Can AI-Enabled Thermostats Create a 'Virtual Power Plant' in Texas? (yahoo.com)
- Reference: 0175445903
- News link: https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/24/11/10/2253250/can-ai-enabled-thermostats-create-a-virtual-power-plant-in-texas
- Source link: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ai-thermostats-pitched-texas-homes-210000983.html
One NRG executive touted the move as "cutting-edge, AI-driven solutions that will bolster grid resilience and contribute to a more sustainable future."
> [Residential virtual power plants] work by aggregating numerous, small-scale distributed energy resources like HVAC systems controlled by smart thermostats and home batteries and coordinating them to balance supply and demand... NRG, in partnership with Renew Home, plans to offer Vivint and Nest smart thermostats, including professional installation, at no cost to eligible customers across NRG's retail electricity providers and plans. These advanced thermostats make subtle automatic HVAC adjustments to help customers shift their energy use to times when electricity is less constrained, less expensive, and cleaner... Over time, the parties expect to add devices like batteries and electric vehicles to the virtual power plant, expanding energy savings opportunities for customers...
>
> Through the use of Google Cloud's data, analytics, and AI technology, NRG will be able to do things like better predict weather conditions, forecast wind and solar generation output, and create predictive pricing models, allowing for more efficient production and ultimately ensuring the home energy experience is seamless for customers.
Google Cloud will also offer "its AI and machine learning to determine the best time to cool or heat homes," reports Bloomberg, "based on a household's energy usage patterns and ambient temperatures."
It was less than a year ago that Renew Home was formed when Google spun off the load-shifting service for its "Google Nest" thermostats, which merged with load-shift management startup OhmConnect. Bloomberg describes this week's announcement as "Three of the biggest names in US home energy automation... coming together to offer some relief to the beleaguered Texas electrical grid."
But they point out that 1 gigawatt is roughly 1% of the record summer demand seen in Texas this year. Still, "The entire industry has been built to serve the peak load on the hottest day of the year," said Rasesh Patel, president of NRG's consumer unit. "This allows us to be a lot more smarter about demand in shaving the peak."
[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ai-thermostats-pitched-texas-homes-210000983.html
[2] https://www.renewhome.com/press/press-release/nrg-renew-home-google-cloud-announce-plan-to-develop-1gw-virtual-power-plant-in-texas
That's not AI. (Score:3)
That's just someone turning up your thermostat when demand is too high for the available supply. This is really just about how they want to own and control your thermostat instead of you.
Re: (Score:2)
> This is really just about how they want to own and control your thermostat instead of you.
The easiest way to make sure all my heating and cooling decisions are made in my families best interest is to make them myself. That way there is absolutely no confusion.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't have to sign up for it.
You can continue to manually control your thermostat.
But you'll pay more for your electricity.
I signed up for a similar scheme in California. I'm happy with the savings, and barely noticed the power adjustments.
Re: That's not AI. (Score:3)
Software has been renamed "AI". Didn't you get the memo?
Re:That's not AI. (Score:5, Informative)
I get where you're coming from - it can feel like utilities are just grabbing control of your thermostat when the grid gets overloaded. That’s essentially what traditional Demand Response (DR) is: when there’s a risk of a brownout or blackout, the utility sends out a signal to participating devices (like your thermostat) to cut back on power usage. It’s a straightforward mechanism to prevent the grid from failing, and it’s valuable enough that it’s traded on the energy markets, both for the promise to reduce demand if needed and for the actual reduction itself.
But this new approach goes beyond just nudging the thermostat up when demand peaks. It’s about leveraging predictive algorithms and machine learning to intelligently manage energy consumption. Instead of a simple override, the system can now learn the thermal profile of each home. By monitoring how fast the house heats or cools, considering outside temperature, insulation, and the efficiency of the HVAC system, it builds a unique thermal model for your home. It’s like the system gets to know your house’s behavior, including how long it can coast without needing active heating or cooling.
