News: 1774441126

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

HMRC hands £473M Fujitsu migration deal to AWS after competition melts away

(2026/03/25)


The UK's tax collection agency has awarded Amazon Web Services – the only remaining bidder – a contract worth nearly £500 million to migrate services from three Fujitsu-run datacenters and host them for up to a decade.

His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said the British branch of AWS's Luxembourg-based subsidiary submitted the only tender it received and assessed for the deal in a [1]contract award notice published on March 23 .

UK govt office admits ability to negotiate billions in cloud spending curbed by vendor lock-in [2]READ MORE

The agreement, priced at £472.8 million including VAT, is scheduled to run for a minimum of seven years from April 2026 with an option to extend it to ten years. HMRC can pay for extras including business services transformation, migration of services not run from the three Fujitsu datacenters, and application modernization.

The "Procurement for the provision of Hyperscaler Services to enable Data Centre Exit" contract is intended to let the tax collector end its use of three datacenters managed by Fujitsu by June 2028. As the project's title suggests, the tender was aimed at the largest cloud suppliers.

In its initial [3]March 2025 contract notice , the total financial value was estimated at £500 million including VAT. HMRC said it "anticipated that the appointment will be limited to a single Hyperscaler" able to migrate services and infrastructure from the Fujitsu-run bit barns – which use about a dozen operating systems including HP's Unix, IBM's AIX, and Sun's Solaris – to UK-based cloud hosting.

[4]

When it [5]published the tender in June , HMRC added "Hyperscaler services" to the title and said "modern hyperscaler cloud technologies would be the preferred solution."

[6]

[7]

The notice stated that 70 percent of the contract decision would be based on quality, with just 20 percent on price and 10 percent on social value, with the full list of criteria provided to shortlisted suppliers.

Sources close to the bidding process told The Register in October that HMRC unofficially shortlisted AWS, Google, and IBM. Microsoft, the only other supplier of a similar scale to AWS, was not in the running. One insider suggested the tender had been written so that only AWS or Microsoft could realistically win it.

[8]

"[It was all about] ability to execute, a proven history of working with departments like this – seven-year track record of hosting massive hyperscaler-type services. It could only be AWS or Microsoft."

HMRC specified it did not want hybrid cloud services so IBM decided not to bid further, a person familiar with the matter added. Google also decided to drop out. Bidding for contracts is an expensive exercise.

"There was only one company capable of bidding [at that point]," he added. "AWS was going into a tender negotiation knowing the value of the contract, and there was zero power for government to negotiate."

[9]

"This is hugely political," a well-placed source said. "Politicians stand up and talk about standardizing frameworks for procurement to get better discounts and value for money... sometimes it appears contracts are already locked down."

In January 2025, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it planned to look at how AWS and Microsoft dominate the UK market for cloud services, saying that " [10]competition is not working as well as it could ." The pair account for up to 80 percent of cloud services market in Britain.

Earlier this month, in a parliamentary written question, Conservative MP Julia Lopez asked the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology how much this limited competition was costing public sector bodies.

[11]HMRC boss defends shift to AWS, says they got 50% knocked off

[12]Amazon gets its tax excuses in early amid rising UK profits – but leaves El Reg off the press list. Can't think why

[13]UK tax collector plans £2B tech binge as legacy systems refuse to die

[14]Amazon brain drain finally sent AWS down the spout

Minister [15]Kanishka Narayan said the CMA's investigation had "identified a number of potential competition concerns with clear negative impacts for UK businesses, consumers and the public sector" without providing a cost. Previously, the CMA estimated businesses and the public sector were paying around £500 million more annually for cloud services than they should.

Narayan pointed out that the CMA had recommended its board prioritize a strategic market status investigation into this [16]back in July , but as it was independent of government, this was up to the authority.

Kip Meeks, former cloud inquiry lead at the CMA, [17]quit the agency in January over the slow rate of progress amid questions about the regulator's independence.

In an article for The Register earlier this week, former Irish government chief information officer [18]Bill McCluggage wrote : "If the UK is serious about digital sovereignty, fiscal responsibility, and fostering innovation and economic growth, then the CMA must act swiftly. Because the longer this drags on, the more expensive the outcome becomes for the UK taxpayer."

The UK government is to [19]draft an outage blueprint following the massive AWS outage in October that knocked out services at several departments, including HMRC. Clearly that didn't deter the latest contract award heading in the direction of Amazon. ®

Get our [20]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/026139-2026

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/04/uk_cddo_admits_cloud_spending_lock_issues_exclusive/

[3] https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/010581-2025

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2acQUtEvSRKat8LabDZjGsQAAAIs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/035512-2025

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44acQUtEvSRKat8LabDZjGsQAAAIs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33acQUtEvSRKat8LabDZjGsQAAAIs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44acQUtEvSRKat8LabDZjGsQAAAIs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33acQUtEvSRKat8LabDZjGsQAAAIs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/28/microsoft_and_aws_cma_provisional_findings/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2017/10/26/hmrc_defends_shift_to_aws/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/18/amazon_uk_results/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/28/hmrc_tech_pipeline/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/20/aws_outage_amazon_brain_drain_corey_quinn/

[15] https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2026-03-11/119997

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/31/cma_aws_microsoft_sms/

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/04/cloud_inquiry_chair_quits_cma/

[18] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/23/the_cost_of_inaction_how/

[19] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/29/uk_govt_outage_plan/

[20] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



The missing option

Pete 2

> Insiders say single-bidder process left little room for negotiation.

