IBM swoops in to rescue UK Emergency Services Network after Motorola shown the door
- Reference: 1737113170
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/01/17/ibm_esn_contract/
- Source link:
In a contract award notice released this week, [1]the government department said IBM was awarded £1.362 billion (excluding VAT) set to run until December 31, 2031, with two options to extend for 12 months each.
The agreement is for a "managed service to be provided to the 3 Emergency Services (Police, Fire and Rescue and Ambulance) and other future users." It is part of the Emergency Services Mobile Communications Programme (ESMCP).
[2]
The award notice adds: "The US supplier will provide end to end systems integration (including interfaces and testing services) for the ESN including, but not limited to providing public safety communications services (including developing and operating the public safety applications), providing the necessary telecommunications infrastructure; user device management, customer support, and service management."
[3]
[4]
The contract was [5]first tendered in May 2023 at £895 million (excluding VAT) over the same period, which suggests the price has increased by £467 million.
A Home Office spokesperson explained that the contract value advertised in May 2023 was the Home Office's estimate for the procurement based on the understanding of the market and the complex set of requirements at that point in time.
[6]
"These requirements have since been refined as part of the tendering process. After the evaluation of bids, IBM was selected as the most suitable for this contract, following rigorous government procurement procedures," they said.
"Any impacts on ESN delivery and costs will be set out in the Programme's revised Programme Business Case, expected early this year."
The Home Office began talking to suppliers about the new contract in October 2022 after Motorola pulled out of the project due to perceived conflicts of interest owing to its supply of the existing emergency services network, Airwave.
[7]
Motorola won a place on the ESN project in 2015, with a contract [8]first awarded for around £300 million, which climbed to [9]£400 million following a project reset in 2019 .
However, delays to the delivery of ESN meant the government had to negotiate an extension of service supporting Airwave, which was first commissioned in 2000 and was scheduled to close in 2019. In 2016, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) cleared the acquisition of Airwave Solutions Limited by Motorola, expecting ESN to be delivered on time.
As the two projects overlapped, the CMA became concerned about Motorola's dual role. In October 2022, the [10]regulator proposed plans to cap Motorola's fees on the Airwave network. In December, [11]Motorola began to discuss ending the ESN contract with Home Office , with some residual termination services.
[12]UK government tech procurement lacks understanding, says watchdog
[13]Motorola loses appeal to kill price cap on UK Airwave emergency services contract
[14]Airwave a 'license to print money' on legacy blue-light comms contract
[15]'There has never been a realistic plan' for UK's £11B Emergency Services Network
In October 2023, [16]the CMA estimated that the US vendor could make nearly £1.3 billion ($1.6 billion) in excess profits over a decade given its position as a supplier of the legacy network as the ESN replaces it.
"The CMA imposed a charge control to mitigate Motorola's ability to price above a competitive level, which is equivalent to an estimated saving to the taxpayer of £200 million per year. In February 2024 Motorola applied to the Court of Appeal (CoA) for permission to appeal the CMA's decision and a 'rolled up' hearing of the application for permission of the appeal has been fixed for November 2024," Matthew Rycroft, Home Office permanent Secretary, explained in September.
"In addition to the CMA market investigation, a termination agreement was concluded with Motorola to terminate the User Services contract early," he said.
Motorola [17]appealed the decision at a hearing in November.
The notice awarding IBM the new contract said more than 300,000 frontline emergency service users would depend on ESN, using handheld devices or operating equipment in 45,000 vehicles, more than 66 aircraft, and more than 100 control rooms. While IBM will provide user services, EE provides the 4G network to cover the majority of roads, aircraft at altitudes up to 10,000 feet, and areas up to 12 nautical miles from Britain's coastline.
ESN is expected to deliver essential capabilities for users of this new communications system, "including the push-to-talk (PTT) function and data," [18]the government said .
It is expected to go live in 2029 at the latest, according to [19]estimates from 2023 , a decade later than first planned.
