News: 1738924034

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Musk's move fast and break things mantra won't work in US.gov

(2025/02/07)


Opinion 120-hour work weeks, firing government staffers and dismantling agencies? Oh my. The US government under pseudo President Musk is in for a world of radical change.

Let's leave aside what Elon Musk – who some are saying has become the de facto US government ruler – is doing with American policies, as de jure President Donald Trump plays golf and issues frequently nonsensical executive orders. I hate most of Musk's policies, but today my subject is how he is changing the nuts and bolts of the federal government and its approach to technology.

I come at this not from a unique place, but a relatively rare one. You see, before I became a tech journalist who's spent a lot of time in Silicon Valley, I worked as a programmer and system administrator for NASA and the Department of Defense Inside the Beltway. In short, I know how tech works, how tech bros think, and how government tech staffers do their jobs. There's a gigantic difference between them.

[1]

For starters, Musk wants to bring the manic tech work style to the government. You can only con tech workers into 120-hours work weeks with the Initial Public Offering (IPO) carrot in their 20s. Thirty-year-old government workers who will never see an IPO are another story entirely.

[2]

[3]

Tech IPOs are largely a fantasy anyway. The dream of being a billionaire compels people to work themselves into oblivion, but the reality is that only a tiny percentage actually achieve significant wealth via this route. Your best shot is to slave for a company when it's just taking off and then hope like hell it actually makes it to an IPO or an incredibly lucrative exit buyout.

The US government, on the other hand, is 248 years old. I don't see an IPO coming anytime soon.

[4]

As it happens, though, you can profit from the government. For example, Musk paid Trump more than $250 million to help fund his political campaign. In return, via the non-governmental Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk has since gained unprecedented power over the United States for an unelected person. This is hardly a route that a NASA software developer or a Veteran Administration's pharmacist can take.

On the other hand, if you're a young workaholic working for Musk, like, say, 25-year-old Marko Elez, who's now in charge of the US Treasury payment system, you'll do just fine. Ordinary government employees? Not so much.

Besides simply being unable to work seven days a week even if they wanted to, millions of federal employees face layoffs or buyout offers, with DOGE seeking to eliminate "redundant" roles. Career officials opposing these moves have been sidelined or forced into retirement.

[5]

Unfortunately, the government needs day-in, day-out humdrum workers. As Musk takes Trump's idea of getting rid of employees into practice, they'll find there's a lot less fat than Republican propaganda would have Americans believe.

In particular, this fire or retire-them-all approach Musk is pushing will lead to the best and brightest leaving the government. I've seen this playbook in action before, albeit on a much lower level, when I was in the government. It didn't work well then. It won't work well now.

Musk, like Trump before him, also doesn't have a clue about how the government works. Yes, you can dictate "Make it so" but this isn't Star Trek. Well, not the Enterprise Star Trek, anyway. The government moves more like Star Trek's Lower Decks [6]Cerritos on a bad day.

If you've watched the show, though you'll have seen that comical blunders and all, the crew get the job done. Yes, there are government employees that need to be fired, but many others are essential to getting the necessary work done.

It's exciting, or terrifying, to see Musk making government changes, but Musk and company aren't taking time to consider what these changes mean. For example, Musk claims "corruption and waste is being rooted out in real-time" when he shut down funds sent to Lutheran Family Services, which provides elder care in South Dakota and support for Afghan refugees who worked with the US army during the Afghan war, among other services.

[7]FBI's secret UFO hunters fear Trump's January 6 purge will send them into orbit

[8]OpenAI, Microsoft urge judge to toss out Musk's 'fact-free' lawsuit

[9]Musk’s DOGE ship gets ‘full’ access to Treasury payment system, sinks USAID

[10]Trump scrubs all mention of DEI, gender, climate change from federal websites

A few minutes of study would have revealed that this group should not immediately be defunded. After all, even if you disagree with their humanitarian policies, South Dakota is a solidly red state that voted for Trump with a 63.4 percent majority. Is it really a smart move for Republicans to get on the bad side of their older voters?

Musk's overhaul reflects an ideological push to shrink government but destabilizes institutions reliant on expert, experienced oversight.

Even if you disagree with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who [11]accuses Musk of running a "shadow government" and calls DOGE's actions a "hostile takeover," I think anyone can agree that while "move fast and break things" may work in technology, it doesn't work well for governments or democracies. ®

Get our [12]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z6Xn09JudNbAEDmQc2xucAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z6Xn09JudNbAEDmQc2xucAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z6Xn09JudNbAEDmQc2xucAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z6Xn09JudNbAEDmQc2xucAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z6Xn09JudNbAEDmQc2xucAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/USS_Cerritos

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/04/fbis_secret_ufo_hunters_fear/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/04/openai_microsoft_musk_lawsuit/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/03/musk_doge_treasury_usaid/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/03/trump_admin_scrubs_dei_websites/

[11] https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/leader-schumer-floor-remarks-condemning-doge-and-the-trump-administrations-illegal-seizure-of-usaid-putting-american-security-at-risk

[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Filippo

> Musk's overhaul reflects an ideological push to shrink government but destabilizes institutions reliant on expert, experienced oversight.

You know what the global populist right thinks about experts.

Brewster's Angle Grinder

You beat me to it.

"You're driving towards a wall!" "No I'm not!" *smash*

Brewster's Angle Grinder

"...destabilizes institutions reliant on expert, experienced oversight."

Isn't that the point? They've had enough of experienced people telling them they can't do things. (Cf. [1]this tech dirt piece on on Musk moving a data centre). More importantly, they've had enough of experts telling them what reality is. They want the world to be X and they are going to fire anyone who tells them otherwise.

Reality, will no doubt have the last laugh. But at what cost?

[1] https://www.techdirt.com/2023/09/12/the-batshit-crazy-story-of-the-day-elon-musk-decided-to-personally-rip-servers-out-of-a-sacramento-data-center/

Brewster's Angle Grinder

"Is it really a smart move for Republicans to get on the bad side of their older voters?"

In 2020, USAID bought $2.1bn in food from US farmers. USAID is being cancelled. That means $340million in purchases have been "paused". [ [1]Washington Post ]

They just don't do joined up thinking. Or think things through. (It makes their heads hurt.)

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/06/trump-usaid-money-american-farms/

President Musk for life.

Dave Coventry

The advantage of being unelected is that there are no term limits, you have no reason to adhere to a Constitution and nobody can stop you doing what you like.

Moreover, given the flawed Justice system in the US where a felon may avoid jail time by being elected President, there is no measures that may be taken against him, however many laws he may breach. He can't even be impeached.

JD Vance makes the point that, while nobody might voted for Musk, they voted for Trump and Musk came with the package.

BARBARA STANWYCK makes me nervous!!