodified (Score:2)
If Israel can make undetectable radio bombs, Qatar can make undetectable airplane parts.
And free maintenance (Score:1)
People seem to have forgotten that after his last term, Trumps existing personal plane (a 757-200) was left to rot because, according to rumour, he couldn't afford to pay for the maintenance. (big jet maintenance is a very large expensive proposition) He had to rent or borrow a smaller jet for a lot of his travel during the Biden administration.
According to current information, the plane is that the US gov't will pay to have this 747 refitted to be Air Force 1. But that after Trump steps down (assuming he
Among the stupid statements are yours. (Score:2)
How is the weather in St. Petersburg?
> Qatar is giving the plane to the DoD.
For use by Trump.
> So Trump will never own the plane, will likely never fly in,
Bullshit. If Trump says he flies in it, he flies in it, which he will.
> it will be given to the Trump Presidential Library as a gift in the collection
Which Trump will then have use of by the agreement.
> What is the threshold where Presidents need to get Congressional approval to accept a gift?
The constitution says that the president cannot accept any gift from another government, so anything would require approval.
It is clear to everyone that this is just a bribe to Trump. Your legal excuses do not fool anyone.
Re: Among one of the more stupid statements on thi (Score:2)
The limit for a gift is $480. After that, the government and not the gifted owns it. If they want to keep it, they can pay a fair market value for it. The laws and the constitution are quite clear. Not that the fascist Cheeto cares about the constitution.
Par for the course. (Score:1)
Only Trump could be bribed with a White Elephant.
Sure, it's a security nightmare... (Score:2)
... but is it any more of a security nightmare than Trump himself is?
What's wrong with the current air force one??? (Score:2)
What's wrong with the current air force one??? It's 35 years old.
I know, you're not interested in facts, just bashing Trump.
It could be his way of embarrassing boeing in to delivering the damn jet they keep delaying.
Re: What's wrong with the current air force one??? (Score:2)
Most commercial aircraft are 15-20 years old or older. Those exiting planes log very few hours in the air compared to commercial planes. The age is not a problem.
Let me fix that title for you (Score:2)
Trump Is a Gold-Plated Security Nightmare
Sorry, couldn’t help myself after seeing that title.
Not wrong, but ... (Score:2)
> I'm not sure what's wrong with the current Air Force One, ...
The 2 current 747-200 ( [1]Boeing VC-25 [wikipedia.org]) are 35 years old. Not necessarily anything wrong with that, but it may be a maintenance and reliability issue, especially for the air frame.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_VC-25
Re: (Score:2)
Air frames have a limited life as the stress in flight eventually weakens the aircraft. You can keep it going but the down time for inspection and maintenance eventually becomes too expensive.
Pretty sure ... (Score:2)
Pretty sure most people would be very happy to get this "Security Nightmare" present.
Not 100% made in America (Score:2)
so it's cool if he doesn't buy something 100% made in America. Especially if it's gold plated
So what? You're missing the point, (Score:2)
If you think they intend this thing as anything other than a bribe, you're off the rails. It's a bauble. A trinket to curry (buy) favour. And Trump is very bribeable. He doesn't look at it as a functional Air Force One, the providers aren't either. Nitpicking about its technical shortcomings is like complaining that a Miata can't haul rocks well. It's not for that.
Retask it... Why not pay it foward? (Score:1)
So why use it for Air Force One or critical leadership functions at all? Why not instead use it for dignitary use, heads of state flights for poorer country's leaders to fly in style? Flying celebrities and other personnel on humanitarian or 'emissary' style missions? There's ZERO reason CRITICAL personnel has to go on this, but there's NO reason that this can't be turned into an opportunity to give the experience of both private and government sanctioned people doing good work for and by this country a won
Just pathetic (Score:2)
So take this for what it is - a bribe laundered through the US government. Which, fine, we should expect bald corruption; everyone watched him learn to wet his beak last go 'round, going from petty [1]overcharging the Secret Service [go.com] to making off with [2]nuclear secrets [apnews.com]. But this is just a national embarrassment.
Think about it - the richest, most technologically advanced country on the planet, accepting a used cargo plane from a tiny monarchy as Air Force One. Nevermind it'll never be used for that, nevermind i
[1] https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-organization-charged-secret-service-14m-stay-properties/story?id=91640350
[2] https://apnews.com/article/trump-justice-department-indictment-classified-documents-miami-8315a5b23c18f27083ed64eef21efff3
Refueling (Score:2)
Pretty sure the new ones aren't going to have in-air refueling capabilities, so scratch that one off the liest.
