News: 0177486491

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Microsoft is Cutting 3% of All Workers (cnbc.com)

(Tuesday May 13, 2025 @11:20AM (msmash) from the more-cuts dept.)


Microsoft is [1]laying off 3% of employees across all levels and geographies, the company said Tuesday. "We continue to implement organizational changes necessary to best position the company for success in a dynamic marketplace," a spokesperson told CNBC. Microsoft had 228,000 employees worldwide at the end of June, meaning that the move will affect thousands of employees.



[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/13/microsoft-is-cutting-3percent-of-workers-across-the-software-company.html



The AI gamble (Score:2)

by haxor.dk ( 463614 )

....hasn't paid off.

Cetainly more than these 3% will have to go later this year.

Re: (Score:2)

by timeOday ( 582209 )

Wait, I thought boosting worker productivity (or taking over entirely) so you can trim the headcount was the promise of AI that we're all upset about. Then this is not a failure, but a success.

Re: The AI gamble (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

Most of their AI gamble is tied up in OpenAI though. I doubt this will have much further impact. Microsoft doesn't have much of a history of layoffs. The pandemic has exposed a lot of malinvestment that's still unwinding.

Re: not enough (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

"The money isn't flowing [at Microsoft]"

Hahaha lol, that's the funniest shit I've heard all week

Re: (Score:2)

by Tony Isaac ( 1301187 )

I was mostly with you until you started going on about gold-based currency. There were also recessions when gold was king. Even gold has imaginary value, it is only worth what it is because of the balance of supply and demand, just like for any commodity or service. Wishing for a return to gold, is like wishing for a return to the barter system, where everybody could touch and feel what they were trading.

Will they fire the CEO and marketing? (Score:2)

by gweihir ( 88907 )

And what passes for "security experts" and "UI experts" with these cretins, please? No? Just more enshittification? Well. No surprise, really.

Sales are doing just fine (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

And the company is plenty profitable. The CEO isn't firing people because mistakes were made resulting in declining revenue. They're doing it because of recession is coming and they're going to need a ton of cash for stock BuyBacks to protect wealthy investors.

The economy is fundamentally set up against you. And you probably voted for it if you're around here. I think most of us who haven't figured that out are just too old now. You get incredibly stubborn past the age of 40. If that teenage stubbornnes

Re: Will they fire the CEO and marketing? (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

Why would they fire the CEO? Microsoft has performed amazingly under Nadella and Hood.

If you don't like MS's products, stop using them. Don't complain about a CEO that's delivering what their customers want.

I stopped using Windows like 25 years ago. But I do hold a notable amount of MSFT. I have no use for their products, but I'm not going to sit here and complain that they don't make MS Linux; that's not what the paying customers want.

3% (Score:2)

by groobly ( 6155920 )

So, if you're 6 feet tall, your hair is going to be cut 2" shorter. Not so great for bald guys.

Everyone knows Trump is going to cause a recession (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

The only question is how bad and whether the Democrats will take back the House and Senate so that they can limit the damage for his last two years.

I get that Trump won because of voter suppression but he still had 77 million people voting for him.

And we've got hard numbers about how many people voted for him because they were panicking over trans girls and it was a lot.

If you're one of them congratulations you're a 50 year old man who's about to lose his job in the worst economy America has kno

Re: (Score:1)

by MikeD227 ( 546924 )

This, ladies and gentlemen, is what Trump Derangement Syndrome looks like.

There are a lot of tech companies (Score:2)

by wakeboarder ( 2695839 )

That are laying off those that underperform. 10 years ago every tech company was rapidly hiring and they didn't care who they got, now that the space isn't its competitive they are laying off those who don't perform and calling it restructuring

C Suite (Score:3)

by ThurstonMoore ( 605470 )

I bet they don't cut 3% of the C suite.

cutting staff is important (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

If you don't have any products or services you wish to develop and can't grow your business then what other choice is there but to reduce costs like payroll.

If on the other hand you are managing a successful business, you will find things for people to do that have a higher return than what you spend on their salary.

> The day people think linux would be better served by somebody else (FSF
> being the natural alternative), I'll "abdicate". I don't think that
> it's something people have to worry about right now - I don't see it
> happening in the near future. I enjoy doing linux, even though it does
> mean some work, and I haven't gotten any complaints (some almost timid
> reminders about a patch I have forgotten or ignored, but nothing
> negative so far).
>
> Don't take the above to mean that I'll stop the day somebody complains:
> I'm thick-skinned (Lasu, who is reading this over my shoulder commented
> that "thick-HEADED is closer to the truth") enough to take some abuse.
> If I weren't, I'd have stopped developing linux the day ast ridiculed me
> on c.o.minix. What I mean is just that while linux has been my baby so
> far, I don't want to stand in the way if people want to make something
> better of it (*).
>
> Linus
>
> (*) Hey, maybe I could apply for a saint-hood from the Pope. Does
> somebody know what his email-address is? I'm so nice it makes you puke.
(Taken from Linus's reply to someone worried about the future of Linux)