News: 1769001030

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

FTC tries to un-Zuck Meta's grip on the market by dragging it back to court

(2026/01/21)


The Federal Trade Commission has doubled down on its belief that Meta maintained a monopoly of social networking by anticompetitive conduct, appealing last year's district court victory for Zuck and co.

The FTC first brought its case back in [1]December 2020 , alleging "the company is illegally maintaining its personal social networking monopoly through a years-long course of anticompetitive conduct."

US watchdog pokes Facebook a second time: Meta faces fresh monopoly lawsuit [2]READ MORE

That "conduct" included snapping up potential rivals such as [3]Instagram and [4]WhatsApp , as well as imposing "anticompetitive conditions on software developers." At the time, the FTC demanded divestitures of assets, including those acquisitions, and removing the "anticompetitive conditions" on devs.

However last November, district judge [5]James Boasberg ruled that "Meta holds no monopoly in the relevant market," citing a constantly changing social media ecosystem and noted that Meta’s market share "seems to be shrinking."

He also noted that the FTC had approved the Insta and WhatsApp buys.

[6]

In a statement yesterday, the [7]FTC confirmed it "continues to allege, and robust evidence at trial demonstrated, that for over a decade Meta has illegally maintained a monopoly in personal social networking services through anticompetitive conduct."

[8]

[9]

FTC Bureau of Competition Director Daniel Guarnera said: "The Trump-Vance FTC will continue fighting its historic case against Meta to ensure that competition can thrive across the country to the benefit of all Americans and US businesses."

The original case was brought after the November 2020 election and before the inauguration of Joe Biden.

[10]UK gambling regulator accuses Meta of lying about its struggle to spot illegal ads

[11]Meta retreats from metaverse after virtual reality check

[12]Zuck forms Meta Compute to pave the planet with 'hundreds of gigawatts' of AI datacenters

[13]Zuck buys Chinese AI company Manus that claims it deals in actions, not words

[14]Meta can't afford its $600B love letter to Trump

Donald Trump was [15]banned from Meta's platforms , amongst others, following the Capitol Hill riot. Republicans have, in the past, railed against the perceived liberal bias of Silicon Valley based platforms, like Meta. And Trump has his own platform – albeit at arm's length – in the shape of Truth Social.

But that's all water under the bridge. Trump has since been reinstated to Meta, and other platforms. Meanwhile Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg was amongst the tech titans who [16]attended Trump's inauguration and picked up the tab. While simultaneously [17]ditching DEI .

[18]

Earlier this month, Dina Powell McCormick joined Meta as president and vice chairman. McCormick was previously a board member at the firm, and her CV includes stints as deputy national security advisor in Trump's first administration, as well as time in the Bush administration in the early 2000s. ®

Get our [19]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/09/facebook_crushed_competitors_to_maintain/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/12/ftcs_antitrust_meta/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2012/08/15/facebook_acquisition_instagram_oft/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2014/02/20/facebook_whatsapp_19bn_buy_also_45_for_your_phonebook/

[5] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crklgrpdke8o

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aXEGOBdzBnmiQlgA9oKAKgAAAdg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/01/ftc-appeals-ruling-meta-monopolization-case

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aXEGOBdzBnmiQlgA9oKAKgAAAdg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aXEGOBdzBnmiQlgA9oKAKgAAAdg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/20/uk_gambling_comission_criticizes_meta/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/16/meta_quest_horizon_workrooms/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/12/meta_compute/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/30/meta_acquires_manus/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/08/meta_cant_afford_its_600b/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/07/social_media_trump/

[16] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgpqeq82rvo

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/13/diversity_equity_inclusion_tech/

[18] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aXEGOBdzBnmiQlgA9oKAKgAAAdg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Doctor Syntax

It sounds as if Zuck hasn't grovelled enough.

Like a badger

Surely it's simply that he hasn't paid the Trump tithe?

Yet Another Anonymous coward

Why doesn't he just buy the FTC from Musk ?

If you ever want to have a lot of fun, I recommend that you go off and program
an imbedded system. The salient characteristic of an imbedded system is that
it cannot be allowed to get into a state from which only direct intervention
will suffice to remove it. An imbedded system can't permanently trust
anything it hears from the outside world. It must sniff around, adapt,
consider, sniff around, and adapt again. I'm not talking about ordinary
modular programming carefulness here. No. Programming an imbedded system
calls for undiluted raging maniacal paranoia. For example, our ethernet front
ends need to know what network number they are on so that they can address and
route PUPs properly. How do you find out what your network number is? Easy,
you ask a gateway. Gateways are required by definition to know their correct
network numbers. Once you've got your network number, you start using it and
before you can blink you've got it wired into fifteen different sockets spread
all over creation. Now what happens when the panic-stricken operator realizes
he was running the wrong version of the gateway which was giving out the wrong
network number? Never supposed to happen. Tough. Supposing that your
software discovers that the gateway is now giving out a different network
number than before, what's it supposed to do about it? This is not discussed
in the protocol document. Never supposed to happen. Tough. I think you get
my drift.