Gen Z Grads Are Being Fired Months After Being Hired (fortune.com)
- Reference: 0175151493
- News link: https://it.slashdot.org/story/24/09/28/2115224/gen-z-grads-are-being-fired-months-after-being-hired
- Source link: https://fortune.com/2024/09/26/bosses-firing-gen-z-grads-months-after-hiring/?utm_source=search&utm_medium=suggested_search&utm_campaign=search_link_clicks
"According to a [3]new report , six in 10 employers say they have already sacked some of the Gen Z workers they hired fresh out of college earlier this year."
> Intelligent.com, a platform dedicated to helping young professionals navigate the future of work, surveyed nearly 1,000 U.S. leaders... After experiencing a raft of problems with young new hires, one in six bosses say they're hesitant to hire college grads again. Meanwhile, one in seven bosses have admitted that they may avoid hiring them altogether next year. Three-quarters of the companies surveyed said some or all of their recent graduate hires were unsatisfactory in some way...
>
> Employers' gripe with young people today is their lack of motivation or initiative — 50% of the leaders surveyed cited that as the reason why things didn't work out with their new hire. Bosses also pointed to Gen Z being unprofessional, unorganized and having poor communication skills as their top reasons for having to sack grads. Leaders say they have struggled with the latest generation's tangible challenges, including being late to work and meetings often, not wearing office-appropriate clothing, and using language appropriate for the workspace.
>
> Now, more than half of hiring managers have come to the conclusion that college grads are unprepared for the world of work. Meanwhile, over 20% say they can't handle the workload.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader [4]smooth wombat for sharing the article.
[1] https://fortune.com/2024/05/28/gen-z-most-difficult-work-research-managers-hirable-baby-boomers/
[2] https://fortune.com/2024/09/26/bosses-firing-gen-z-grads-months-after-hiring/
[3] https://www.intelligent.com/1-in-6-companies-are-hesitant-to-hire-recent-college-graduates/
[4] https://www.slashdot.org/~smooth+wombat
Unpopular opinion here (Score:5, Insightful)
But I think this has A WHOLE LOT to do with "fee fees" and being taught to crybully their way through life, and being taught the ways of the snowflake. Unsorry, but I wasn't too hard to see this one coming and I told people this was going to end up happening.
Re: (Score:2)
"...Unsorry, but it wasn't too hard..."
It's more to do with high interest rates (Score:3, Insightful)
making companies skitzo. It's not free to hire. But companies were expecting rate cuts back in July because that's when all the indicators were in place for them.
So they started up their post rate cut hiring plans and then the fed sat on their asses for another 3 months.
It'll cost these business $$$ to reacquirer those hires but nothing is more important than this quarter's numbers. Next quarter's numbers are a problem for Mr Future.
Re:Unpopular opinion here (Score:5, Funny)
> But I think this has A WHOLE LOT to do with "fee fees" and being taught to crybully their way through life, and being taught the ways of the snowflake. Unsorry, but I wasn't too hard to see this one coming and I told people this was going to end up happening.
This should be at +5, but it will probably be at -1 something.
My experience has been that they came into work with unrealistic expectations, thought way too highly of themselves do to being trained for very high self esteem while not building it through accomplishments. They were told that they would get meaningful jobs, and make the world a better place, and all they had to do was find their passion, and nothing could get in their way. They expected to be promoted in a few months to management.
Now before the mob goes nuts on me, this is not really their fault. They were taught this was their future by well meaning but seriously stupid parents and teachers who tried to insulate them from any adversity. To the point of trying to eliminate the competitive drive that is needed to excel.
They were never allowed to grow up. Many young males are uninterested in adulting, many young females expect perfection from males, because they are told that they are all "10s", and since they didn't grow out of the High School attraction to bad boys, with the males avoiding interactions, many women find themselves stuck in a cycle that involves the only me who will approach them are bad for them, and they are going through a lot of trauma. What is worse for the young ladies is they have been taught they can wait until their late 30's-mid 40's to have children via IVF, which in truth, doesn't work all that great.
So many dreadfully unhappy women in that age range. And call me old fashioned, but I really hate to see women crying.
Re: (Score:2)
"My experience has been that they came into work with unrealistic expectations, thought way too highly of themselves do to being trained for very high self esteem while not building it through accomplishments."
Which as also said about Millennials, and said about GenX, and I presume said about Boomers.
Re: (Score:2)
"'We live in a decaying age. Young people no longer respect their parents. They are rude and impatient. They frequently inhabit taverns and have no self-control." These words - expressing the all-too-familiar contemporary condemnation of young people - were actually inscribed on a 6,000-year-old Egyptian tomb.
