Open Source Fights Back: 'We Won't Get Patent-Trolled Again' (zdnet.com)
(Friday November 15, 2024 @05:00AM (BeauHD)
from the enough-is-enough dept.)
- Reference: 0175474125
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/24/11/15/018247/open-source-fights-back-we-wont-get-patent-trolled-again
- Source link: https://www.zdnet.com/article/open-source-fights-back-we-wont-get-patent-trolled-again/
ZDNet's Steven Vaughan-Nichols reports:
> [...] At [1]KubeCon North America 2024 this week, CNCF executive director Priyanka Sharma said in her keynote, "Patent trolls are not contributors or even adopters in our ecosystem. Instead, they prey on cloud-native adopters by abusing the legal system. We are here to tell the world that [2]these patent trolls don't stand a chance because CNCF is uniting the ecosystem to deter them. Like a herd of musk oxen, we will run them off our pasture." CNCF CTO Chris Aniszczyk added: "The reason trolls can make money is that many companies find it too expensive to fight back, so they pay trolls a settlement fee to avoid the even higher cost of litigation. Now, when a whole herd of companies band together like musk oxen to drive a troll off, it changes the cost structure of fighting back. It disrupts their economic model."
>
> How? Jim Zemlin, the Linux Foundation's executive director, said, "We don't negotiate with trolls. Instead, with United Patents, we go to the PTO and crush those patents. We strive to invalidate them by working with developers who have prior art, bringing this to the attention of the USPTO, and killing patents. No negotiation, no settlement. We destroy the very asset that made patent trolls' business work. Together, since we've started this effort, 90% of the time, we've been able to go in there and destroy these patents." "It's time for us to band together," said Joanna Lee, CNCF's VP of strategic programs and legal. "We encourage all organizations in our ecosystem to get involved. Join the fight, enhance your own company's protection, protect your customers, enhance our community defense, and save money on legal expenses."
>
> While getting your company and its legal department involved in the effort to fend off patent trolls is important, developers can also help. CNCF announced the [3]Cloud Native Heroes Challenge , a patent troll bounty program in which cloud-native developers and technologists can earn swag and win prizes. They're asking you to find evidence of preexisting technology -- referred to by patent lawyers as "prior art" -- that can kill off bad patents. This could be open-source documentation (including release notes), published standards or specifications, product manuals, articles, blogs, books, or any publicly available information. All entrants who [4]submit an entry that conforms to the contest rules will receive a free "Cloud Native Hero" t-shirt that can be picked up at any future KubeCon+CloudNativeCon. The winner will also receive a $3,000 cash prize.
>
> In the inaugural contest, the CNCF is seeking information that can be used to invalidate Claim 1 from US Patent [5]US-11695823-B1 . This is the major patent asserted by Edge Networking Systems against Kubernetes users. As is often the case with such patents, it's much too broad. This patent describes a network architecture that facilitates secure and flexible programmability between a user device and across a network with full lifecycle management of services and infrastructure applications. That describes pretty much any modern cloud system. If you can find prior art that describes such a system before June 13, 2013, you could be a winner. Some such materials have already been found. This is already listed in the "known references" tab of the [6]contest information page and doesn't qualify. If you care about keeping open-source software easy and cheap to use -- or you believe trolls shouldn't be allowed to take advantage of companies that make or use programs -- you can help. I'll be doing some digging myself.
[1] https://events.linuxfoundation.org/kubecon-cloudnativecon-north-america/
[2] https://www.zdnet.com/article/open-source-fights-back-we-wont-get-patent-trolled-again/
[3] https://www.cncf.io/heroes/
[4] https://patroll.unifiedpatents.com/contests/s3vQkRdTC6coNkjyx
[5] https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/US-11695823-B1
[6] https://patroll.unifiedpatents.com/contests/s3vQkRdTC6coNkjyx
> [...] At [1]KubeCon North America 2024 this week, CNCF executive director Priyanka Sharma said in her keynote, "Patent trolls are not contributors or even adopters in our ecosystem. Instead, they prey on cloud-native adopters by abusing the legal system. We are here to tell the world that [2]these patent trolls don't stand a chance because CNCF is uniting the ecosystem to deter them. Like a herd of musk oxen, we will run them off our pasture." CNCF CTO Chris Aniszczyk added: "The reason trolls can make money is that many companies find it too expensive to fight back, so they pay trolls a settlement fee to avoid the even higher cost of litigation. Now, when a whole herd of companies band together like musk oxen to drive a troll off, it changes the cost structure of fighting back. It disrupts their economic model."
>
> How? Jim Zemlin, the Linux Foundation's executive director, said, "We don't negotiate with trolls. Instead, with United Patents, we go to the PTO and crush those patents. We strive to invalidate them by working with developers who have prior art, bringing this to the attention of the USPTO, and killing patents. No negotiation, no settlement. We destroy the very asset that made patent trolls' business work. Together, since we've started this effort, 90% of the time, we've been able to go in there and destroy these patents." "It's time for us to band together," said Joanna Lee, CNCF's VP of strategic programs and legal. "We encourage all organizations in our ecosystem to get involved. Join the fight, enhance your own company's protection, protect your customers, enhance our community defense, and save money on legal expenses."
>
> While getting your company and its legal department involved in the effort to fend off patent trolls is important, developers can also help. CNCF announced the [3]Cloud Native Heroes Challenge , a patent troll bounty program in which cloud-native developers and technologists can earn swag and win prizes. They're asking you to find evidence of preexisting technology -- referred to by patent lawyers as "prior art" -- that can kill off bad patents. This could be open-source documentation (including release notes), published standards or specifications, product manuals, articles, blogs, books, or any publicly available information. All entrants who [4]submit an entry that conforms to the contest rules will receive a free "Cloud Native Hero" t-shirt that can be picked up at any future KubeCon+CloudNativeCon. The winner will also receive a $3,000 cash prize.
>
> In the inaugural contest, the CNCF is seeking information that can be used to invalidate Claim 1 from US Patent [5]US-11695823-B1 . This is the major patent asserted by Edge Networking Systems against Kubernetes users. As is often the case with such patents, it's much too broad. This patent describes a network architecture that facilitates secure and flexible programmability between a user device and across a network with full lifecycle management of services and infrastructure applications. That describes pretty much any modern cloud system. If you can find prior art that describes such a system before June 13, 2013, you could be a winner. Some such materials have already been found. This is already listed in the "known references" tab of the [6]contest information page and doesn't qualify. If you care about keeping open-source software easy and cheap to use -- or you believe trolls shouldn't be allowed to take advantage of companies that make or use programs -- you can help. I'll be doing some digging myself.
[1] https://events.linuxfoundation.org/kubecon-cloudnativecon-north-america/
[2] https://www.zdnet.com/article/open-source-fights-back-we-wont-get-patent-trolled-again/
[3] https://www.cncf.io/heroes/
[4] https://patroll.unifiedpatents.com/contests/s3vQkRdTC6coNkjyx
[5] https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/US-11695823-B1
[6] https://patroll.unifiedpatents.com/contests/s3vQkRdTC6coNkjyx
This is not how "prior art" works (Score:2)
Bad guy has a patent (how dubious it might be)
You infringe on his patent.
I can proof prior art.
You have a problem!
I have not.
To invalidate a patent, you need more than "prior art".
Perhaps that is why they wrote it in quotes.
You have to show it is a standard procedure, everyone is doing.