News: 0175453349

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

SpaceX To Attempt Daring Orbital Refueling Test of Starship (gizmodo.com)

(Tuesday November 12, 2024 @05:00AM (BeauHD) from the ambitious-plans dept.)


SpaceX [1]plans an ambitious in-orbit refueling test between two Starships in March 2025. "The orbital demonstration is a major step for Starship, and a crucial part of SpaceX's capability of delivering NASA's Artemis mission to the Moon," reports Gizmodo. The plans were unveiled during Spaceflight Now's [2]recent interview (source: YouTube) with Kent Chojnacki, the deputy manager for NASA's Human Landing System program. Gizmodo reports:

> SpaceX is under a $53.2 million contract with NASA, signed in 2020, to use Starship tankers for in-orbit propellant transfer. During its third test flight, SpaceX transferred around 10 metric tons of liquid oxygen from Starship's header tank to its main tank while it was in space. The upcoming demonstration, however, requires a lot more of the launch vehicle. Two Starships will launch to low Earth orbit around three to four weeks apart, the spacecraft will meet and dock in orbit, and one will transfer propellant to another. After the demonstration, the two Starships will undock from one another and deorbit.

>

> "Once you've done that, you've really cracked open the opportunity to move massive amounts of payload and cargo outside of the Earth's sphere," Chojnacki said during the interview. The in-flight propellant transfer tests are set to conclude in the summer. With in-flight refueling, NASA is aiming to develop technologies to "enable long-term cryogenic fluid management, which is essential for establishing a sustainable presence on the Moon and enabling crewed missions to Mars," the space agency stated when the contract was signed.

>

> SpaceX is developing a version of Starship to land humans on the Moon in September 2026 as part of NASA's Artemis 3 mission. To prepare for the Moon mission, SpaceX is expected to launch between eight and 16 propellant tanker Starships into low Earth orbit in rapid succession. Each of the tankers will carry around 100 to 150 tons of liquid oxygen and liquid methane and will dock with a larger fuel depot. The orbiting depot will then connect with the Human Landing System Starship, filling its massive 1,200-ton fuel tanks. Once refueled, the Starship lander will continue its journey toward the Moon.



[1] https://gizmodo.com/spacex-to-attempt-daring-orbital-refueling-test-of-starship-2000520122

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyjYETLJjHs



Re: (Score:2)

by Tailhook ( 98486 )

Or don't. It's tired.

This is a test of a interplanetary spacecraft that Musk will test in 4 months (or something.) You'll all watch, wonder at how this could be possible, and cope with your Musk derangement syndrome.

Maybe go ahead and not shit up every Musk adjacent story you stumble over with your "thoughts."

Re: (Score:2)

by nukenerd ( 172703 )

> spacecraft that Musk will test

Musk won't test it, his staff will. Musk is the company financier and salesman, and now a politician and addicted Tweeter. I'm surprised he even gets the time these days to drop in to the mission control room for the sake of appearances. Stop thinking he is a genius and the snark might stop too.

Re: (Score:2)

by bleedingobvious ( 6265230 )

> ...now a politician and addicted Tweeter.

You forgot uber-addicted Diablo 4 lamer.

Re: (Score:2)

by joh ( 27088 )

Neither SpaceX nor Starship would exist without Musk. There's nothing wrong with accepting this, you don't even need to like Musk. And yes, he was "financier", by founding SpaceX with $100m.

Re: (Score:2)

by Ritz_Just_Ritz ( 883997 )

Musk has a history of building companies from scratch that have revolutionized a couple of industries (like EVs and space tech). Like him or not, he has been a visionary and a serial success. The shade comes off as petulant sour grapes for many. Color me a happy investor.

I had a feeling once about mathematics -- that I saw it all. Depth beyond
depth was revealed to me -- the Byss and the Abyss. I saw -- as one might
see the transit of Venus or even the Lord Mayor's Show -- a quantity passing
through infinity and changing its sign from plus to minus. I saw exactly
why it happened and why tergiversation was inevitable -- but it was after
dinner and I let it go.
-- Winston Churchill