Later, in the fourth century BC, Plato was heard to remark: "What is happening to our young people? They disrespect their elders, they disobey their parents. They ignore the law. They riot in the stree
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like you are the one who can't face reality, that whatever false positivity crap you were loaded up turned out to be utter bull. And you found this out the hard way, didn't you? And who is "no one"? Your mom?
Re: (Score:2)
"No one agrees with a word this nutjob says" . Shut up
Re: Unpopular opinion here (Score:2)
I'd say you are just that named guy posting anon to have an argument with yourself. Slow Saturday evening?
Hopefully a wake up call (Score:5, Insightful)
I won't paint an entire generation with such a broad brush, but hopefully this is a wake up call for those who never received one before. As much as we all might like to shove the blame on the newest generation just entering into the world, some of it falls on the older generations that failed to raise them properly. Maybe we thought we were doing them a favor or were just overcorrecting for the problems we perceived in our own generations, but expecting them to spring fully formed from the head of Zeus is foolish. I'd like to think that they're up to this learning experience, as harsh as it may seem.
Re:Hopefully a wake up call (Score:4, Insightful)
This coddling began with millennials. Xenials or early millennials had far less of this but as you get on to kids born in the 90's it goes down hill pretty fast. We essentially tossed out ALL child rearing concepts in favor of garbage social science and mind altering antidepressants within a single generation, then ignored the fact they were homicidal and suicidal. Instead of fixing this problem as it goes wrong we've just kept on steamrolling forward.
"expecting them to spring fully formed from the head of Zeus is foolish. I'd like to think that they're up to this learning experience"
That's what college is supposed to be. If they aren't springing out from a bachelors ready to compete with the guy who has being doing the job for 4yrs then why are you hiring them instead of him? We have massive unemployment in tech, the market has reportedly contracted by over 40% this year and the buzz I hear is that for some reason the rare instances of hiring that actually happen are hiring for formal education over proven experience.
Re:Hopefully a wake up call (Score:4, Informative)
> This coddling began with millennials. Xenials or early millennials had far less of this but as you get on to kids born in the 90's it goes down hill pretty fast. We essentially tossed out ALL child rearing concepts in favor of garbage social science and mind altering antidepressants within a single generation, then ignored the fact they were homicidal and suicidal.
My son was in middle school in the 90's and the teachers diagnosed every single boy in his class with ADHD. I refused, but most other parents chemically straitjacketed their sons. They were trying to work that stuff like it was candy. Today, most of his friends are not normal. Turns out the effort to protect th almost universal teaching staff of females that wanted the males to be as tractable as the young ladies wasn't well thought out. Despite womanist doctrine, there ar fundamental differences between boys and girls.
> Instead of fixing this problem as it goes wrong we've just kept on steamrolling forward.
> "expecting them to spring fully formed from the head of Zeus is foolish. I'd like to think that they're up to this learning experience"
Let's hope. We have a lot of apathetic males, and frustrated females. They have to throw away most of the social mores they have been taught in order to conform to reality. Life is a competitive grind, you aren't going to be CEO a month after you get your first job, and making a difference is kind of nebulous.
But when you do have accomplishments and garner real self esteem, that's priceless.
They said you were coddled too!!!! (Score:2)
> This coddling began with millennials. Xenials or early millennials had far less of this but as you get on to kids born in the 90's it goes down hill pretty fast. We essentially tossed out ALL child rearing concepts in favor of garbage social science and mind altering antidepressants within a single generation, then ignored the fact they were homicidal and suicidal. Instead of fixing this problem as it goes wrong we've just kept on steamrolling forward.
I am so sick of this narrative. I'm old AF, but don't shit on new generations. Gen X was no better and the boomers...I've never met more fuckups than the boomers. These stupid stereotypes are just things we tell ourselves to feel better. People bitched about the "The Greatest Generation." Millenials served in the armed forces (in the USA) more than the generation before and after, but people made a million stupid jokes about wokeness and them taking pictures of their avocado toast to make themselves fe
Re: (Score:3)
> I won't paint an entire generation with such a broad brush, but hopefully this is a wake up call for those who never received one before. As much as we all might like to shove the blame on the newest generation just entering into the world, some of it falls on the older generations that failed to raise them properly.
We older folks have a lot of blame to share.
> Maybe we thought we were doing them a favor or were just overcorrecting for the problems we perceived in our own generations, but expecting them to spring fully formed from the head of Zeus is foolish. I'd like to think that they're up to this learning experience, as harsh as it may seem.
We (a collective we) tried to insulate them from any adversity, and gave them unrealistic self esteem with no real accomplishments, as well as other stupid but well meaning things. And many of us tried to stifle competitive drive. People bristle when they are claimed to be participation trophy generation, but that was exactly what happened.
