News: 0175180457

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

FCC is Offering $200 Million To Protect Schools and Libraries From Hackers

(Wednesday October 02, 2024 @05:45PM (msmash) from the moving-forward dept.)


The Federal Communications Commission is making up to $200 million available to help schools and libraries [1]make their computer systems more secure . From a report:

> The Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program will be used to evaluate whether to fund this kind of program on a more permanent basis. The funding will come through a pool of money called the Universal Service Fund (USF), which is made up of contributions from telecommunications companies. Schools and libraries participating in the program will be able to reimburse things like advanced firewalls, identity protection and authentication services, malware protection, and VPNs.



[1] https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/2/24260459/fcc-schools-libraries-cybersecurity-pilot-universal-service-fund



When? (Score:5, Insightful)

by backslashdot ( 95548 )

Is this like the $42 billion "for rural broadband" they gave AT&T and Verizon who hasn't bothered to connect even one rural person?

Re: (Score:2)

by smooth wombat ( 796938 )

It's far worse than that. Roughly $1 trillion has been given to private companies to build out broadband in this country [1]since the Clinton administration [newnetworks.com]. While we may now have higher speeds than the 45 Mbps indicated in the link, do we have symmetrical speeds? Has, as you pointed out, rural broadband been a success?

Considering the amount of money thrown at private industry to get broadband in this country up to speed, we should all have 500 Mbps for less than $100/month and our choice of providers.

[1] https://newnetworks.com/ShortSCANDALSummary.htm

Sure, I'll take that money (Score:1)

by GoTeam ( 5042081 )

My plan would be to remove computers and internet from all schools and libraries. Gimme money!

Re: (Score:2)

by GoTeam ( 5042081 )

Something needs to change for sure. Schools have been going downhill since "no child left behind". The quality has likely been dropping for a much longer period of time, but I can only speak to the scope of time I've been paying attention.

Re: (Score:2)

by Rick Schumann ( 4662797 )

> Something needs to change for sure. Schools have been going downhill since "no child left behind". The quality has likely been dropping for a much longer period of time, but I can only speak to the scope of time I've been paying attention.

When you had unqualified jackasses like Besty DeVos, who had an agenda other than educating kids in charge of the DoE, what can you expect?

When you've had nutty ideas like the so-called 'whole language' approach to teaching kids to read being given creedence instead of continuing to teach phonics, what did you expect?

When you have our so-called 'conservatives' screaming 'socialism!!!' about making sure kids get at least one decent meal a day by providing school lunches, what did you think would happen?

Wh

Re: (Score:2)

by GoTeam ( 5042081 )

> When you had unqualified jackasses like Besty DeVos, who had an agenda other than educating kids in charge of the DoE, what can you expect? When you've had nutty ideas like the so-called 'whole language' approach to teaching kids to read being given creedence instead of continuing to teach phonics, what did you expect? When you have our so-called 'conservatives' screaming 'socialism!!!' about making sure kids get at least one decent meal a day by providing school lunches, what did you think would happen? When you say 'no child left behind', as you point out, yet you allow them to shove rote learning down kids' throats instead of actually teaching them, just so they can pass standardized tests, and it's all really about getting federal tax money given to them so they can build sports programs and other non-essential nonsense, how did anyone think that would go? Last but not least, when teachers are paid so little for their efforts that some decide to go be bartenders and make dramatically more money, and the only teachers that schools can afford to pay are the literal bottom of the barrel, why would anyone think that kids are going to get a decent education from someone who doesn't give a shit? Yes, Timmy, the public school system is a mess. It needs to be fixed, and that doesn't mean siphoning off tax money into bullshit 'vouchers' that end up getting spent on religious schools that give an """education""" biased against science and real truths and towards superstitious nonsense and 'white nationalism'.

I agree with the vast majority of your statements (the statement I don't agree with is understandable when you have people with different perspectives). The teachers being underpaid is a major problem along with the curriculum angled towards passing standardized tests.

Slightly unrelated but a sister-in-law in Oklahoma working in a middle school library had a kid tell her another teacher was making sexual advances on him. She turned the teacher in and it's being investigated, but too many of these stories ex

Re: (Score:2)

by Rick Schumann ( 4662797 )

Our species pretends to be evolved and civilized but when it comes right down to it we're not that much better than the rest of the animals on this planet. True, we have our Better Days when we are our Better Selves, but there's lots of 'bad actors' out there who act more like animals than others.