Dale Peters, senior research director at TechMarketView, said: "Although this is a big win for IBM, ESMCP is a complex program that has been beset with costly overruns, which will present risks and challenges for the company and the other ESMCP suppliers. It is vital that the revised program delivers quickly and effectively to avoid further costs and disruption being incurred by the emergency services." ®
Get our [20]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/001272-2025
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z4qMzu8-7pcEO11KTVU3SAAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z4qMzu8-7pcEO11KTVU3SAAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z4qMzu8-7pcEO11KTVU3SAAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/18/home_office_launches_895_million/
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z4qMzu8-7pcEO11KTVU3SAAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z4qMzu8-7pcEO11KTVU3SAAAAJI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:209642-2019:TEXT:EN:HTML
[9] https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/home-office-motorola-terminate-contract-emergency-services-network
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/17/cma_motorola_airwave/
[11] https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/home-office-motorola-terminate-contract-emergency-services-network
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/16/nao_uk_government_tech/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/09/tribunal_sides_with_cma_in/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/04/airwave_profits/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/14/pac_emergency_services_network/
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/04/airwave_profits/
[17] https://www.cityam.com/motorola-in-last-chance-saloon-to-overturn-competition-regulators-charge-control/
[18] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-emergency-services-mobile-communications-programme/emergency-services-network
[19] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/06/emergency_services_network_2029/
[20] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
See an article on that obscure web site 'The Register'
Indeed, one only needs to read https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/16/nao_uk_government_tech/ about a government report specifically stating that UK Government Tech procurement is sadly lacking in, well, pretty much everything.
WTF do IBM know about emergency services radio?
About one-sided contracts to milk the taxpayer, yes, IBM know lots. But about setting up a bespoke radio system with demanding requirements?
Sorry, you want to *use* this to be used in an emergency
We *provide* this for 1.36bn. To *use* it you need to pay more
Re: WTF do IBM know about emergency services radio?
This.
But also, the government keep trotting out "PTT services" as though this was something normal and everyday on cellular services.
It Isn't.
There are no fully working reliable examples of PTT operation over a commercial cellular network anywhere.
Motorola did have a system, but they couldn't get it to work properly, which is part of the reason this contract has rumbled on so long.
Re: WTF do IBM know about emergency services radio?
Indeed. The PTT requirement changes the cell/phone 'tracking' system from the very low bandwidth regular update ping* into a permanent higher bandwidth open channel. This is a case where a 95% fit is no good when the other 5% is the killer application requirement!
The Government really needs to give up and just admit that replacing the Motorola bespoke emergency system requires another bespoke system more akin to military communications even if this ends up with a dedicated cell network.
*needed to immediately route incoming calls to the correct cell instead of spamming the entire network looking for 'fred' - that doesn't scale well with 10s of millions of handsets.
Re: WTF do IBM know about emergency services radio?
Maybe, just maybe there is nothing wrong with the current system.
If I have remembered correctly the main driver is that the Government of the day wanted the radio spectrum to auction. All the funky stuff was a bolt on to make it sound sexy and try and sell it.
Re: WTF do IBM know about emergency services radio?
Nah, all IBM will do is employ a load of contractors to do the work. Problem solved, they now know all there is to know about setting up a bespoke radio system with demanding requirements.
It may even be the same people who are currently working on this for Motorola.
What could possibly go wrong???????????
Re: WTF do IBM know about emergency services radio?
No doubt priority will be given to bodyshopping from their Indian outfit as that allows for more profit. A nice little gravy train
Solar / EMP events
So, what's the backup for when a solar flair, EMP event or sabotage, which will happen at some point, knocks out all the technology?
And it doesn't just apply to this - the world is now in a position that any event that knocks out "technology" will lead to huge loss of life (no water, food distribution, access to records/documentation/knowledge).
Re: Solar / EMP events
There isn't one. I wonder if carrier pigeons will get their navigation scrambled by EMP?
But more importantly, most commercial cellular mast sites do not have any power backup at all, at least the Airwave sites mostly have either battery backup or generators.