Ar they up to adapting to reality? Yes, but they need to understand that life is not infinite, so they should start soon.
Re: (Score:2)
> Life is a competition, not puppydogs and rainbows that your third grade teacher told you.
I agree, bud. They should be working for pennies in the coal mines for the robber barons.
Re: (Score:2)
>> Life is a competition, not puppydogs and rainbows that your third grade teacher told you.
> I agree, bud. They should be working for pennies in the coal mines for the robber barons.
Or maybe should just give them all a billion dollars pat them on the back, and say You made it!
Most of my male relatives worked in the coal strippings. They worked hard and saved their money and sent their children to college.
You have a problem with that? Despite your concept that young people need to start from the top, it doesn't work like that other than in your fever dreams,
I didn't become wealthy until I was around 49. And I lived pretty frugally until my mid 30's. The archetype 25 year old
Every new wave of workers (Score:4, Insightful)
On my first job I did shitty work. It's unbelievable how even simple things can be done poorly by a kid. But I started working (summers) at 16, so people kind of expected that. By the time I was out of college I already knew how to get along with people in a work environment, how to handle frustration at bad supervisors or being dependent on the output of a bad coworker. I still wasn't as good as someone who had years on the job, but I could be professional and churn out the labour.
A lot of kids today have never been in 'the real world' and the Covid pause didn't help at all. They're poorly socialized and entitled because they've been coddled. They'll figure it out, they're just behind by a few years.
Re:Every new wave of workers (Score:4, Insightful)
They're poorly socialized and entitled because they've been coddled.
And looking at their phone for hours each day, claiming they have "anxiety" if they have to talk to someone, claim they're "autistic" which is why they can't communicate well, claim they "panic" if they get a phone call, claim they're "introverted" which is why they don't socialize, and the excuses go on.
As I've gotten older I've found there's always an excuse for something. Nowadays that's the default for most people, but particularly for this group.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's probably true, a self-fulfilling prophecy. They're allowed to self-isolate and everything outside their bubble is scary because they haven't been forced to acclimate.
And it's not something in the water. I've known some great kids who are going to rule their own futures with any luck at all, but I do see a lot of kids who can't handle making eye contact. I worked with one last year who quit 2 days in because she couldn't handle saying 'good morning' every day to a half dozen people in the off
Re:Every new wave of workers (Score:5, Interesting)
> They're poorly socialized and entitled because they've been coddled.
> And looking at their phone for hours each day, claiming they have "anxiety" if they have to talk to someone, claim they're "autistic" which is why they can't communicate well, claim they "panic" if they get a phone call, claim they're "introverted" which is why they don't socialize, and the excuses go on.
> As I've gotten older I've found there's always an excuse for something. Nowadays that's the default for most people, but particularly for this group.
I have social anxiety, tested as dyslexic, possibly slightly autistic and introverted. None of this stopped me from working my ass off to get along with my coworkers in the office, publish and present papers, and do some adjunct teaching. Usually anything worth doing scares the crap out of people (it does me), so just be scared and do it anyway has worked for me (I've only resulted in one major breakdown so far).
Re:Every new wave of workers (Score:4, Insightful)
> As I've gotten older I've found there's always an excuse for something. Nowadays that's the default for most people, but particularly for this group.
As I've gotten older I've noticed that there's always blame for something too, even the things that are blatantly obvious phantasms of deranged minds. Avocado toast outrage for instance by people who want to pay half the minimum wage but expect their workers to be on call 24/7, never sick and for the government to pick up the slack for them with food stamps, or helpfully tell them to get another job.. as long as it doesn't interfere with that 24/7 availability. Oh and the benefits the law says you're entitled to, that's just paper, if you actually try to use them you can find another job.
Re: (Score:2)
We have massive unemployment and tech employment market that shrank 40% since Feb. Many of the listings are just to make existing workers see how bad the market is so they'll be afraid to lose their existing job and absorb more roles.
Companies are turning away rockstars with decades of varied progressive and proven performance even if they'll take entry money. Why would you hire a mouthy and whiny woke kid when you won't hire a guy who was integrating global enterprise scale solutions less than a year ago t
Re: (Score:2)
The kid's willing to work for less because they don't have rent to pay since they haven't been able to afford moving out of their parents' house anyway. And they don't have the experience to know a bad deal and walk away quickly.
And at the bottom end of the industry, it's always been this. What's remarkable is seeing these 'disposable' entry level people get fired rather than abused until they've picked up enough experience to find a better job.
Re: Every new wave of workers (Score:2)
The big players are ripe for the pickings. People are literally sick of their technology, addicted and sick of course. There is a lot of room for cheaper, simpler and less evil.
