Criminal Charges Announced Over Multi-Year Fraud Scheme in a Carbon Credits Market (marketwatch.com)
- Reference: 0175194527
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/24/10/05/0543252/criminal-charges-announced-over-multi-year-fraud-scheme-in-a-carbon-credits-market
- Source link: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-disaster-for-us-how-a-carbon-credit-pioneer-allegedly-stole-millions-of-dollars-by-cooking-the-books-1f4cc01d
[2]MarketWatch reports :
> Ken Newcombe had spent years building a program to distribute more environmentally friendly cookstoves for free to rural communities in Africa and Southeast Asia. The benefit for his company, C-Quest Capital, would be the carbon credits it would receive in exchange for reducing the amount of fuel people burned in order to cook food — credits the company could then sell for a profit to big oil companies like BP.
>
> But when Newcombe tried to ramp up the program, federal prosecutors said in an indictment made public Wednesday, he quickly realized that the stoves wouldn't deliver the emissions savings he had promised investors. Rather than admit his mistake, he and his partners cooked the books instead, prosecutors said... That allowed them to obtain carbon credits worth tens of millions of dollars that they didn't deserve, prosecutors said. On the basis of the fraudulently gained credits, prosecutors said, C-Quest was able to secure $250 million in funding from an outside investor.
>
> "The alleged actions of the defendants and their co-conspirators risked undermining the integrity of [the global market for carbon credits], which is an important part of the fight against climate change," said Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.
From [3]announced by the U.S. Attorney's Office :
> U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said... "The alleged actions of the defendants and their co-conspirators risked undermining the integrity of that market, which is an important part of the fight against climate change. Protecting the sanctity and integrity of the financial markets continues to be a cornerstone initiative for this Office, and we will continue to be vigilant in rooting out fraud in the market for carbon credits...."
>
> While most carbon credits are created through, and trade in compliance markets, there is also a voluntary carbon market. Voluntary markets revolve around companies and entities that voluntarily set goals to reduce or offset their carbon emissions, often to align with goals from employees or shareholders. In voluntary markets, the credits are issued by non-governmental organizations, using standards for measuring emission reductions that they develop based on input from market participants, rather than on mandates from governments. The non-governmental organizations issue voluntary carbon credits to project developers that run projects that reduce emissions or remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
>
> CQC was a for-profit company that ran projects to generate carbon credits — including a type of credit known as a voluntary carbon unit ("VCU") — by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. CQC profited by selling VCUs it obtained, often to companies seeking to offset the impact of greenhouse gases they emit in the course of operating their businesses.
The company itself was not charged due to "voluntary and timely self-disclosure of misconduct," according to the announcement, along with "full and proactive cooperation, timely and appropriate remediation, and agreement to cancel or void certain voluntary carbon units.
[1] https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/us-attorney-announces-criminal-charges-multi-year-fraud-scheme-market-carbon-credits
[2] https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-disaster-for-us-how-a-carbon-credit-pioneer-allegedly-stole-millions-of-dollars-by-cooking-the-books-1f4cc01d
[3] https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/us-attorney-announces-criminal-charges-multi-year-fraud-scheme-market-carbon-credits
Like that Old Comic Says . . . (Score:3)
. . . "What if we make a worse world at great cost?"
Good thing that it wasn't mere one-sided, disingenuous propaganda, eh?
Carbon credits are a fraud? (Score:3)
Color me surprised. /s
Expected (Score:3)
If you make a system that allows someone to sell something that has no physical existence and do not create a system that audits it in real time, someone will game the system. The real question is why we allow people to buy and sell carbon credits, rather than actually reduce their emissions.
Re: (Score:2)
> The real question is why we allow people to buy and sell carbon credits, rather than actually reduce their emissions.
Because they fucking lobbied for it. The real question is, did you lobby otherwise?
I didn’t think so.
Re: (Score:2)
>> The real question is why we allow people to buy and sell carbon credits, rather than actually reduce their emissions.
> Because they fucking lobbied for it. The real question is, did you lobby otherwise?
> I didn’t think so.
Here’s the hilarious thing in all this, they are bought off cheap, a 200+ year old democracy with the most powerful arsenal in the world for a motor coach (NOT RV he was VERY adamant) here or booking floors of expensive hotels where no guests show up or fake watches for $100k. If somehow we the people banded together and bought off politicians, we could massively swing the country back to represent citizens first instead of rich entities, or at the very least up the ante on how much it costs.
Re: (Score:2)
Carbon credits totally make sense to these assholes. They know they're fucking worthless, that's the whole point. It's not about solving any particular problem, it's about giving the illusion of it so you can claim a moral high ground. Part of the broader progressive "do as I say, not as a I do" mentality. They want to feel justified while they shame other people for doing the exact same shit that they themselves are some of the worst offenders of. Better known as virtue signaling. Note the distinction from
Re: (Score:2)
> If you make a system that allows someone to sell something that has no physical existence and do not create a system that audits it in real time, someone will game the system. The real question is why we allow people to buy and sell carbon credits, rather than actually reduce their emissions.
Precisely why emissions should be checked on regular time periods by satellite and everything put up in a transparent database. Credits for things like “development X was never implemented so give me credits” when it never was going to exist in the first place just shouldn’t even be an option. These things can indeed be done well, but it’s so badly botched im just uncertain if it’s somewhat criminal but also incompetence or if it’s pure criminal activity effectively le
Congress makes the system into a game... (Score:2)
...and then is shocked (SHOCKED!) when some people try to game the system. The f****** nerve of some people, eh? Bottom line: You can't prevent open and free markets from becoming monopolies or fraud swamps without having strict regulatory enforcement to prevent it.
Meta \o/ (Score:1)
> which led to "securing an investment of over $100 million."
Why not just say:
> which led to "securing an investment of $250 million."
Re: (Score:2)
Doing good doesn't pay as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Posted under wrong thread. :-/
Just imagine if... (Score:2)
...all of the energy, creativity and time spent on coming up with clever criminal scams could instead be redirected to doing good
What?!?! (Score:4)
Fraudulent carbon credit programs? You don't say!
Re:What?!?! (Score:4, Funny)
You stole my comment, dammit!
Re: (Score:2)
It's a cryptocurrency that you mine with proof of non-work.
Re: (Score:2)
> It's a cryptocurrency that you mine with proof of non-work.
Dire Straits was so ahead of their time.
Re: (Score:2)
Took me a bit to connect that, forgot this was their song:
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Interesting story behind that song as well:
[2]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHJj25PBIhg
Re: What?!?! (Score:2)
The carbon credit is ideal for corruption. It combines virtue signaling with money. If you dared to criticize the market, you were anti-environment.