News: 1775818871

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Britain seeks views before it drops the hammer on signal jammers

(2026/04/10)


The UK government is seeking views on radiofrequency jammers as it prepares legislation to ban the controversial devices.

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) announced Friday that the government is seeking a deeper understanding of how signal-jamming devices are being used across a range of criminal activities.

Previous communications regarding plans to ban the devices have largely focused on how they can facilitate car thefts.

[1]

Today's announcement signals the government's concerns extend well beyond that, citing threats to home security systems and critical public infrastructure, including cell towers that support mobile and emergency service networks.

[2]

[3]

More seriously, DSIT warned that signal jammers could disrupt positioning, navigation, and timing systems. This is a scenario that could threaten jobs, businesses, and livelihoods, and deal an estimated £7.62 billion ($10.2 billion) blow to the economy.

"We are stepping up efforts to stop the illegal use of jamming devices, which are threatening not only our daily lives, but also our vital public services across the country," said telecoms minister Baroness Lloyd.

[4]

"This is an opportunity for the public and industry experts to have their say on how we safeguard our homes, businesses, transport networks, and more from those seeking to exploit these technologies.

"By gathering a broad range of informed opinions, we can make sure any future measures we introduce are rooted in evidence and address the real issues people are facing."

The Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006, the current legislation governing jammers, bans possession of illegal equipment, but DSIT said proving an individual used a jamming device to interfere with a signal can be difficult.

[5]

The upcoming [6]Crime and Policing Bill , currently in the final stages of passing through Parliament, is the relevant lever lawmakers intend to pull when prosecuting car thefts facilitated by jammers.

However, the findings from today's [7]call for evidence will inform any future legislation concerning jamming technology, DSIT said.

[8]UK.gov's top tech jobs pay more than prime minister earns

[9]UK's grand plan to fuel AI with public data faces uphill battle

[10]UK wants to know if banning under-16s from social media does anything useful

[11]When it comes to catastrophic space weather, the UK is holding a cocktail umbrella

Submissions open today and will run for four weeks.

Years in the making

The UK government has had its eye on radiofrequency jammers as a crime issue since [12]at least 2020 and [13]potentially over a decade , although it only announced its intention to ban them and keyless repeaters last year.

According to reports at the time, the devices were allegedly cobbled together by Bulgarian company SOS Autokeys and shoved into the housing of old Game Boy Colors before being sold for thousands to carjacking crews across Europe.

West Yorkshire Police arrested several suspects back in 2021, saying the devices were purchased for around £20,000 ($30,000).

They came pre-loaded with the tools and software required to open up cars manufactured by the likes of Hyundai, Kia, Mitsubishi, Nissan, and Genesis in seconds.

The UK government believes that around 40 percent of all car thefts are carried out using this kind of technology.

DSIT said today that other types of jammers found in the UK and used in burglaries can be disguised as "everyday tech like digital watches."

The US Department of Homeland Security [14]expressed concern last year about a surge in Chinese-made signal jammers being found across the country, reporting an 830 percent increase in device seizures. ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2adkep1ngKcQoSPT2cPHmKgAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44adkep1ngKcQoSPT2cPHmKgAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33adkep1ngKcQoSPT2cPHmKgAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44adkep1ngKcQoSPT2cPHmKgAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33adkep1ngKcQoSPT2cPHmKgAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/19/uk_intimate_images_online/

[7] https://www.gov.uk/government/calls-for-evidence/possession-of-radiofrequency-jammers-and-the-relevant-legal-framework

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/09/dsit_tech_jobs/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/08/national_data_library_plan/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/26/uk_social_media_ban_trial/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/23/nao_uk_space_weather/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/12/hyundai_want_secure_locks_on/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2010/09/21/car_jammer_vehicle_theft_scam/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/20/dhs_issues_warning_about_influx/

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Incomprehensible

may_i

If RF jammers are already illegal under existing laws, what on earth do you need more legislation banning them for?