Re: (Score:2)
The tech market didn't "shrink", it was thrown away for short term gains so the CEO could get some more stocks to make tax free loans against. All of the money they saved they'll dump into a poorly formed AI boondoggle from another company that won't exist in 5 years.
Been watching this same cycle happen for 20+ years. In 2 or 3 years if not next year, they'll be whining about being unable to find workers with Masters degrees willing to take entry level positions in the janitorial dept.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I think there's something good to be said about high school part time work in terms of what it instills in a kid early on. As you say they get exposed to real world expectations in an adult environment but also learn skills around money management and the like, having real personal finances for the first time.
Re: (Score:3)
When I was a teen I worked summer jobs. One summer I shoveled horse manure out of the stables and spread it on the farm-fields -all day, everyday. Another summer was spent splitting firewood (by hand, with an axe). Another was doing construction work -mostly carrying and pushing things. In college I worked part time as an office temp. Low effort, but lots of emphasis on timeliness, appearance, politeness, and willingness to follow instructions.
By the time I got into the real working-world, I knew what
These are among the first wave of pandemic grads (Score:2)
And these complaints all sound a lot like cptsd symptoms. Itâ(TM)s gonna be like this for a while. We have rushed to get âoeback to normal,â but thereâ(TM)s lots of ailing psyches.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"cptsd symptoms... there's lots of ailing psyches"
Sorry but speaking like this is symptomatic of the problem. Coddling.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, why can't they just deal with their depression and mental disorders like real men, silently with alcoholism and domestic violence?
Re: These are among the first wave of pandemic gra (Score:2)
No. This hate of coddling just makes the ptsd worse. It's easy to sit in judgement, but hard to fix. Why aren't people dinging the employers for not proactively offering this training? Why are we letting them off so easily?
Please (Score:2)
This isn't news.
Old people have been complaining about the current youth generation since time immemorial. I can pretty much guarantee that if you did a similar survey 10, 20, etc. years ago you'd get very similar "news".
Re: (Score:2)
Eventually you go back far enough that on-the-job training was normal and expected, and employers were willing to invest in it because they had good retention, and they had good retention because they had actual benefits and pay and so on, and they had benefits because they were afraid of unions.
But now, employers don't like hiring entry level employees for entry level positions, so new generations are strangled out of the workplace.
Re: (Score:2)
> Old people have been complaining about the current youth generation since time immemorial.
It's always funny when you see someone reference a quote about younger generations that looks similar to TFS above, only to reveal afterwards that the quote came from a newspaper or magazine article originally published in the mid 1800s.
Re: (Score:2)
"originally published in the mid 1800s"
"The young are by character appetitive and of a kind to do whatever they should desire. And of the bodily appetites they are especially attentive to that connected with sex and have no control over it They are irate and hot-tempered and of a kind to harken to anger. And they are inferior to their passions; for through their ambition they do not tolerate disregard but are vexed if they think they are being wronged"
-Aristotle's _Rhetoric_, circa 4th century BC
Re: (Score:2)
> a three piece suit
Two flip-flops and Bermuda shorts.
Re: (Score:2)
Now I will be first to admit the young'uns have their problems, but...
Even if college did actually teach skills that are needed in the workplace - which it doesn't...
Who in their right mind would think anyone should be motivated to go to meetings, wear a three piece suit and use "language appropriate for workplace"? Much more so for a salary that cannot even rent a room? Stfu you retarded manager wannabe, go and die a sad death somewhere, you are obviously missing a few vital workplace "skills" yorself, too
Re: (Score:2)
> Even if college did actually teach skills that are needed in the workplace - which it doesn't...
Typically the people who say things like this haven't been in college in more than 10 years, they're just parroting back what their clique agrees is wisdom.
As for the skills that are needed, most companies can't even articulate what skills they need for the jobs their workers are doing. They have so many employees holding the company together covering 3 other people's positions with non-codified spreadsheets, just trying to quantify a set of skills necessary is futile. They expect a graduate to have 10
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure I follow. Companies, much like human beings, not able to articulate their needs does not mean they do not have needs. Not even all of the bullshit of the job market takes away from that.
Also, you can be an old fart in the industry, yet the job postings still expect from you to have 10 years of experience on the latest fashionable js framework and whatnot. Such cluelessness is universal and not tied to the age or offered position of the prospect employee. Same goes for fishing expeditions and ev
I predict a ground swell of old farts (Score:2, Troll)
yelling at the kids in this thread the likes of which the world has never seen.
I also predict a bunch of old farts who hit their 1st jobs during the .com bubble rather than after 3 recessions and a long series of rate hikes that were designed to cause a 4th recession (but which failed) going on and on about how lazy "kids these days" are while forgetting how much better they had it growing up.
