News: 0175287599

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Bill Gates Applauds Open Source Tools for 'Digital Public Infrastructure' (gatesnotes.com)

(Sunday October 20, 2024 @03:34AM (EditorDavid) from the road-ahead dept.)


It connects people, data, and money, Bill Gates [1]wrote this week on his personal blog . But digital public infrastructure is also "revolutionizing the way entire nations serve their people, respond to crises, and grow their economies" — and the Gates Foundation sees it "as an important part of our efforts to help save lives and fight poverty in poor countries."

> Digital public infrastructure [or "DPI"]: digital ID systems that securely prove who you are, payment systems that move money instantly and cheaply, and data exchange platforms that allow different services to work together seamlessly... [W]ith the right investments, countries can use DPI to bypass outdated and inefficient systems, immediately adopt cutting-edge digital solutions, and leapfrog traditional development trajectories — potentially accelerating their progress by more than a decade. Countries without extensive branch banking can move straight to mobile banking, reaching far more people at a fraction of the cost. Similarly, digital ID systems can provide legal identity to millions who previously lacked official documentation, giving them access to a wide range of services — from buying a SIM card to opening a bank account to receiving social benefits like pensions.

>

> I've heard concerns about DPI — here's how I think about them. Many people worry digital systems are a tool for government surveillance. But properly designed DPI includes [2]safeguards against misuse and even enhances privacy... These systems also reduce the need for physical document copies that can be lost or stolen, and even create audit trails that make it easier to detect and prevent unauthorized access. The goal is to empower people, not restrict them. Then there's the fear that DPI will disenfranchise vulnerable populations like rural communities, the elderly, or those with limited digital literacy. But when it's properly designed and thoughtfully implemented, DPI actually increases inclusion — [3]like in India , where millions of previously unbanked people now have access to financial services, and where biometric exceptions or assisted enrollment exist for people with physical disabilities or no fixed address.

>

> Meanwhile, countries can use open-source tools — like [4]MOSIP for digital identity and [5]Mojaloop for payments — to build DPI that fosters competition and promotes innovation locally. By providing a common digital framework, they allow smaller companies and start-ups to build services without requiring them to create the underlying systems from scratch. Even more important, they empower countries to seek out services that address their own unique needs and challenges without forcing them to rely on proprietary systems.

"Digital public infrastructure is key to making progress on many of the issues we work on at the Gates Foundation," Bill writes, "including protecting children from preventable diseases, strengthening healthcare systems, improving the lives and livelihoods of farmers, and empowering women to control their financial futures.

"That's why we're so committed to DPI — and why we've committed $200 million over five years to supporting DPI initiatives around the world... The future is digital. Let's make sure it's a future that benefits everyone."



[1] https://www.gatesnotes.com/Digital-public-infrastructure

[2] https://www.dpi-safeguards.org/

[3] https://youtu.be/DN8HlTGpQ6c

[4] https://mosip.io/

[5] https://mojaloop.io/



Re: Meanwhile in America (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

Maybe voter registration programs should be created to offer free beer to anyone who goes to get an ID. Then there's an appropriate incentive.

Billy Gates roots for open source now (Score:5, Informative)

by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 )

[1]That's rich [wikipedia.org].

And here's another one who has quite the set of balls too to declare [2]his newfound love for open source [zdnet.com].

Those two disgusting individuals have set back open source decades and their legacy is still felt today by those of us who were on the right side of history all along.

Fuck Gates and fuck Ballmer with a wire brush.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween_documents

[2] https://www.zdnet.com/article/ballmer-i-may-have-called-linux-a-cancer-but-now-i-love-it/

Re: (Score:2)

by Archtech ( 159117 )

"If you can't beat 'em, join 'em".

Re: (Score:2)

by Sleeping Kirby ( 919817 )

> "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em".

That's what we're worried about. He'll join and embrace it. Then he'll love it so much that he'll extend it. Then he'll exting--

Oh give it a rest (Score:2)

by Viol8 ( 599362 )

I don't care what Gate's motivation is in anything he does so long as he does the right thing. So far his foundation has donated billions to healthcare in the 3rd world and elsewhere which is more than any of the other arrogant tech bros have done sitting on their yachts or pinging off on a giant dildo into space while counting their money.

Yes, maybe it is all whitewashing his reputation for posterity with that and with his new found love of open source. Who fucking cares? Results are ultimately more import

Re: (Score:2)

by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 )

Bezos has a [1]foundation [bezosfamil...dation.org]. All the ultra-wealthy have foundations, and for a [2]very good reason [propublica.org].

You're impressed by the Gates Foundation donating billions to healthcare in the 3rd world: ask yourself how much Gates could have contributed to healthcare IN THIS COUNTRY if he had just paid his taxes like the rest of us instead of dodging them with his foundation. Hint: it's a lot more than whatever his foundation donated over the years.

[1] https://www.bezosfamilyfoundation.org/

[2] https://www.propublica.org/article/how-private-nonprofits-ultrawealthy-tax-deductions-museums-foundation-art

Did Bill have some beef with Microsoft? (Score:2)

by thesjaakspoiler ( 4782965 )

Or is this another evil ploy that we don't understand yet?

Re: Did Bill have some beef with Microsoft? (Score:1)

by PoopMelon ( 10494390 )

Why?

Re: (Score:2)

by phantomfive ( 622387 )

[1]Bill Gates was openly against open source back in the 1970s [wikipedia.org].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists

Re: (Score:2)

by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 )

That was almost half a century ago. People can change their minds in 50 years. But Gates was against open-source a lot more recently than 1976.

But here's the thing: it's like people who quit smoking and suddenly become the most vocal anti-tobacco activists you've ever seen. Sure it's great that they do the right thing now, but those people also stank up everybody else's atmosphere and cost the healthcare system a lot of money before they finally went straight.

So they really should shut the fuck up because,

Re: (Score:2)

by Oscaro ( 153645 )

Bill was openly against open source back in the '90s and early 2000s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween_documents

I think the title is super midleading (Score:1)

by PoopMelon ( 10494390 )

It suggest as if bill gates pursued open source. But if you read the quotes it actually seems that bill gates just pursues privacy invasive orwellian digital identification

A penny saved is a penny earned (Score:3)

by Archtech ( 159117 )

'...[T]he Gates Foundation sees it "as an important part of our efforts to help save lives and fight poverty in poor countries."'

If the Gates Foundation thinks in at all the same way as its eponymous founder, it sees it as a really neat way to get valuable software without paying. Bill would never pass up such an opportunity.

Re: (Score:2)

by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 )

The Gates Foundation, like all foundations set up by ultra-billionaires, is a [1]tax-dodging vehicle [vox.com]. Whatever the Gates Foundation says or does is ultimately designed to make people forget that Gates doesn't pay his fair share of taxes.

[1] https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/9/3/20840955/charitable-deduction-tax-rich-billionaire-philanthropy

No (Score:2)

by phantomfive ( 622387 )

> Then there's the fear that DPI will disenfranchise vulnerable populations like rural communities, the elderly, or those with limited digital literacy. But when it's properly designed and thoughtfully implemented

It won't be properly designed.

DIDI ... is that a MARTIAN name, or, are we in ISRAEL?