Armed with this information, the system can make smarter decisions. Instead of just cranking up the thermostat when things get tight, it might pre-cool your home when energy is cheap or demand is low. By doing this, it takes advantage of the house’s thermal inertia, letting the temperature drift up naturally when demand spikes later in the day. It’s not simply raising the set point; it’s anticipating the demand curve and optimizing your energy use in advance. This way, you stay comfortable while the system reduces the overall load during peak hours.
This isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach either. The machine learning aspect comes into play as the system continuously learns from new data. It tracks how your home responds to changes, how quickly temperatures shift, and even how you react to different temperature settings. Over time, it adjusts its strategy based on this feedback, getting better at finding the sweet spot between energy savings and comfort. It’s a dynamic process that adapts to your preferences, rather than imposing a blanket rule.
It’s also worth mentioning that modern DR programs are typically opt-in, with incentives for participation. You get to choose whether you want to take part, and in exchange, you often receive rebates or lower rates. It’s less about taking away control and more about offering a smarter, more flexible way to manage energy that benefits both you and the grid. If you’re open to the idea, these systems can help save money, reduce strain on the infrastructure, and even prevent outages.
So, while the term "AI" might seem like buzzword marketing, there’s actually substance behind it. This isn’t just a utility flipping a switch on your thermostat. It’s about using predictive algorithms and adaptive learning to orchestrate energy use in a way that balances comfort, cost, and grid stability. It’s a step up from the old DR methods, aiming to optimize rather than simply cut back.
Source: I design DR systems for smart thermostats
Re: (Score:2)
People can sell their home temperature variability to utilities. It may be worth it for many. Especially if they can set limits on the maximum difference from the optimal setting.
Oh, yeah (Score:2)
This is gonna end well.
* hops online and orders more popcorn *
Popcorn AI (Score:3)
We clearly need an AI capable of ordering popcorn at the right time.
Maybe they should.. (Score:2)
just turn off the AI at times of peak energy demand.
No (Score:2)
A thermostat that's programmed to keep somebody from being as warm or cold as they need to be does not "generate" ANYTHING but anger. What arrogant bastard is going to tell a thermostat to abuse somebody who might actually have a medical condition that REQUIRES them to run their thermostat a bit warmer or cooler? Who the hell gave these monsters the right to determine how warm or how cool somebody else's house will be?
Just slapping the letters "AI" onto some dishonest, and arguably evil scheme MIGHT be en
More dumb AI news (Score:1)
Why do some people keep wasting their reader's time with such nonsense?
Hype makes subventions rain (Score:2)
It's the Hype, Baby.
Hype makes subventions rain, and gives some startups a growth push.
It's already in effect around hill country (Score:2)
Nest thermostat activates a "Rush Hour" on top of "Eco Mode" whenever the electric utility indicates a need to save power.
Re: (Score:2)
2/ Yes, this is dumb terminology throwing around the "AI" buzzword and marketing wank to try to fool people into believing additional generation capacity exists when it doesn't.
Energey not used = energy saved? No. (Score:1)
The concept isn't new. In the early 1970s (yea, like 50+ years ago) the US Government told people to set the thermostat down to stop heating homes to outrageous highs like 70F or so... and stick with lower temps and energy could be saved.
That's true.
But the problem is people didn't like to "wear blanket and coats" in their houses, so that went nowhere.
Now it's being called "virtual power plant." The gist is the same -- If you don't use power at peak times, and since we build power infrastructure for peak
Re: (Score:3)
> reducing demand by 1GW is not the same as generating an extra 1GW.
Reducing demand is better, because you don't even need to pay the cost of generation.
We have this in California. PG&E attached a device to my central AC to shut it off during peak demand, and I get a discount in return.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't peak demand usually happen when you need the AC the most? That seems like the worst time time shut off the AC. Seems like they should just do time of use billing instead.
Re: (Score:3)
> Doesn't peak demand usually happen when you need the AC the most?
