Oxford researchers pull off quantum first with distributed gate teleportation
- Reference: 1739349730
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/02/12/oxford_quantum_gate_teleportation/
- Source link:
[1]Published in Nature, the study doesn't claim to be the first to achieve quantum teleportation - after all, scientists have been teleporting quantum states [2]for years . What is new is the deterministic (e.g., once entanglement is established, the teleportation always succeeds) and repeatable teleportation of a quantum logic gate.
"Previous demonstrations of quantum teleportation have focused on transferring quantum states between physically separated systems," study lead Dougal Main, a graduate student at Oxford's physics department, [3]said in a University press release. "In our study, we use quantum teleportation to create interactions between these distant systems."
[4]
Quantum gates - the building blocks of quantum computers - manipulate qubit states. The Oxford team claims to have deterministically teleported a fundamental two-qubit quantum gate across two meters of optical fiber, linking two separate quantum modules.
[5]
[6]
"One of the key aspects of our result is that the interactions between the two separated qubits can be done deterministically, even if the photonic link connecting the two modules is lossy," Main explained in an emailed comment. "This is particularly important for quantum computing, since if these interactions were probabilistic [i.e., prone to failure], then for large computations, the probability of successfully completing a computation without any failures becomes exponentially small."
"We deterministically teleport a controlled-Z (CZ) gate between two circuit qubits in separate modules, achieving 86% fidelity," the group reported in their paper. Their work marks "the first implementation of a distributed quantum algorithm comprising several non-local, two-qubit gates."
This breakthrough enables us to effectively 'wire together' distinct quantum processors into a single, fully-connected quantum computer
What makes the achievement important is its potential to tackle quantum computing's scalability challenge. According to Oxford University, a [7]practical quantum computer that is powerful enough to be industry-disrupting would need to be capable of processing millions of qubits, making it prohibitively large and complex. The approach demonstrated by Main's team shows how distributing quantum operations across smaller, interconnected devices - each handling only a few qubits - could provide a scalable path forward for building large-scale quantum systems.
"This breakthrough enables us to effectively 'wire together' distinct quantum processors into a single, fully-connected quantum computer," Main said.
[8]
Not only did the team achieve quantum gate teleportation, but they also demonstrated Grover's algorithm - a quantum search algorithm designed to speed up searches through unstructured data - using fewer queries as part of their experiment.
"In the two-qubit case, there are four items to search through. Classically, the item a could be identified with, on average, two queries," the paper authors said. "Using the quantum circuit … the same task can be accomplished with only one query."
The team achieved a 71 percent success rate with Grover's, and also demonstrated distributed iSWAP and SWAP gates.
A far-from-perfect first
"In our experiment, we linked two trapped-ion quantum computers located two meters apart," Main told The Register in an email. "There's no fundamental limit to how far apart they can be," Main added, though he did say that longer distances cause signal loss that can slow down operations. One potential solution is quantum repeaters, which have made [9]significant progress in recent years.
"A key advantage, though, is that these losses don't destroy any quantum information," Main added. "With gate teleportation, you only carry out the final step of the process once entanglement is successfully established."
[10]
But at two meters apart, and just 86 percent fidelity, Main's team's work isn't exactly ready to build usable distributed quantum computers quite yet.
[11]A lone Nvidia GPU speeds past the physics-straining might of a quantum computer – in these apps at least
[12]Google exec sees enterprise quantum app on closer horizon
[13]Quantum? No solace: Nvidia CEO sinks QC stocks with '20 years off' forecast
[14]Quantum computing dreamers face stock market reality check
"Typically, you'd want entangling gates with fidelities above 99.9 percent," Main told us.
That said, Main noted that his work is a proof of concept that shows a distributed quantum computing approach works - now we just need time, money and more research to improve the fidelity.
"The very first quantum computers had relatively low fidelities, but have improved greatly over the past two decades," Main said. "With the increasing commercial investment in quantum technologies, we anticipate rapid progress for distributed quantum computing. Some companies are already building toward this kind of architecture."
