News: 1736966711

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Even modest makeup can thwart facial recognition

(2025/01/15)


Researchers at cyber-defense contractor PeopleTec have found that facial-recognition algorithms' focus on specific areas of the face opens the door to subtler surveillance avoidance strategies.

In a pre-print [1]paper titled "Novel AI Camera Camouflage: Face Cloaking Without Full Disguise," David Noever, chief scientist, and Forrest McKee, data scientist, describe their efforts to baffle face recognition systems through the minimal application of makeup and manipulation of image files.

Noever and McKee recount various [2]defenses that have been proposed against facial recognition systems, including CV Dazzle, which creates asymmetries using high-contrast makeup, adversarial attack graphics that confuse algorithms, and [3]Juggalo makeup, which can be used to obscure jaw and cheek detection.

[4]

And of course, there are masks, which have the advantage of simplicity and tend to be reasonably effective regardless of the facial recognition algorithm being used.

[5]

[6]

But as the authors observe, these techniques draw attention.

"While previous efforts, such as CV Dazzle, adversarial patches, and Juggalo makeup, relied on bold, high-contrast modifications to disrupt facial detection, these approaches often suffer from two critical limitations: their theatrical prominence makes them easily recognizable to human observers, and they fail to address modern face detectors trained on robust key-point models," they write.

[7]

"In contrast, this study demonstrates that effective disruption of facial recognition can be achieved through subtle darkening of high-density key-point regions (e.g., brow lines, nose bridge, and jaw contours) without triggering the visibility issues inherent to overt disguises."

[8]

Image from the pre-print depicting man's face with Darth Maul-style makeup ... Click to enlarge

The research focuses on two areas: applying minimal makeup to fool [9]Haar cascade classifiers – used for object detection in machine learning, and hiding faces in image files by manipulating the alpha transparency layer in a way that keeps faces visible to human observers but conceals them from specific reverse image search systems like BetaFaceAPI and Microsoft Bing Visual Search.

Facial recognition, said Noever in a phone interview with The Register , represents a third-rail issue – one that poses significant risks.

"It brings up all the best and worst parts of AI," he said," from bias to counting crowds, to all the useful things that can be done with traffic movement."

[10]Cops love facial recognition, and withholding info on its use from the courts

[11]Facial recognition tech has outpaced US law – and don't expect the Feds to catch up

[12]This app could block text-to-image AI models from ripping off artists

[13]Sick of AI engines scraping your pics for facial recognition? Here's a way to Fawkes them right up

"You can systematically attack the recognition algorithm without necessarily drawing attention to yourself," he said, adding that it provides a way around the Streisand effect – "the moment you seek anonymity, you attract it."

Noever isn't taking a position on whether AI and facial recognition are good or bad – as the paper acknowledges there are beneficial and harmful uses. As far as his company is concerned, "we get a lot of technical evaluation work and so this is more like the good housekeeping seal of approval," he explained. "How do we have confidence that this algorithm does what it says it's going to?"

But overall, he argues, this kind of technology needs to be viewed with caution. "You saw it with the recent [14]New York street assassin – that manhunt relied on basically everyone being involuntarily in a police lineup because of the way those images are collected from social media. It's incredibly useful technology for good and incredibly dangerous. AI and facial recognition combined really is Pandora's Box, so we have to be careful with it."

Despite a lot of research, masks remain one of the few surefire ways of evading these systems [for now]

Emily Wenger, assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at Duke University, who has worked on anti-facial recognition projects like [15]Glaze and [16]Fawkes , told The Register in an email that technical defenses against facial recognition and AI face challenges.

"Some colleagues and I wrote a [17]paper taxonomizing this space a few years ago," she explained. "Our main conclusions were that: (1) methods targeting the 'setup' phases of facial recognition systems, like data collection and reference database creation are underexplored; and that (2) there is a fundamental information asymmetry in this problem that puts people trying to evade these systems at a disadvantage.

[18]

"If you don’t know where the system is operating, what underlying machine learning/AI model it uses, or whether you’re part of the reference database, you’re left with very few guaranteed options for evasion beyond just wearing a mask."

