News: 1738834213

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Openreach tests 50 Gbps broadband – don’t expect it anytime soon

(2025/02/06)


Network builder and maintainer Openreach says it has tested a 50 Gbps fiber broadband connection in the UK, as a first step towards making it commercially available at some point in the distant future.

The infrastructure arm of former state-owned telco BT says it ran trials from a residential property in Ipswich near England's east coast using 50G PON (passive optical network) kit supplied by Nokia.

This achieved download speeds of 41.9 Gbps and upload speeds of 20.6 Gbps during its tests, Openreach claims, which were run over a section of the company's existing Full Fiber network.

[1]

The implication is that customers now getting fiber rolled out to their premises as part of BT's network expansion program should be able to receive the service over the same connection in future.

[2]

[3]

When that might be is debatable, of course. Openreach told The Register : "It won't be available commercially just yet," and that "higher speeds are going to be needed in the future as data consumption keeps on increasing as we all do more stuff online."

For comparison, Vodafone was claiming to offer higher speeds than any other provider in the UK [4]last year , with up to 2.2 Gbps available across altnet CityFibre's network.

[5]

However, [6]ISPreview notes that Openreach is still using the older Gigabit Passive Optical Network (GPON) kit across most of its broadband network, meaning the vast majority of those 17 million properties across the country that BT Group claimed to have reached in its recent [7]Trading Update .

In a statement, Trevor Linney, Openreach director for Network Technology, said: "Today we're deploying XGS-PON ready equipment, and this trial proves we're ready for the next generational leap, as and when it's needed."

XGS-PON allows for symmetrical data transfer speeds of up to 10 Gbps (i.e. 10 Gbps upstream and downstream), and the fact Openreach is just rolling this out now demonstrates it is a long way from providing 50Gbps.

[8]

BT rival Virgin Media O2 announced it was offering UK services powered by XGS-PON at least a couple of years back. Alphabet-owned Google Fiber claimed to be the first operator to trial 50G PON in the US last year.

Yet as Openreach notes, demand for higher speeds and ever greater bandwidth continues to grow apace, and the operator says future deployments of 10 Gbps, 25 Gbps and 50 Gbps capable broadband will open up "a world of exciting possibilities."

As use case, Openreach lists virtual reality, augmented reality, and 8K video streaming, while crystal-clear video conferencing, instantaneous file sharing, and uninterrupted access to cloud-based applications might be of more interest to business users.

Did we mention AI? It's obligatory to mention AI, and Openreach says that 50Gbps connections will allow these applications to handle larger datasets more efficiently, leading to more accurate training and better model performance. It might make synchronization of models across greater distances easier, we suppose.

[9]Telcos scolded for unwanted erection of utility poles in race to wire up Britain

[10]BT chief blames regulations for UK lagging in next-gen network rollout

[11]The last mile's at risk in our hostile environment. Let's go the extra mile to fix it

[12]BT unplugs plans to turn old cabinets into EV chargepoints

PP Foresight Founder and telecoms analyst Paolo Pescatore said the development underlines the potential of fiber and should ensure a path towards much needed investment in next generation networks.

"We are someway off needing those speeds and we may never see actual live commercial packages," Pescatore told The Register .

"However, given the insatiable appetite of users for more data, more new connected devices, all combined with the euphoria of AI, then we will need a robust, reliable and fast backhaul to deliver a plethora of services across fixed and mobile networks." ®

Get our [13]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z6SWVFpb01qdnHHrD3MrIQAAAcI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z6SWVFpb01qdnHHrD3MrIQAAAcI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z6SWVFpb01qdnHHrD3MrIQAAAcI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.vodafone.co.uk/newscentre/press-release/launch-of-2-2gbps-proii-broadband/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z6SWVFpb01qdnHHrD3MrIQAAAcI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2025/02/openreach-and-nokia-claim-uks-first-live-test-of-50gbps-broadband.html

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/31/bt_fiber_rollout_passes_17/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z6SWVFpb01qdnHHrD3MrIQAAAcI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/16/uk_telegraph_poles/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/06/bt_chief_blames_regulations_broadband_rollout/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/18/opinion_networks/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/20/bt_ev_chargepoints/

[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



How does the back end support this?

RSW

So in the future every house has 40G down and 20G up how will the back end support those sort of speeds?

Re: How does the back end support this?