It's not clear how long it'll take to get that improved fidelity. The research team hopes their work will lead to distributed quantum computing, a quantum internet, improved cryptography, physics, and more.
Beyond improving the error rate, quantum information processing across a network is achievable using current technology, noted Professor David Lucas, principal investigator on Main's research team.
"Scaling up quantum computers remains a formidable technical challenge that will likely require new physics insights as well as intensive engineering effort over the coming years," said Lucas, lead scientist of the UK quantum computing and simulation hub at Oxford. But "our experiment demonstrates that network-distributed quantum information processing is feasible with current technology." ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08404-x
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2012/05/23/quantum_teleport_record/
[3] https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2025-02-06-first-distributed-quantum-algorithm-brings-quantum-supercomputers-closer
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z6x_VUx1tDYrMVKhYc6rrwAAAQA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z6x_VUx1tDYrMVKhYc6rrwAAAQA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z6x_VUx1tDYrMVKhYc6rrwAAAQA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/24/darpa_quantum_computer_benchmarking_papers/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z6x_VUx1tDYrMVKhYc6rrwAAAQA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/29/quantum_internet_paper/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z6x_VUx1tDYrMVKhYc6rrwAAAQA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/03/quantum_reality_check/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/06/google_quantum_apps/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/08/quantum_no_solace_nvidia_ceo/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/07/quantum_firms_risk_being_delisted/
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Physics A Level
Even with degree level physics, it is tough going. It is very much a highly technical and specialised area requiring true boffins.
Re: Physics A Level
With articles like this, my A grade at Physics A Level is woefully inadequate. It was nearly 40 years ago. We didn't even get to Einstein's work. All Newton et al.
Forty+ years ago quantum entanglement was still considered tainted with heresy even after 10 years after J S Bell's 1964 paper and the then recent (1972) early confirmatory experiments.
Physicists are as daft as the rest of the population - I had to really scratch my head when one presumably more daft stated authoritatively that Bells Inequality was incompatible with the Bohmian interpretation of quantum mechanics (it's not). Bell himself is on record as stating the inherent non-local nature of David Bohm's theory was a significant source of inspiration. See [1]Goldstein's Bell Paper.
Undergraduate Quantum Mechanics was largely 'don't ask questions - "shut up and calculate. †"' Possibly still is.
† Apparently from a criticism in [2]What's Wrong with this Pillow? , N. David Mermin Physics Today 42 (4), 9–11<(1989) (pg 1, para 4 (col 2))
[1] https://ijqf.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Goldstein-Bell-paper.pdf
[2] https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2810963
Is the end point of this research, two quantum computers, physically separated, but running in-step?
Useful if one computer is on Earth and the other on the Mars.
“deterministically teleported a fundamental two-qubit quantum gate across two meters of optical fiber, linking two separate quantum modules.”
I don’t pretend to understand from the article what went on in the experiment but the optical fibre might be a limiting factor on interplanetary use.
I think the essence of it is more about getting enough hardware together to do the computing, unlike traditional CPUs/motherboards where all the components are very close together to maximise data transfer speeds. The quantum computer components don't need to be rammed tight together.
But if they're using light to connect, they're going to be speed-of-light limited, no? And so as with electronic computers, smaller = faster?
(caveat: I am not a quantum boffin, though I did once build a Quantum kit-car).
Re- optical cable
The optical cable from what i can gather is part of the deterministic feed back loop .... how high a probabilty are the qubits entangled ...how lossy/stable is the signal. A way to make predictions on out comes before the gate is "teleported" .
across two meters of optical fiber
These twats need to watch Star Trek if they think that is teleportation.
Re: across two meters of optical fiber
Yep. Those guys have also perfected faster-than-light travel & artificial gravitation. Why is no-one looking into this?
Re: across two meters of optical fiber
And nobody in Star Trek ever needed to go to the toilet either, so there's more research needed.
Physics A Level
With articles like this, my A grade at Physics A Level is woefully inadequate. It was nearly 40 years ago. We didn't even get to Einstein's work. All Newton et al.