I live in a two-story house and work downstairs during the summer, which is cooler than upstairs.
I turn on a fan, strip down to my skivvies, and don't schedule any Zoom calls.
Hominids survived for three million years without AC.
Re: (Score:2)
> Hominids survived for three million years without AC.
So why are they talking about increased death rates during heat waves?
But otherwise I agree - AC is used much more than it is really needed.
Re: (Score:2)
> So why are they talking about increased death rates during heat waves?
Most people who die in heat waves are frail elderly.
If you live with your sickly 95-year-old granny, perhaps you shouldn't sign up.
But for healthy young people, it's fine.
Re: (Score:2)
By 2050, almost a quarter of the US is forecast to have at least one day over 125.
The elderly or otherwise compromised are the canaries of this heat. Ignore them as 'normal' at your own peril.
Re:No. Obviously. (Score:4, Informative)
> But otherwise I agree - AC is used much more than it is really needed.
It depends on the local climate. Here in Florida, even if you can somehow tolerate the heat, the humidity will turn the inside of your home into a breeding ground for mold.
Personally, life is too short to spend it miserable and sweaty. I'll cut other things out of my budget before I'll ever give up A/C. Also, I saw a rather hilarious TikTok video awhile back where someone was reacting to a Briton who'd complained that Americans use too much air conditioning. Turns out it's mostly just a misunderstanding over how much hotter it actually gets in the US, especially in the south. A lot of us here in Florida keep our homes at 75F (a little bit below 24C). That's actually on the warmer side of what kind of climate the UK naturally experiences, in summer.
Re: No. Obviously. (Score:2)
I was new on the job, had to go to a conference in the US for the first time in my life. It was in Arizona. I asked my colleagues what to pack. They said a thick pullover. I thought they were pulling my leg. But they were right. AC was set so low there that I was happy to wear it. Oh and chips with breakfast. Weirdos.
Re: (Score:2)
Similar two story situation here, but I have no A/C. PG&E's idea of demand management a few years ago was a 2.5 day blackout. I had a 3 hour blackout 3 weeks ago, and the other side of town had one more recently. And for this I pay between $0.52 and $0.68 / kWh. Because this microclimate can have daily temperature excursions of 30+ F, in fall and early winter I often use a box fan to bring warm outside air into the house in the afternoon, to save on nighttime heating.
I spent summers as a child in NE
Re: (Score:2)
If you turn your AC off for 15 minutes on one afternoon you won't notice a significant difference.
If you can roll 15 minute shut offs across 10 million homes, at that peak time, you can reduce quite a bit of that peak.
Works the same for using EV cars as peak shavers as well. If *everyone* has an EV and say 20% of them are plugged in at any one time during that afternoon peak, pulling 10% of the charge of those EVs, even if pay the consumer for the power, is cheaper for the grid and it's customers - and pe
Re: (Score:2)
> We have this in California. PG&E attached a device to my central AC to shut it off during peak demand, and I get a discount in return.
The real savvy thing to do would be to install a bunch of mini splits but leave the central HVAC equipment in place. Then you'll get the discount and still have air conditioning. Win/win.
Re: (Score:3)
Where I am we had a company called Pooled Energy they tried to do the same thing with swimming pools they went bust fairly quickly
https://www.aer.gov.au/news/articles/communications/aer-ensures-continued-supply-former-pooled-energy-and-weston-energy-customers
AI= Wasted power (Score:4, Insightful)
AI means waste 1GW of power in some big ass datacenter 24/365 in order to try to gain 1GW 20% of the time.
Yeah. Nope.
It does not need AI to modify slightly the temperature of thermostats to optimize energy consumption.
Regular prediction and interconnection will do.
Re: (Score:2)
And things like heating and cooling have peak times for a reason. Being told "everyone else is using their heating so you have to stay cold" won't go down very well. All you can do is defer things which are not time critical, like the laundry or dish washing etc.