Anonymous Coward

Nobody is promising the packets will go anywhere once they leave the boundaries of your property.

Re: How does the back end support this?

Anonymous Coward

It's still a contended service on the optical network though - the current 2.4Gbps is divided amongst 30 subscribers (well, technically, 30 subscribers each getting 1/32 of the total available) - the guaranteed minimum is 80Mbps per subscriber (yes, ISPs oversell that massively)

It's entirely feasible to think that a 40Gbps network might get shared with a greater number of subscribers - it's possible that they'll combine 2 of the current PONs so there's 60 subscribers each with a guaranteed 640Mbps.

What the article doesn't mention is that the various speeds use different wavelengths and can therefore occupy the same fibre simultaneously, so you don't need all subscribers on that leg to upgrade at the same time.

At some point in the distant future

that one in the corner

From Open reach?

Remind me, when is the Sun scheduled to be a Red Giant?

Re: At some point in the distant future

John Robson

"Remind me, when is the Sun scheduled to be a Red Giant?"

Well where else are OR going to get their red photons?

Hans Neeson-Bumpsadese

I think it's great that network providers are building in that kind of capacity as a means of future-proofing, but what I really object to is sales-folk from ISPs telling us that we need that kind of capacity "now*.

At home I have FTTC which gives me around 80 Mbps download / 20Mbps upload, which is plenty fast enough. I keep getting calls from other ISPs and also the upgrades team at my current ISP, inviting me to move to a package that offers better speeds than that...obviously for more money than I'm paying right now.

But I don't need more. The household has a finite number of eyeballs and can only consume a finite amount of HD streamed content. Any extra capacity would be wasted. Fortunately I understand my needs and know to say no, but I do worry about less savvy people being suckered into packages where they're paying for way more bandwidth than they need.

that one in the corner

Apparently, I could get a "good deal" if I sign TODAY for a fibre download speed that exceeds the speed of my LAN.

RSW

It's the same revenue model as gym memberships, pay every month but 75% never use it

Chloe Cresswell

While my needs are different, so my upgrade from FTTC to FTTP was to get higher upstream speeds, when I went from Zen VDSL2 (offically 80/20, over the last few years it's dropped to 56/19), to Fibre (900/100), the price went _down_.

A Non e-mouse

For me, moving to fibre broadband was driven by my copper broadband being very unreliable (and speeds slowly dropping as more people signed up). I'm currently on a lowly 160Mb/s. My inner geek would love to say "I've got 1Gb/s broadband" I just don't need it. Looking at my usage graphs I rarely go above 10Mb/s.

abend0c4

I'm using an "unlimited" 4G service from a MVNO that provides sufficient speed for me, is less than half the price of a wired option and is on a monthly rolling contract. It won't suit everyone: CGNAT and a bit of latency, though the former can be remedied with Andrews & Arnold's [1]L2TP service . I have no intention of signing up to a two-year contract with in-built price hikes and will, if necessary, adjust my "needs" accordingly.

I can see the need for greater backbone capacity, though even that must have some limit - unless the surveillance state grows to the point there's a camera in every room.

[1] https://www.aa.net.uk/broadband/l2tp-service/

John Robson

It's not just more bandwidth, it's more reliable connection, and significantly lower latency.

You can get a relatively low (for fibre) connection, and still reap benefits - though the higher speeds are useful to some of us, it's the consistency and reliability which are really king.

Right now hundreds of Anonymous Cowards are cheering the fact that only
Windows boobs are victims of ILOVEYOU and other email viruses. I realize
Outlook is so insecure that using it is like posting a sign outside your
door saying, "DOOR UNLOCKED -- ROB ME!". However, Linux isn't immune. If I
had a dollar for every pine buffer overflow uncovered, I could buy a
truckload of fresh herring.

I expect the next mass email virus to spread will be cross-platform. If
the recipient is a Windows/Outlook luser, they'll get hit. If the
recipient is a Linux/pine user, they'll find themselves staring at a
self-executing bash script that's has just allocated 1 petabyte of memory
and crashed the system (or worse).

Either that or the next mass email virus will only damage Linux systems. I
can just see Bill Gates assigning some junior programmer that very task.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.

-- A speech given at the First Annual Connecticut Conspiracy]
Convention (ConConCon) by an anonymous creature said to
be "wearing what appeared to be a tuxedo".