It is not obligatory to accept whatever proposal a single bidder makes. The most powerful option is to just walk away.

After all if no other contender is interested, that alone tells you something is extraordinarily wrong with the requirements.

Re: The missing option

elsergiovolador

Correct. If HMRC wasn't addicted to wine and steak, the correct action would be to create capability in house, including building government owned data centre.

Re: The missing option

Dave314159ggggdffsdds

Ah yes, that famously goes well...

Re: The missing option

elsergiovolador

I wonder why it's famously goes well... Perhaps because of addiction to wine and steak?

Re: The missing option

Dave314159ggggdffsdds

If there's only one supplier that can actually give you what you need, then they deserve to make a reasonable profit; if they're unreasonable you can walk away, but I note that despite the insinuation in the article, there isn't any analysis of what a reasonable price should be, or if this is overpriced.

It's common in my line of work for there to only be a single provider that actually fits the requirements. Not a sign there is anything wrong with what we're asking for, just a sign that we're dealing with the right people. There are usually less suitable alternatives, mostly due to scale - we could deal with them if absolutely necessary, but better to work things out with the provider whose main business is working on our scale.

Re: The missing option

elsergiovolador

HMRC's position is that when a client identifies a single provider as uniquely capable of delivering a service, and engages them directly on that basis, the arrangement is inherently suspect and the provider isn't genuinely in business. Unless, of course, the client is HMRC and the provider charges nine figures - in which case it's sound procurement. They are a bunch of hypocrites.

Re: The missing option

Dave314159ggggdffsdds

Lunatic conspiratorial fantasy.

Sums

elsergiovolador

The question is if Fujitsu software can do sums correctly and it's reassuring that running on AWS, the keen eye of US government of course will notify us of blatant maths errors.

This is exactly what HMRC needs. Reboot of Post Office scandal.

Re: Sums

Anonymous Coward

They aren't doing the software. Just infrastructure migration to AWS from legacy data centres.

I would be curious as to why no other bidders progressed as this would be a profile for Kyndryl, Capgemini, ATOS, DXC, etc

I wonder if Fujitsu priced it so that they will take it way below existing margins, but enable the deal to provide solid cash flow for Fujitsu...

Re: Sums

steviesteveo

By the sounds of it they aren't doing the software *yet*. They've left a wide open door for variations with those transformation services which they are clearly then the closest vendor to understand the complex AWS mess they've made

Re: Sums

elsergiovolador

Just infrastructure migration to AWS from legacy data centres.

That's a massive surface for potential cock ups. Not sure if you ever worked on migrations of such calibre, but I can tell you this is more difficult than writing software from scratch.

"Who put this rounding code for the tax table migration?" etc.

Weeks after letters been sent that you owe tax you never owed. It's gonna be "fun".

taxes

Anonymous Coward

HMRC collects tax - AWS shifts money around to show losess on balance sheet and avoid paying tax

AWS In 2020:

€44bn revenue in Europe

€0 corporate tax in Luxembourg

AWS In 2022:

€50bn+ revenue

Again no corporate tax paid in Luxembourg

Re: taxes

elsergiovolador

It is also obvious conflict of interest. HMRC is never going to investigate Amazon, because of "me servers will be turned off!"

If someone in the government had brains, they would have stopped it and possible sacked whoever thought it is a good idea.

Re: taxes

steviesteveo

I wonder if anyone sarcastically pitched the extra-territorial tax arrangements as *removing* a conflict - any tax investigations would be on Luxembourg

Apply within

Fruit and Nutcase

Perhaps they can give gainful employment to the Post Office managers and lawyers who covered up and wrongfully prosecuted [persecuted] the sub-postoffice staff, ready for when this migration hits the provabial.

Bonuses and trebles all around. May be even a trip or two up to the Kármán line on Blue Origin? A day at the races or a night at the opera is so yesterday

VAT and extras

David M

"The agreement, priced at £472.8 million including VAT..."

Why would HMRC need to pay VAT? They're only going to collect it back again.

"HMRC can pay for extras including business services transformation, migration of services not run from the three Fujitsu datacenters, and application modernization."

...can pay through the nose for extras...

FTFY

Ark?

Anonymous Coward

Does the Government still have a stake in Ark Data Centres? If they do then why aren’t they using them??

Re: Ark?

elsergiovolador

I thought they are majority US owned and therefore covered by US Cloud Act.

A New York City ordinance prohibits the shooting of rabbits from the
rear of a Third Avenue street car -- if the car is in motion.