News: 1777036392

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Microsoft tackles quality control issues. Just kidding, it's encouraging experienced workers to leave

(2026/04/24)


Microsoft has committed to improving the quality and reliability of Windows, and a step on the path to that goal is… encouraging a chunk of its US staff to leave the company.

As confirmed by The Register sources, the company has announced, via internal memo, a voluntary buyout scheme for US employees. So if you work in that region, are at the senior director level or below, and if your age plus years of employment at Microsoft comes to 70 or higher – you might be eligible to leap from the gangplank of the good ship Nadella rather than receiving a shove from HR.

There will be some exceptions, including employees with sales incentive plans, but a figure of approximately 7 percent is a guide to how big a chunk of the workforce could be eligible. That translates to just under 9,000 employees.

[1]

Microsoft has laid off thousands of employees in recent years. In July 2025, it cut [2]9,000 jobs , and later that month, the company's CEO, Satya Nadella, [3]wrote that the terminations were "weighing heavily on me."

[4]

[5]

The anniversary of Nadella's handwringing is fast approaching; it is not difficult to imagine a stack of pink slips being prepared somewhere in the bowels of Redmond if voluntary redundancy doesn't reduce the headcount sufficiently.

The problem with voluntary buyouts is that they tend to target experienced employees, and these are the workers that Microsoft desperately needs if it wants to deal with the quality issues in its software. Earlier this year, Windows boss Pavan Davuluri [6]assured customers complaining about the relentless flow of out-of-band updates that Microsoft will "raise the bar on Windows 11 quality." He didn't specify where that bar will be raised to, but if the corporation sheds too many experienced workers, the answer could end up being "not very high."

[7]

The Register understands that AI has not been mentioned, but Microsoft has poured billions of dollars into the technology. Nadella, who rarely misses an opportunity to talk up AI's potential, saw his own compensation [8]grow to $96.5 million for Microsoft's fiscal 2025. But hey, he's worth it, right? Best not look at the company's stock price, which has fallen by more than 20 percent during the last six months.

[9]WARNING: Oracle's AI obsession could mean higher prices and worse support

[10]Atlassian to shed ten percent of staff, because AI

[11]Amazon insists AI coding isn't source of outages

[12]DOGE bites taxman

Buyouts are a blunt tool to reduce headcount, yet early retirees might include staff with useful skills who are effectively being paid to find work elsewhere. NASA reportedly [13]lost many of its most experienced workers during 2025's buyouts and terminations, and Microsoft might take heed of the space agency's experience.

AI assistance will not resolve Microsoft's quality problems on its own, and persuading skilled and experienced employees to depart seems counterproductive. Still, if enough people walk, perhaps there won't be a need to pull out the redundancy gun in a few months to keep the Copilot fires burning.®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aeuTrF6aiP5Fj7Nug_d7pwAAA08&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/04/former_and_current_microsofties_react_layoffs/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/25/microsoft_ceo_job_cuts/

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aeuTrF6aiP5Fj7Nug_d7pwAAA08&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aeuTrF6aiP5Fj7Nug_d7pwAAA08&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/24/windows_boss_promises/

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aeuTrF6aiP5Fj7Nug_d7pwAAA08&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/22/microsoft_nadella_pay/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/13/oracle_job_losses_ai_impact_support/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/11/atlassian_layoffs/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/10/amazon_ai_coding_outages/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/19/irs_job_cuts/

[13] https://www.planetary.org/articles/4000-gone-inside-nasas-brain-drain

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Got to pay that 'leccy bill somehow

cyberdemon

Fag packet calc incoming

9000 employees ~= $1bn/year (assuming average microsoftie salary + overhead of $110k)

At a low, low price of $10/MWh, that's enough to buy, er, 10GW of electricity! Or about a quarter of the amount they say they'll need to supply their latest batch of slop fountains

And that's without any other operational costs such as equipment, and maintenance/failure/depreciation thereof

Re: Got to pay that 'leccy bill somehow

David 132

I think you're on the right lines there, although your guesstimate of average employee cost is probably on the low side; including salary & overheads (401k contributions , healthcare, etc) it's probably closer to $200K per targeted employee, at least for those in the US.

None of which invalidates your argument!

Re: Got to pay that 'leccy bill somehow

Anonymous Coward

The Soylent Corporation still needs humans, even if Microsoft's AI considers them obsolete.

Removing objections

Pete 2

> voluntary buyouts is that they tend to target experienced employees

Isn't that a big part of the plan?

To remove those senior, experienced, staff who can tell the head-in-the-clouds marketing people why a particular "improvement" is a bad idea, won't work or will alienate even more lusers who cannot escape the MS ecosystem.

Doctor Syntax

Microsoft will "raise the bar on Windows 11 quality." He didn't specify where that bar will be raised to,

Maybe "raising the bar" means raising it so more stuff can get out underneath it.

Doctor Syntax

"Nadella, who rarely misses an opportunity to talk up AI's potential, saw his own compensation grow to $96.5 million for Microsoft's fiscal 2025."

When I see "compensation" mentioned in this sort of context I usually wonder what he's being compensated for, what harm might have befallen him.

"Best not look at the company's stock price, which has fallen by more than 20 percent during the last six months."

Ah, that's what he's been compensated for. The value of his share pot has fallen.

QET

The irony obviously being that for quality to quantitatively improve, the irredeemable sloppers and related "use AI" incentives are what actually should be on the chopping block, followed closely by the senior devs training the bright and young ones who's not "AI" addicts.

But this is modern day MS, where the OS no longer is the primary income source, but rather a way to retain market share.

Ten of the meanest cons in the state pen met in the corner of the yard to
shoot some craps. The stakes were enormous, the tension palpable.
When his turn came to shoot, Dutsky nervously plunked down his
entire wad, shook the dice and rolled. A smile crossed his face as a
seven showed up, but it quickly changed to horror as third die slipped out
of his sleeve and fell to the ground with the two others. No one said a
word. Finally, Killer Lucci picked up the third die, put it in his pocket
and handed the others to Dutsky.
"Roll 'em," Lucci said. "Your point is thirteen."