Ancient Martian Atmosphere May Be Sequestered In Clay (space.com)
- Reference: 0175133507
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/09/25/2215228/ancient-martian-atmosphere-may-be-sequestered-in-clay
- Source link: https://www.space.com/mars-missing-atmosphere-hiding-plain-sight-clay-methane
> Conditions on early Mars were highly likely to have had CO2 carried down into the ground by water, where reactions with rock resulted in iron oxide (and Mars' rust-red surface) and released hydrogen, which in turn [3]reacted with the water to form methane that was bound in smectite clays . It's all still there, just under the surface.
The research has been [4]published in the journal Science Advances .
[1] https://www.space.com/mars-missing-atmosphere-hiding-plain-sight-clay-methane
[2] https://slashdot.org/~Baron_Yam
[3] https://www.space.com/mars-missing-atmosphere-hiding-plain-sight-clay-methane
[4] https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adm8443
Stupid claim in summary (Score:3)
> with methane possibly still present and usable as an energy source
This is Mars, where do you get Oxygen to react Methane as an energy source?
And?
How much energy do you spend to extract and process the clay to extract this methane and all the process to extract an Oxydizer from a yet unknown source.
This is just to highlight this baseless stupid claim in the summary.
Re: (Score:2)
> This is Mars, where do you get Oxygen to react Methane as an energy source?
Magic! Duh!
Also, please stop discouraging the Muskovites from volunteering to die in entertaining ways on that frozen, radioactive rock. I plan to make a mint on what promises to be the only worthwhile reality show, ever.
Re: (Score:2)
When you can let hydrogen react with water to form methane, anything is possible.
Re: (Score:2)
From humans, we aren't 100% efficient at breathing oxygen. /s
TFS vs TFA (Score:2)
Ah, the great editors. TFS says:
> hydrogen, which in turn reacted with the water to form methane
Which makes no sense at all. TFA actually says:
> hydrogen could have combined with carbon dioxide in the water to create methane
Which is an interesting hypothesis. However, this process could only "rescue" hydrogen released from groundwater (due to formation of iron oxides). Hydrogen release from water in the atmosphere (split by solar radiation) will have been lost to space. Without going into painful details, it is highly likely the the atmospheric losses dominate.
But I thought it got blown away (Score:1)
Mars has a cold core so it has no Van Allen belts. Nothing shields it from the solar wind. That blew away the atmosphere, or so I was told.
Re: (Score:3)
> Mars has a cold core
Are you sure you about that?
[1]https://www.nasa.gov/missions/... [nasa.gov]
[2]https://www.sciencealert.com/i... [sciencealert.com]
[1] https://www.nasa.gov/missions/insight/nasa-insight-study-provides-clearest-look-ever-at-martian-core/
[2] https://www.sciencealert.com/in-an-incredible-first-scientists-have-discovered-whats-at-the-core-of-mars