News: 0175152093

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Why Boeing is Dismissing a Top Executive (barrons.com)

(Saturday September 28, 2024 @11:34PM (EditorDavid) from the personnel-changes dept.)


Last weekend Boeing announced that its CEO of Defense, Space, and Security "had left the company," [1]according to Barrons . "Parting ways like this, for upper management, is the equivalent to firing," they write — though they add that setbacks on Starliner's first crewed test flight is "far too simple an explanation."

> Starliner might, however, have been the straw that broke the camel's back. [New CEO Kelly] Ortberg took over in [2]early August , so his first material interaction with the Boeing Defense and Space business was the spaceship's failed test flight... Starliner has cost Boeing $1.6 billion and counting. That's lot of money, but not all that much in the context of the Defense business, which generates sales of roughly $25 billion a year.... [T]he overall Defense business has performed poorly of late, burdened by fixed price contracts that have become unprofitable amid years of higher than expected inflation. Profitability in the defense business has been declining since 2020 and started losing money in 2022. From 2022 to 2024 losses should total about $6 billion cumulatively, including Wall Street's estimates for the second half of this year.

>

> Still, it felt like something had to give. And the change shows investors something about new CEO Ortberg. "At this critical juncture, our priority is to restore the trust of our customers and meet the high standards they expect of us," read part of an internal email sent to Boeing employees announcing the change. "Why his predecessor — David Calhoun — didn't pull this trigger earlier this year is a mystery," wrote Gordon Haskett analyst Don Bilson in a Monday note. "Can't leave astronauts behind."

"Ortberg's logic appears sound," the article concludes. "In recent years, Boeing has disappointed its airline and defense customers, including NASA...

"After Starliner, defense profitability, and the strike, Ortberg has to tackle production quality, production rates, and Boeing's ailing balance sheet. Boeing has amassed almost $60 billion in debt since the second tragic 737 MAX crash in March 2019."

Thanks to Slashdot reader [3]Press2ToContinue for sharing the news.



[1] https://www.barrons.com/articles/boeing-defense-chief-out-starliner-12db02a2

[2] https://www.barrons.com/articles/boeing-new-ceo-letter-8e735ab5?mod=article_inline

[3] https://www.slashdot.org/~Press2ToContinue



Boeing needs an lot to trun it around! (Score:2)

by Joe_Dragon ( 2206452 )

Boeing needs an lot to trun it around!

So let me get this straight... (Score:2)

by dgatwood ( 11270 )

So let me get this straight. This guy took over one year ago. Starliner had three launches prior to him starting, two of which were declared successes despite things going substantially wrong (parachute failure, thruster failure), the third of which was declared a failure because it couldn't dock with ISS, having entered the wrong orbit because of a computer programming/configuration error. And out of the 25 months since the last failure, he had been over the project for just 10 of those months.

One can

Re: (Score:2)

by phantomfive ( 622387 )

If that were the worst thing happening at Boeing recently, they would be doing really well.

Re: (Score:3)

by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 )

> So let me get this straight.

You don't have it straight. But it isn't your fault. TFS is extremely poorly written.

The new CEO, Kelly Ortberg, isn't being fired. He's the person doing the firing.

The person being fired, Ted Colbert, isn't even named in TFS.

Re: (Score:2)

by dgatwood ( 11270 )

>> So let me get this straight.

> You don't have it straight. But it isn't your fault. TFS is extremely poorly written.

> The new CEO, Kelly Ortberg, isn't being fired. He's the person doing the firing.

> The person being fired, Ted Colbert, isn't even named in TFS.

Oh. Oof. I didn't even notice that it was the same person's name down below, and assumed that the "new CEO" was actually... you know, new, not 13 months into the job.

Seems like (Score:2)

by phantomfive ( 622387 )

Seems like a lot of executives need to be fired. TBH if you want to improve efficiency, the first thing you should look at is getting rid of middle management and executives.

This could have happened 20 years ago (Score:3)

by evanh ( 627108 )

and would still have been very late. The behaviour from the top, of crushing anyone for reporting company/subcontractor procedural issues was in full swing from the late 1990's.

They've got a lot of trust to restore - Both internally and externally.

Gentlemen, I want you to know that I am not always right, but I am
never wrong. -Samuel Goldwyn