News: 1773162430

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

AI datacenters may gulp a New York City's worth of water on hot days

(2026/03/10)


Public water supplies in America will need billions invested to meet the peak requirements of datacenters during the hottest periods of the year, even if their overall annual consumption is relatively modest.

A study by researchers at the University of California, Riverside, acknowledges that water is an efficient means of cooling for server farms, which are looking to minimize their power usage.

But it warns that the growing water demand will lead to substantial peak withdrawals, which many communities in the US do not have the capacity to supply, particularly during the hottest days of the year.

[1]

Without new water efficiencies, datacenters across America may require 697 million to 1.45 billion gallons of extra peak water capacity per day by 2030, the study estimates. This compares with New York City's daily water supply of about a billion gallons.

[2]

[3]

Even with the most optimistic projected water use reductions, the new capacity required could amount to half of New York's supply for most of the year, says the [4]report .

Water consumption by server campuses has become something of a hot topic, with [5]some operators disputing that their usage represents a problem.

A peak problem

Datacenter cooling typically occurs in two stages, the study explains.

The first is server-level cooling, which transfers heat from the IT equipment to an intermediate facility-level heat exchanger through either air-based or closed-loop liquid cooling. This typically does not involve direct water consumption.

[6]

The second stage is facility-level cooling, which transfers heat from the facility to the outside environment. This may involve water consumption depending on the technology employed, such as cooling towers that rely on evaporation, or air-cooled systems supplemented by direct evaporation or adiabatic cooling to reduce the peak power demand during the hottest days of the year.

A large server farm that relies on evaporation cooling can suck up millions of gallons of water per day during the hottest periods of the year, the report says, significantly more than at other times.

[7]Munificent 7 vow to spare US households from AI's rising energy costs

[8]NIMBY pushback begins to bite US datacenter buildout

[9]Singapore eyes barge-based hydrogen power for datacenters

[10]Altman: You think AI is wasted energy? Try raising 100 billion humans

Not all water withdrawn by datacenters is "consumed" by being evaporated or otherwise removed; some is discharged or returned. But any water that is taken in by a server farm is not available for other users, which is where the problem arises.

The report states that there are roughly 50,000 community water systems across the US, of which approximately 40,000 are small systems each serving no more than 3,300 people. About 9,000 are medium-sized, and only 708 are large systems serving upward of 100,000 people.

Nearly all hyperscale and colocation facilities across the country are supplied by community water systems (mostly from potable sources), with only a few drawing their H 2 O from private groundwater sources.

[11]

Such public systems are designed to safely and reliably meet maximum demand at all times, with additional margins to allow for extreme conditions such as prolonged heatwaves and droughts.

Depending on local climate conditions and cooling system design, the UC Riverside team estimates that a 100 MW IT load will require approximately 0.5 to 2.5 million-gallons-per-day (MGD) of water. And this capacity is modest compared with the gigawatt-scale AI facilities being planned for deployment across America.

After accounting for operational safety margins and reliability headroom, it may be difficult for many public water systems to support the needs of an evaporation-cooled 100 MW IT load, let alone giant facilities.

In fact, the researchers claim that many datacenter projects have required substantial upgrades to local water infrastructure, even when their peak water demand was as low as 0.1 MGD.

Overall, the report concludes that US server farms are projected to require 697 to 1,451 MGD of new water capacity, at a cost of up to $58 billion and comparable to New York City's average daily supply.

The authors recommend that datacenter operators report peak water use, not just yearly averages, to aid in planning. They might also partner with local communities to fund water infrastructure upgrades, and work more closely with utilities by adjusting cooling methods. The latter would see them use water-based cooling when the power grid is stressed, but switch to dry cooling when the community water system is stressed. No telling what would happen on peak-heat days when both systems are stressed.®

Get our [12]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2abCik-BacxEB6H7RLVPo_QAAANU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44abCik-BacxEB6H7RLVPo_QAAANU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33abCik-BacxEB6H7RLVPo_QAAANU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02705

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/22/googles_gemini_water/

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44abCik-BacxEB6H7RLVPo_QAAANU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/05/munificent_7_pledge_on_energy/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/04/cbre_datacenter_figures_2025/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/02/singapore_bargebased_hydrogen_power_datacenters/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/23/sam_altman_ai_efficiency/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33abCik-BacxEB6H7RLVPo_QAAANU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



"many datacenter projects have required substantial upgrades to local water infrastructure"

Pascal Monett

They have required ? They can pay for it.

This is going to be fun to watch (from afar). Seems to me that all those geniuses who continue to build water-gozzling facilities in Texas are going to be in for a bad surprise, and they deserve bad surprise they'll get.

Re: "many datacenter projects have required substantial upgrades to local water infrastructure"

Uh, Mike

Be grateful that the NLBG (National Laboratory for Bad Government) is getting the kinks worked out in their own territory, and on their own grid..

Hmmmm

Anonymous Coward

Maybe they should build those datacenters on that 45 km² of land that [1]burnt last May North of Duluth, on the shores of Lake Superior that holds about [2]3,000 cubic miles of water (shared with Canada I guess) -- which could come in handy.

Cheap TX desert landscapes and the likes don't seem nearly as appropriate by a longshot ... Then again, by 2030, one expects this whole AI (so-called) bubble to be just a bad memory, bursted, and siting should become a total non-issue by then. Still, partially-built DCs might then serve as winter shelter for local Bullwinkles (and Rocky) that [3]seem to be vanishing a bit of late ... Could be a right win-win-win! ;)

[1] https://www.fox9.com/news/duluth-man-admits-causing-camp-house-wildfire-campfire-unattended

[2] https://www.glc.org/lakes/lake-superior/

[3] https://www.startribune.com/researcher-lands-a-dream-job-to-help-solve-the-mystery-of-the-vanishing-minnesota-moose/601480756

Re: Hmmmm

DS999

Well they also need lots of lots of power, and I doubt there's large amounts of excess grid capacity in the vicinity of Duluth.

Assuming they had power what they could do next to a massive body of cold water like that is use it as a geothermal cooling loop. Then they don't "use" any water at all for cooling, and assuming the loops are long enough and go far enough out wouldn't heat up the lake's water in the datacenter's vicinity by any measurable amount.

When AI Takes Over

Uh, Mike

Dateline 2030

Artificial Intelligence is now rationing power and water for human consumption.

"It's better for you. We're keeping you safe enough and warm enough. Don't worry, be happy."

Trust everybody, but cut the cards.
-- Finlay Peter Dunne, "Mr. Dooley's Philosophy"