UK manufacturers under cyber fire with 80% reporting attacks
- Reference: 1775032206
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/04/01/uk_manufacturer_cyberattacks/
- Source link:
[M]any organizations still treat cybersecurity as an IT issue... When it sits outside the boardroom, it's harder to prioritize appropriately
According to security outfit ESET, 78 percent of UK manufacturers admit to suffering at least one cyber incident in the last 12 months, with more than half reporting lost revenue as a result. These aren't minor hiccups either. In more than half of the worst incidents, losses surpassed £250,000, because when something breaks digitally, the production line usually follows suit.
The sector got a high-profile reminder of the stakes last year when [1]Jaguar Land Rover was forced to halt production following a cyberattack that rippled across its supply chain. The disruption dragged on for weeks, with [2]estimates putting the wider economic hit at around £1.9 billion once suppliers, delays, and lost output were factored in.
ESET's numbers suggest this kind of fallout is increasingly common. Almost all respondents said incidents had a direct operational impact, with supply chain disruption and missed commitments near the top of the list. And when things do go down, they don't bounce back quickly. Most outages stretch into days, sometimes close to a week, with the knock-on effects lingering well after systems are back up and running.
[3]Jaguar Land Rover's cyber bailout sets worrying precedent, watchdog warns
[4]London boroughs limping back online months after cyberattack
[5]UK government exempting itself from flagship cyber law inspires little confidence
[6]NHS tech supplier probes cyberattack on internal systems
Despite that, visibility into risk remains patchy. One in five manufacturers said they have limited or no insight into the cybersecurity threats that could knock production offline, a blind spot that's increasingly hard to justify as attacks evolve. Nearly half of respondents now see AI-assisted attacks as the top threats over the next year, ahead of phishing and ransomware – a sign that the tooling on both sides of the fence is getting more sophisticated.
"If the JLR attack showed us anything, it's how quickly a cyber incident can shut down production at scale and have major consequences for the business and the wider economy," said Matt Knell, UK country manager at ESET. "The real challenge is that many organizations still treat cybersecurity as an IT issue rather than a strategic business decision. When it sits outside the boardroom, it's harder to prioritize appropriately."
Cyber incidents might be a production problem now, but ownership still mostly sits in IT. Only 22 percent of firms put it at the executive level, even though the damage is clearly big enough to warrant board attention. Despite that, more than a fifth still lean toward reacting after the fact rather than trying to stop incidents in the first place. ®
[7]
Get our [8]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/23/jaguar_landrover_shutdown_extended/
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/22/jaguar_lander_rover_cost/
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/20/jlr_bailout_cmc/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/23/landmark_milestone_as_hammersmith_fulham/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/10/csr_bill_analysis/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/18/nhs_tech_supplier_cyberattack/
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aczswSi0bAONGA5AM7pfKQAAAMc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[8] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
I was wondering the same. What happened to DMZ and restricted access? No need for everything to be exposed to everywhere.
As per article, it's not so much that the manufacturers are exposing themselves directly, as the fact that they are outsourcing aspects of their IT to suppliers who in turn outsource aspects of their IT ...
In consequence the manufacturer is dependent on a chain and may not even know the extent of it. As we know a chain is no stronger than its weakest link. What makes it worse is that these links are common to a lot of end users so are worth far more spending effort on breaking than any particular end user company. "Hollowed out" does not seem adequate to describe the situation.
Stop using Microsoft desktops?
It's the common thread (and threat) in these breaches..
Maybe they shouldn't have business-critical stuff exposed to the Internet.
The 70's called and they want you to be listening to their "cybersecurity" protocols.