News: 0175126343

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

X-Rays From a Nuclear Explosion Could Redirect an Asteroid (space.com)

(Wednesday September 25, 2024 @03:00AM (BeauHD) from the straight-out-of-a-sci-fi-movie dept.)


Scientists have proposed a method to deflect dangerous asteroids using nuclear explosions, not by directly blowing them up, but by detonating a bomb above the surface to create an X-ray burst that [1]vaporizes part of the asteroid and changes its course . Experiments using the Z machine at Sandia National Laboratories simulated this process, showing that it could potentially redirect even large asteroids to prevent catastrophic impacts on Earth. Space.com reports:

> In a new study, the researchers employed the Z machine at Sandia National Laboratory, the most powerful laboratory source of radiation in the world. It generates powerful electric pulses, magnetic fields and X-rays to find out how materials react under high pressures and temperatures. "At present, there is only one way to generate an intense enough X-ray burst to do an experiment like this, and that's using the Z Machine," said [Nathan Moore, a physicist at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, N.M.]. The scientists used electrical pulses from the Z machine to generate powerful magnetic fields. These in turn compressed argon gas to generate plasma, the same form of matter that makes up lightning and stars. This argon plasma produced the X-ray burst the researchers needed to simulate a similar one from a nuclear explosion.

>

> "You have to concentrate a lot of power, about 80 trillion watts, into a very small space, the size of a pencil lead, and very quickly, about 100 billionths of second, to generate a hot enough argon plasma, several millions of degrees, to make a powerful enough X-ray burst to heat the asteroid material surface to tens of thousands of degrees to give it enough push," Moore said. The scientists hung up a pair of targets in a vacuum, each 0.47 inches (12 millimeters) wide -- one made of quartz, the other of fused silica. These materials are similar in composition to known asteroids. Previous attempts to study various asteroid deflection strategies all held targets fixed in place, "which wasn't very realistic," Moore said. "After all, asteroids in outer space aren't attached to anything. Besides, how would a mock asteroid accelerate realistically if it was anchored down?"

>

> To overcome this problem, the researchers devised what they called "X-ray scissors." They hung the targets up using thin metal foil just 13 microns thick, or about one-eighth the thickness of an average human hair. This foil vaporized when the X-rays hit it, freeing the targets to accelerate naturally in space. The X-ray pulses generated vapor plumes from each target and accelerated each one to about 155 mph (250 km/h), matching computational predictions. "The ability to deflect miniature asteroids in a laboratory using the Z Machine is unlike anything else you can do anywhere else on Earth," Moore said. Scaling these findings up to a 2.5-mile-wide (4 kilometer) asteroid, with a 1 megaton nuclear bomb exploding about 1.25 miles (2 km) from its surface, the researchers suggested the resulting push could help deflect dangerous asteroids away from Earth.

>

> "For reference, a 4-km [2.5-mile] asteroid is predicted to be large enough to cause global devastation and possible disruption of civilization, according to the NASA Planetary Defense Strategy and Action Plan," Moore said. Moore noted that asteroids come in a variety of compositions. "This new technique can be used to investigate the deflection response of different asteroid materials," he said. "Understanding how different asteroid materials vaporize and deflect will be critical for preparing for a planetary defense mission, should the need arise."

The study has been [2]published in the journal Nature Physics .



[1] https://www.space.com/asteroid-nuclear-bomb-deflection-x-rays

[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-024-02633-7



Irrealistic crap. (Score:2)

by stooo ( 2202012 )

Let the humans die instead.

Re: (Score:2)

by DrMrLordX ( 559371 )

Uh, no. Unless you're volunteering?

Re: (Score:2)

by stooo ( 2202012 )

hating himself for being human and wanting to destroy everything

Who wants to destroy everything ?

Thickness 13 m = kitchen aluminium (Score:2)

by test321 ( 8891681 )

> using thin metal foil just 13 microns thick, or about one-eighth the thickness of an average human hair.

What they mean is they are using kitchen aluminium foil (11 m cheapest from supermarket, 33 m science grade).

Re:Thickness 13 um = kitchen aluminium foil (Score:2)

by test321 ( 8891681 )

Apparently the micrometer symbol isn't working here (despite being part of good old Code Page 437 from from original IBM PC).

Bruce Willis will be glad to hear that (Score:2)

by nospam007 ( 722110 ) *

No need to go there.

PUNK ROCK!! DISCO DUCK!! BIRTH CONTROL!!