California Sues ExxonMobil For Alleged Decades of Deception Around Plastic Recycling (cnn.com)
- Reference: 0175117565
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/24/09/23/2336240/california-sues-exxonmobil-for-alleged-decades-of-deception-around-plastic-recycling
- Source link: https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/23/climate/california-sues-exxonmobil-plastic-recycling/index.html
> California Attorney General Rob Bonta [1]filed a lawsuit against ExxonMobil on Monday alleging the company [2]carried out a "decades-long campaign of deception " in which the oil and gas giant misled the public on the merits of plastic recycling. The complaint accuses the company of using slick marketing and misleading public statements for half a century to claim recycling was an effective way to deal with plastic pollution, according to a press release from Bonta's office published Monday. It alleges the company continues to perpetuate the "myth" of recycling today. The case, filed in the San Francisco County Superior Court, seeks to compel ExxonMobil "to end its deceptive practices that threaten the environment and the public," the statement said.
>
> Bonta is also asking the court to rule ExxonMobil must pay civil penalties, among other payments, for the harm inflicted by plastic pollution in California. "Plastics are everywhere, from the deepest parts of our oceans, the highest peaks on earth, and even in our bodies, causing irreversible damage -- in ways known and unknown -- to our environment and potentially our health," Bonta said. "For decades, ExxonMobil has been deceiving the public to convince us that plastic recycling could solve the plastic waste and pollution crisis when they clearly knew this wasn't possible. ExxonMobil lied to further its record-breaking profits at the expense of our planet and possibly jeopardizing our health," he said. [...]
>
> Lawsuits against oil and gas companies for their role in climate change and air pollution are becoming more common, but Monday's is the first in the country to take on a fossil fuel company for its messaging around plastic recycling. The statement said that ExxonMobil "falsely promoted all plastic as recyclable, when in fact the vast majority of plastic products are not and likely cannot be recycled, either technically or economically." The lawsuit also alleges Exxon "continues to deceive the public by touting "advanced recycling" as the solution to the plastic waste and pollution crisis." Advanced -- or chemical -- recycling is a technology promoted by many oil companies, but which has been plagued by missed targets, closed or shelved plants and reports of fires and spills. [...] At the heart of the suit is the allegation ExxonMobil's messaging caused consumers to buy and use more single-use plastic than they otherwise would have.
In response to the lawsuit, ExxonMobil pointed the finger back at California, which it said has an ineffective recycling system that officials have known about for decades: "They failed to act, and now they seek to blame others. Instead of suing us, they could have worked with us to fix the problem and keep plastic out of landfills."
ExxonMobil contends chemical recycling does work. "We're bringing real solutions, recycling plastic waste that couldn't be recycled by traditional methods," the company said in a statement.
A copy of the Attorney General's complaint can be found [3]here (PDF).
[1] https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-sues-exxonmobil-deceiving-public-recyclability-plastic
[2] https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/23/climate/california-sues-exxonmobil-plastic-recycling/index.html
[3] https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/Complaint_People%20v.%20Exxon%20Mobil%20et%20al.pdf
I'm good with this (Score:2)
Exxon, Chevron, and the majors should all clean things up. Stop selling oil, gasoline, diesel and oil products in California in 30 days.
It will help California to not collect the 60 cents of state-level gasoline tax per gallon [1]https://www.nbcsandiego.com/ne... [nbcsandiego.com]
It will also help California not collect the $7+ billion in gasoline taxes each year. [2]https://advocacy.calchamber.co... [calchamber.com]
This is the same thing that Puerto Rico tried a while back to get a never-ending tax/penalty revenue stream from the oil companies,
[1] https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/california-gas-tax-goes-up-on-july-1-heres-how-much-youre-paying/3555332/
[2] https://advocacy.calchamber.com/policy/issues/californias-gas-tax/
Question is when (Score:2)
When will the amount of regulation and industry targeting by the government will seriously break a fundamental part of the economy.
Re: (Score:2)
> This is the same thing that Puerto Rico tried a while back to get a never-ending tax/penalty revenue stream from the oil companies, just like the big tobacco settlement did 20 (?) years ago in the USA.
What dumb shit conservative talking point is this? You want to know why big tobacco settled? It's very simple actually.
Here is video of tobacco executives in court and under oath saying nicotine is not addictive. [1]https://senate.ucsf.edu/tobacc... [ucsf.edu]
That's why they had to pay billions of dollars. Not that big government is picking on the poor little tobacco companies. Because they claimed for years their products were safe and non addictive and slowly poisoned people.
Honestly, the best thing that could ever hap
[1] https://senate.ucsf.edu/tobacco-ceo-statement-to-congress
Exxon Valdeze (Score:2)
After the Exxon Valdeze 1989 oil spill ecological disaster, Exxon and the major oil companies sold all of their transport ships, transport barges (to Kirby corp), etc. to other companies to get out of the liability of transporting crude oil.
Expect something similar to happen with California where the oil majors essentially will have no assets in California to sue, no money in California and gasoline sold to middlemen who then sell it in California and the middlemen are incorporated outside the USA.
No longer a conspiracy theory (Score:2)
Ten years ago, if you claimed plastic recycling was an oil industry hoax, you would have been called a nut. A recycling and climate change denier. Now, totally mainstream consensus opinion.
Re: (Score:2)
Plastics industry executive came out ~5 years, conveniently at/after retiring, saying that the entire 1980s plastic recycling and labeling different grades of plastic for recycling was an advertising PR move since there was no viable way to recycle large amounts of plastic.
OK. So now it's out in the open (Score:2)
We know plastic can't be recycled economically. We know plastic manufacturers have been engaging in PR campaigns to deceive us into thinking recycling was the answer. Now they're blaming us for not catching on faster.
Somewhere there must be a wall we can line the execs up against before we shoot them.
Barring that, there are trillions and trillions of dollars needed to clean up the mess and trillions more needed to wean us off plastics. We need to be taxing that stuff at the source starting about 1970, coll