Washington reportedly moves to tighten leash on AI chip exports
- Reference: 1772805068
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2026/03/06/us_ai_chips_restrictions/
- Source link:
The Department of Commerce is said to be drafting rules that would require chipmakers to obtain government approval before exporting AI chips to any country, effectively giving Washington a stranglehold on AI compute supply.
News site [1]Axios says a 129-page draft is circulating through the government, though a White House official pushed back, saying the draft "does not reflect what President Trump has said on export controls nor does it reflect the direction of the Trump administration on encouraging export of the American AI stack."
[2]
AI chipmakers such as Nvidia and AMD would have to obtain export permission on a country-by-country basis. This has drawn comparisons with the [3]AI Diffusion rules passed by the outgoing Biden administration during its final weeks. This proposed to cap AI chip sales to most countries, exempted a tier of trusted allies, and imposed total bans on Russia, China, and Iran.
[4]
[5]
The [6]Trump administration rescinded those rules before they took effect, with the Commerce Department saying they would have "stifled American innovation and saddled companies with burdensome new regulatory requirements."
The department posted on [7]X that it is "committed to promoting secure exports of the American tech stack," citing its Middle East agreements as a model and adding that internal discussions are ongoing about "formalizing that approach."
[8]
It closed by saying it "will not" return to the AI Diffusion rule, calling it "burdensome, overreaching, and disastrous." Reg readers will note that this is neither a denial nor a confirmation of country-by-country export rules, which are a distinct proposal that has merely been compared with the Diffusion scheme.
Separately, the [9]Financial Times reports that the Department of Commerce may require corporations that buy large volumes of Nvidia and AMD chips to invest in AI infrastructure on US soil.
The scheme is consistent with President Trump's broader demand that [10]foreign tech companies spend in the US or face punitive import tariffs. According to the FT's sources, the scheme would also allow Washington to approve GPU export deals along the lines of last year's agreements with the UAE and [11]Saudi Arabia .
[12]Nvidia hasn't made a cent in China lately – and might not need to given $120B profit
[13]Trump promises nuclear datacenter permits in 3 weeks, calls Greenland 'big beautiful ice'
[14]Trump administration sets GPU export rules that put Chinese buyers at the back of the queue
[15]Letting Nvidia sell H200s to China is closing the door after the horse has bolted
Neither proposal has been officially confirmed. The Register asked the Commerce Department whether either resembles rules it plans to enforce, and will update if we get an answer.
All of this makes for just another installment in the Trump administration's chaotic, politically driven, and ever-shifting trade strategy, especially when it comes to technology.
[16]
In January, it announced that exports of Nvidia and AMD GPUs to China would [17]only be allowed if there was sufficient supply of the same products in the US. Beijing, however, is now trying to wean its industries off American technology, and [18]ordered them to cancel orders for Nvidia kit. This comes after several years of fluctuating tactics designed to stymie China's access to advanced AI technology. ®
Get our [19]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.axios.com/2026/03/05/trump-ai-chip-clash-white-house
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aasIMCsKaDmWbjsc-zJDlAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/13/nvidia_us_ai_chips/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aasIMCsKaDmWbjsc-zJDlAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aasIMCsKaDmWbjsc-zJDlAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/13/trump_ai_exports/
[7] https://x.com/CommerceGov/status/2029670081915941164
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aasIMCsKaDmWbjsc-zJDlAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.ft.com/content/30d0b1df-ad8c-42eb-852b-dad53acaecfc
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/19/trump_semiconductor_tariff_plan/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/14/saudi_spending_spree/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/26/nvidia_q4_2026/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/21/american_genius_says_dont_panic/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/14/us_gpu_export_rules/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/09/nvidia_h200s_china_ai/
[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aasIMCsKaDmWbjsc-zJDlAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[17] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/14/us_gpu_export_rules/
[18] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/14/us_gpu_export_rules/
[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Techbros betrayed!
How's the return on investment for those bribes to Trump working out?
not a typo
Draft rules could force Nvidia and AMD to seek government approval before selling abroad
Didn't you mean daft?
Re: not a typo
Have a pint for beating me to it!
Re: not a typo
Thank you ,slurp.
I couldn't resist the comment.
Probably unworkable
Not least because the chips themselves are not made in the US and much of the IP required to make the chips is not US either.
Re: Probably unworkable
Except that parties like TSMC and ASML still won't be in a hurry to draw the irascible geriatric's attention. There is of course much potential for supply chain leakage (as has already happened with GPUs accounted through Singapore) so restrictions can't be watertight, but certainly enough to put a brake on high volume selling.
Re: Probably unworkable
I'm not sure that Trumpty Dumpty has that much leverage anymore and it's not just those two companies: Japan and Korea are also key to the supply chain. It's one thing getting everyone on board to try and squeeze out China, but quite a different to want to restrict exports to most of the developed world. Thus far, countries decided that trade agreements in return for lower tariffs were preferable to trade wars, but tariffs per executive order are no longer an option; and all the alternatives require congressional approval.
I guess we'll find out but this could push development of ARM or RISC-V (I know neither are GPUs) ecoystems faster than anyone expected.
Exporting the American tech stack to the Middle East - one bomb, missile and drone at a time.
Yes, although you have to wonder how much US IP there is in one of Iran's Shahed drones?
Although the US have copied it and fielded their own version back as Lucas, maybe two wrongs make a right in intellectual property.
AI
It would be better if they extended the law to ban exporting of all things “AI”
Go on - you know it makes sense - it would close any and all loopholes and would make for a much cleaner law. Which must be a good thing, yes?
Unfortunately, the rest of the world wouldn’t have access to American slop …errr “AI”. A real shame but I think a price worth paying
There are alternatives
>> effectively giving Washington a stranglehold on AI compute supply
The rest of the world could just say "FUCK AMERICA", and buy Chinese. It's clear we don't need the very latest top performance chips. Nice to have, but not essential.
I have long commented that the USA seeks world domination. Every week I am proved more and more right. The naysayers can't escape it.