In the name of science: Boffins build fart-tracking undies
- Reference: 1773732492
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/03/17/scientists_build_farttracking_underwear_discover/
- Source link:
Rather than trusting volunteers to keep an honest diary of their daily emissions, [1]researchers at the University of Maryland built a sensor that clips onto underwear and listens for the chemical calling card of a fart: hydrogen gas produced when gut microbes ferment carbohydrates. In other words, the so-called "Smart Underwear" quietly keeps tabs on every toot.
The project's goal is more serious than the subject matter might suggest. Gastroenterologists have long struggled to objectively measure gas production. Most previous studies relied on patient diaries, lab tests, or short clinical observations – methods that tend to miss what happens in everyday life and almost certainly overlook overnight emissions.
[2]
The wearable sensor aims to clear the air by tracking hydrogen levels throughout the day and night, producing a continuous record of intestinal activity.
[3]
[4]
Early results from trials with healthy volunteers have already blown one of digestive science's most persistent figures clear out of the water, and possibly the room. Participants averaged roughly 32 gas-release events per day, with individual totals ranging from just four to as many as 59.
That's more than double the commonly cited estimate of around 14 daily expulsions, a figure that may have lingered for decades largely because nobody had a reliable way to measure it.
[5]
Self-reporting, it turns out, is a notoriously leaky dataset when it comes to logging one's own emissions.
[6]Ig Nobel Prize flees US for Switzerland after 35 years over safety concerns
[7]Scientists show it's possible to solve problems in your dreams by playing the right sounds
[8]CERN boffins turn lead into gold for about a microsecond at unimaginable cost
[9]Got an idea for dealing with space waste? NASA wants to hear from you
The project forms part of a larger research effort dubbed the "Human Flatus Atlas," an attempt to map what normal gas production actually looks like across different people, diets, and microbiomes. Volunteers in future studies will log their meals while the wearable quietly records the resulting intestinal after-effects.
Researchers are particularly interested in identifying different digestive profiles. Some individuals appear to be what scientists jokingly describe as "hydrogen hyper-producers," while others – even those consuming fiber-heavy diets that should ferment enthusiastically – seem to produce surprisingly little gas.
Beyond finally putting numbers behind one of humanity's most persistent bodily mysteries, the work could help doctors better understand gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome and food intolerances, where excessive gas production is often a symptom but difficult to measure objectively.
If the numbers hold, humanity is producing considerably more background rumble than society prefers to acknowledge – and the long-running question of fart frequency might finally have hard data behind it rather than anecdotal wind. ®
Get our [10]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/03/260314030516.htm
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2abk0U5TKKV2qP52a8gydOwAAAkI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44abk0U5TKKV2qP52a8gydOwAAAkI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33abk0U5TKKV2qP52a8gydOwAAAkI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44abk0U5TKKV2qP52a8gydOwAAAkI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/11/ig_nobel_prize_leaves_us/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/17/night_time_soundscapes_solve_problems/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/12/cern_lead_into_gold/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/01/nasa_space_waste_competition/
[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
quietly
the so-called "Smart Underwear" quietly keeps tabs on every toot
It would be more fun if a loud siren was activated and the name of the miscreant was projected onto the office wall.
Re: quietly
Full skid marks for that comment
Are the results adjusted for the quantity of beans consumed in the preceding 24 hours?
Are the results adjusted for the quantity of beans consumed in the preceding 24 hours?
I too was wondering whether hydrogen gas alone is an accurate proxy for the all the variety and volumes that population produces.
I would want a flow meter and a suitable spectrometer incorporated in these Reg Grundies, just to be sure.
As an undergraduate I do recall seeing amateurish attempts at what I assumed was flame photometry
Re: Are the results adjusted for the quantity of beans consumed in the preceding 24 hours?
I would suggest the people conducting this study have a talk with Mythbusters who did some sterling work to determine the effect of diet, albeit in a short timeframe, and to analyse the gases produced. This should enable a much more accurate sensor to be used.
Come on, ElReg : this article lacks a link to click and order the device. Wasn't there one for smart watches which record some other biometrics ?
/AC only because proper science requires double-blind testing
Wouldn't that be double-anosmia testing?
Beer, curry, beans - all contribute, proportionally more by men.
We lead where it's really important.
Yes!
(icon - no naked flames!)
Champagne is a exquisitely notorious excessive flatus contributor
Only 32?
Only 32?
times per hour......
I pride myself in being well above average for once.
Rice & Beans
I eat a lot of rice & beans. I think my farts would disrupt and break the sensors.
Pffft
> Self-reporting, it turns out, is a notoriously leaky dataset when it comes to logging one's own emissions.
There's a commentary on greenwashing somewhere in there.
Shut up and take my money!
Surely...
..this should end up in a prestigious journal such as the Anals of Improbable Research!
The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind
It should be good for an Ig, at the very least...
Re: The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind
Damnit, beat me to it by four minutes! Have one of these -->
Surely we're all missing the point ...
- in the current global energy crisis these emissions are vital.
Instead of merely counting these air-biscuits, the device should harvest them, using the hydrocarbons to do something useful such as charge a phone so you can watch more AI videos. Or something.
Every careless Y-front whistle is energy lost my friends, and heedless trouser-coughs must be eliminated.
Just a little bit more choke and that one might have started!
Re: Surely we're all missing the point ...
Hmm, a fuel cell to make electricity might be a bit too bulky but a platinum catalyst with some microscopically thin copper or sliver wires to conduct heat away from the catalyst, self-heating underpants could be made, perfect for those winter evenings.
I'd need some heavy duty kevlar reinforced gusset pairs otherwise i'd damage the wiring harness...
Going
For an igNobel - and as a bounus they have an excuse to escape the US next year.
Re: Going
They've already escaped, the 2026 awards are to be held in Zurich as they consider the USA to be, in their words, "unsafe" for their guests:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/mar/09/ig-nobel-prize-europe
Edit: Maybe you meant the scientists could escape rather than Ig Nobel itself. In which case 2027 may be too late for them.
Who? Me?
Play the Trumpet? Why I am not a Billionaire at all, Sir!