Threads Adds 35 Million More Members in November - But Bluesky's Traffic is Surging (theverge.com)
- Reference: 0175566563
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/11/30/0536237/threads-adds-35-million-more-members-in-november---but-blueskys-traffic-is-surging
- Source link: https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/26/24306591/threads-35-million-signups-november-growth
> Threads has accrued over 35 million signups so far in November and is "going on three months with more than a million signups a day," Meta spokesperson Alec Booker told The Verge in an email today. 20 million of those signups have come since November 14th, [3]as Axios notes ...
>
> At the same time, Bluesky has seen a surge of interest. The platform grew to 15 million users earlier this month and continued to add about a million signups per day for several days. It now sits at over 22 million users.
Dave Earley, audience editor at Guardian Australia , says that traffic to TheGuardian.com from BlueSky " [4]is already 2x that of Threads ."
> [T]hat's on a straight threads.net vs bsky.app referral comparison. BUT! 75-80% of tracked referral from owned Bluesky account posts is NOT being attributed to bsky.app, so I'm certain organic traffic would be undercounting by that much as well. By which I mean, I'm pretty sure traffic from bsky.app to theguardian.com is *significantly* higher than the very obvious 2x that of Threads.
That post was in response to one by a platform VP for the Boston Globe newspaper, who'd reported that traffic from Bluesky to bostonglobe.com " [5]is already 3x that of Threads , and we are seeing 4.5x the conversions to paying digital subscribers."
And Axios notes that Bluesky's growth "has [6]spurred inbound interest for a new investment round , just weeks after raising $15 million in Series A funding, per Axios' Dan Primack."
In response, Threads "rolled out a series of changes over the past week in what was seen as an attempt to keep an edge over Bluesky," [7]reports The Hill :
> The changes included a [8]new custom feed feature , which gives users the ability to build their feeds around the topics and people they are most interested in. Bluesky lets users make their own lists and feeds and set their own content moderation preferences. The platform also rolled out a few "long-overdue improvements" to its search and trending now features and its algorithm.
[1] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/11/16/1911231/threads-grew-by-a-bluesky-this-month-now-has-over-275-million-users
[2] https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/26/24306591/threads-35-million-signups-november-growth
[3] https://www.axios.com/2024/11/26/exclusive-threads-adds-35m-new-signups-this-month
[4] https://bsky.app/profile/earleyedition.bsky.social/post/3lbvwgzurbc2y
[5] https://bsky.app/profile/mkarolian.bsky.social/post/3lbunm54agc2k
[6] https://www.axios.com/2024/11/26/exclusive-threads-adds-35m-new-signups-this-month?stream=top
[7] https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5010118-instagrams-threads-gets-35-million-new-users-this-month/
[8] https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5000740-meta-instagram-threads-custom-feed/
Blink...and? (Score:2)
I had a peanut butter and jam sandwich. Grape jam specifically. I prefer jam to jelly or preserves as it spreads better. Nothing special about the peanut butter, just skippy, so likely nearly as much oil and peanut but it was yummy as could be an 100% whole wheat bread.
See editors, my completely pointless post is already worth more then this drivel you are posting about meta bullshit. No one on Slashdot fucking cares how many idiots are on threads.
While the government shouldn't be involved, it will actually
Re: (Score:2)
Grape pb&j - it's a classic, but over the years, I have come to savor strawberry pb&j even more.
We just had a conversation, about pb&j. It was a feel good conversation. Nostalagia. Happiness. Makes me hungry for a gooey drippy pb&j sandwich right now. What can be bad?
So, your point is is not pointless. And as you correctly imply, your point and this conversation may be worth more than anything on Twitter-X these days or stories about its wannabe clones.
The government can ban social med
Re: (Score:2)
Crofton's Raspberry Jelly. Best of Strawberry and Grape in a single flavor. Plus it's organic and can be found at your local supermarket
worth adding (Score:1, Flamebait)
musk bad
Re:worth adding (Score:4, Informative)
Yes, yes he is.
