Friendster rises from the grave to make social media great again
- Reference: 1777308307
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/04/27/friendster_rises_from_the_grave/
- Source link:
Philadelphia-based computer programmer Mike Carson [1]said in a blog post on Monday that he bought the Friendster domain and later secured the brand's trademarks last year, and now has an [2]iOS app available for aging internet denizens who want to return to Friendster, or those who wish to join anew.
Carson has made a [3]career out of starting solo SaaS operations, like domain name backordering site [4]Park.io , as well as playing the domain name market, and his acquisition of Friendster happened because of his connection to that industry. He explains in his blog post that he noticed Friendster.com began resolving again in October 2023 after eight years offline, and quickly identified the owner through WHOIS records and his Park.io connections.
[5]
"I was curious who owned it, so I looked at the WHOIS info and recognized the owner as a customer of Park.io … and that I had corresponded with him previously over email," Carson said. It turns out the buyer paid less than $8,000 for the Friendster domain and was now simply using it to serve ads.
[6]
[7]
"We worked out a deal where I gave him $20k in Bitcoin and a domain that was making about $9k/year in ad revenue, and he gave me the domain friendster.com," Carson added.
It's worth pointing out at this point that, at its peak, Friendster had more than 115 million registered users, most of whom were located in the Asia-Pacific region after successive platforms (e.g., MySpace and Facebook) displaced it in the US. Malaysian payments provider MOL Global bought Friendster in 2009 in a deal reportedly valued at [8]$26.4 million , as the social network increasingly focused on Asia-Pacific users.
[9]
$26.4 million isn't a lot in big tech bucks nowadays, nor was it in 2009 when Facebook was valued at [10]$10 billion . Either way, $20,000 in bitcoin and a domain that makes a pittance in annual recurring ad revenue is a far cry from Friendster's peak.
Neo-Friendster: Where friends are your actual friends
"Today I feel that social networks foster a lot of negativity, but I remembered Friendster as being a really positive and enjoyable experience," Carson writes, rose-colored glasses on the early internet notwithstanding. "I wanted to create something positive — something that people would enjoy and find useful."
That, he noted, took the form of a platform that [11]wouldn't sell data to advertisers, didn't have an algorithm or ads - basically a back-to-basics version of the early days of social media, hopefully for longer than it's taken other companies to [12]replace user-focused development with maximum profit seeking.
[13]Norway's Consumer Council takes aim at enshittification
[14]Time to end the 'uncontrolled experiment' of social media on kids, scientists say
[15]Friendster wipes data slate clean
[16]Social media is too much for most of us to handle
Carson's initial attempt to relaunch the site by inviting people from a waitlist met with limited success, however, with those features proving "nice but [not] enough of a draw."
Turning to Hacker News for advice, Carson decided to take one user's [17]advice to make it impossible to connect with users, and thus add them to one's friend list, without physically touching phones together, à la NFC, AirDrop, etc.
"The idea that the only way to connect as friends on Friendster is by tapping phones was fun because it would promote people meeting in person," Carson said. "It would also verify that you are connecting to real people, and people that you actually want to connect with."
As it stands now, anyone can sign up for a Neo-Friendster account, but be prepared to have an empty feed unless you want to actually go out and engage with other users. There's no [18]web version , and it's only available on iOS for now. Carson told The Register in an email that he's working on an Android version and plans to restore the web version soon, as it was only temporarily taken down for app integration work.
[19]
As for why he's doing this, Carson said in his blog post, and reiterated to us in his email, that his motivation to build a new, IRL-focused version of Friendster comes from his love of early social media platforms, in particular OkCupid, where he met his wife.
"Websites like that genuinely change the course of people's lives — people meet, fall in love, build families. That's incredible to me," Carson said. "If Friendster helps even a few people find that kind of connection, it will have been worth it."
If it's at all successful, Carson's Friendster may quickly run into the need to spend a lot of cash to prop up a platform without any advertisements or services that'd attract companies willing to spend money. He wrote that he doesn't particularly care about making money off of Friendster, only hoping that it will eventually pay for itself.
"I'll probably offer a paid plan for premium features down the road — but that's a problem for later," Carson noted. Those premium features could include things like vanity usernames, @friendster.com email addresses, and other ideas he told us he's still tossing around.
"I'm still thinking over the best way to go forward with this," Carson told us.
Whatever he chooses, Carson has his work cut out for him. He'll actually need to make people care about a relaunched social media platform that only aging internet users remember, for one, and to use a platform that would actually force people to get out of their internet bubble to try something new. Like getting together with friends in person.
In other words, people will have to get off their butts to make this platform useful, and that might be a hard sell. ®
Get our [20]Tech Resources
[1] https://ca98am79.medium.com/i-bought-friendster-for-30k-heres-what-i-m-doing-with-it-d5e8ddb3991d
[2] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/friendster/id6760240416
[3] https://www.indiehackers.com/podcast/034-mike-carson-of-park-io
[4] http://park.io
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ae_cgFIHIJF6HoqmcikzzQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ae_cgFIHIJF6HoqmcikzzQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ae_cgFIHIJF6HoqmcikzzQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://techcrunch.com/2009/12/15/friendster-valued-at-just-26-4-million-in-sale/
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44ae_cgFIHIJF6HoqmcikzzQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] https://www.fastcompany.com/1706359/facebook-valuation-timeline-do-we-hear-10-billion-50-billion-1-trillion
[11] https://friendster.com/pages/privacy/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/30/tech_monopoly_doctorow/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/06/forbrukerradet_aim_enshittification/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/19/social_media_bad_for_kids/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2011/04/27/friendster_swiped/
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/20/social_overload/
[17] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44053581
[18] https://friendster.com/
[19] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33ae_cgFIHIJF6HoqmcikzzQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[20] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: If it sounds to good to be true...