Re: (Score:3)
You try to sound like a old timer, but given you seem shocked by the recent interest rates... you've apparently not been on this planet all that long. Give me a break, "old farts" who got their first job during the .com boom? Those people are only in their 40s!
The current interest rates are pretty much where they were when my wife and I bought our house - in the 1990s. And those were low compared to the interest rates from the mid 1970s through the 1980s - which was when I grew up and started working. Heck,
Degree inflation (Score:2)
I had this long ass screed written about businesses requiring college degrees leading to an overwhelming number of people opting to take federal loans going to college, which also resulted in grade inflation which then followed them from k-12 to higher ed, and how this process over the last couple of decades has devalued the college degree.
Then I read the article. it's talking about recent college grads. The poor bastards who went through the grind from k-12 post great recession, then started college duri
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, if you never got a chance to work a part time job, or socialize in person during HS/College,
And there's the excuse I wrote about above. While missing out on a part-time job for one year because of covid might come into play, to claim that is the be all and end all of why these whiners can't be on time, properly communicate, or even dress decently, is just an excuse. These people are 21-23 years old. You're telling me they can't communicate an idea because of covid, or that they've never had to be s
"6 out of 10 firing some" is not that much (Score:3)
When I was hiring employees for my department in the "roaring 1990s", keeping 4 out of 10 new hires beyond their first 6 months was a pretty normal rate. Sure, those were highly skilled and highly paid jobs not just anyone was suitable for, but where TFA writes that 4 out of 10 employers have not fired a single new hire, that sounds like a very lenient environment. Or are we talking about burger-flipping jobs, here?
That said, "not wearing office-appropriate clothing" is the most stupid reason I have ever heard of for firing someone. Employees should be rated by the results they deliver, not by their looks - unless they are actors or models.
Re:"6 out of 10 firing some" is not that much (Score:4, Insightful)
That said, "not wearing office-appropriate clothing" is the most stupid reason I have ever heard of for firing someone.
No, it's not. They're running a business. They want people to look presentable. Not dressed to the nines, but at a bare minimum wearing something reasonably approporiate. Polo shirts are perfectly acceptable for most jobs as are short-sleeved shirts. Flip flops are not appropriate unless you work at the beach.
Most places have severaly loosened attire requirements. No more suit and tie or skirt and heels. If you can't at least meet that minimum you're just being lazy, and why would a company want someone like that?
Re: (Score:2)
Unless they are in front of a customer, why are you worried about what someone is wearing? They're working, not showing off the latest fashions to their coworkers.
You're the kind of person who would fire Einstein for not combing his hair.
Re: (Score:2)
Office-appropriate clothing today basically just means 'non-offensive'. Don't wear shirts with slurs on them. Don't wear ripped jeans with your junk hanging out. Wash your hair. Shave. Basically make yourself look presentable. That is NOT a high bar to clear.
Re: (Score:2)
We can only speculate as to what the article's cited managerial ensemble chose to regard as office-appropriate clothing. It might be three-piece suits; it might be shoulderpads and heels like a [1]Pointer Sisters video [youtu.be]. Presumably the real issue is non-compliance with a posted dress code, which is to say a well-developed resentment of middle managers.
[1] https://youtu.be/3IprBx1OlBk?t=49
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure what kind of jobs but they must be in Britain since the summary repeatedly refers to people being "sacked".
And it's too late... (Score:5, Interesting)
And it's too late to hire back all us old-fart baby boomers that they laid off because we were old, highly paid and starting to develop expensive medical complications. We're all cruising around with our Airstreams checking out the national parks. So I say those companies got exactly what they need - a big fat enema bag full of reality.
Re: And it's too late... (Score:2)
An over $100k salary in today's dollars is worth what a $50k salary was in 1995. That's just simple math.
You want quality. Pay for it.
Re: (Score:2)
The challenge is when a company can't bill the time out at 2x what they did in 1995. Some industries bill 3x... but some are just at 1.5x.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh look, it's an entitled boomer. Never seen that before. No sir.
Shouldn't you be outside measuring the neighbors grass height so the HOA can put a lien on their house or something? I bet they have kids too, the little bastards, wanting to play outside and make all that noise. Serve them right to have their house seized. Oh, I don't think you have enough cameras and spotlights pointed at their house either. Better fix that.
Re: (Score:2)
He's not entitled. He's enjoying life. Use the correct adjectives, otherwise you're a moron.
Not really a new thing (Score:4, Insightful)
Fresh college grads are always a crap shoot. Some of them are outstanding, others can't cut it. You don't really know until you get them onboarded and attempting to do work. This was true 35 years ago when I started my career.
"Having poor communication skills" (Score:2)
How does such a college grad get hired in the first place? Are employers not screening for this? Is there some way to fake this?
Re: (Score:2)
As a large language model created by OpenAI, I'm offended you'd even ask.
