News: 1773032190

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

NASA’s asteroid defence mission slowed targets by 1.7 inches per hour

(2026/03/09)


NASA has published new analysis of its 2022 planetary defense test that suggests the mission slowed down the target asteroids, albeit infinitesimally.

The aerospace agency named its 2022 experiment the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), which readers may remember saw a 570kg spacecraft sent to collide with a 170-metre-wide asteroid named Dimorphos that orbits a larger space rock named Didymos. The aim of the mission was to investigate the feasibility of diverting an asteroid that poses a threat to Earth.

Analysis of the mission [1]found the collision moved Dimorphos closer to Didymos, and reduced the duration of the smaller rock’s orbit. Astroboffins who peered at the asteroids using the Hubble Space Telescope also spotted 37 boulders orbiting Dimorphos after DART struck.

[2]

Last Friday, the journal Science Advances published [3]fresh analysis of the DART mission titled “Direct detection of an asteroid’s heliocentric deflection: The Didymos system after DART.”

[4]

[5]

NASA’s [6]summary of the research reminds us that scientists use the term “momentum enhancement factor” to describe the thrust imparted when one object hits another in space.

“The momentum enhancement factor for DART’s impact was about two, meaning that the debris loss doubled the punch created by the spacecraft alone,” the summary explains before adding “The new study shows the impact ejected so much material from the binary system that it also changed the binary’s orbital period around the Sun by 0.15 seconds.”

[7]

Rahil Makadia, the study’s lead author at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, shared another finding: “The change in the binary system’s orbital speed was about 11.7 microns per second, or 1.7 inches per hour,” he said. “Over time, such a small change in an asteroid’s motion can make the difference between a hazardous object hitting or missing our planet.”

“This is a tiny change to the orbit, but given enough time, even a tiny change can grow to a significant deflection,” said Thomas Statler, lead scientist for solar system small bodies at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “The team’s amazingly precise measurement again validates kinetic impact as a technique for defending Earth against asteroid hazards and shows how a binary asteroid might be deflected by impacting just one member of the pair.”

The method used to reach that conclusion is also interesting, as the authors of the paper used observations conducted by volunteer astronomers who recorded 22 stellar occultations between October 2022 and March 2025.

[8]

“When combined with years of existing ground-based observations, these stellar occultation observations became key in helping us calculate how DART had changed Didymos’ orbit,” said study co-lead Steve Chesley, a senior research scientist at JPL. “This work is highly weather dependent and often requires travel to remote regions with no guarantee of success. This result would not have been possible without the dedication of dozens of volunteer occultation observers around the world.” ®

Get our [9]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/21/dart_dimorphos_ejection/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aa5T83ln-y_Zz6JXY__-iAAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aea4259

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aa5T83ln-y_Zz6JXY__-iAAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aa5T83ln-y_Zz6JXY__-iAAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.nasa.gov/missions/dart/nasas-dart-mission-changed-orbit-of-asteroid-didymos-around-sun/

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aa5T83ln-y_Zz6JXY__-iAAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aa5T83ln-y_Zz6JXY__-iAAAAEQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



THE "FUN WITH USENET" MANIFESTO
Very little happens on Usenet without some sort of response from some other
reader. Fun With Usenet postings are no exception. Since there are some who
might question the rationale of some of the excerpts included therein, I have
written up a list of guidelines that sum up the philosophy behind these
postings.

One. I never cut out words in the middle of a quote without a VERY
good reason, and I never cut them out without including ellipses. For
instance, "I am not a goob" might become "I am ... a goob", but that's too
mundane to bother with. "I'm flame proof" might (and has) become
"I'm ...a... p...oof" but that's REALLY stretching it.

Two. If I cut words off the beginning or end of a quote, I don't
put ellipses, but neither do I capitalize something that wasn't capitalized
before the cut. "I don't think that the Church of Ubizmo is a wonderful
place" would turn into "the Church of Ubizmo is a wonderful place". Imagine
the posting as a tape-recording of the poster's thoughts. If I can set
up the quote via fast-forwarding and stopping the tape, and without splicing,
I don't put ellipses in. And by the way, I love using this mechanism for
turning things around. If you think something stinks, say so - don't say you
don't think it's wonderful. ...
-- D. J. McCarthy (dmccart@cadape.UUCP)