Re: (Score:1)
musk bad
he never invented anything
he is just spending government money
he enables fascists on twitter
he promised we would be driving self-driving cars on Mars by now, just to get money from investors
he killed my dad
Re: (Score:2)
You seem mad when people point out facts.
Re: (Score:1)
nuance good
Re: (Score:1)
#AccidentalAlly
Don't forget the Lemmyverse as well (Score:3)
For those who got fed up of Reddit. And of course Slashdot still exists after all this time, and despite being like 1% of the original comment volume of the 2000s, it still gives me a chance to vent my tech gripes.
Actual signups? (Score:3)
If sign-ups are jumping that fast but traffic isn't, it sounds like phantom numbers to me. Are we sure they didn't just flip a switch and make all Insta or WhatsApp or Reels users into Threads users?
I don't think Bluesky will last (Score:1)
Not saying it's not good to have diversity in the marketplace of ideas, I just don't see bluesky achieving an underdog breakthrough.
Re: I don't think Bluesky will last (Score:1, Troll)
If Bluesky would give the intolerant lefties a place to vent, while leaving normal folks in peace, then it would not be a bad thing. The trouble however is that lefties hate being without an unwilling audience and they always go out of their way to find normal people to annoy.
Re: I don't think Bluesky will last (Score:5, Interesting)
If Bluesky would give the intolerant lefties a place to vent, while leaving normal folks in peace, then it would not be a bad thing.
[1]Try again [imgur.com]. What you really meant to say is there is a large group of people whose only response to everything is MAGA! and who is unwilling to listen to, let alone consider, any idea which contradicts their bigotry. For example, when you tell them the stock market, as a rule, does better under Democrats than Republicans, they lose their shit despite the facts speaking for themselves. When you tell them that women trying to be seen as equal to men [2]don't commit 80% of all violent crime [imgur.com], or that 99% of all murders are committed by men, they will immediately change the subject.
So try again.
[1] https://i.imgur.com/rmAHYVb.jpeg
[2] https://i.imgur.com/JPmkJLr.png
Re: I don't think Bluesky will last (Score:4, Interesting)
> ... there is a large group of people whose only response to everything is MAGA!
One (one!) of the sad things is that they don't realize the slippery slope they're on and how easy it is to be deemed "not MAGA enough" and banished. This is a group that revolves around exclusion and sooner or later many inside this circle will find themselves on the outside because of the slightest thing. They were fooled once, and I sympathize but not for this second time. The first time around, many wanted to offer, or hoped for, the benefit of the doubt, but that doesn't exist this time; they know what they were getting, this is what they voted for and (apparently) support. They made their bed...
(Also, spot-on about the rest of your comment.)
Re: I don't think Bluesky will last (Score:2)
Look at you. Big, strong alpha male, triggered by liberal diatribe.
Threads (Score:2)
Threads is (sic) not growing. People are not flocking to it.
Instagram with its over a billion of users has been pushing Threads via ads incessantly ever since Threads was released. People have been installing and using it out of FOMO.
Can Mark Zuckerberg please release the stats on how many people are actually posting to Threads on a regular basis? What about commenting? Because that would indicate real growth. Not these sign-ups.
I guess he won't. Investors won't like it.
Re: (Score:2)
X is popular as usual and I even hear about Bluesky recently, but never heard anything about Threads apart from their statistics, they must be inflated.
Less compelling (Score:5, Interesting)
Hank Green had [1]a recent video [youtube.com] on why having a less aggressively polished algorithms and relying on community lists makes for a better experience on Blue Sky vs Twitter/Threads that I thought was enlightening.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4ghgVq9z4M
wonder what musk is thinking at this time... (Score:2)
wonder what musk is thinking at this time.. .considering the pile of cash he burned buying up Twitter and running it straight into the ground. And a clone of the original Twitter just absorbing all the user base.
Maybe this is why he's pumping DOGE coin... trying to make up for the losses.
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt he's crying too much. Buying that platform helped cement him some political power and it's not his only source of wealth. Twitter isn't going away even if it suffers a bit.
Seems only the hate-mongers will remain on Twitter (Score:5, Insightful)
Kind of fitting with Elon-the-asshole in charge.