This sounds like a flamebait (Score:4, Insightful)
An entire generation being shit? I don't think so.
Here's the truth: young, inexperienced professionals are young and inexperienced. You were too before you got older and more experienced. The experience includes learning that silly things like being on time and dressing decently matters.
In fairness, when I started my career, I was awful. I was always late (but I made up for it by staying late too), my code was shit and - most annoying memory for me now as a seasoned professional - I have an opinion on everything and voiced it loudly, despite the fact that I didn't know jack squat.
I see the same thing with some of the latest recruits in my company, who are fresh out of university: they're eager, but they have no patience for anything, they know it all and they have a hard time getting up in the morning. It sometimes annoy me to no end when I try to show them something useful I know and being told that "it's old crap".
But here's the thing: I was the same when I was their age :) So I'm patient, because really, they're not bad people. They just don't know yet that they don't know.
trash (Score:2)
the skibidi toilet kind
Before blaming Gen Z... (Score:2)
Before we go blaming Gen Z for everything, just remember who raised them.
These young adults do need to take responsibility. I also have experience with an employee who has poor business communication and doesn't take pride in making sure the results look presentable rather than just thrown together.
Huh (Score:2)
My daughter is a Gen Z and she's a fantastic worker. Hard-working and passionate and her employers have really liked her at the jobs she's had so far.
Dissing an entire generation is lazy and stupid, and will come back to haunt people when Gen Zers are in charge.
Busiiness Cycle - Because they can (tm) (Score:2)
Retired boomer here.
The business cycle ebbs and flows just like the tide. This is a side effect of capitalism and cheap or expensive money.
Employers can get away with this now, but the music won't be playing forever and there won't be enough chairs when the music stops. Demographics will see to that.
AI is mostly hype. I'll come crashing down just like the Dot Com crash in the naughty oughties. When it does, there will be more pain for both sides for a while,
but the economy will will get reconfigured and r
Take a hard look at the world they grew up in (Score:2)
Just a reminder: Gen-X here.
I remember what the world was like in the 80's and even the 90's, and at risk of being accused of seeing the past through 'rose-colored glasses', many things were much better then than they are now, quality-of-life-wise and hope-for-the-future-wise.
Gen-Z grew up in a world where in order to get that college degree they had to go into massive amounts of debt with a payment system that is stacked against them, and on graduation they're launched into a system that apparently doesn
Only been laid off once in my life. (Score:2)
Knock on wood, I'm well into retirement age and only once in my life have I ever been laid off, and that was at an engineering job where I was working part time as a contractor. In every other situation I left on my own; sometimes with another job lined up, sometimes not. You would think that hiring a fresh out of school technical type would be more trouble than it's worth, what with the whole on-boarding thing, if you think you might just fire them a few months later.
These kids today can't knap flint for shit. (Score:2)
You know who ELSE thinks that certain other groups are whiny, soft-bellied, parasitic trash with a shite work ethic? That's right, I'm talking about EVERY GENERATION EVER. Surely we can't all be right.
Also, maybe your willingness to quietly and obediently tolerate being exploited by the rich isn't the flex you think it is. Just a thought.
Meanwhile (Score:2)
Those 6 in 10 companies definitely have shitty leadership and shitty policies. Motivation and initiative are the employer's problem, not the employee's. My motivation to work is because I want to buy things, but that doesn't mean I'll do just any work for any money, and it doesn't mean I'm motivated to work harder or faster, because I'm not going to get paid any extra. As for initiative, it's getting the job. Initiative done. The only other initiative I'm going to take is the initiative to do my job in a qu
Dead beat dads (Score:2)
One thing I learned though about being a 15 year old (I'm 33 now) working in IT all through high school and after, is that your boss and older coworkers have to raise you a bit, and they should. So when I see these reports of firing Gen-Z'rs I see a bunch of dead-beat-dads that have no teaching or parenting skills. These kids need mentors, guidance, support, and someone to build their confidence in themselves (or cut it down if it's too high), and not all of them get that at home, nor is what they get at h
Let's play "Big Number or Small Number" (Score:2)
"six in 10 employers say they have already sacked some of the Gen Z workers they hired fresh out of college earlier this year."
"one in six bosses say they're hesitant to hire college grads again."
"one in seven bosses have admitted that they may avoid hiring them altogether next year."
"Three-quarters of the companies surveyed said some or all of their recent graduate hires were unsatisfactory in some way"
Is that more or less than what they've said previously?