Anything that could concern the Trillionaires is good to me.
Before now I thought Friendster was a fake app from the TV show "Community".
if it sounds too good to be true
If he can avoid the pit falls of greed and keep it honest he will probably be very, very successful. He has to make it work FOR us, and not AGAINST us. The problem is that the same people who will make you money fast, will be screaming and shouting at him to do things that will destroy it. He has to avoid THAT. That's not easy. Keep it honest. Realize that bots and foreign actors, as well as overly paid young "influencers" and advertisers, will be all over this. Those are NOT his targets. He has to keep this app friendly to the average user. Make it about the ACTUAL user.
More than likely, as soon as he has sufficient amounts of people interested and signed up, he will sell everyone off to the baddies.
That's good and all...
As of March 2026 there is a new site that will replace Reddit and it's name is thenooks.app and it also doesn't use algorithms or is a warzone of neckbeards like Reddit is.
Already beaten
[1]SpaceHey was launched five years ago. Inspired by the original MySpace, "Classic" GUI design, and not an algorithm in sight. Also based in Germany so it's more difficult to sell everyone's data.
[1] https://spacehey.com/
So...
"That, he noted, took the form of a platform that wouldn't sell data to advertisers, didn't have an algorithm or ads - "
So how IS it going to make money? Even if it was completely non-profit, it will still need revenue for staffing, infrastructure etc.
Re: So...
You don't need a billion to be happy and successful do you? If you play the long, slow game you can be very happy and successful. He just has to avoid the toxic baddies.
Re: So...
Again. How is it going to generate revenue?
Facebook reportedly acquired or licensed Friendster’s patents
ClippyAI: Around 2010 .. Facebook reportedly acquired or licensed Friendster’s patents for an estimated $40 million. Key aspects of the Friendster patents: fundamental social networking, relationships within social networks", method of inducing content uploads in a social network.
Re: So...
Suffering a 'sophisticated attacked carried out by a state sponsored hacker group....', aka selling your info. Just like everybody does.
A couple problems with this
1) just because you own friendster.com doesn't necessarily mean someone else doesn't own the Friendster trademark. He might get contacted by a lawyer soon if/when such owner notices someone is trying to bring it back to life.
2) requiring tapping phones to add friends is fine in theory, but that really limits your social circle. How do you connect with friends who have moved away, or just don't see that often? You might still consider them good friends, talk to them on the phone, engage with them on other social media to stay connected in each other's lives, but there would be no way to add them.
I think he'll have to compromise on the tapping phones thing. Maybe have a different category of friendship for those (give an "in person" star for people who you have tapped to verify friendship or whatever) but you gotta have a way where you could for example post on Facebook "hey I'm on friendster if you are too add me there" to build your circle. Otherwise I'd have to ask people in see in RL "are you on friendster?" and when it is getting off the ground 99% of them will say "no" or "what's friendster?" or "I don't need yet another social media account" and it just isn't going to be able to build a network. If I joined and I had only five friends on it I was able to add in person I'd never use it because it would be boring as hell and it'll never reach critical mass.
And how is he planning on keeping this going if it catches fire and there are 100 million users a year from now? You gotta get revenue somehow, unless you are independently wealthy, which I assume a "Philadelphia area programmer" is likely not. So either you bring in outside investors, who will demand some way to make a return on their investment, or you will have to find a way to make a return on it yourself.
Now in exchange for some type of enforceable ironclad guarantee that it would never have ads or 'sponsored' stuff where you see content not from your friends (or perhaps friends of friends) I would be willing to pay a buck or two a month if I became a regular user of this. Would enough others be willing to do so though? That's the only way you can make a go of it without advertising, which guarantees eventual enshittification.
«Carson decided to take one user's advice to make it impossible to connect with users, and thus add them to one's friend list, without physically touching phones together, à la NFC, AirDrop, etc.
"The idea that the only way to connect as friends on Friendster is by tapping phones was fun because it would promote people meeting in person," Carson said. "It would also verify that you are connecting to real people, and people that you actually want to connect with."»
This (boreal) summer I'll be in "Madriz" for the 20 year reunion of my master's Degree ¿Shall I run like crazy trying to re-add all my friends on friendster? ¿What About all the friends that could not travel there?
I have Family and friends who left Venezuela for many other places during our (ongoing) diaspora ¿Shall I globetrott to add them? I am not sure if my finances can handle that...
Such silly idea...
If, at least you have a "tiered" friend system (say, addewd the normal way, added via phone touch, the friend and I coincide if we are friends or aquantiances, etc), that would be another thing... ¿but this?... silly indeed.
If it sounds to good to be true...
What's the catch here? Why shouldn't we believe success invites enshittification, whether that was the plan from the beginning, or a founder just happened to fall in love with that ring they were given?
Also, it should be noted this requires installing (cr)apps. Connecting to the (cr)app stores invites advertising, exfiltrates data, and undermines privacy, even if a specific package doesn't.