Re: (Score:2)
> Pretty sure the new ones
New ones? The last 747 rolled off the assembly line in 2023.
For the next Air Force One, the Air Force needs to look at a replacement for the C-17, add a few requirements and order a variant to fulfill the AF1 role. I'm guessing that most of the comms, armor and countermeasures are in the base model already. Throw in a gold toilet seat and call it done.
Re: (Score:2)
> Throw in a gold toilet seat and call it done.
I wouldn't even try to guess how much government contract for a gold toilet would cost.
Re: (Score:2)
The food is free, but shitting will cost you! :-)....
Re: (Score:2)
There are two AF1s that Boeing is supposed to, and currently miserably failing at, building.
Re:Refueling (Score:4, Interesting)
We know the reason why now.
The requested gold ornaments turned out to be too heavy, and Boeing hasn't come up with a good substitute color yet.
And you can't cheat the boss, his eye is well-trained, he can always spot if it isn't real gold.
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
So don went with the Arabian nights version, which, on top of the "real gold", also sports direct lines to putin and that Saudi Arabian bloke, who orders journalists dismembered at embassies and paid for Bin Laden.
A true patriot.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIoxg6aSIso
Re: (Score:2)
The reason for the delay is Boeing made a bad deal both financially and project plan wise.
The new AF1 contract is fixed-price, so Boeing has to eat any cost overruns. BTW, Trump45 personally negotiated this deal. Boeing thought it would save money using two already built 747-8s that were originally produced for Russian airline firm Transaero but never delivered. The problem with using existing 747s is the AF1 modifications are extensive and will require much of the 747s to be disassembled to install the new
Re: (Score:2)
> currently miserably failing at, building
The airframes are complete. The screw-ups are in the special extras. And, although Boeing might be prime contractor on this job, the AF1 spec stuff will have to be completed by different subcontractors.
Re: Refueling (Score:3, Informative)
Trump ordered new AF1 replacements years ago, Boeing is running about 8 years behind schedule (was targeting 2021, current target is 2029), that's why we're discussing an interim replacement for the 25 year-old customized 747 that is AF1 now.
Re: (Score:1)
> the 25 year-old customized 747 that is AF1 now.
There's actually two of them, not including the multiple decoy AF1's, and they have been in service for 35 years at this point.
Re: (Score:2)
No, you're not discussing an "interim replacement".
You're discussing a blatant personal bribe to the president of the US for unspecified "services" that the US will render to the people who finance anti-US terrorism. The only thing that's not clear in this case is what specific services is Qatar getting in exchange for the plane.
But we can get some ideas from a different case of the same disease.
[1]https://www.reuters.com/articl... [reuters.com]
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Actually, notice one difference: Erdo claims th
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/world/turkeys-erdogan-defends-gift-of-luxury-plane-from-emir-of-qatar-idUSKCN1LX0YR/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar%E2%80%93Turkey_relations#2017_Qatari_diplomatic_crisis
Re: (Score:2)
>> Pretty sure the new ones
> New ones? The last 747 rolled off the assembly line in 2023.
The new Air Force-1s are 747s, and are scheduled to be delivered in 2027.
[1]https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/08... [cnn.com]
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/08/business/boeing-trump-air-force-one
Re: (Score:2)
That, and I can imagine many simple ways an IC could take down an Airplane, based on an RF or Satellite signal. I imagine Boeing vets all contractors, keeps an eye on them, the plane, and tests things out. Getting an Airplane for AF1 from another Country seems really, really stupid to me.
Re: Refueling (Score:2)
On a scale of zero to bankrupting two casinos, how stupid are we talking?
Re: (Score:1)
If POTUS is not on board, the plane isn't designated as "AF1".
Fun fact: any plane with POTUS on board IS designated as "AF1".
Re: (Score:2)
> Pretty sure the new ones aren't going to have in-air refueling capabilities, so scratch that one off the list.
That's discussed in this article, [1]The Next Air Force One Aircraft Will Not Be Able to Refuel in Midair [twz.com] and "The change seems almost entirely driven by the USAF's desire to match one of President Trump's off-the-cuff claims." -- about saving money. It's a pretty interesting read and notes that removing this ability is, basically, stupid and what will have to be done to compensate, like perhaps having an E-4B Nightwatch airborne command post shadow Air Force One in case there's an emergency that may require
[1] https://www.twz.com/14199/the-next-air-force-one-aircraft-will-not-be-able-to-refuel-in-midair