Re:Seems only the hate-mongers will remain on Twit (Score:5, Interesting)
Difficult to have open conversations with bots, russian psyops, and actual Nazi's, along with actual sexist people ("Your body, my choice", isn't something we can really have an open conversation about).
There's disagreements and there's "You don't have any right to exist" and "Status quo is just fine, just shutup and tolerate being denigrated as subhuman for merely EXISTING, without any action"
I imagine you will be arguing people should be having open conversations on who will be rounded up and put into concentration camps? Or perhaps open conversations on how much fraud should be permitted because of how wealthy someone is? Or perhaps open conversations on how many deaths are acceptable in the pursuit of right wing ideals?
It's ironic, for decades right wingers dismissed everyone else concern, and finally now that they have been on the receiving end, they cry and say "Why so mean and toxic" without a shred of self realization.
Re: (Score:1)
This place isn't much better, if you disagree...you are voted off the page.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly.
Re: (Score:1)
The amount of projection with right-wingers is absolutely fascinating. I have never seen more censorship than with a conservative subreddit or forum. You think Republicans aren't well-known for having to "toe the line"? You act on feelings, and are willing to lie and distort reality to satisfy what you want to feel.
Re: (Score:2)
10 Every accusation is a confession
20 goto 10
Re:Seems only the hate-mongers will remain on Twit (Score:5, Informative)
> The only people moving away from X are individuals who are are unable to have open conversations with people they don't agree with.
It's hard to hold a conversation about any topic when the disagreeable people are simply trying to flood you own by posting crap in response.
It's one thing if the responses were informed debate. But no, it generally devolves into general hatred all around - racism, misogyny and other crap whose aim is to simply make it impossible to provide informed replies.
It's like debating the benefits of cycling around town, when the people opposed, rather than bring up honest arguments and counter evidence, simply decide to "roll coal" at "the greenies". (If you don't get it, it's what happens if you squirt diesel in the tailpipe - it causes a huge plume of black smoke to be emitted from the tailpipe).
Debate is impossible if the other side refuses to debate. That is the reason for free speech - that the solution to disagreeable speech is more speech.
But as long as Elon decides things like "cis" are banned terms, or some topics are just to rile up his people, more speech just won't happen. It's not unusuak for Elon to post something that's partially true, but the nuance is lost - the whole point is to get people to repost it blindly without thinking or critical analysis - to extract the truth from that nugget.
Elon calls himself an engineer, but he goes for the emotional response without engaging his logical thinking side to actually see what's going on.
Not that Bluesky is likely any different. Though the primary appeal is that both sides can debate something (i.e., "more speech") equally since no one can really control it or censor it.
Re: (Score:3)
Twitter was always pretty cesspool-ey.
Before the racist apartheid nepobaby took it over, it at least tried to flush the garbage and suppress the Nazis and bots. Now its leader unbans and promotes them.
Re:Seems only the hate-mongers will remain on Twit (Score:5, Insightful)
> The only people moving away from X are individuals who are are unable to have open conversations with people they don't agree with.
The same could be said about people who are staying. Just sayin', it cuts both ways and your comment is pretty closed/narrow-minded too. To be fair, it's hard to have discussions with people who believe fiction to be fact and are unwilling to consider, or care about, the actual truth.
Re: (Score:1)
But how many bots are on extwitter and Threads? If both Zucker and Musk are friendly with Trump then they both must be friends to each other. Prolly have been secretly visiting each others often for dinner and having scat fests. Which illusion do you think AWS, Microsoft, and Google are rivals to each others or working together in secret against other countries to keep them down?
Re: (Score:1)
Well then you will absolutely LOVE this new service called bsky, they have absolutely zero protections against bots and even encourage bot creation!
Have you not realized that social media does not actually solve problems, but merely pretends to at the surface level but under the covers acts like every other hazardous social media service?
[1]https://docs.bsky.app/docs/starter-templates/bots [bsky.app]
[1] https://docs.bsky.app/docs/starter-templates/bots
Re: (Score:2)
Only to somebody who actually is one. A clear view of yourself is not part of _that_ package.