ISPs Say Their 'Excellent Customer Service' Is Why Users Don't Switch Providers (arstechnica.com)
- Reference: 0175548285
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/11/26/2013204/isps-say-their-excellent-customer-service-is-why-users-dont-switch-providers
- Source link: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/11/isps-say-their-excellent-customer-service-is-why-users-dont-switch-providers/
> Lobby groups for Internet service providers [1]claim that ISPs' customer service is so good already that the government shouldn't consider any new regulations to mandate improvements. They also claim ISPs face so much competition that market forces require providers to treat their customers well or lose them to competitors. Cable lobby group NCTA-The Internet & Television Association told the Federal Communications Commission in [2]a filing (PDF) that "providing high-quality products and services and a positive customer experience is a competitive necessity in today's robust communications marketplace. To attract and retain customers, NCTA's cable operator members continuously strive to ensure that the customer support they provide is effective and user-friendly. Given these strong marketplace imperatives, new regulations that would micromanage providers' customer service operations are unnecessary."
>
> Lobby groups filed comments in response to an FCC review of customer service that was [3]announced last month , before the presidential election. While the FCC's current Democratic leadership is interested in regulating customer service practices, the Republicans who will soon take over opposed the inquiry. USTelecom, which represents telcos such as AT&T and Verizon, [4]said that "the competitive broadband marketplace leaves providers of broadband and other communications services no choice but to provide their customers with not only high-quality broadband, but also high-quality customer service."
>
> "If a provider fails to efficiently resolve an issue, they risk losing not only that customer -- and not just for the one service, but potentially for all of the bundled services offered to that customer -- but also any prospective customers that come across a negative review online. Because of this, broadband providers know that their success is dependent upon providing and maintaining excellent customer service," USTelecom wrote. While the FCC Notice of Inquiry said that providers should "offer live customer service representative support by phone within a reasonable timeframe," USTelecom's filing touted the customer service abilities of AI chatbots. "AI chat agents will only get better at addressing customers' needs more quickly over time -- and if providers fail to provide the customer service and engagement options that their customers expect and fail to resolve their customers' concerns, they may soon find that the consumer is no longer a customer, having switched to another competitive offering," the lobby group said.
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/11/isps-say-their-excellent-customer-service-is-why-users-dont-switch-providers/
[2] https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1122573117031/1
[3] https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-review-customer-support-offered-consumers
[4] https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1122191898118/1
Thanks for the reminder to return Optimum's router (Score:2)
Because the only thing worse than their Internet service is their customer support.
Nobody switches because (Score:4, Insightful)
There are no alternatives, usually big broadband ISPs hold monopoly power in neighborhoods and towns & cities
Partly true (Score:2)
In some markets this argument holds merit. While others they are the only game in town with agreements with the municipalities for exclusive access to telephone poles. Maybe the compromise is to waive regulations in circumstances where there are at least 5 competing carriers able to provide at least 40% of the bandwidth of the fastest carrier in that municipality.
no choice (Score:2)
There is a single fiber provider in my area, and frankly they suck. The only alternative is cable, which sucks even more. There is no real choice and if I had one I'd probably take it at least once.
With the stupid 'introductory pricing' if there were two viable providers I would flip/flop every other year and pay less.
Re: (Score:2)
Consider yourself lucky. I my options for "wired" connections are Xfinity or DSL. No fiber anywhere near me. I hate Comcast enough that I'm still willing to suffer through Verizon's 5G Home Internet. (Which, I'll be honest, isn't THAT bad.)
Oh, you're serious? (Score:2)
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa Oh, you're serious?
Flat out lie (Score:2)
Most US ISP hold pretty strong regional monopolies or participate in likewise strong duopolies.
WTF are they talking about? (Score:2)
With large portions of the country essentially locked to one, and only one, ISP, how is competition so fierce they can't possibly need regulation? I know in my neighborhood there's only one choice unless you want the unreliability of the local wireless provider. I think defacto, and sometimes local government enforced monopoly power pretty much negates this argument.
The last two stories here are real "corporations have a problem with reality" takes. Is there going to be a point were reality is forced back t
Competition (Score:2)
Good customer service, and the pricing, and quality, all mostly depend on if there is or is not competition in that space. So many areas have government-approved/allowed/granted/mandated/whatever monopolies on cabled ISP and those customers are trapped. Those customers can only hope for government regulation and interference, and even then it doesn't work out that great.
I have been locked into a monopoly at home for decades. My only realistic choice has been the cable company (DSL is either long gone or
It's True, At Least In My Case (Score:2)
At least in my case, it's definitely true.
I'm on Comcast right now, and I could very easily switch to CenturyLink fiber. But for as nice as the higher upload speeds would be, CenturyLink's network engineering and customer support is notoriously bad around these parts. They have far more downtime and service outages (DNS, etc) than Comcast does.
Not that Comcast is a saint, especially in terms of pricing. But their network engineering and infrastructure management is top notch; the only time I'm out of servic
I must be dreaming (Score:3)
Have you ever had one of those dreams where things happen that are so Kafkaesque weird that you think you must be in another world?
Kudos to the lobbyist. It's a masterwork of gaslighting.
Re: Kudos to the lobbyist (Score:1)
These must be the same people that say kamala ran a perfect campaign.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you the same dipshit AC claiming "TDS Much" [1]a few comments up? [slashdot.org]
[1] https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=23532923&cid=64974559