Wenger said that masks presently are practical since they're easy to wear and have become more acceptable in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Despite a lot of research, masks remain one of the few surefire ways of evading these systems [for now]," she said. "However, [19]gait recognition is becoming quite powerful, and it’s also unclear if this will supplant face recognition. It is harder to imagine practical and effective evasion strategies against this technology." ®

Get our [20]Tech Resources



[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13507

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/21/lowkey_facial_recognition/

[3] https://www.aclumich.org/en/im-juggalo-not-gang-member

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z4g-Exeb0I4Tip_FruBf-QAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z4g-Exeb0I4Tip_FruBf-QAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z4g-Exeb0I4Tip_FruBf-QAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z4g-Exeb0I4Tip_FruBf-QAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://regmedia.co.uk/2024/12/19/face_recognition_test.jpg

[9] https://docs.opencv.org/3.4/db/d28/tutorial_cascade_classifier.html

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/07/cops_love_facial_recognition_and/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/17/face_recognition_tech_us/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/16/computer_scientists_develop_new_technique/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/22/defeat_facial_recognition/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/10/unitedhealthcare_shooting_camera/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/16/computer_scientists_develop_new_technique/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/22/defeat_facial_recognition/

[17] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.04558

[18] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z4g-Exeb0I4Tip_FruBf-QAAAAc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[19] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11227-024-06172-z

[20] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Prog Rockers

Yet Another Anonymous coward

They walk among us - undetectable

Re: Prog Rockers

FBee

DOES BRITANNIA RULE? PROG is from the ANZAC countries. FUSION is American.

CAPE STATUS If you’re in a FUSION band and you show up for the gig wearing a cape, you get fired.

Let’s just make this simple: If you are allowed to get away with any Rick Wakeman-style bullshit, then you are in a PROG band.

(DID THE KEYBOARDIST QUIT THE GROUP SO HE COULD SOLO OVER AN ICE CAPADE? That’s PROG, man.

That’s some of the PROGGIEST shit I’ve ever heard of.)

BLACK GUY? If there’s a black guy in the band, then it’s FUSION. (That probably had more to do with the UK/US split than anything.)

SPRECHEN SIE DEUTSCH? Ha-HA! Trick question! If the band speaks German, then clearly it’s KRAUTROCK. Fooled you, fucker!

Courtesy of - Fusion Or Prog? Thoughts On The Dead

"However, gait recognition is becoming quite powerful..."

Mike 137

Roll on the Ministry of Silly Walks 1

Monty Python's Flying Circus series 2 episode 1 15 Sept. 1970

.

Re: "However, gait recognition is becoming quite powerful..."

Joe W

Nice try. Remember the skit? The guy came in to have his silly walk registered....

Re: "However, gait recognition is becoming quite powerful..."

David 132

...and was offered a role on the Anglo-French silly walk project - Le Marche Futile !

Re: "However, gait recognition is becoming quite powerful..."

Anonymous Coward

"gait recognition" or "gait analysis" is my best means for navigating society, followed by voice recognition. [1]Prosopagnosia is a thing. 'Gait' is the only way outside the home that I could recognize my own mother when she was more than a few feet away from me. I can recognize friends seeing them walk in the dark far away, but not necessarily if I walk up to them in daylight while they're standing and silent.

Gait is subconscious and the result of so many small unacknowledged influences in your early life. It is what is 'natural' to you, and is quite peculiar to oneself. Think about stories where people disguised themselves. Often they imitated old people, because you have to change your gait extravagantly - slowed, methodical, limping, etc. I'm not sure that imitating another same-age person would work, too much of you would bleed through.

So, yes, buy a face mask *and* special shoes. Easiest disguise for walking is stones in your shoes - forces you to walk differently. No help for how your upper body moves, tho.

Much later, someone will realize they can equip doctors and physical therapists with AI analyses of short walks. My orthopedic surgeon friend gets better health impressions from how you walk than from any other diagnostics. There have been studies of longitudinal changes in gait as supplemental diagnostics for various mental and physical declines. Heck, just watching my doctor walk down a hall told me he was going to retire shortly. And two months later...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosopagnosia

Re: "However, gait recognition is becoming quite powerful..."

Anonymous Coward

>Gait is subconscious and the result of so many small unacknowledged influences in your early life.

Stops being though when you want it too - spycraft, actors, dance training etc - you'll struggle to find two films where great actors (eg Alec Guinness, Daniel Day-Lewis, Peter O'Toole etc) have even vaguely similar gaits because they work on that very early on if not first when creating the role.

How long before CCTV

DS999

Starts using LIDAR, or dot mapping like iPhone's Face ID? Makeup might fool 2D only face recognition, but that's only going to remain the state of the art for public surveillance for so long before it becomes cheap enough to improve with 3D mapping technology. First in higher security areas like airports and government buildings (which may already be using it AFAIK) but it'll eventually trickle down to the mass market.

Already where CCTV is smooth video rather than 2 fps freeze frames getting multiple facial angles would probably be sufficient (given sufficient processing power) to tease out the 3D map well enough such that makeup isn't fooling it.

Gait recognition

david 12

Long pre-dated AI. According to common detective / action stories, defeated by putting a rock in your shoe.

katrinab

I've noticed in some of these systems that if I tie my hair back, the gender recognition thing goes from eg Female 96% confident, to Male 54% confident.

Are you making all this up as you go along?