Re: Solar / EMP events
I think the pigeons will be very confused for a few mins before getting back to normal and I've no idea how they'll handle this in flight?
As for the power issue, write this into the license terms 'Will operate off mains power for a minimum of 24 hours' at whatever minimum capacity is required.
Cheap or Resilient - pick one.
Re: Solar / EMP events
In O2's case, it just needs an expired certificate to take the network offline for 2 days...... No flares required.
I wouldn't have thought that mobile radio comms is IBM's area of expertise, but, heck, what do I know, after 40-ish years in the radiocomms business. Maybe they want to fit every police car with a system360.
And in reply to earlier post, yes, Airwave was maintained by a fairly dedicated workforce, who could go to extra lengths to pull out the stops during a crisis event. But, relying on a public network, maintained at minimum cost, with little backup.or resilience...... What could go wrong?
Not Fujitsu...
At least it's not Fujitsu. Nor Serco, nor Accemture, nor Crapita, nor..........
What about non 4G?
As Alister mentions this sort of service hasn't been proven over 4G. The article does technically imply it should also cover areas not conventionally reachable by 4G, the question is how?
Things *should* be better now, but as we know from the Lancaster floods mobile comms can't be relied on in the event of a natural disaster
Re: What about non 4G?
Yes I'd go with non 4G protocols as a serious option from an engineering viewpoint. How much has technology changed during the last decade while we all waited for nothing to appear.
Successive governments eyeing the cash from 3/4/5G spectrum auctions were not inclined to add anything about making the thing work in an emergency, that would reduce the cash bids.
National security implications
What are the national security implications here? Will any data be transferred to the USA for processing (siloing)?
Will any equipment used be audited for backdoors and/or gaping security holes?
Re: National security implications
Not necessary, the US are our friends.
Re: National security implications
You forgot the joke icon --->
Re: the US are our friends.
Only until midday on the 20th. After that? No one apart from Putin and Xi are friends with Trump V2.0 (outside the MAGA faithful)
His approval rating in the US is a miserly 41%. Trump 1.0 never managed more than 50%.
It will only be a matter of time before Trump talks about buying the UK (or just Scotland and turning it into one big Golf Course for his exclusive use).
We (the rest of the world) will be impacted by his tariffs. Eggs will go up in price.
Re: National security implications
Given how extensively compromised the US networks seem to be, from other ElReg reports, you can be sure the data and network will be fully accessible to Chinese hackers…
Never grow by acquisition
As the old saying goes "Never grow by acquisition".
Acquisition is a risky strategy, all too often companies end up with a pig in a poke.
Companies think when they are buying customers they are buying profit... they're not.
They think that buying a profitable company it will make them profitable... it won't.
They think the customers will be pleased to switch product line ... they won't be, and they'll blame the supplier.
They is an argument for a "synergy" to integrate with other offerings and getting into the market rapidly.... integration is tough and slow
They think the big company will provide the level of investment necessary to expand - it won't.
EBITDA isn't in the GAAP - for a good reason.
How much is a loss making company worth? Are you blitz scaling? are you? are you really?
"Really its a merger"... Check out the illustration for The Economist article "The Trouble with Mergers"
Asking the seller questions is not "due diligence".
Do a better job than your competitors at a price your customers find sustainable, at a profit and then like Sun Tzu settle down by the river... "If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by."
Who is up for retirement in a couple of years and suddenly shows up on the IBM payroll?
Hope the contracts has some stiff penalties for missed targets, poor performance and lack of system coverage.
Oh hang on, its UKGov normal job to hand over taxpayer money for failures and scandals to private companies for bailouts.
Wonder if IBM asking Musk for a hand in deploying a few dozen sats around the UK for coverage?
But isn't IBM's services capability as was now the separate Kyndryl ? How can they take this forward ? Just subcontract everything ?
rigorous government procurement procedures
deciding whose turn it is to take a large-scale project massively over budget and over schedule