GitHub backs down, kills Copilot pull-request ads after backlash
- Reference: 1774903644
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/03/30/github_copilot_ads_pull_requests/
- Source link:
Australian developer Zach Manson [1]noted on Monday that, after a coworker asked Copilot to correct a typo in one of his pull requests, he was surprised to find a message from Copilot in the PR pushing readers to adopt productivity app Raycast.
"Quickly spin up Copilot coding agents from anywhere on your macOS or Windows machine with Raycast," the note read with a lightning bolt emoji and link to install Raycast.
[2]
"Initially I thought there was some kind of training data poisoning or novel prompt injection and the Raycast team was doing some elaborate proof of concept marketing," Manson told The Register in an email.
[3]
[4]
But no: Take a [5]look around GitHub and you'll see more than 11,400 PRs with the same tip in them, all seemingly added by Copilot. Take a look at the PRs' code itself and search for the block invoking Copilot to add a tip and you'll find plenty [6]more examples of different tips being inserted by Copilot.
Manson told us that he's not surprised to see GitHub doing this with an AI model, but he said it's pretty offensive to see the Raycast ad inserted by Copilot into his own PR like he wrote it.
[7]
"I wasn't even aware that the GitHub Copilot Review integration had the ability to edit other users' descriptions and comments," Manson told us. "I can't think of a valid use case for that ability."
GitHub backs down
It was only Monday morning when Microsoft watchers at Neowin [8]picked up Manson's report that Copilot was injecting what developers saw as ads into PRs, and, by the afternoon, GitHub had decided a recent change to Copilot may have gone a bit too far.
GitHub VP of developer relations Martin Woodward [9]explained in a post on X later in the day Monday that Copilot inserting ads into PRs isn't actually new behavior - it's been doing so in the ones it creates for a while. Letting Copilot touch PRs it didn't create, but is mentioned in, on the other hand, is new behavior that hasn't really worked out.
"[When] we added the ability to have Copilot work on any PR by mentioning it the behaviour became icky," Woodward said.
[10]New GitHub Copilot limits push AI users to pricier tiers
[11]GitHub hits CTRL-Z, decides it will train its AI with user data after all
[12]Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features
[13]GitHub infuriates students by removing some models from free Copilot plan
Tim Rogers, principal product manager for Copilot at GitHub, took to Hacker News on Monday to [14]say that giving Copilot the ability to add "tips" to PRs was intended "to help developers learn new ways to use the agent in their workflow."
Hearing feedback from the community following Manson's post and the kerfuffle it generated, Rogers said, has helped him realize that "on reflection," letting Copilot make changes to PRs written by a human without their knowledge "was the wrong judgement call."
"We've now disabled these tips in pull requests created by or touched by Copilot, so you won't see this happen again," Rogers added.
[15]
Neither Microsoft nor GitHub responded to questions for this story. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://notes.zachmanson.com/copilot-edited-an-ad-into-my-pr/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2acryg1wVXtwoqCClhIN_mAAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44acryg1wVXtwoqCClhIN_mAAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33acryg1wVXtwoqCClhIN_mAAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://github.com/search?q=%22%E2%9A%A1+Quickly+spin+up+copilot+coding+tasks%22&type=pullrequests
[6] https://github.com/search?q=%22START+COPILOT+CODING+AGENT+TIPS%22&type=code&p=1
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44acryg1wVXtwoqCClhIN_mAAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-copilot-is-now-injecting-ads-into-pull-requests-on-github-gitlab/
[9] https://x.com/martinwoodward/status/2038612131084464521
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/20/github_begins_enforcing_premium_request/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/26/github_ai_training_policy_changes/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/05/github_copilot_complaints/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/13/microsoft_github_removes_models_student_plan/
[14] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573233
[15] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33acryg1wVXtwoqCClhIN_mAAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: 180 vs 360
As far as I'm concerned they can spin on it.
Re: 180 vs 360
CoStarmer.
It's M$, what did you expect?
That the real downside of having a useful, and arguably vital, resource for Open Source owned by Microsoft. We're no longer in the Ballmer era but it sure looks like we're effectively heading back that way.
Trust issues
So Copilot was quietly editing other people's pull requests to insert product ads, and the defence was "it's to help developers learn"? At what point does an AI assistant that edits your work without asking, to advertise things, stop being an assistant and start being a liability? The fact that 11,400 PRs got hit before anyone noticed or said a word about it is the more troubling part.
Re: Trust issues
Reversing a bad idea is good idea. One wonders, however, what kind of management could devise such a plan in the first place and what their next idea might be.
Re: Trust issues
Help developers learn to stop using GitHub and Microslop software.
180 vs 360
So far this is a 180. When GitHub adds the feature back in 3 months from now, hoping developers will be distracted and not complain as much, that will be the 360.