Also, how many are really hesitant or will really
Kids out of College Were Always a Pain (Score:2)
Working with kids out of college has always been difficult. Employers invested in them because in the long run they would be productive. If something has changed its likely the willingness of employers to invest. It may be that hiring is easier with online processes. It may be that employees aren't likely to stay around once they get up to speed. It may be that managers don't have the resources to put up with less than optimal results from anyone. It may be that turnover is a standard part of office culture
Isn't this every generation? (Score:2)
I remember in the 1990s, how people didn't want to hire Gen X because Gen X had poor morals due to "rock and roll" and had rockstars wearing makeup. A decade or two later, people didn't want to hire millennials and mocked industrial and then emo. Especially around 2000 when jobs were scarce, and stayed scarce until around 2003 or so, because after 9/11, no company would hire for at least a year after that, and even then, people were skittish until after the Iraq invasion in 2003/2004.
Gen Z isn't any worse
This isn't a new thing (Score:2)
Every job I've been at will fire a few of the people they hire not long after hiring them. You can't really tell all that much in an interview. I'm talking back before 2008, I remember one new grad got hired in, was still living with his parents and immediately went out and bought a brand new Mercedes or BMW or something it was, and he didn't make it past his probationary period (3 months). His sense of financial priorities was about as strong as his technical ability.
Motivation ha ha ha (Score:2)
"Employers' gripe with young people today is their lack of motivation or initiative"
LOL. I repeat, LOL.
At ~66 years old, my motivation is somewhere in the negative numbers. I just don't give a fuck anymore because, as the saying goes, I have no more fucks to give.
All my fucks were squandered by hapless PMs, brain-dead SMEs, and incompetent managers who couldn't find their way out of a phone booth with a map, a mirror, and a squad of Army Rangers to lead the way. (I'm lookin' at YOU, Rick, Krista, and Mark.)
To be fair (Score:4, Interesting)
As a young Gen X, they should have fired me at my first tech job. Between the insubordination, slacking off, and office drinking. But it was the late 1990's and they were taking any warm bodies that could use a computer.
Re: (Score:2)
"office drinking." The first two I could understand, but this third one I'm finding hard to believe. Either you were very good at hiding your alcohol consumption at work, or they were unusually lax in enforcing employee conduct at that particular workplace.
Re:To be fair (Score:5, Interesting)
I didn't have office drinking. We went to the nearest bar. During work hours, if there wasn't enough to occupy us.
And it was not the standard of the day for all industries, but it seemed fairly common in IT. We were like Gods back then. I was no catch, but I actually had women hit on me when they heard what I did for a living, presumably dreaming of accessing what must certainly have been a large bank account (it wasn't).
Things settled down after the dot-com bubble burst and most of us became commodities like everyone else working for a buck.
Re: (Score:2)
You can still have lots of women hit on you today, just tell them you're an AI. That's what I do.
NO CARRIER
Re: To be fair (Score:2)
Office drinking was not unheard of in the 80's thru early 2000's. Many of us had taken drugs casually from Jr. High thru College during the 70's. Laxxer attitudes back then.
Re: (Score:2)
In the Valley, drinking was normalized. Hell, even at the eBay/PayPal complex (which was one of the more straight-laced places in San Jose), beer taps turned on at 5pm and people would regularly grab a few and head back to their desks. At Adobe, it wasn't uncommon for all the managers to have bourbon or whisky at their desks. At Intel, there wasn't a ton of booze out there in the open, but all the engineers I knew in the early 2000's had at least two drinks at lunch before they came back to the office.
Re:To be fair (Score:4, Interesting)
"six in 10 employers" , this tells me 6 in 10 employers are rubbish. Which is an easy to believe statistic. Adapt with the times, or start paying people what they are worth.
I'm guessing that 6 in 10 employers didn't offer their new hires a decent wage, and thus in turn the employees were disinterested in doing more than the minimum to keep a paycheck. I've seen fast food workers more motivated than some office workers.
But here's something not said. Outsourcing sucks. Outsourced employees are often abused to the point of not caring. It would not surprise me if all "6 in 10" employers are some form of outsourcing or consulting firm.
Re: (Score:3)
Some of the most motivated workers I've had the pleasure of sharing office space with were at the very lowest end of the pay scale. Motivation comes in all sorts of shapes and sizes.
Re: To be fair (Score:2)
You're drawing way too many conclusions from limited data. What if those 10 companies hired an average of 15 zoomers? And six fires a single person. 6/150 is a VERY healthy rate to fire new employees.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait till you figure out that if you think your attitude was bad, multiply genZ by 100.
Seriously, I get to watch genZ fire genZ and they're brutal; out of the genZ running the place I'd keep 1 maybe 2 of them.
We're talking drug use, alcohol use, violation of regulations, health codes, theft. And those are the ones that get to stay.