Also worth noting that teenage boys are more animal than some others, if you know what I mean, I ought to know having been one myself. ;-) Doesn't make what that kid was bragging about right, though.

Re: (Score:2)

by RitchCraft ( 6454710 )

18 year teacher here (2000 to 2018). You sir are spot on! Mod this up!

Re: (Score:2)

by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 )

I take exact opposite position; no private schools and homeschooling except for very, very special circumstances. Germany and Sweden for example ban homeschooling.

Are we (trying to be) a meritocracy or not? Can't say yes and then offer better education behind a paywall, not very meritocratic is it?

#1 focus if public schools are lagging is to improve the public schools, anything else is distraction. I think pretty much all the founders believed in public education, even Jefferson and Adams agreed upon it,

Re: (Score:2)

by GoTeam ( 5042081 )

I came from a poor family and made it into a private school based on merit. That part was fine. There were a couple super rich people who had no business there, but when your name is on a building, exceptions are made. That part was less fine.

I think you still need schools based on accelerated programs for students that would benefit from them. At my daughter's middle school, the accelerated programs were crap. They only did it for "social studies" classes. Absolutely pointless. She's home schooled now and

Re: (Score:2)

by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 )

> made it into a private school based on merit

That's great but that isn't a law that private school must accept poor students, see Adam's specifically calling out "chairtable individuals", its a definite moral hazard. Fact is the school is private so they could (and most do) take a "can't pay, can't attend" policy. My parents sent me to a Catholic school for 1-8. If they didn't make tuition I would have gotten the boot.

> At my daughter's middle school, the accelerated programs were crap

That's a problem and the actual problem. Private schooling isn't helping that problem, if anything it makes it worse.

If we want to

Re: (Score:2)

by GoTeam ( 5042081 )

> Exceptions and anecdotes don't make an argument.

I'm happy to hear anyone's experiences. Each exception and anecdote added to the discussion gives a clearer example of what is going on with real people under these circumstances. Your anecdotes are just as helpful. You're absolutely right that many parents aren't equipped for the job of schooling their own kids. I'm lucky that my wife was previously a police officer and a teacher. I'm also lucky that we earn enough for her to stay home and not have to get a paying job just so we can meet our families needs

Re: (Score:2)

by StormReaver ( 59959 )

> ...homeschooled kids who found out the hard way later in life they didn't actually have the fundamentals they were told they had.

I can give you nonstop anecdotes of public school graduates (some with Honors) in the exact same position.

Universal Service Fund (Score:5, Insightful)

by usedtobestine ( 7476084 )

This fund is from fees collected by the Telcos from their customers. It is not, as the summary stated, "made up of contributions from telecommunications companies"

Re: Universal Service Fund (Score:1)

by writeRight ( 1444379 )

FCC wasting my tax money. When do we get to vote on end-of-life for this tax?

Weird pitch ... (Score:2)

by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 )

> FCC is Offering $200 Million To Protect Schools and Libraries From Hackers

Sounds like a good, steady, well-paying job for hackers ... :-)

How much does common sense cost? (Score:2)

by Rick Schumann ( 4662797 )

The problems with 'cybersecurity' anywhere, schools or otherwise, are mostly people problems, not technology problems. If they're going to spend that money training people to not be stupid, not clicking that sketchy link in their email or falling for any kind of phishing attempts, then it might be money well-spent.

Overstepping. (Score:2)

by Fly Swatter ( 30498 )

USF is supposed to be for deploying access to those in low income areas, and healthcare, and schools. Not to fund some useless cybersecurity theater.

The IT sector has become the new administration bloat, school administration departments became so bloated they need more administration just to manage the administration department. IT is just another layer that now is self-feeding on expenses just like administrations did a few decades back.

Someday schools will become focused on teaching children again,

I wasn't aware Linux licenses cost that much (Score:2)

by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 )

You want to protect schools and libraries from hackers? Just ditch Windows and install Linux. That will get you 3/4th of the way there.

Which raises the question: what does $200m pay for?

Password is too complex to decrypt