Re: Incomprehensible

andy gibson

Same with knife crime:

"In the UK, carrying a knife in public without a "good reason" is illegal, with a maximum penalty of four years in prison, an unlimited fine, or both"

Yet, only got 6 months here:

https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2026/march/30-03-26/men-jailed-for-knife-possession--milton-keynes/

And this one:

"A knife carrier who previously threatened to stab his neighbour’s dog has been sentenced after he was caught carrying weapons for a second time. "

SUSPENDED SENTENCE!

https://www.romfordrecorder.co.uk/news/25990099.harold-hill-man-sentenced-repeat-knife-carrying/

Re: Incomprehensible

JoshOvki

Making it illegal to own something that is illegal to use whilst doing something illegal. Yes the car thieves are definitely not going to to break this law too...

Re: Incomprehensible

tony72

It's illegal to use them, but contrary to what the article says, under current laws it's not illegal to possess them. As the article does say, proving someone used such a device to commit a crime is difficult, so being able to prosecute them simply for having the device would make things a lot easier.

Re: Incomprehensible

Anonymous Coward

"We're not getting enough convictions, so let's lower the bar, and make it easier for the police. Hmmm ... let's just go all the way and make 'illegality' be whatever the officer wants it to be."

Re: Incomprehensible

may_i

Ah, that old chestnut.

If they're going to make it criminal to own an RF oscillator, I can see many, many problems with that.

Or maybe they're even thinking of parts - possession of an RF power transistor with intent eh?

Sounds like new ways to fit people up to me.

Re: Incomprehensible

Anonymous Coward

That's exactly why there's a comment period. Plenty of equipment is capable of jamming RF signals but has other constructive uses. That's not what needs to be banned. Policymakers need to know the difference. Given they're pretty bad at understanding tech issues, this is one case where feedback might make a difference.

The main problem is with devices designed and marketed for the purpose of interference. Chinese sellers know they've created one-click burglary tools and don't care, because it's not their problem.

If a jamming device has no lawful and constructive purpose, then we should hope customs stops it at the border. Just because advanced RF equipment can also be used for jamming doesn't mean most crooks are capable of using it. We'll never stop 100% of jammers, but that doesn't mean we have to make it easy for stupid crooks to order one-click jammers from China.

Re: Incomprehensible

cyberdemon

In the UK it is already illegal to possess "Information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism" .

Presumably that includes a map, a weather forecast, a collection of science textbooks, and indeed a schematic for a RF oscillator / amplifier..

Re: Incomprehensible

An_Old_Dog

They are doing this partly so politicians and the government can appear to the (less-analytical members of the) public they are "doing something" about crime.

It's posturing.

The government is potty

VoiceOfTruth

Ban burglary because that will stop burglaries. Oh.

Ban murder because that will stop murder. Oh.

Re: The government is potty

IGotOut

@voiceoftruth

I take it you don't understand how laws work?

Going by your stupid argument (yes it is stupid) then there is no point having ANY laws. Well may as well not ban guns, as bad people will still carry them. May as well not have an age of consent, because peado's will still do it; may as not make armed robbery illegal, as bank robbers will still do it.

Burglars

elsergiovolador

Burglar1> Oy mate, got this thingy for the new job at Bumlicks Road.

Burglar2> What's that? Your sister's massager?

Burgler1> No you wimpet, it's a jammer!

Burglar2> Yeah, she jams it in no?

Burglar1> I am going to smack the eyeballs out of you!

Burglar2> Calm your udders, tiger.

Burglar1> This thing will ensure their cameras won't record us on the job!

Burglar2> Ah no mate, I heard this is illegal now.

Burglar1> Really???... Bummer... okay, let's just use my sister's tights.

Burglar2> Yeah, her massager is too much.

Burglar1> I swear imma going to smack you.

Burglar2> Hit me harder, daddy.

Re: Burglars

TimMaher

Burglar3> Oi lads! I just heard that Joey, owns the Greasy Spoon, got nicked for having a toaster. It was connected to the internet or something. Bummer…

Black shiny mollies and bright colored guppies,
Shy little angels as gentle as puppies,
Swimming and diving with scarcely a swish,
They were just some of my tropical fish.

Then I got mantas that sting in the water,
Deadly piranhas that itch for a slaughter,
Savage male betas that bite with a squish,
Now I have many less tropical fish.

If you think that
Fish are peaceful
That's an empty wish.
Just dump them together
And leave them alone,
And soon you will have -- no fish.
-- To My Favorite Things