Re: (Score:3)
I think it's just the overall direction we've been going on for some time. I'm a millennial myself, but I seem to be really unpopular, likely even among other millennials when I make posts like this:
[1]https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
The moderation says a lot, but the responses even more. The typical person doesn't seem to want to take responsibility for themselves, just expecting the river to come to them and then have the fish jump out of the water and on to their plate. Otherwise, to them, there's no oppor
[1] https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=23466745&cid=64818171
Re: (Score:2)
At least America has been losing it's direction for a long time now. I think Gen Z pretty much lost hope so of course work quality is going to follow. What boomers got to enjoy at their age as far as work-}reward goes seems like something of a far off fantasy world.
Re: (Score:3)
> I seem to be really unpopular, likely even among other millennials when I make posts like this:
You're unpopular because you're assuming that opportunities must exist where others are that will absolutely fulfill their needs and that they are just too lazy to go after them. That in and of itself is intellectual laziness.
> The moderation says a lot, but the responses even more.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. You casually dismissed their concerns en mass as them not grinding their noses hard enough, of course they aren't going to respond well to that. Especially the ones that have put forth a good faith effort only to be taken advantage of again and ag
Re: (Score:2)
"You miss all the chances you never take."
That's right up there with "tomorrow is the first day of the rest of your life."
Not terribly useful.
Re:To be fair (Score:4, Interesting)
To be fair, expectations of employers today are completely off-kilter; from expectations of always being on-call to the circus that is the interview process, I have to imagine the fault lines are manifesting in unexpected ways.
The bigger point however- hiring is irrevocably broken. Might have something to do with the complexity of modern institutions, maybe the complete joke that is HR, but once or twice of being burned is expected. A trend is a lack of due diligence in your "meritocracy".
Re: (Score:2)
> expectations of always being on-call
My perception is there's less of that. Servers are more reliable, and when a VPS goes down, it's often someone else's problem.
> to the circus that is the interview process
There's nothing new about that.
Re: (Score:3)
As of 98 I was a college drop out (after two years, due to money), moved back home and figured I'd try to find a job and go to school locally instead. I ended up in the job I wanted (IT), rose quickly, and going back to school was never more than a fleeting thought. I got my foot in the door at just the right time. Friends who finished their degrees found a very different job market at that time, and those with CS degrees found themselves at minimum wage working a help desk while I was the main system
Re: (Score:3)
I started in the professional world out of college in the mid-90's... and I do realize my bosses needed to adapt a bit to me, and I needed to adapt a LOT to them. E-Mail was just starting to be a major form of communication which created friction: the office still relied primarily on fax machines for communication with external parties, and faxes were treated with just a tiny reduction in formality from posted letters on letterhead. My boss might write one email a day, while I was writing 20-50. [With Mi
Re: (Score:2)
I found several in a row, but they all crashed and burned rather dramatically, ultimately taking my career down with them, and later I pieced together they were actually just fronts for organized crime. You probably dodged a bullet.
Re: (Score:2)
Were you ever wondering why a spaghetti store needs a sysadmin? (Or spaghetti code I suppose)
Re: (Score:3)
Networking company in the 90's. Beer carts on Fridays shuttled right to the lab. Cookies, cake, soda... Pizza Fridays from a place down the street for 50 engineers. I was right out of college and what a great time! .... then the layoffs started. A startup and another layoff and finally landing at somewhere stable for the last 15 years I see it about to turn dark again. Buckle up friends.
Re: (Score:2)
I went public sector. Gold-plated health insurance, $130k a year and a month of paid vacation time. Private sector can kiss my cushy ass.
Re: (Score:2)
> In the late 90s I could never find these unicorn jobs you are talking about.
Where did you live?
Hint: The jobs weren't in Alabama.
I was in San Jose in the 1990s. It was like the gold rush.
Re: (Score:3)
They started catering free lunches like salmon or chicken with french style sauces for the staff. That lasted several weeks before they switched to sandwiches then to nothing at all. Eventually instead of fancy lunches, we filled the cafeteria with arcade machines and several people got in trouble for playing them all day (even though they were working all night). And the new rule was we couldn't play them during business hours (?!?)
Later we hired the voice actor that did HAL 9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey (
Re: That's funny. (Score:2)
That's too bad. We were snorting lines of blow in tech support.
Re: (Score:2)
You wound me sir! I'm a shit stirrer, not a troll!
Also, I've been fired from a bunch of jobs. Not sure why that would surprise anyone given my post history!
Re: (Score:2)
I always appreciate a good stir of shit, you're going on my friends list ol' buddy ol' pal.
Re: (Score:2)
> You wound me sir! I'm a shit stirrer, not a troll!
You provide a valuable social service and don't let anyone say otherwise. (I'm being dead serious here, no lie.)
Make no mistake, the world needs shit-stirrers just as much as it needs heart surgeons or mechanical engineers.